My View For Awhile: YHUGE DELAY Edition – UPDATED

I am in Denver. What a strange airport. I’ve only been through Denver 3 times (I think) and each time I like this airport less.

I think an undergrad designed it.  Who thought that the layout for check in relation to  security in relation to access to the gates was a good idea?

In any event, I am waiting for a flight… and waiting. The entire Delta system is “down” we are told and all planes are grounded. My flight was slated to be late to begin with (what else? … it’s Delta). They say that all flights are equally locked down, so I might get my connection.

The lounge is boring and my mind is a bit to flat to read much.

UPDATE:

All Delta flights were grounded because the computers were down.

After about an hour wait we were told that the system is slowly coming back up and the flights will be released in a “phased way”.

I wonder what “phase” my connection will be in?

I have a serious appointment on Monday morning.

UPDATE:

Okay… this is Zuhlsdorf’s Law, isn’t it.  I get it now.

UPDATE:

Still waiting.

I have a backup flight out of MSP for tomorrow morning.   Of course tomorrow morning is when I am supposed to sell my car back to VW.  No, I didn’t wait long for that appointment.

UPDATE

FLIGHT CANCELLED “because of weather”

Lie.

So this is not going to be good.

UPDATE:

They are working “expeditiously”.

Here’s the deal.  They cancelled our flight because of WEATHER.  Right.

So, I put my hands around the necks of a Delta personnel, squeezed forth some travel vouchers, made a call to the poor priests who had to deal with me over the last few days, extracted my bag from the bowels of Delta and…

I now await my return.

I’m really tired.

Maybe tomorrow I’ll tell you of the whole story of helping the hasidim with their luggage while waiting for my ride.   It ended with, “Tank you.  Heer’s a dahlah.”

UPDATE:

WIERD AIRPORT.

 

 

Posted in On the road, What Fr. Z is up to | Tagged ,
29 Comments

Brick by Brick: D. Venice (FL) – new TLM parish

From a reader:

Today it was announced that Bishop Frank Dewayne of the Diocese of Venice, FL has given permission for a non territorial parish for the Latin Mass. The pastor will be Fr. Stephan DuPre, FSSP. There will be 2 churches, one of which is already built and paid for and one to come. Each church will have 2 priests.

This is a large brick. Please offer prayers for Bishop Dewayne and Fr. Dupre.

Posted in Brick by Brick, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged
9 Comments

SSPX Bp Fellay: We don’t have to wait for everything to be completely satisfactory

A reader sent me a link to Radio Spada which posted that SSPX Superior Bp Fellay said in an interview that it isn’t necessary to wait for reconciliation with the Holy See until the situation is perfect.

Of course the situation in the Church has never been perfect and it never will be.  Hence, this makes sense though it doesn’t say more than it says.

Bp Fellay said that relations now are such that they lack only the “timbro…stamp, seal”.

“Cet accord est possible, selon le supérieur général, sans attendre que la situation ne soit devenue totalement satisfaisante, à ses yeux, dans l’Eglise”,

“Questo accordo è possibile, secondo il superiore generale, senza attendere che la situazione sia diventata totalmente soddisfacente, ai suoi occhi, nella Chiesa” [RS]:

In other words:

This agreement is possible … without waiting for the situation to become completely satisfactory, as we see it, in the Church.

The moderation queue in ON.

Posted in ¡Hagan lío!, Mail from priests, New Evangelization, SSPX, The future and our choices |
39 Comments

A Forty Hours Devotion and Prayers for Priests. Wherein Fr. Z rants.

I am in Denver, preaching for a Forty Hours Devotion following, of course, the Clementine Instruction in the Extraordinary Form of the Roman Rite.

On Thursday we had a Sung Mass, after which I exposed the Blessed Sacrament, we had a procession, and sang the litany.  Yesterday, we had Low Mass at a side altar, while the Blessed remained exposed.  Tonight we have that rarest of liturgical critters, the Solemn Mass coram Sanctissimo, in the presence of the Blessed Sacrament exposed.  I’ve done it once before.  There are lots of little changes to keep the clerics focused.   Wait… I think even rarer might be the Solemn Mass coram Sanctissimo in the presence of the Ordinary.   Yes, such is thing exists.  Maybe we’ll get to do that some day.  But I digress.

In the run up to Forty Hours, I was asked if I had intentions for the Masses.  I chose as intentions, 1) In reparation for sacrilegious Communions, 2) For defense if the priesthood and of priests, 3) For an increase of vocations to the priesthood.   We are not praying about vocations in general, generic vocations.   No.  We are praying for priests.

One of the points I am making in sermons is that time with the Blessed Sacrament, good Holy Communions included, must have concrete results out there in living life.  When Forty Hours developed in the 16th century, so did Confraternities of the Eucharist.  But these confraternities of lay people also clothed and fed the poor, educated orphans, and picked up the dead in the streets and gave them proper burial.  There were social benefits integrally tied to their adoration of the Eucharist.  The benefits were not dreamy.  They were concrete.

So too, in talking about vocations to the priesthood, I stress that while we should pray for an increase of vocations to the priesthood in a general way, we have to pray for vocations here and now among us.  Vocations can’t be someone else’s job to foster.  We all have that task here and now.  Concern for the poor “out there somewhere” is not enough.  Helping the poor right here and now is needed.  Concern for vocations “out there somewhere…”.

I hear from people all over the country about the state of vocations.  Some say that, as things are going now, they can expect 50% of their priests to retire or die in the next 5 years!   They add that there were X (a small number) of ordinations this year and only Y entered the seminary.  In other words: disaster.  Right?

We need more priests.

Furthermore, we need to pray for vocations in our midst, in our homes.  That prayer must constantly ring in the ears of young men in our families, our parishes.

In my home parish we prayed for vocations to the priesthood and religious life at every Sunday Mass using this.  Directly after the Gospel, the people would and the priest or deacon lead this:

In the 33 years that Msgr. Schuler was pastor there, and this prayer was used, there were 30 First Masses.   I’m just sayin’.  Again and again we see that traditional and reverent sacred worship, hard-identity priesthood, an open door, joy and a sense of humor, and lots of prayer draw men to the priesthood.

On this note… the Extraordinary Ordinary, Bp. Morlino of Madison, has been able to foster a large number of vocations for a mostly rural diocese.  How does he do it?  First, he asks men to think about the priesthood.    Duh, right?  He is supportive of his priests and seminarians.  And he says Mass, including the Extraordinary Form, happily and often.  Consider this:

Your Excellencies… THIS is how you do it.

Pray for vocations TO THE PRIESTHOOD.   Sure, go ahead and also pray for vocations for other walks of life too.  Fine.  But, right now, PRAY FOR PRIESTS and for an INCREASE in priestly vocations.

And, parents, grandparents, be willing to offer your children to God for this purpose.  For those of you who are… how to say this with delicacy… stingy, I offer you the example of St. Solomnis, mother of the Seven Holy Maccabee Brothers whom the Church venerates as saints and martyrs. The mother is being tried, tested, by being forced to watch each of here sons executed in different ways, eldest to youngest. She urges them not to give in.

Here is a taste of Ambrose in De Iacob et vita beata II, 12:

The words of the holy woman return to our minds, who said to her sons: “I gave birth to you, and poured out my milk for you: do not lose your nobility.” Other mothers are accustomed to pull their children away from martyrdom, not to exhort them to martyrdom. But she thought that maternal love consisted in this, in persuading her sons to gain for themselves an eternal life rather than an earthly life. And thus the pius mother watched the torment of her sons … But her sons were not inferior to such a mother: they urged each other on, speaking with one single desire and, I would say, like an unfurling of their souls in a battle line.

Everyone, unfurl your sons like battle standards.  Pray for all priests.  Pray for more priests.

Posted in Priests and Priesthood, Seminarians and Seminaries | Tagged , , , ,
28 Comments

Big Changes Strike the Knights of Malta

UPDATE: From the SMOM:

Fra’ Ludwig Hoffmann von Rumerstein assumes the office of Lieutenant ad interim, Albrecht Boeselager resumes his office as Grand Chancellor

The Sovereign Council, the government of the Sovereign Order of Malta, met this afternoon in the Magistral Palace in Rome. On the agenda was the resignation from Office of Grand Master presented by Fra’ Matthew Festing, in accordance with article 16 of the Constitution of the Order of Malta. The Sovereign Council accepted his resignation from office. Conforming to the Constitution, the Pope has been notified of the resignation of Fra’ Matthew Festing, which will be communicated to the 106 Heads of State with whom the Order has diplomatic relations. In accordance with Article 17 of the Constitution, the Grand Commander, Fra’ Ludwig Hoffmann von Rumerstein, has assumed the office of Lieutenant ad interim and will remain the Order of Malta’s head until the election of the successor of the Grand Master. The Sovereign Council thanked Fra’ Matthew Festing for his great commitment during his nine years in office.

Subsequently, the Sovereign Council presided over by the Lieutenant ad interim annulled the decrees establishing the disciplinary procedures against Albrecht Boeselager and the suspension of his membership in the Order. Albrecht Boeselager resumes his office as Grand Chancellor immediately.

In a letter sent yesterday, 27 January 2017, to Fra’ Ludwig Hoffman von Rumerstein and the members of the Sovereign Council, Pope Francis reaffirmed the special relationship between the Sovereign Order of Malta and the Apostolic See. The Pope affirmed that the Lieutenant ad interim assumes responsibility over the Order’s government, in particular regarding relationships with other States. Pope Francis noted precisely that his Special Delegate will be operating on “the spiritual renewal of the Order, specifically of its professed members.” The Sovereign Order of Malta ensures its full collaboration with the Special Delegate whom the Holy Father intends to appoint.

The Sovereign Order of Malta is most grateful to Pope Francis and the Cardinal Secretary of State Pietro Parolin for their interest in and care for the Order. The Order appreciates that the Holy Father’s decisions were all carefully taken with regard to and respect for the Order, with a determination to strengthen its sovereignty.

The Lieutenant ad interim together with the Sovereign Council will soon convoke the Council Complete of State for the election of the successor of the Grand Master, according to Art. 23 of the Constitution.

From ANSA:

Ordine Malta: si dimette Festing. Lettera del Papa, nessun commissariamento
La missiva è per definire i rapporti tra governo interim e delegato vaticano

[…]

The Pope sent a letter to the Sovereign Council of the Knights of Malta expressing what he wanted to happen.

The Sovereign Council accepted the resignation of the Grand Master, Matthew Festing.

An “interim lieutenant”, fra’ Ludwig Hoffmann von Rumerstein, will assume control.

Grand Chancellor Albrecht Boeselager was reinstated.

There will not be a “commissar” or commission placed over them.

The Pope expressed that the interim lieutenant must work:

operando in stretta convergenza di obiettivi con il delegato speciale, il quale si occuperà del rinnovamento spirituale dell’Ordine, specificatamente dei suoi membri professi”.

working in strict concurrence of goals with the special delegate, who will occupy himself with the spiritual renewal of the Order, specifically of its professed members.

Hmmm… no commission, but a “special delegate”. Reinstated is the brother of a fellow who had just been appointed to govern Vatican finances. The “special delegate” must work to renew the SMOM spiritual life.

I read at the site of the SMOM about the role of the Cardinal Patron of the SMOM, Card. Burke HERE:

The Supreme Pontiff appoints a Cardinal of the Holy Roman Church as his representative to the Sovereign Order of Malta, the “Cardinalis Patronus” (Cardinal Patronus), vested with special authority. The Cardinalis Patronus is in charge of promoting the spiritual interests of the Order and of its members, as well as the relationships between the Holy See and the Order of Malta. As of 8th November, 2014, the Cardinal Patronus of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta is:

Posted in The Coming Storm, The Drill | Tagged , , ,
35 Comments

What to do if you don’t know what to do. Wherein Fr. Z … advises.

My in-box is filled with email from people who are frustrated, angry, confused.

I am with you.  I jot people’s names down and I pray for you.  I am shifting my other practices around to include mortifications.  After all, as St. John Vianney said to another priest: “You have preached, you have prayed, but have you fasted? Have you taken the discipline? Have you slept on the floor? So long as you have done none of these things, you have no right to complain.”  Therefore, I have to do more.

So, I pay attention to your notes and I can offer a bit of advice here and there (mainly about being patient).  However, I can’t do anything more for you than that.  Right?

That said, you are NOT without options.   Allow me to spell out a couple of them.

First, put your time and treasure where you don’t doubt that it will be well used and not abused.  Get my drift?

Next, write to your bishops and tell them exactly what you think and feel.

Of course, you need to follow also my rules for writing to ecclesiastics… unless you really want to be thought of as a crank and subsequently ignored.   Go ahead and be a jerk, if you want, and hurt your cause and ours.  Otherwise, keep it brief and be respectful, but also be crystal clear about what you think and feel.

Think about this.  Bishops talk to each other.  When they meet, they discuss what’s going on.  They share what they hear.  Give them a lot to think about and don’t let them off the hook.

You have the right and they obligation to make yourselves known:

Can. 212 … §2. The Christian faithful are free to make known to the pastors of the Church their needs, especially spiritual ones, and their desires.

§3. According to the knowledge, competence, and prestige which they possess, they have the right and even at times the duty to manifest to the sacred pastors their opinion on matters which pertain to the good of the Church and to make their opinion known to the rest of the Christian faithful, without prejudice to the integrity of faith and morals, with reverence toward their pastors, and attentive to common advantage and the dignity of persons.

If they write a snippy letter back to you… write again!  And keep writing.

Bishop can (and do) grind priests into the gutter and wash them down the grate.

They can’t do that to lay people.

So, if you want something to happen – sure, you can write to me, but I am not in a position to do much.

YOU, dear lay people, have all the power.

And if your bishop is wonderful, doing great things, LET HIM KNOW!  Tell him that you support him and even send him a check to apply to whatever he wants.   “Your Excellency, I enclosed a check for a small amount.  Get yourself a new zucchetto or take seminarians to supper.  Whatever.  You are appreciated.”  Even if it is $10, the gesture will not be lost.  Believe me.  I get small donations from people and I am grateful for the gesture.  There is no priest on earth worth his salt who doesn’t respect and venerate “the widow’s mite”.

And, if you support him and you tell him that you do, also tell him what you are concerned about.

Do NOT sit silently, wringing your hands.  Fill that hand with a pen.

 

Posted in ¡Hagan lío!, "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Be The Maquis, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Wherein Fr. Z Rants |
6 Comments

RELIGION OF PEACE: ISIS video of child “soldiers” shooting people as targets, drill

Today Pres. Trump had a meeting at the Pentagon with the JCs and others about ISIS.  He wants plans.

Today I saw this at Clarion Project:

ISIS Graphic Video: Kids’ Shooting Exercise With Living Targets

As if all the other videos we’ve brought you weren’t enough, now ISIS uses an empty building for its child soldiers to hunt and kill bound prisoners.

In its latest video, ISIS places bound prisoners in an abandoned building and then lets loose child soldiers to hunt and kill them.

Clarion Project condemns ISIS and its action with every fiber in our collective body but believes the truth must be told about the evil that is ISIS. That is why we decided to publish this video.

WARNING: EXTREMELY GRAPHIC CONTENT:

[…]

Honestly, this is something that I hope most of you will never have to see. And for those of you who have seen stuff like this… well. “Oremus pro invicem.”

That said, let us consider the trajectories we see in the world today and let us toughen up and get ourselves into that mental place where we can make sacrifices.

Posted in Si vis pacem para bellum!, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices, The Religion of Peace | Tagged , ,
30 Comments

ASK FATHER: Varia concerning today’s problems in the Church

Since I am on the road and busy with many times, but since these are pressing issues, allow me to respond, but collectively.

From readers…

QUAERITUR:

Given the rate things are going for this current pontificate, would it be sinful to pray that, if it be God’s will, that the pope either abdicates or dies and a new pope of a more conservative leaning is elected?

I get this often.

No.  It is not necessarily sinful to pray for the end of a pontificate, one way or another.

However, it depends on why and on your attitude.  I urge people not to have hate in their hearts for the person of the Holy Father.  He deserves our prayers.  That doesn’t mean that we have to like him or what he does.  We do NOT worship the Pope.  Popes come and go.  In our prayers, we can, without sinning, discuss with God about His time table.

QUAERITUR:

What are we to do if they reverse the English translation and go back to the other one?  That was so bad.  I can’t go back.  I just can’t.

In the news lately we have gotten signals that a “study” will be undertaken of translations and of the norms of Liturgiam authenticam.   Keep in mind that no translation is perfect.  We are using human language to convey pretty deep things.

I don’t think that any of the powers that be would attempt simply to reverse the implementation of the current ICEL translation.  I suspect that their first (and vicious) attack will be on the rendering of pro multis back to “for all”.  That’s because they a) don’t give that damn that that’s not what pro multis means and b) they don’t believe that there are those who are not saved.

What I think might happen is that they will make various translations “options” which priests can choose from.  That is, after all, what the Novus Ordo is: a rite filled with lots of options.

In any event, if they go down this road, and right now I don’t see anything preventing it, I think it might get pretty ugly.

And they won’t stop there.  Once these dogs are off the leash, they’ll bay and chase down anything that has even the faintest scent of tradition.  Mark my words.   They will be vicious.  They are liberals, after all.  Agere sequitur esse.

QUAERITUR:

The more news I learn about what is happening in Rome and what our Holy Father is doing, the more I teeter on the brink of despair for the future of the Church. I want to believe that Hell cannot prevail against the Church, as Our Lord promised, but it is getting very hard to do so. Some days, I simply want to give up.

Has there ever been a time like this one? What might I do to avoid giving in wholly to despair?

Buck up.  We have magnificent spiritual tools and weapons. And… you are not alone.

You might spend some time reading about the lives of martyrs in different periods of the Church’s long and sometimes bloody history.  Many of them went to their death with joy.  The martyrs are given to us as examples.  They are witnesses.

Also, if what you are reading causes serious anxiety and spiritual suffering, you might consider spending less time reading about current Church news.  If what the Holy Father is doing is causing you great anger or anxiety… ignore him.  Stick to your regular routine of daily prayers.  Perform concrete works of mercy.  Go to Mass.  GO TO CONFESSION!   Ignore the Pope and bishops, except for to pray for them… from afar.

Everyone, close ranks, clean your own houses, sacrifice.

Remember that this is an “ASK FATHER” entry.

The moderation queue is ON.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box |
29 Comments

ASK FATHER: Can the Novus Ordo be “ad orientem”, in Latin, with Deacons?

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

Can a Novus Ordo be ad orientem with Latin, chant, a subdeacon and deacon in traditional vestments?

Not only can the Novus Ordo be celebrated ad orientem, it ought to be.  The rubrics indicate that this is the standard, the norm.  The Roman Church’s tradition calls for it.  Permission is not necessary.  It can’t be forbidden.

Not only can the Novus Ordo be celebrated in Latin, it ought to be.  Latin is the language of the Latin Church.  The official books are in Latin.  The Second Vatican Council called for Latin to be preserved.  The Church’s sacred music is in Latin. Canon Law puts Latin in the first place for the language of Holy Mass.  Permission is not necessary.  It can’t be forbidden.

Not only can the Novus Ordo be celebrated with deacons, it ought to be.  Deacons have a proper liturgical role.  I’ll leave aside for now the issue of a subdeacon, which is complicated as far as the Novus Ordo is concerned.

My home parish in St Paul, St. Agnes, always had Mass ad orientem, in Latin, with deacons, one taking the role of reading the Gospel, and the other being at the altar near the priest.  So, they swapped roles of deacon and subdeacon, but they were both deacons, properly vested in dalmatics.  Yes, this can be done.

Keep in mind that the paradigm for Mass is not the quiet “Low Mass”.  Rather, it is the Pontifical and the Solemn Mass that are the paradigm. So, deacons aren’t “add ons”.  They are desired in the Roman Rite.

Where there are deacons, permanent or transitional, they should be warmly prompted to serve in their proper roles, in their proper vestments.  That means that parishes with deacons shouldn’t vest just one, but two!  They should have matching vestments with the priest!   C’mon!

Here is a shot of Fr. Philips of the Canons of St. John Cantius saying Mass at St. Agnes as a visiting celebrant.  NB: Deacons.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , , ,
11 Comments

Can 7th c. Pope Honorius I teach us about “Amoris laetitia” controversy?

7th c. mosaic of Pope Honorius I (625-638), in Basilica Sant’Agnese fuori le mura, Rome

7th c. mosaic of Pope Honorius I (625-638), in Basilica Sant’Agnese fuori le mura, Rome

These days it seems like we are “all Amoris laetitia all the time”. That’s because the document has stirred great confusion. The confusion has resulted even in contrary interpretation on the part of conferences of bishops, no less, about whether people who are committing objectively grave mortal sins can, without firm purposes of amendment, be admitted to Holy Communion. It is no wonder that confusion rises, since it concerns something taught by Our Lord Himself and which is confirmed in the Deposit of Faith through the centuries to our own day.

As controversy grows, so do pleas for clear explanations.

We have a long history in this our Church. We have been around the block. The experiences of our forebears ought to instruct us, who are coping with confusing circumstances.

Was it Edmund Burke who said that those who don’t know history are doomed to repeat it? It might have been George Satayana. Could be that we are repeating now, something that we have been through before?

Look at the increasingly valuable Crisis, where Fr. Regis Scanlon, OFM Cap, has a useful study of a time of confusion resulting both from a Pope’s teaching and – this is key – that same Pope’s refusal to clarify what he meant when he was urgently asked to do so.

Here are some samples so you can get the drift of it.  My emphases and comments:

What History May Tell Us About Amoris Laetitia

[…]

[A] similar situation of great confusion happened 1,500 years ago during the papal reign of Honorius I (625-638).

[…]

Honorius was pressured to react to a popular heresy Monothelitism, which held that Jesus Christ possessed only one will naturally. But the Church teaches that Jesus Christ has two inseparable but distinct wills or two distinct operations naturally. However, the Church also teaches there is only one will and one operation in Christ morally. In other words, there is no opposition between the two wills and two operations in Christ.

Although Honorius believed the Church’s true teaching, he wanted to avoid trouble in the Church and offending the Monothelitites, one of whom was the Emperor Heraclius. Similar to today, bishops wanted clarification, but Honorius counseled silence. He advised bishop Sergius saying:

That our Lord Jesus Christ, the Son and Word of God, by whom all things were made, is Himself one, operating divine and human things, the sacred writings plainly show. Whether, however, on account of the works of the Humanity and Divinity, one or two operations ought to be proclaimed and understood, these things do not belong to us; let us leave them to the grammarians, who are accustomed to display to the young their choice derivations of words…. [Sounds rather familiar in style, no?] We exhort your Fraternity to preach with us, as we do with one mind with you, in orthodox faith and Catholic unity,—avoiding the use of the introduced terms, one or two operations—that there is one Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of the Living God, most true God in two Natures, operating divinely and humanly.

Note that the Pope said, “…these things do not belong to us; let us leave them to the grammarians…” The Pope thought that the truth was plain enough and the Church didn’t need to clarify it further with terms, like two operations and two wills.

About 40 years after Honorius died, however, the Sixth General Church Council condemned the fact that Honorius had remained silent. Pope Leo II, [St. Leo II] the successor to Pope Agatho, accepted this condemnation with some qualification. In his confirmatory epistle sent to Constantine Pogonatus, Leo II stated:

We also anathematize the inventors of the new error, that is, Theodore, bishop of Pharan, Cyrus of Alexandria, Sergius, Pyrrhus, Paul, and Peter, ensnarers, rather than guides, of the church of Constantinople; and also Honorius, who did not illumine this Apostolic Church with the doctrine of the Apostolic tradition, but allowed it, while immaculate, to be stained by profane betrayal.

And, in his epistle to the bishops of Spain, Pope Leo II also stated:

Those, however, who contended against the purity of Apostolic doctrine, departing, have indeed been visited with eternal condemnation; that is, Theodore of Pharan, Cyrus of Alexandria, Sergius, Pyrrhus, Paul, and Peter, Constantinopolitans; with Honorius who did not extinguish the incipient flame of heretical dogma, as befitted Apostolic authority, but, by neglect, nourished it.

Therefore, Honorius’s decision was condemned—not because he actively preached falsehood or heresy—but because he “neglected” teaching the truth. As Pope Leo II pointed out, even during the silence of Honorius, the apostolic tradition and teaching remained untouched and “immaculate.”

This ancient case helps us to relate to Amoris Laetitia. After all, Pope Francis has remained silent, apparently allowing his bishops to judge the meaning of the document for themselves without his help in the face of calls for clarity amidst confusion and anguish. Actually, while Honorius’s silence affected the doctrine of the faith (theory), Pope Francis’ actions are even more serious since his silence pertains to moral acts (practice) which more directly and rapidly affect the people.

[…]

So, why does Pope Francis remain silent?

As of today, we do not know, and this is why we must be careful. While we can advise, plead, and complain to the pope (like St. Catherine Siena) about his actions and lack of action, we cannot officially judge him. Only a pope can judge a pope, which is not the same thing as fellow archbishops and cardinals exercising their authority to correct false statements. Pope Francis and his Amoris Laetitia will certainly be judged by a later pope. Will he receive a better judgment than Honorius? Only God knows. But we do not know everything. There may be reasons unknown to us why Pope Francis is refusing to settle the dispute. And, when all is said and done, he may receive a better and more favorable judgment from future popes than Honorius received.

[…]

Scanlon also gives a good explanation of how seriously wrong the Bishops of Malta are in their document about how to implement Amoris laetitia Chapter 8.

We all suffer from the effects of Original Sin.  Our intellects and wills are weakened.  However, we have the help of both authority (the teaching of the Church, the lessons of the past, etc) and of grace, procured through humble prayers.

Pray.  Study and pray.

Comment moderation is ON.

Posted in Francis, One Man & One Woman, The Drill | Tagged , , , ,
25 Comments