VIDEO about the Chartres Pilgrimage: Guardians of Tradition

For the second time today I choked up a little.

The first time was this morning during Mass.  The profundity of the moment, place, act smothered me and I could barely breathe.

Let not the partaking of Thy Body, O Lord, Jesus Christ, which I, though unworthy, presume to receive, turn to my judgment and condemnation; but let it, through Thy mercy, become a safeguard and remedy, both for soul and body; Who with God the Father, in the unity of the Holy Ghost, livest and reignest God, world without end. Amen.

There was of old a Mass formulary “for the gift of tears” that priests used to pray precisely for this grace. It is in the 1962 Missale as “Ad petendam compunctionem cordis – For asking compunction of heart”.  Today I was celebrating St. Bruno but sometimes you get ambushed.

The second time was a few minutes ago.  I had received a note in my mail box about the video that Michael Matt and the good folks at The Remnant created about the annual Chartres Pilgrimage at Pentecost.   There are beautiful images of beautiful people doing a beautiful thing: walking from Paris to the legendary cathedral some 90km, some 20 hours by foot.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

The images themselves are enough to move you emotionally, even if you are a bit stony hearted as I am. However, what struck me so hard is the perfect cruelty of the powers that be who have set out to hurt these people under the pretext of an ecclesiology they claim to have gleaned from Vatican II. In fact, even if there were anything to the claim that there are ecclesiologies at variance with each other, that wouldn’t justify the wretched treatment of the people who desire the Vetus Ordo and what goes with it.

There is no justification for the way traditional Catholics, even those who can admittedly be hard to deal with, are being treated.

The video show so many of the faithful of various nations and ages coming together for the pilgrimage, precisely when there are those who would suppress them, drive them from churches or guilt them into a morally injurious acquiescence to abuse… it’s wrenching.

And it’s all for nothing. And it’s all for everything.

It’s for nothing, because their efforts to suppress Tradition are bound to fail.

It’s for everything, because what they are trying to suppress is the faith of our forebears.

Change the way people pray and you change what they believe and how they live. That’s plenty evidence in 2022.

It’s not going to work.

Meanwhile, if you are one of those backwardizing home-altar building restorationists, keep yourself clean and clear.   GO TO CONFESSION!

Posted in ¡Hagan lío!, Be The Maquis, Brick by Brick, GO TO CONFESSION, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Save The Liturgy - Save The World, Si vis pacem para bellum!, The future and our choices | Tagged ,
5 Comments

ROME 22/10 – Day 6: Of eyes and heads and ligaments

Up came the Roman sun this morning at 7:10 and down it will go at 18:46.  The days shorten in more than one way.   The Ave Maria should still ring at 17:00.  The Feast of St. Bruno graces the traditional calendar.

Qui pius, prudens, húmilis, pudícus,
Sóbriam duxit sine labe vitam,
Donec humános animávit auræ
Spíritus artus.

Again I am trying to give my MCL a bit of a rest. It’s not real bad, but I am not going to do much walking. This morning I was out, quite early before the sun; later I should go to the shops for something for supper.

A few shots from the last couple of days, since today I won’t collect many.

A lovely paper cone of freshly grated pecorino romano.

I’m about to use some for my lunch (all’amatriciana).

Oh… and the spaghetti with clams last night.

Otherwise…

The “head of St. John the Baptist” at S. Silvestro in capite.

Your use of my Amazon affiliate link is a major part of my income. It helps to pay for insurance, groceries, everything. Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance.

US HERE – UK HERE

Black to move.  Time is everything.

Remember the monks at Le Barroux and their good wine from the centuries dormant papal vineyards, now revived.   Thanksgiving isn’t all that far away.  How about some of their wine for your meal?

Here’s a ringing of the Angelus at Ss. Trinità dei Pelegrini and also the sanctuary bell for the beginning of Mass.

Watch for more, later.  I hope…

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
4 Comments

Not even the Council imagined what is going on today!

From Vatican News:

Cardinal Grech: Synodal process is mature fruit of Vatican II

As the Pontifical Lateran University begins the celebration of the 250th anniversary of its founding, Cardinal Mario Grech reflects on the Second Vatican Council and synodality.

Cardinal Mario Grech, the Secretary General of the Synod of Bishops, spoke Wednesday morning at the opening of the #250PUL with a Lectio Magistralis on the Second Vatican Council and synodality. For the Secretary General of the Synod, the current synodal process is a “mature fruit of Vatican II” and shows how “a correct reception of the Council’s ecclesiology [a kind of gnosticism, it seems] is activating such fruitful processes to open up scenarios that not even the Council had imagined and in which the action of the Spirit that guides the Church is made manifest”. [Ummm… what was that, again?  Not even the Council imagined this?  But it is something of the Council? ]
Dwelling then on the next steps of the ongoing synodal process, the cardinal explained why the Document for the Continental Stage will be sent to the local Churches, explaining at the same time the concept of “Restitution”. [I’d like an explanation of that, frankly.] “If the prophetic dimension resides in the People of God — the totality of the baptized (cf. LG 12) — and the first act of the Church is listening, then it is precisely to the People of God that the outcome of that listening must be returned. And since the People of God live in the Churches, the Document must be sent to the Churches.” [“Restitution”.  When terms like this get flashed around, I think about the Latin.  Restitutio… “a rebuilding”.  Or, and this is probably the meaning for the mandarins of the Synod (“walking together”), it is in juridical terms “the act of replacing, reinstating one condemned or proscribed in his former condition; the restoration of rights which have been forfeited by law” and “a recalling from exile”.  I suspect they see this as the “reinstating” of the right of El Pueblo that was so unfairly denied them before the Council’s restorative and transformative superseding of all the previous Councils and laws of the Church back to and including the Council of Jerusalem.  Trent, for example, and Vatican I conceived of the Church as a “perfect society”… ONLY. Those unenlightened laity-deniers were myopic.  They lacked a broader spirit-led vision of blue-skying together, while walking together.]

For the Secretary of the Synod, this important ecclesial act “is neither a concession nor a deference to those on the margins of a project; it is not a gesture of bon ton [HA!] to gain some sympathy or some cheap consensus; [The last thing ramming this consensus through will be is “cheap”.] not even a report — indeed, an account — to someone who claims the right to know. It is a purely synodal ecclesial act, reflecting in the circularity of the process, the ‘mutual interiority’ that exists between the particular Churches and the universal Church.” In short, for Cardinal Grech, sending the Document for the Continental Stage to the Churches is “a due act”.

Lastly, the Secretary-General concluded his speech with a wish that “the Church continues to live the synodal process in the logic of listening to God and to others, to the Spirit in others… [Unless they are attached to the Vetus Ordo, of course.]  If there is one disposition that the Council Fathers lived and handed down to the Church as a legacy, it is that of listening to one another to hear what the Spirit is saying to the Church”.  [Yeah… because listening to the Holy Spirit was something that started at Vatican II and no one ever did before.]

Posted in Pò sì jiù, Synod, The Drill, What are they REALLY saying? | Tagged
11 Comments

Synod (“walking together”) art work was a distorting sham, say the students who were supposedly the subjects

Remember that art that the Synod (“walking together”) process in Philly excreted, not to reflect the actual opinions of young people but to drive an agenda?

Well, it turns out that the art was intended not to reflect the actual opinions of young people but to drive an agenda.

A priest friend alerted me to this piece at CNA.  You should also read the whole thing there.  I cut stuff out.

Some excerpts.  My emphases and comments:

Artwork based on a listening session for Philadelphia-area Catholic university students drew global comment and criticism after it was shared on Vatican social media. Organizers are now taking seriously some students’ objections that the art mislabels their images and misrepresents their professed Catholic faith.

“We thought it was misrepresenting what we were standing for,” Sean Smith, a student who is an active member of the Catholic Newman Center at West Chester University in West Chester, Pennsylvania, told CNA Sept. 30. “The artist put us in the spot where it looks like we are saying the beliefs found in the artwork. None of that is any of the beliefs that we share.

Smith and several companions had attended a session of the Philadelphia Catholic Higher Education Synod, which drew about 400 participants from 11 Catholic colleges or universities and three non-Catholic universities’ Catholic centers. The synod’s final report included artwork that drew global attention after the Synod of Bishops on Sept. 24 shared cropped images on its social media accounts.

[…]

Further, the artwork realistically draws six young people sitting in folding chairs. They are labeled as “Muslim,” “first-year education student,” “physics major,” “CLC leader,” “grad student,” and “Queer.” Various opinions are written in cursive across the whole image.

[…]

“The art portrayed in the picture of the synod does not correctly represent us as practicing Catholics. The artist depicted four out of five of us with false identities seemingly to fit a more inclusive and skewed agenda,” he told CNA.

Furthermore, the woman next to Smith was drawn with her real-life features, except she was drawn as a person of color and labeled as a graduate student, when she is a white undergraduate student.

“The woman next to her was labeled as queer, but she is a heterosexual woman in agreement with Church teaching on sexuality,” Smith told CNA. “This image warps the truth.”  [Tisk tisk.  What is “truth” after all?  The image has its own truths which are transformative!  They reflected you as you ought to be and will be through the synodal, walking together, process, maybe not this year or next year… but eventually, when you are all vaxxed multiple times, rendered sterile to save the planet and have a vague memory that what happened in that big decorated building, now a night club, was something against the unity of the global community.]

[…]

O’Connell [a spokesperson for the local synod team] said that, in her understanding, the artist used an image from the cross-campus gathering to try to “communicate the broader demographic of the 400 students.” [Sooo… not reality, as it really was but how it ought to have been.  Something not true.]

“Our intention there was that art expands the conversation, it doesn’t contract the conversation. Art opens up space for multiple interpretations,” O’Connell, who is an associate professor of Christian ethics [?!?!?] at La Salle University in Philadelphia, said. “Hearing that there have been students who feel as though their very selves have been misrepresented is a cause for real concern. So we are definitely trying to address that.”  [One might be tempted to think that a profession of Christian ETHICS at a nominally “Catholic” school might have thought of that ahead of time.  But the artist was chosen, not out of the blue, but for a reason.  And one might ask… was the artist paid?]

O’Connell said the first synodal session is focused on listening.

[NOTA BENE]This isn’t about articulating truths, it’s about articulating what the hopes and the dreams of the people of God are,” she said. She hoped that art in the next stage of the synod is “something that can help us cultivate much-needed skills for communal discernment.” [Orwell could not have done better. Read between the lines and you find propaganda.]

“We don’t want that to cause harm to any student who showed up and had entered into a space of trust to risk telling us what was really on their hearts in terms of their wounds and their hopes,” she said. [After exposure of this effeminate venom-infused navel-gazing B as in B, S as in S, I’d be surprised if a single man showed up for future events.  I am torn between saying to the college men who might read this in Philly either 1) ignore this crap or 2) organize, get a whole phalanx of glad trads and take over the damn meetings.]

Smith, one of the students who says he was misrepresented, said he and his companions were “trying to represent truth” and wanted to say that the youth would like the clergy to “share that truth found in Scripture.”

There’s a lot of confusion in the Church regarding clergy and opposing views between progressive bishops and conservative bishops,” he said. “What I’m looking for is a unifying voice.[“When Jesus saw the crowds, he had compassion for them, because they were harassed and helpless, like sheep without a shepherd.”]

In Smith’s view, the discussion at the cross-campus synod gathering reflected cultural pressures, [Wait for it….] including the discussion on homosexuality. He said the event “started out talking about women deacons and more representation in the Church and in the clergy.”  [homosexuality and deaconettes… whaddya know?  Yeah, normal men really want to sit around and share their feeling about that garbage.]

Other artwork from the synod report included a picture of a “woman priest” that drew particular comment and criticism when it was shared by the global Synod of Bishops on social media, given that the Catholic Church has rejected as impossible the ordination of women as priests.

Synod organizers said they had commissioned the artwork from Becky McIntyre, a northwest Philadelphia artist and alumna of St. Joseph’s University, because she has commitments to the Church and has “a deep background in an understanding of the arts and human dignity and the common good.”  [Her site HERE. “I believe art ignites transformative justice and healing.” Operational word: transformative. Look at the bio and her other gigs.]

“We believe in the power of artistic expression to help people speak and hear truths, to build empathy and compassion, to build participation especially for voices that are often marginalized in our Church,” organizers told CNA in a Sept. 29 email.  [“Especially traditionally-minded Catholics who have been callously shoved to the periphery”, she added with a snicker.]

The primary goal of this “listening phase” of the synod was “to listen well to the students,” organizers said.

“Our report is consonant with Catholics across the country shared about women’s leadership and ordination,” they added, citing the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ own instruction that during the synodal process “one may agree or disagree with some of the perceptions heard and expressed, but we cannot assume they have no importance in lived reality.”  [So to hell with Church’s teachings.  This is Rawlsian exercise in forcing consensus by whatever means possible while cooing about process and safe spaces.]

Guidelines for the synodal process emphasize the need for people with different experiences and perceptions to “continue to meet and listen to one another” to help perceptions “become more realistic and less based on broader cultural or political narratives,” local organizers told CNA.  [Is that a freudian slip?  “to become more realistic [forget about the “ideals” that Catholic moral teaching offers] and less BASED…”? Please correct me if I am wrong but isn’t “based” right now the current opposite of “woke”?]

“We believe in building trust among students who named experiences of broken trust,” the local organizers said. [I’ll bet you are.]

Posted in B as in B. S as in S., Liberals, Pò sì jiù, Synod, The Drill, The future and our choices, What are they REALLY saying? | Tagged
7 Comments

What do you think of this video from the Synod (“walking together”) of Bishops about the synodal (“walking together”) before the Synod (“walking together”) on Synodality (“walking together”)?

This was made by the office of the Synod (“walking together”) of Bishops.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

If you are going to comment, phrase it in such a way that it will be more likely I will let through the moderation queue, if you get my drift.

Posted in Synod | Tagged
82 Comments

ROME 22/10 – Day 5: Of chalices and clams and rest

The sun was up at 7:09 in Rome and set at 18:47.  The Ave Maria was to be rung at 19:00.  The Feast: St. Placid and companions.

It’s definitely mosquito season here.   I found both my hands to have been bit up in the night, which is seriously annoying.  It’s ironic, since screens were installed with the new windows.  I know how they are getting in and I will devise a cunning plan against their ingress.

Black to move.  This one shouldn’t take very long.

This morning I took my chalice to the shop where it was made over 30 years ago and the very same goldsmith. I almost didn’t bring it, what with the confusion of the hurricane and changing flights. I figured that because some folks had contributed to its overhaul, I had better get to it and the dollar is really good. We had a good chat about it and made a plan.

I had a bit of a stroll afterward but my knee is acting up. Home again.

But I did stop and pick up some clams!

Some other choices.

A couple of street shots.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
2 Comments

Card. Koch: German Synod (“spazieren gehen zusammen”) is doing what some Christians did along with Nazism in order to change the Church’s teaching

It seems that Swiss Card. Koch has raised his concerns about the Germans “Synodal (“walking together”) Way”.  In doing so, he has incurred the wrath of German bishops and others who have sent him, and the organizers of an event where he was to speak, threatening messages.

This is reported by LifeSite.  They picked up an interview in German in Die Tagespost, on the occasion of the annual Schülerkreise started by Pope Benedict with some of his alumni.

Let’s see what there is and then consider the real issue.

From LifeSite:

Cardinal Kurt Koch received the threatening communications after comparing the Synodal Way of the German bishops to Protestantism during the Nazi era in a recent interview with the German newspaper Die Tagespost.

[…]

In addition to Koch receiving hate mail and threats of violence, host organization Schönblick reportedly also received threatening messages.

The cardinal, who is also the president of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity in the Roman Curia, complained that the Synodal Way takes up the idea of “new sources of revelation,” including secularist ideas and new scientific insights into human sexuality in order to change the Church’s long-standing teaching on matters regarding homosexuality, for example.

[…]

We should usually avoid giving people the chance to invoke Godwin’s Law, or fall into a trap of the reductio ad Hitlerum.  However, that is exactly what happened in the time of Nazi Germany … “new sources of revelation” as Card. Koch describes.   And nota bene: “in order to change the Church’s long-standing teaching on matters regarding homosexuality”.

That’s it.  If Koch and other got “threatening” message, put your money on those who promote the homosexualist agenda.  That’s how they fight: dirty.

Koch didn’t say that the German SynodalWeg (“spazieren gehen zusammen”) was trying to produce what the Christians with the Nazis were trying to produce, about “race” etc.  But they are using the same technique that Christians and Nazis used: use the “zeitgeist”, modern trends, etc. to bend Christian teaching to express something that it has never expressed and is, in fact, contrary to Christianity.

[…]

“It irritates me,” Koch stated, “that besides the sources of Revelation – Holy Scripture and Tradition – new sources are still being accepted; and it frightens me that this happens, again, in Germany.”

“For this phenomenon has already occurred during the National Socialist dictatorship, when the so-called ‘German Christians’ saw God’s new revelation in blood and soil and in the rise of Hitler,” Koch added.

By his comments, the Swiss cardinal intended to show that both today and during the Nazi era, some Christians tried to promote new sources of revelation, in accordance with the zeitgeist, in order to change traditional Church teaching.

However, his statement caused outrage among the German Catholic hierarchy, including the head of the German bishops’ conference, Bishop Georg Bätzing, who threatened to complain to Pope Francis, should Koch not issue an apology.

[…]

Meanwhile, poor Bätzing is not satisfied with Koch’s self-defense.

GOOD!

From Die Tagespost:

It irritates me that new sources are accepted in addition to the sources of revelation from Scripture and tradition; and it frightens me that this is happening – again – in Germany. Because this phenomenon already existed during the National Socialist dictatorship, when the so-called “German Christians” saw God’s new revelation in blood and soil and in the rise of Hitler. The Confessing Church protested against this with its Theological Declaration of Barmen in 1934, the first thesis of which reads: “We reject the false doctrine that the Church can and must as a source of proclamation apart from and in addition to this one Word of God also other events and powers , forms and truths as God’s revelation.”

The Christian faith must always be interpreted in a manner that is both true to its origins and contemporary. The church is therefore certainly obliged to take careful note of the signs of the times and take them seriously. But they are not new sources of revelation. In the three steps of believing knowledge – seeing, judging and acting – the signs of the times belong to seeing and by no means to judging alongside the sources of revelation. I miss this necessary distinction in the orientation text of the “Synodal Path”.

Es irritiert mich, dass neben den Offenbarungsquellen von Schrift und Tradition noch neue Quellen angenommen werden; und es erschreckt mich, dass dies – wieder – in Deutschland geschieht. Denn diese Erscheinung hat es bereits während der nationalsozialistischen Diktatur gegeben, als die so genannten „Deutschen Christen“ Gottes neue Offenbarung in Blut und Boden und im Aufstieg Hitlers gesehen haben. Dagegen hat die Bekennende Kirche mit ihrer Barmer Theologischen Erklärung im Jahre 1934 protestiert, deren erste These heißt: „Wir verwerfen die falsche Lehre, als könne und müsse die Kirche als Quelle der Verkündigung außer und neben diesem einen Worte Gottes auch noch andere Ereignisse und Mächte, Gestalten und Wahrheiten als Gottes Offenbarung anerkennen.“

Der christliche Glaube muss stets ursprungsgetreu und zeitgemäß zugleich ausgelegt werden. Die Kirche ist deshalb gewiss verpflichtet, die Zeichen der Zeit aufmerksam zur Kenntnis und ernst zu nehmen. Sie sind aber nicht neue Offenbarungsquellen. Im Dreischritt der gläubigen Erkenntnis – Sehen, Urteilen und Handeln – gehören die Zeichen der Zeit zum Sehen und keineswegs zum Urteilen neben den Quellen der Offenbarung. Diese notwendige Unterscheidung vermisse ich im Orientierungstext des „Synodalen Weges“.

Posted in ¡Hagan lío!, Fr. Z KUDOS, Our Catholic Identity, Pò sì jiù, Synod, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged
4 Comments

ASK FATHER: Convert from Orthodoxy or Protestantism: Which Catholic Church would I belong to?

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

If I’m not mistaken, a Russian Orthodox Christian, who converts to Catholicism, is juridically Russian Catholic regardless of which particular Church brings them in. (PLEASE CORRECT ME IF I’M WRONG).

In the case of a validly baptized Protestant, do they automatically become Latin? Or if a baptized Lutheran was brought into the Church via Melkite channels, would they be Melkite?

Example: a gentleman on a forum I read who was originally Anglican, became Orthodox, then became Catholic and is under (I believe) Ruthenian jurisdiction despite praticing as though he was a Latin.

What if he had skipped Orthodoxy but entered the Church by way of an Eastern Catholic Church directly from Anglicanism?

Russian Orthodox Christian would become Russian Catholic. A Greek Orthodox Christian would become Greek Catholic. An Armenian Orthodox would become Armenian Catholic.

This would be the case even if they became Catholic at a Latin parish.

A validly baptized Protestant, upon becoming Catholic, can choose which Catholic Church sui iuris he or she wishes to belong to: Latin, Maronite, Melkite, Coptic Catholic, Armenian Catholic, etc. However, that would best be done via a parish and a sacred minister of that Catholic Church sui iuris, whichever ritual Church sui iuris the convert chooses.

NB: It’s not so much who “brings in” a non-Catholic, but rather which Catholic Church sui iuris the convert intends to belong to as per…

Can. 111 §1. Through the reception of baptism, the child of parents who belong to the Latin Church is enrolled in it, or, if one or the other does not belong to it, both parents have chosen by mutual agreement to have the offspring baptized in the Latin Church. If there is no mutual agreement, however, the child is enrolled in the ritual Church to which the father belongs.

§2. Anyone to be baptized who has completed the fourteenth year of age can freely choose to be baptized in the Latin Church or in another ritual Church sui iuris; in that case, the person belongs to the Church which he or she has chosen.

Can. 112 §1. After the reception of baptism, the following are enrolled in another ritual Church sui iuris:

1/ a person who has obtained permission from the Apostolic See;

2/ a spouse who, at the time of or during marriage, has declared that he or she is transferring to the ritual Church sui iuris of the other spouse; when the marriage has ended, however, the person can freely return to the Latin Church;

3/ before the completion of the fourteenth year of age, the children of those mentioned in nn. 1 and 2 as well as, in a mixed marriage, the children of the Catholic party who has legitimately transferred to another ritual Church; on completion of their fourteenth year, however, they can return to the Latin Church.

§2. The practice, however prolonged, of receiving the sacraments according to the rite of another ritual Church sui iuris does not entail enrollment in that Church.

That last point is important in this time of confusion when lots of people are saying, in the face of persecution of Tradition, “Just go to an Eastern Catholic Rite!”   You don’t become Eastern Catholic by attending Divine Liturgy, even for a long time.  Similarly, if you start going to some parish across town, instead of your territorial parish (leaving personal parishes aside for the moment) you don’t become a member of that other, “destination” parish by going there or registering there.  Registration means nothing in that matter, other than the parish has some record of you for services you might need or donations received.

Posted in Both Lungs, Canon Law | Tagged ,
2 Comments

ROME 22/10 – Day 4: A stroll and an “I dunno”

In Rome sunrise, still to take place as I write this part of this post, will be at 7:08. It will appear to set at 18:49 and the Ave Maria is in the 19:00 phase. It is the Dies Natalis of St. Francis of Assisi. Sometimes invoked as a excuse for liturgical minimalism because of “the poor”, this is what he wrote:

I beg you more than if it were a question of myself that, when it is becoming and you will deem it convenient, you humbly beseech the clerics to venerate above all the most holy Body and Blood of our Lord Jesus Christ and His Holy Name and written words which sanctify the body. They ought to hold the chalices, corporals, ornaments of the altar, and all that pertain to the Sacrifice as precious. And if the most holy Body of the Lord is left very poorly in any place, let It be moved by them to a precious place, according to the command of the Church and let It be carried with great veneration and administered to others with discretion. The Names also and written words of the Lord, In whatever unclean place they may be found, let them be collected, and then they must be put in a proper place. And in every time you preach, admonish the people about penance and that no one can be saved except he that receives the most holy Body and Blood of the Lord. And whenever It is being sacrificed by the priest on the altar and It is being carried to any place, let all the people give praise, honor, and glory to the Lord God Living and True on their bended knees. And let His praise be announced and preached to all peoples so that at every hour and when the bells are rung praise and thanks shall always be given to the Almighty God by all the people through the whole earth.

Taking Francis’ advice to heart…

GO TO CONFESSION!

Please support the wonder Benedictine monks in Norcia who make some of the best beer I’ve every had.

I stopped at Gammarelli yesterday and saw….

I dunno.

From yesterday evening out with a friend and looking for a glass of franciacorta.

Meanwhile… black to move and win material.  This shouldn’t be too hard, but can you name the tactic?

Priestly chess players, drop me a line. HERE

Please remember me when shopping online at Amazon. Thanks in advance. US HERE – UK HERE

And if you are looking to improve your game, think about this. I recently had a bad slump in my play, online and over the board (OTB). I couldn’t win a game to save my life. I took a course from this guy, Igor Smirnov, which sounds like a pseudonym or an enemy of moose and squirrel. Slump over.  Perhaps some of you would like to start playing? Click the box, below. Others will be more advanced and might want to work on opening theory: HERE.  Have a look.

UPDATE:

After Mass I had a stroll.

I visited St. Vincent Pallotti.

I saw a great car.  Note the age!  Ooooold plate.

There’s a decent ATM near my old digs at San Carlo.

On the way to the left-leaning bookstore Feltrinelli, I was asked directions – I suppose because of the collar and the knowing way – in five different languages.

Could they be more obvious?  I’m not sure they know what they put on that end cap.

My old seminary street.

 

Posted in Chess, SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
4 Comments

ASK FATHER: Are evil dreams from the Devil?

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

Both of my parents were fortunate to receive the last rites and the apostolic blessing.  I was filled with peace at their deaths because I had hope they may have been saved.  That peace has been challenged by dreams my sister and I had on the same night recently about our parents.
I have had evil dreams in the past filled with temptations and sinful situations.
[…]
In the second dream … […] I woke up at this point.  The same night my sister dreamt about our parents. […]

Is the devil permitted to send us evil dreams so that we give up praying for our parents?

Do not stop praying for your parents.  While it is good, nay rather, excellent that you arranged the Last Rites, whereby we have great confidence about those who go to God, nevertheless remember them in your prayers and have Masses said, as the increasing shortage of priests permits.

Demons can manipulate our dreams. Usually the demonically inspired ones are very graphic, disturbing, have a story arc and leave us unsettled. That’s the point of them.  It’s part of the demonic bag of party tricks meant to distract and get us off track, lead us to fear or to temptation.

Often these irritations through dreams come in reprisal for the good we do – such as arranging parents’ last sacraments.

Since they can come from the Devil we ought not worry about them.  They are empty.  They are unpleasant, to be true, but really only like someone suddenly pointing and shouting, “LOOK!  A SQUIRREL!” while she tries to pick your pocket.  For example, one could have a dream that a Jesuit had been elected as the next Pope.  Surely that’s not prompted by someone nice.  It would be a bad distracting.

Also, the 1st Commandment prohibits us from interpreting dreams.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Four Last Things | Tagged ,
6 Comments