Fr. Z’s VOICEMAIL! A spiffy message in Latin!

Fr. Z's VOICEMAIL! A spiffy message in Latin!From my voicemail… this is fun.

This fellow on 30 March was able to follow my live-streamed Mass.  HERE He sent me a message in Latin!

Gratias libenter propter verba sententiasque persolvo!

How to reach my voicemail.

Nota bene: I do not answer these numbers or this Skype address. You won’t get me “live”. I check for messages regularly.

Fr. Z's VOICEMAIL! A spiffy message in Latin!
WDTPRS

Fr. Z's VOICEMAIL! A spiffy message in Latin!
020 8133 4535

Fr. Z's VOICEMAIL! A spiffy message in Latin!
651-447-6265

 

 

Posted in LIVE STREAMING, Reader Feedback, Voice Mail | Tagged ,
2 Comments

ASK FATHER: The Sacred Triduum in the Extraordinary Form privately, without people.

Numerous priests have written to me, asking about what to do about the Sacred Triduum in private.

I’ve been pondering and consulting.

Summorum Pontificum 2 excepts the Triduum for Holy Mass in the Vetus Ordo sine populo.

However, Card. Sarah, Prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship, issued a decree about celebrating Triduum with the Novus Ordo sine populo.

That said, there is a principle of interpretation of law in the Church, odiosa restringi et favores convenit ampliari, or else odiosa sunt restringenda et favoribilia amplianda/ampliantur. That is to say, laws that place burdens or restrictions on people must be interpreted strictly so that they don’t put onto people what the laws don’t say. On the other hand, laws which grant favors or freedoms to people should be interpreted as generously as possible so that people can enjoy favors and freedoms. Be narrow and picky with laws that restrict and wide and generous with laws that grant things.

In light of how the Church interprets laws, I say that what applies to the Triduum in the Ordinary Form applies also to the Extraordinary Form. If a priest wants to observe the Triduum sine populo, he can… this year.  I don’t know how he will pull off Good Friday alone and the Vigil alone, but I suppose there may be a way.  It would be good to have at least a couple servers.

We have to figure out some mechanics for Good Friday and Holy Saturday Vigil.  Thursday isn’t really a problem.

But, salvo semper meliore iudicio, Fathers, you are good to go for sine populo!

Let’s pray hard this Holy Week and Triduum and really give the Devil and this virus HELL!

Ask God straight out for a miracle: to end this virus NOW, COMPLETELY, and FOR GOOD.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Si vis pacem para bellum!, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM | Tagged ,
5 Comments

Fr. Z’s Gold Star For The Day: Dr. Peter Kwasniewski

Fr. Z's Gold Star For The Day: Dr. Peter KwasniewskiAt The Remnant my friend the talented Dr. Peter Kwasniewski wrote about the recent tyrannical moves of Bp. Christensen of Boise against the Traditional Roman Rite, against priests, against lay people, especially the elderly. I wrote about that HERE.

It is grim how the Bishop abused the GIRM, but Peter responded with some humor, as well as an analytical take down. At the end of his analysis, he posted a response in limericks. Yes, you read that right. Limericks. Check this out.

A Clarification of Limericks
By Peter Kwasniewski

Bishop Christensen’s issued directives,
But the content is largely invectives:
He’s opposed to folks kneeling,
Latin Mass ain’t appealing—
And forbidden are GIRM’s own electives!

As to media, warnings are thundered:
“If you read NLM, you have blundered!
The blogosphere traddy
Has made you all batty—
Roman coffers are NOT to be plundered!”

“Rid the church of its harmful prie-dieus!
Make presiders gaze out to the pews!”
Thus the prelate in Boise,
who’s regrettably noisy
About just what his clergy may choose.

How disturbing it is to be told:
“You can’t offer the great Mass of old
Except if you wish
To report to the Bish
All the details His Grace has cajoled.”

One would think, with the plague all around us,
That a shepherd would not try to hound us:
“Don’t get down on your kneeses
(I don’t care if it’s Jesus!)”—
When we know a true father would ground us.

False obedience never will heal
A liturgical rupture so real.
Caring pastors, mild vicars,
Please eschew Kool Aid liquors;
Feed your flocks with the best, we appeal!

Fr. Z kudos.

Posted in Fr. Z KUDOS, Lighter fare | Tagged , , ,
7 Comments

The Church’s highest confessor, Card. Piacenza, says that, in this time of COVID-19, there must not be “ecclesial distancing”

The Church's highest confessor, Card. Piacenza, says that, in this time of COVID-19, there must not be "ecclesial distancing"At Vatican News I read that His Eminence Mauro Card. Piacenza – the Penitenziere Maggiore or the head of the Church’s highest tribunal that covers matters of the Sacrament of Penance, all internal forum issues, and indulgences has something to say to priests and bishops.  He has released a letter to confessors for Easter.  HERE

In this time of Coronavirus….

[L]a Misericordia non si ferma e Dio non si distanzia!

Il distanziamento sociale richiesto per motivi sanitari, pur necessario, non può, né deve mai tradursi in distanziamento ecclesiale, né tantomeno in distanziamento teologico-sacramentale.

[…]

Mercy does not cease and God does not distance Himself.

Social distancing required for health reasons, even though it is necessary, cannot and must not ever turn into ecclesial distancing, much less theological-sacramental distancing.

He acknowledges that there must be distancing, but clear the Church’s highest confessor under the Roman Pontiff, the Major Penitentiary, is urging priests and bishop to find ways, within the strictures of social distancing and local laws, to continue to confess their penitents.    That’s how I read this.

We have to find sound and prudent ways to make the Sacrament of Penance available to those who need it… and who doesn’t?!?

The Sacrament of Penance was instituted by Christ Himself as the ordinary means for the for the forgiveness of post-baptismal sins.

St. Augustine of Hippo gave us probably the most profound commentary on the Last Supper ever preached.   He explains Christ’s washing of the feet of the Apostles in unsentimental terms.   It isn’t about all people washing each other’s feet.  It’s precisely about priestly service to the people.

Augustine teaches in his exegesis of the washing of feet that ministry can be dirty and risky.  He interprets the mandatum or foot washing by Christ through the lens of the Song of Songs.

You will recall that, in the Song of Songs, when the lover calls to his beloved to rise and come to him, she demures.  At first she says that she has already washed her feet and she doesn’t want to dirty them. If she got up, her feet would get dirty again.  Getting dirty feet, however, is precisely what the priest is supposed to do.  The priest must risk contact with the dirt in his constant battle against the world, the flesh and the Devil for the sake of the people he serves.  Priests must risk getting dirty in order to serve, in order to go to Love Himself.

The grit of the world and the grease of the flesh and the grime of the Enemy must be constantly cleansed.  Augustine explains that Christ wanted the Apostles to get up and get their feet dirty in His service and that He would wash them as they needed.

How can this be other than a call to forgive the sins of penitents?

I hope that priests and bishops out there will find prudent and creative ways to receive sacramental confessions and shrive their people.   C’mon!  You can do it!

And, Fathers, try to make your own good confession as well.

Posted in GO TO CONFESSION | Tagged ,
12 Comments

4 April – Holy Mass (TLM) Saturday in Passion Week – LIVE VIDEO: 1200h CDT (GMT/UTC -5) – With “fervorino”

I am again going to LIVE stream a Traditional Latin Mass at NOON Central Daylight Time (= GMT/UTC -5 and ROME 1900h). The Mass formulary will be for Saturday in Passion Week (the week before Holy Week).

  • You can find an English translation of the Mass formulary HERE.  Scroll down use the 1960 setting.
  • I will say a prayer for a Spiritual Communion at the very beginning for those of you who cannot make a Eucharistic Communion. 
  • I will also recite the traditional  “Statement of Intention” (which every priest should recite before Mass).
  • I will add orations “Tempore Mortalitatis… In time of widespread death/plague”.  Here’s the Collect:
    Deus, qui non mortem, sed paenitentiam desideras peccatorum: populum tuum ad te revertentem propitius respice; ut, dum tibi devotione exsitit, iracundiae tuae flagella ab eo clementer amoveas.. O God, who desire not the death of sinners but rather penance: look propitiously on Your people returning to You, with the result that, so long as they are conspicuous to You in devotion, You might withdraw the whips of Your wrath.
  • At the end, I’ll say a “Prayer against disease” from the Roman Ritual followed by the blessing with a fragment of the Cross in the large reliquary.

I’ll add a “fervorino” (short sermon).

My YouTube Channel HERE

Play video

My Jesus, I believe that Thou art present in the Blessed Sacrament. I love Thee above all things and I desire Thee in my soul. Since I cannot now receive Thee sacramentally, come at least spiritually into my heart. As though Thou wert already there, I embrace Thee and unite myself wholly to Thee; permit not that I should ever be separated from Thee. Amen.

Gesù mio, credo che voi state nel ss. Sacramento. V’amo sopra ogni cosa e vi desidero nell’anima mia. Giacchè ora non posso ricevervi sacramentalmente venite almeno spiritualamente nel mio cuore. Coma già venuto io v’abbraccio e tutto mi unisco a voi, non permettete ch’io m’abbia mai a separare da voi. Così sia.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
1 Comment

@TuamArchdiocese in Ireland – Muslim Friday prayer in church alongside the priest – VIDEO AUDIO

You have GOT to be kidding.

First, a Pachamama bowl for demonic idol worship is placed on the altar of St. Peter’s Basilica.

Now this.

 

Posted in The Religion of Peace, You must be joking! | Tagged
22 Comments

@BoiseBishop goes to the liturgical zoo. Attempts to forbid “ad orientem” worship, kneeling for Communion, etc.

@BoiseBishop goes to the liturgical zoo. Attempts to forbid "ad orientem" worship, kneeling for Communion, etc.I am at a point where I can react now, in a measured way, to the astonishing chutzpah of Bp. Peter Christensen of the Diocese of Boise since 2014.  Some time back he told priests of that diocese that they cannot celebrate Mass ad orientem and that they should inform him of the use the 1962 Missale Romanum.  The paper of the Diocese of Boise has this:

@BoiseBishop goes to the liturgical zoo. Attempts to forbid "ad orientem" worship, kneeling for Communion, etc.

Now that the story is out and about, I think I can write about it, because priests of that diocese had written to me about it. I didn’t want to give them up.  Peter Kwasniewski – who has already forgotten more about liturgy than 99.99% of bishops ever knew – reacted HERE.

The first thing Bp. Christensen notes is something from GIRM 387, namely, that bishops should “regulate” and be “vigiliant” over the liturgical life of the diocese.  Fine.   I wonder how he has dealt with liturgical abuses in the Novus Ordo over the last years, or how he has respected Redemptionis Sacramentum in matters of kneeling and reception of Communion.  Just wondering.  I wonder, to that end, how vigilant he has been in insuring that the seminarians of the diocese all seven of them in total) have been in a) learning Latin according to the dictates of Sacrosanctum Concilium and the 1983 Code of Canon Law, can. 249, which requires that all in priestly formation be “very well trained” in the Latin language.  I wonder if he has qualms when someone attests to him during an ordination that seminarians were well-trained when they don’t know the language of their Rite.   So you suppose he will be equally concerned about priests using the short Second Eucharistic Prayer on Sundays?  GIRM 365 says it should be used on weekdays.   Surely Bp. Christensen saw that when gazing with admiration at GIRM 387.

Rhetorical questions.  Perhaps people in his former see of Superior and present see of Boise know.  I don’t.

GIRM 387 does NOT make the diocesan bishop into a demi-god.

Next, the bishop says that there is “disinformation regarding liturgical matters” in the diocese and he is – the irony is thick – addressing that…. with his own disinformation.

He goes on.

Under point #1 he says that priests must form the faithful.  Okay.   However, he adds this: “Sources such as independent websites and social media platforms that are unaffiliated with the Holy See or the USCCB are not to be considered trustworthy or appropriate for catechesis.”  Risible.   Frankly I and a few others have over the years done a hell of a lot more than either the Holy See or the USCCB in liturgical catechesis.   Couple that with the fact that the USCCB still can’t get a key paragraph, GIRM 299, translated correctly – even after Rome explained the Latin to them, leads me to purse my lips and to move along.

Under point #2 he attempts to impose versus populum worship in the Ordinary Mass according to that same GIRM 299.   This is a howler.   He quotes a faulty translation that the USCCB used and then stuck to – mendaciously – after Rome explained the grammar of the Latin.  I know I am “unaffiliated” but I’ve written about that many times over the years.  HERE  Christensen – or whoever advised him – ignorantly or duplicitously – depended on that faulty and long-exposed translation of GIRM 299.    This is not a good situation.  If the bishop of a diocese wants to claim powers beyond his station, he would do well to know what he is doing.  However, maybe he just consulted a staffer.  He picked the wrong guy.

Going on Christensen claims: “[T]he overwhelming experience worldwide after Vatican II is that the priest faces the people for the Mass, and this has contributed to the sanctification of the people.”

WHAT?!?

@BoiseBishop goes to the liturgical zoo. Attempts to forbid "ad orientem" worship, kneeling for Communion, etc.Can anyone, anywhere, looking around at the state of the Church today, especially in wealthy Western countries, and at the Pew Research survey about belief in the Eucharist, read that claim and not simply laugh aloud?   Furthermore, gratis asseritur gratis negatur.  There is zero proof to back that up and a heck of a lot of evidence to the contrary.

Christensen goes on with an attempt to parse the rubrics of the Mass, and say: “There has been at attempt to justify the ad orientem practice because the Order of Mass indicates places when the priest should face the people.  (However, it never asks him to turn away, as the preconciliar Missal did).”  Puhleze.  As if he knows the pre-Conciliar Missal.  If the bishop read Latin with the comfort that can. 249 requires – and he was ordained in my native place at the disastrous St. Paul Seminary of the day – when the 1983 CIC was in effect, he might be a little less sure of himself.

Later he delivers the chestnut about the priest having his “back to the people” which is too facile for a response here.

And then he lets fall a good one: “It was clearly the mind of the Council that the priest should face the people.”  It was?  It was also the mind of the Council that Latin and Gregorian chant should be retained, that priests read their office in Latin.  The missal used at the Council was John XXIII’s 1962 Missale Romanum.  And get this: “During funeral rites the coffin of a deceased cleric is to be positioned in the way he was in life at Mass: facing the people.”   PUHLEZE!   NO.  That’s not why, for centuries, priests and bishops lay in state with their heads toward the altar.

Think about this.  The custom of orientation of the body of priests, which has been done for centuries in a certain way, has its origin in the newfangled, modern imposition of Mass facing the people?  Does that sound right?

In the Latin tradition, deceased laypeople are usually placed before the altar with their feet toward the altar, that is, their bodies facing toward the liturgical East, whence for some two millennia Christians have believed Christ would return. This orientation of laypeople results from at least the 12th c. The 13th c. liturgist Durandus affirms this usage. For clergy, it is otherwise.

Priests are usually placed in church with their heads toward the altar. This would not have been the way that the priest said Mass, but rather the way that the priest taught and conferred blessings. Also, in the Greek East, the bodies of laypeople and priests and monks were placed in different locations, lay even outside the sacred space. It could be that the Greek use influenced the Latin Church usage through S. Italy, which had a strong Greek presence. However, even in the Catholic Encyclopedia we read: “the bishop (or priest) in death should occupy the same position in the church as during life, i.e. facing his people whom he taught and blessed in Christ’s name.” Again, this was NOT the priest’s position celebrating Mass! Greek priests were, of course, behind a screen, the iconostasis, and Latin priests were at the ad orientem altar, facing together with the people the liturgical East. But they preached and blessed facing the people, to whom they had to turn around to preach and to bless.

But Christensen warns about disinformation.

In #3, Christensen completely blows off the rights of people under the Church’s universal legislation in Redemptionis Sacramentum to kneel for Communion.  He says that there should be no prie dieus for people or Communion rails.

In #4, he misses the accurate way of citing Benedict XVI’s Summorum Pontificum and then asks priests as a “matter of courtesy” to be made aware of such celebrations.   This on the surface seems reasonable.  However, I think there is something else behind it.  More later.

In #5, priests are not to add elements of the Extraordinary Form to the Ordinary Form.  Okay.  However, I would be far more interested in how he is handling the abuses of his priests in celebrating the Ordinary Form, introducing their innovations with no history, rather than fretting about things that priests did at the altar for centuries.

@BoiseBishop goes to the liturgical zoo. Attempts to forbid "ad orientem" worship, kneeling for Communion, etc.

Send this man some emergency drinkware!

Yes, I am piling on a bit here.  But for pete’s sake when is the episcopal bullying going to end?

Lemme sum up a few things.

After talking with some canonists and having seen these attempts again and again over the years, this bishop is obviously wrong about a lot of things and he cannot do what he is attempting to do.

However, as one canonist friend said, and this is surely the truth, “he owns all the cards, the dice, the table and the room.  It’s not right, but it is what it is.”

About informing the bishop about saying Mass with the 1962 Missale Romanum.

As I have put it, it doesn’t make any difference if the bishop is wrong and operating outside his powers.  A priest can have the law and reason and tradition on his side all day long and twice on Sunday.  In the end, a bishop who is a bully can crucify a priest in a thousand ways.   It comes down to power and the imposition of will through threat of reciprocity.  Priests, in the end, barely have the right to Christian burial (with their heads toward the altar), but that’s about it.

Let’s leave this sorry mess and move to happier thoughts, like worldwide pandemic.

I’ll turn on the moderation queue for this.

Posted in Liberals, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Pò sì jiù | Tagged , , , ,
40 Comments

ASK FATHER: Ritual “solita oscula” in the time of coronavirus

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

The solita oscula are deeply ingrained in the roman rite, however should these still be given in times of disease, like this coronavirus? Thanks for any answer you can provide.

Solita oscula or “usual kisses” refers to the kissing of objects and hands as they are handed to or taken from the celebrating priest or bishop.   This is also done on Palm Sunday by the faithful as they receive palms from the priest.

My suggestion:  Either just omit them or just sort of make a gesture in that direction without touching.

While these solita oscula are symbolic and meaningful, they are not of the essence of the rites.

So, for the duration of the coronavirus challenge, just kiss the solita oscula goodbye.

ASK

Posted in Lighter fare, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged
3 Comments

Friday after 1st Passion Sunday: Our Lady of the Seven Sorrows and the “Our Lady of Sorrows Project”

Today, Friday after 1st Passion Sunday, and a 1st Friday this year, we commemorate Our Lady of the Seven Sorrows.  Priests can say the Mass of Our Lady of Sorrows today, with counter-intuitive white vestments, a Gloria and other aspects usually abandoned during Passiontide.   It is a striking liturgical moment.  I will say this Mass in today’s live stream at Noon, CDT.

Some time ago, I wrote a series of reflections on the Seven Sorrows of the Blessed Virgin.  I invite you to have a look.   Our Lady of Sorrows Project

Jere are links to the individual posts

1st Sorrow – The Prophecy of Simeon
2nd Sorrow – The Flight into Egypt
3rd Sorrow – The loss of the Child Jesus in Jerusalem
4th Sorrow – Mary meets Jesus on the way to Calvary
5th Sorrow – The Crucifixion of Jesus
6th Sorrow – The Piercing of the Side of Jesus, and His Deposition
7th Sorrow – The Burial of Jesus

Today, Friday in Passiontide, the Roman Station is at Santo Stefano Rotondo.

This image of Our Lady of Sorrows is from that very basilica.

Friday after 1st Passion Sunday: Our Lady of the Seven Sorrows and the "Our Lady of Sorrows Project"

Posted in Linking Back, Our Solitary Boast | Tagged ,
3 Comments

WDTPRS: Collect of the new Mass “In time of pandemic” v. Collect of traditional Mass, “In time of pestilence”. Wherein Fr. Z rants

WDTPRS: Collect of the new Mass "In time of pandemic" v. Collect of traditional Mass, "In time of pestilence". Wherein Fr. Z rantsRemember: We are our rites.

The way we pray has a reciprocal relationship with what we believe.  Change our prayers and our belief will, over time, shift and vice versa.   This dynamic is at the core of the phrase from Prosper of Aquitaine, “ut legem credendi lex statuat supplicandi”… which gives us the catch phrase “Lex orandi lex credendi“… the law of what is to be prayed is the law of what is to be believed”.

After the Second Vatican Council an artificially pasted up form of Mass was thrust upon the Latin Church. Couple that with liturgical experimentation and abuse unchecked by ecclesiastical authorities.  Overlay that with, in most places, a systematic elimination of the Latin from the worship of the Latin Church and the imposition of dreadful translations of prayers already edited for content by the ideology driven liturgical experts of the Consilium.  That results also in a slamming and chaining of the doors of the Church’s vats treasury of sacred music and the hurried rush to fill the void with unworthy vernacular ditties unlike anything ever heard in churches for centuries.  Because “we are our rites, the cumulative results have not been pretty.  We have witnessed a devastating atomization of Catholic identity that still ravages like a virus today.  This is born out by numbers of priests and religious who dropped out, the plummeting number of new vocations, the numbers of school, hospitals, parishes, seminaries, convents, monasteries, retreat houses, orphanages that have closed.

Decades of praying prayers whose content was shifted to ignore whole swathes of belief and certain doctrines – and decades of really bad translations – have at last produced an only vaguely Catholic people with an increasing percentage who don’t know or believe what the Church teaches about faith or morals.  A minority of people who – after these decades – now believe what the Church teaches about the Eucharist.  And now the demographic sink hole that will inevitably open underneath the Church in these USA may be accelerated by the societal changes stemming from the present Coronavirus challenge and the choice our Church’s leaders have made.

Let’s return for a moment to the issue of the editing of content of our prayers after Vatican II.

For the Novus Ordo, older prayers were in fact systematically edited for their content.  Certain concepts were intentionally stripped out, so that nary a mention of themes like propitiation, sin, guilt, judgment and sacrifice remain.  The emphasis was shifted to happy thoughts about the life to come, future heavenly bliss and only rare traces of eschatological judgment.

Only 17% of the orations from the traditional Missale Romanum survived unscathed in the Novus Ordo edition.   There were, in the older Missale, 1182 orations.  For the Novus Ordo, 760 of those prayers were expunged.  Of the remaining 422 (36%), half were edited.  And there were orations that were revived from ancient sacramentaries or cobbled up from bits and pieces of older prayers. They, too, were edited for content.

What you find removed from the old or missing from the new are teachings that any well-trained boy or girl would once have learned from their basic catechism.

Remember: We are our rites.  If we pray a certain way, we come to believe the content of what we pray.  If we believe in certain things, our prayers reflect those beliefs.  This is a constant interplay.

A few days ago, the Congregation for the Divine Worship and Discipline of the Sacraments issued a decree with a Votive Mass formula “In tempore universalis contagii… In time of pandemic”.  It can be used fairly often, according to the rubrics.  It was released in Latin and other major languages.

First, one notes that, while there was such a Mass in the older, traditional Missal, there wasn’t such a Mass in the Novus Ordo, which is why they had to put one together.  Holy Church has been through plagues before, horrible plagues.  So, in the Missale Romanum there was a Mass for such a challenge.  But in the happy thoughts of the modern age, there were in the Novus Ordo only vague Masses formularies “For Various Needs and Occasions”.

Next, what do the prayers of this new Novus Ordo Votive Mass really say?

Omnípotens sempitérne Deus, in omni perículo singuláre præsídium, qui fílios tuos in tribulatióne fide supplicántes exáudis, nobis propitiáre benígnus, et præsta, qu?sumus, defúnctis réquiem ætérnam, solámen plorántibus, salútem infírmis, moriéntibus pacem, operántibus pro fratrum sanitáte robur, spíritum sapiéntiæ illis qui nos in potestáte moderántur, et ánimum ad omnes benévole accedéndi ut cuncti nomen sanctum tuum glorificáre valeámus. Per Dóminum.

Official English:

Almighty and eternal God, our refuge in every danger, to whom we turn in our distress; in faith we pray look with compassion on the afflicted, grant eternal rest to the dead, comfort to mourners, healing to the sick, peace to the dying, strength to healthcare workers, wisdom to our leaders and the courage to reach out to all in love, so that together we may give glory to your holy name.  Through our Lord Jesus Christ, your Son, who lives and reigns with you in the unity of the Holy Spirit, God [sic], for ever and ever.

The first thing we notice is the length.  The Roman Rite, flowing from the Roman mind, was ever succinct.  The wordier the prayer, the more likely that it was written closer to our own day.

As for the content, all these petitions are fine.  There’s nothing wrong with them.  We all want these things.   It’s a good prayer.  We want compassion, comfort, solace, health, peace, strength, wisdom, don’t we?

Let’s now look at the prayer from the older, traditional Missale Romanum from the Votive Mass “Tempore Mortalitatis… In time of (widespread death)/pestilence”.

Deus, qui non mortem, sed paenitentiam desideras peccatorum: populum tuum ad te revertentem propitius respice; ut, dum tibi devotione exsitit, iracundiae tuae flagella ab eo clementer amoveas.

Interesting words here are exsto, which can be simply “to be”, but also means, “be conspicuous, stand out (ex-sto).”  Also, a flagellum is a striking word in Latin.  It can mean “threshing flail” or a “riding-whip”, both good images for this prayer, but it’s first impact is that of a “scourge” something worse than a scutica, or a “lash”, like a bull-whip.    When the Lord was beaten, it was a flagellatio, with a scourge, used to excoriare, rip off the skin or flay.

Literal:

O God, who desire not the death of sinners but rather penance: look propitiously on Your people returning to You, with the result that, so long as they are conspicuous to You in devotion, You might withdraw the whips of Your wrath.

A rather different tone.

“Deus, qui non mortem, sed paenitentiam desideras peccatorum…” This echoes one of the prayers for the blessing of ashes at the beginning of Lent.

I have had permission of the bishop to use even on III Class Ferias of Lent the VI Class Votive Tempore Mortalitatis for some time, and so I have been reading these prayers with frequency.

Whereas the Collect from the newer Novus Ordo Votive Mass presents an image of God as a kindly grandpa or a thoughtful boyfriend, who has kind words and gestures when we are in a jam, the traditional prayer makes a connection between the horrors we are experiencing, and the necessary to beg for relief from God who must be appeased (propitius) by our sustained and genuine return to Him in devotion.

In the newer prayer we turn to God “in faith”.  That’s fine.  However, even when charity and hope are lost, faith is always the last thing to go.  Many people who don’t have or live in charity, or who are on the verge of hopelessness, still believe.  Even the Devil believes.

In the older prayer, we see a turning around of a people.  They are turning because they drifted away.  And they have to demonstrate to God that they are worthy of relief.   In other words, they have to appease and do so for a while (dum).   This isn’t undertaken lightly.  It is a sincere turning back… conversion.   This is a prayer about conversion of the people, not just faith and comfort.  Conversion is necessary when you have done something wrong.

Look.  I could go on.  In the newer “Prayer over the gifts” we pray for relief from today’s peril.  In the older Secret, we beg to be released from sin and, therefore, delivered from destruction.   In the newer Post Communion, we pray for the “medicine of eternal life” and “heavenly healing”.  In the older Postcommunion we pray to be delivered “ab iracunidae tuae terroribus… from the terrors of Your rage” and for mercy.

Get it?  Cuddle me Jesus v. God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

All human suffering is a result of sin.  At the root it stems from the Original Sin of our First Parents.  But our actual sins also bring suffering and disharmony which open a gulf between us and God.

God foresees and permits that terrible things happen to us for the sake of correcting us and testing us and strengthening us.

What we need to draw out of this coronavirus challenge – and I think that this is just the dressed rehearsal for something far worse – is true conversion coupled with sincere acts of penance.

What has been the message of the major apparitions of the Lord and of His Mother?  Repent!  Do penance!  Make reparation!  Again and again they repeat…

Repent!  Do penance!  Make reparation!

It is hard right now for you to “GO TO CONFESSION!”

Learn that classic Act of Contrition and then say it often, reaching each time down more deeply into your mind and heart.  Practice makes perfect, and we want our contrition to be perfect.   Take on some penance.   Perform some penitential acts and some acts of mercy towards others with the explicit intention of making reparation for your sins and the offenses of others, especially against the Hearts of Jesus and of Mary.

If we can learn to do these things again… or better!… then we will have drawn good fruit from the bitter experience of this pandemic.

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, Semper Paratus, The Coming Storm, WDTPRS | Tagged , ,
11 Comments