Fr. Z – R.I.P.

News of my demise has been greatly exaggerated.

Instead, please stop and say a prayer for the late Fr. John Zuecher, SJ, a former chaplain at Creighton University Law School who died recently, at 86 years of age.

Creighton University’s Beloved “Fr. Z” Former Law Chaplain, Dies

His smile lit up a room almost as much as the colorful plaid jackets he wore over his priestly blacks. Zuercher was an avid Chicago Bears and Red Sox fan and his favorite hobbies included watching sports and old movies.

The Rev. John “Jack” Zuercher, S.J., former Creighton University Law School Chaplain and founder of the University’s Collaborative Ministry office, died Saturday, May 7, in Omaha. He was 86.

“Fr. Z,” as many knew him, came to Creighton in 1976. During his 35 years at the University he taught psychology courses, founded the Collaborative Ministry Office and served as Chaplain at the School of Law for several years. He most recently worked as a promoter of Christian Life Communities for the North Central Region.

“Our beloved Father Z was a wonderful chaplain for the Law School,” said Marianne Culhane, dean. “In the days before e-mail, he encouraged faculty, staff and students with lively, usually humorous messages on small slips of paper which he delivered to each person’s individual mailbox several times each semester. Some were jokes – at least tangentially – about law and lawyers, and others were short prayers and meditations. I’ll never forget the retreats he organized, his listening skills, his perfect choices for invocations and benedictions and his deep knowledge of psychology when asked for advice. But it’s those little surprise messages that still make me smile.”

[…]

Posted in The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged
5 Comments

US Navy Chaplains: the devil to pay and no pitch hot

I am sure this will inspire men who want to be priests and chaplains in the United States Navy, who are also the chaplains for the Marines.

From The Navy Times with my emphases:

Once the military’s ban on gays serving openly is lifted, Navy chaplains will be permitted to officiate at same-sex marriage and civil union ceremonies on base, according to an April 13 memorandum from the Navy’s head chaplain.

“Consistent with the tenets of his or her religious organization, a chaplain may officiate a same-sex, civil marriage: if it is conducted in accordance with a state that permits same-sex marriage or union; and if that chaplain is, according to the applicable state and local laws, otherwise fully certified to officiate that state’s marriages,” the memo signed by Chief of Chaplains Rear Adm. Mark Tidd states. The memorandum, designed to update chaplains’ training guidance for the repeal of the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy banning openly gay members from serving, was posted by the conservative website Media Research Center.

In addition, the memo states that “if the base is located in a state where same-sex marriage is legal, then base facilities may normally be used to celebrate the marriage. This is true for purely religious services (e.g., a chaplain blessing a union) or a traditional wedding (e.g., a chaplain both blessing and conducting the ceremony).”

Navy spokeswoman Lt. Alana Garas said that the new policy guidance was a revision to the repeal training and emphasized that no chaplains will be required to officiate at same-sex messages, if that conflicts with their faith.

The federal Defense of Marriage Act defines marriage as between a man and a woman. Responding to questions about the law and the new policy in an email, Defense Department spokeswoman Eileen Lainez wrote: “DOMA does not limit the type of religious ceremonies a chaplain may perform in a chapel on a military installation. Chaplains are authorized to perform religious ceremonies consistent with the practices of the chaplain’s faith group in chapels on military installations.”

But conservatives contended this policy violates the Defense of Marriage Act.

“This new guidance from the Navy clearly violates the law,” Rep. Todd Akin, R-Mo., chairman of the House Armed Services seapower subcommittee, said in a statement Monday. “While our president may not like this law, it is unbelievable that our Navy would issue guidance that clearly violates this law. While a state may legalize same-sex marriage, federal property and federal employees, like Navy chaplains, should not be used to perform marriages that are not recognized by federal law.”

Grrrrr.

Didn’t the Obama Administration say that it would not defend the Defense of Marriage Act.

Posted in O'Brian Tags, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , , , , , , ,
24 Comments

TOO COOL!

Check this out, folks.  From Astronomy Pic of the Day.

Just go!  Very cool.

Posted in Look! Up in the sky! | Tagged
5 Comments

CTS: New Roman Missal editions

CTS: New Roman Missal editionsThe Catholic Truth Society in England has offered some resources for their new editions of the Roman Missal, that is, the new, corrected translation.

Emphasis on corrected.

I am sure my confreres across the water are taking note of the pages tearing off the calendar, nay rather, flying.

There is a large altar missal, a chapel-sized edition, and a study edition.

There are also some views of the pages of the new edition.

CTS: New Roman Missal editions

Word by word, friends.

Brick by brick.

Posted in Brick by Brick, The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged , , ,
8 Comments

WDTPRS POLL: Date of release of Instruction of “Summorum Pontificum”!

So… rumor has it that the Instruction on Summorum Pontificum will be released soon.  Spies say “within two weeks” of the time I am writing, which is 9 May, Monday.  We know it won’t be today.

When will it be?

Have a wild guess?  Have a reasoned guess?

Pick your date and then give your reasons in the combox.

If you were to ask me, if I were Pope I would release it on the anniversary of my ordination, 26 May, the Feast of St. Philip Neri, co-patron of Rome.  But, hey… I’m not Pope and I don’t think Papa Ratzinger will remember.

On what day will the Instruction on Summorum Pontificum be released?

  • Dream on. It'll be delayed again, at least more than two weeks. (51%, 515 Votes)
  • 13 May, Friday (17%, 170 Votes)
  • 17 May, Tuesday (5%, 50 Votes)
  • 18 May, Wednesday (4%, 43 Votes)
  • 20 May, Friday (3%, 34 Votes)
  • 19 May, Thursday (3%, 28 Votes)
  • 15 May, Sunday (3%, 28 Votes)
  • 22 May, Sunday (3%, 27 Votes)
  • 21 May, Saturday (3%, 27 Votes)
  • 16 May, Monday (2%, 22 Votes)
  • 23 May, Monday (2%, 21 Votes)
  • 14 May, Saturday (2%, 19 Votes)
  • 10 May, Tuesday (1%, 10 Votes)
  • 11 May, Wednesday (1%, 9 Votes)
  • 12 May, Thursday (0%, 4 Votes)

Total Voters: 1,006

Loading ...
Posted in Lighter fare, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM | Tagged , , ,
49 Comments

Instruction on Summorum Pontificum coming. So… name that document.

Instruction on Summorum Pontificum coming. So... name that document.My spies inform me that the “Instruction” for Summorum Pontificum has arrived in the offices of nuntiatures and that it should be published in less than two weeks.

We shall see.  I have a WDTPRS POLL HERE about when and if.

Skeptical?  Optimistic?  Go vote!  Start the countdown.

It should be pretty good.  It should clarify some issues in a helpful way and provide… fraternal correction for some bishops.

We’ve played this game before, but… what might this new document be called?

It probably won’t be called any of the following:

  • Nostra in non paucos ira…
  • Sero vos amavimus…
  • Haudquaquam dubitandum est…
  • De hebetudinis natura …

or, my choice….

  • Pudeat vos vestri…

Any other ideas?

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged ,
50 Comments

Marini (not Guido) says John Paul II wanted all the liturgical nonsense

On the Italian blog Palazzo Apostolico there is a piece by Paolo Rodari in which he say that the former papal MC, Archbp. Piero Marini states that Pope John Paul II wanted all the liturgical novelties which sprinkled his pontificate (and, in my opinion, not in a good way).

I don’t have time to translate this, but the core is this:

  • Piero Marini was the next to continue the line of liturgical thought of Fr. Bugnini.
  • Some say Marini imposed the liturgical hijinkx on a conservative Pope.
  • Marini says, in a new book called “Io sono un Papa amabile. Giovanni Paolo II”, published by San Paolo and written with Bruno Cescon, that John Paul wanted those things and, “would have desired something more” to break out of the rigid Roman canons.
  • Every voyage, a new liturgy.

And there is an awful anecdote about the Pope’s reaction to some liturgical dance.

I think Archbp. Marini is terrified that his liturgical world has been eclipsed and that the shadow that now blankets him is getting deeper.   This is an apologia for, in my mind, the indefensible, and I just don’t but that the late Pope went along with everything Marini did.  Some, yes.  All, no.  I don’t buy it.

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , , ,
69 Comments

A poll in in Phoenix about Bp. Olmstead, the formerly Catholic hospital, and the abortion

You might recall that I nicknamed His Excellency Most Rev. Thomas Olmsted, Bishop of Phoenix, as “the ghost of Christmas yet to come”.  Bp. Olmsted stripped the title “Catholic” from a hospital where, with the consent of administration, a direct abortion was performed.  Predictably, the National catholic Fishwrap began to defend the hospital and attack the bishop.  Sun rises at dawn, right?  They only defend bishops who promote heresy.

National Catholic Fishwrap, I’m informed by an alert reader, was sure to advertize this on their “corner” (cf. Augustine, s. 238,3).

On the site of AZCentral find this story:

Catholic poll: Bishop Thomas Olmsted misused power
Catholics oppose condemning ’09 ending of pregnancy

Bishop Thomas Olmsted misused his authority in revoking the Catholic status of St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center after hospital officials terminated a pregnancy to save a mother’s life, [It is useful to put it that way.  There was a direct abortion performed.] a majority of Phoenix Catholics said in a survey released this week.  [We will get more details about the poll in a mo.]

Olmsted, who called the move an abortion, [And, it’s a “move”.] also said Sister Margaret McBride, a vice president of the hospital, excommunicated herself because she approved the November 2009 procedure.

A total of 651 Catholics in the Diocese of Phoenix were polled in April [But the story came out now.  Why?  Was it because Bp. Olmsted was in the news for his appearance in Washington, DC at Catholic U?] as part of research by William D’Antonio, a sociologist and research fellow at Catholic University of America in Washington, D.C. He said he conducted the survey to explore views of the laity, the non-clergy members of the church, to gauge their understanding of social programs of the church.  [I’d like to see a poll that gauges their understanding of fundamental catechism.]

In a phone interview from his home Friday, D’Antonio said 71 percent of those surveyed said that although they believed the bishop had the authority to revoke the hospital’s Catholic status, it was the wrong use of authority. Nineteen percent said he had the authority outright; 10 percent didn’t know or had no answer.  [I would like to know the actually question.  Was it something like: “Was it right for Bp. Olmsted to impose his will in using his authority?”]

A majority – 79 percent – supported McBride’s actions; 16 percent sided with Olmsted; and 5 percent said they didn’t know which side to support.

During a news conference Friday afternoon in Scottsdale, Olmsted, who serves on the board of Catholic University of America, [AH HAH!  It was the CUA story after all.] dismissed the survey findings, saying the surveyor no longer works for the university. He also said those who participated in the survey were probably influenced by the secular press’ coverage of the matter and don’t “know the situation” of the case.  [I wonder how many of the respondents could tell you what a sacrament is.]

[…]

Read the rest there… if you care.  BLAH BLAH BLAH.

WDTPRS KUDOS to Bp. Olmsted.

I am still taking protest donations, btw.

https://wdtprs.com/2011/05/thanks-to-protesters/
Posted in Fr. Z KUDOS, Linking Back | Tagged , , ,
21 Comments

QUAERITUR: Does sacrament of anointing forgive mortal sins?

Sacrament of Anointing Extreme UnctionFrom a reader:

Can mortal sins be forgiven in the sacrament of Extreme Unction? The Catechism of Trent seems to say no:

“Pastors, therefore, should teach that by this Sacrament is imparted grace that remits sins, and especially lighter, or as they are commonly called, venial sins; for mortal sins are removed by the Sacrament of Penance. Extreme Unction was not instituted primarily for the remission of grave offences; only Baptism and Penance accomplish this directly.”

But the Catechism of St. Pius X says yes:

Q. What are the effects of Extreme Unction?
A. … (2) It remits venial sins, and also mortal sins which the sick person, if contrite, is unable to confess;

The Catechism of Bl. JPII just says “if he has committed sins, he will be forgiven.” (Jas 5:15)

If a person’s mortal sins were forgiven through Extreme Unction, would that absolution be conditional on them confessing those sins to a priest if they recovered? (like with a General Absolution?)

I don’t see what is confusing here.  The primary means for forgiveness of post-baptismal mortal sins is clearly the Sacrament of Penance.  That doesn’t mean that the Sacrament of Anointing does not forgive mortal sins.

In short, if a person incapable of confessing his mortal sins is anointed, his mortal sins are in that anointing forgiven.  However, on recovery he must make a confession of sins when possible.  In that respect it is similar to General Absolution.

I can’t say everything there is to say about this sacrament here, but I can offer some comments.

The effects of the Sacrament of Anointing or Anointing of the Sick or, sometimes, Extreme Unction, are:

  • To increase sanctifying grace in a moment of great need (danger of death)
  • To console the person
  • To strengthen against temptation
  • To heal the body
  • To forgive mortal sins when a person is incapable of confessing them or is unaware of his state of soul

Anointing was placed in the category of “sacraments of the living”, a handy way of saying that for them to be as effective as they can be, we must receive them while “alive”, that is, not “dead in sin”, that is, in the state of grace.  The key to understanding anointing and forgiveness of mortal sins is that the person must be incapable for one reason or another of confessing mortal sins.  However, upon recovery or a change of condition such that he is capable, he is bound to confess mortal sins in the normal way as soon as possible.  Danger of death always changes the playing field.

This is one reason why I believe it is an abuse of the sacrament of anointing and unhelpful for people when the sacrament is given en masse without regard for the person’s condition of soul or, in many cases, body.

It can be argued that when a person reaches a certain age, he or she should be anointed because, at that age you live in a perpetual state of danger of death.  I find that argument weak.  If a person is baptized, he draws on the graces of that sacrament.  The sacrament of confirmation is intended also to strength us against temptation and live our Christian character well in moments of challenge.  The sacrament of penance also strengthens us against sinning and it also consoles us when we are not in danger of imminent death.  The Eucharist forgives venial sins and is our greatest consolation and strength in good times and bad, and at every stage of life.  Furthermore, as far as these en masse anointing services are concerned, there is often no provision for people to make a sacramental confession before they are anointed.  It is wrong, simply wrong, to anoint a person in the state of sin if there is no real danger of death looming on the horizon.  The sacrament cannot be effective for forgiveness of mortal sins if he or she is perfectly capable to make a confession.

The sacrament of anointing should truly evoke reverential awe because it associates us with the suffering Lord, the Crucified Savior, whose Passion gives meaning to all human suffering.

That’s not nothing.

QUAERITUR: Does sacrament of anointing forgive mortal sins?Another point.

The fact that the sacrament of anointing, in some circumstances, forgives mortal sins, then the only valid and licit minister of the sacrament is a sacerdos, a priest or bishop.

DEACONS CANNOT ANOINT.  DEACONS CANNOT ANOINT.  DEACONS CANNOT GIVE THE SACRAMENT OF ANOINTING OF THE SICK.

Neither can nuns in pantsuits with a lapel pin.  Neither can a parish volunteer.  Only a priest or bishop validly administers the sacrament of anointing.

This is a surprise to many.

Therefore, anything that resembles or simulates the actions of the sacrament of anointing should be stopped, so that people are not confused a) about what they are getting .. not getting, and b) what different roles in the Church are.

BTW… for those of you who are perhaps newer, less-seasoned Catholics.  The term “extreme unction” means first, that it is an anointing (“unction” from Latin ungo or unguo, “to smear” and this unctio “an anointing”) and the idea that the person is “in extremis“, that is “”at the farthest points”, which usually means “at the point of death”, though it can be taken “at the limits of one’s powers”, which is pretty close to meaning “near death”.

That said: The sacrament of anointing is not simply for the nearness of death.  It is for the sick or infirm.  But I think we must be wary of making it into something that it isn’t.

Sacraments, all sacraments, should be simultaneously familiar and awesome.  They should be thoroughly incorporated into our lives and approached and received as often as appropriate, with something I can only describe as fearful familiarity, timid  boldness, reverential ease.  They should be both commonplace and also as if the rarest of events.  We should be at the same time filled with longing for them when we need them and also filled with pious dread at the mystery of God’s ineffable favor poured out on us for no merit of our own, all because He has deigned to make us His adopted sons and daughters.

So… in short, the Sacrament of Anointing of the Sick can forgive mortal sins in certain circumstances.  It is, however, a sacrament to be received, unless impeded, in the state of grace, and only a priest can give it.

Use it.  Don’t abuse it.

QUAERITUR: Does sacrament of anointing forgive mortal sins?

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged ,
41 Comments

QUAERITUR: Our Father hand holding – Fr. Z rants

Holding hands Our FatherFrom a reader:

At Mass Saturday evening, the gentleman in the row in front of us came all the way down from his seat next to the center aisle to my husband and me sitting next to the wall aisle. He wanted to hold hands with us during the Our Father and I instinctively clasped my hands tightly and shut my eyes. I know he thought I was rude, but I couldn’t help myself.

QUAERITUR: Where can I find the instruction which the Holy Father gave concerning NOT holding hands during the Our Father? It had something to do with false intimacy and the fact that our unity comes not from handholding but from partaking together the Blessed Sacrament in Holy Communion.

There is no specific prohibition against holding hands during the Our Father, or any other time at Mass for that matter.  However, there is no provision to ask or invite people to do so, and were a priest or deacon to do so during Mass he would be committing a grave liturgical abuse.  Priests can’t just make stuff up and impose things because they think it is meaningful.

The hand holding thing – which I hope will soon vanish – is for those who don’t care to partake, an invasive aberration.

Again, if people spontaneously desire to do this, I cannot see any problem with it.  I am picturing myself with a Mass kit on a crate with candles in the London Underground during the Blitz, and, as I say Mass, people who have never met are holding hands has the horrible booms resound through the ground and echo in the tube tunnels.  I am picturing saying Mass just after an announcement that a terrorist group lit up dirty suit-case nukes in Washington DC, Chicago, and LA.  I am picturing an asteroid… well, you get my drift.

Congregations of total or near total strangers might be spontaneously driven sincerely to hold hands in those circumstances, but – and perhaps it is a lack of something on my part – I cannot see this hand holding stretch excerise as nothing but contrived sentimentalism which distracts us from the transcendent nature of God Almighty and the meaning of the petitions in the Our Father.

Having vented, I repeat: I am unaware of any prohibition of holding hands during Mass.  Spontaneous, fine.  It must never be invited or imposed from someone with a microphone anywhere near the altar.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , ,
113 Comments