Chinese Catholics barricade themselves in church to prevent its destruction

Our Lady of China, intercede for our abandoned brothers and sisters!

I don’t think there is any way to avoid this conclusion: the Holy See sold out our Chinese brothers and sisters.

From CNA:

Chinese Catholics barricade themselves in church to prevent demolition

Beijing, China, Nov 1, 2019 / 09:07 am (CNA).- Priests and parishioners have barricaded themselves in a Catholic church in the Chinese province of Hebei. According to reports, the Catholics are attempting to prevent the Chinese government from tearing down the Church.

The protest began at 6am Thursday morning at the church in Wu Gao Zhang, part of the Guantao district of Hebei, on the coast of northern China. Officials have ordered that the church be destroyed even though it is fully recognized and approved by the government. According to the website AsiaNews, local authorities have said the building lacks appropriate permits.

In September 2017, China enacted strict new regulations concerning religion. Since then, authorities have been vigilant in enforcing permitting requirements. Churches that are not found to be in compliance are destroyed[If not for that reason, then for any other.]

According to AsiaNews, many Chinese Catholics say that last September’s Sino-Vatican Agreement has served to embolden the government to take punitive action against Catholics who did not belong to state-approved churches.

Officials have reportedly claimed that “the Vatican supports us” and have ordered an additional 40 churches be destroyed.

[…]

“The government places spies in CPCA churches to specially monitor what priests say in their sermons and what activities they hold,” a priest from Yujiang reported to the magazine Bitter Winter. The Chinese government monitors the everyday activity of CPCA priests, their travel.

“Basically, the state knows everything about the priests,” he added.

[…]

On that last point, if you don’t think this is happening in “free” countries, you are naive.

 

Posted in Modern Martyrs, Pò sì jiù, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices | Tagged
19 Comments

Your Sunday Sermon Notes

Was there a good point made in the sermon you heard at the Mass that fulfilled your Sunday Obligation? What was it?

For my part… I have some jocular introductory remarks about the TMSM and singing. I’ll start the video at the Sign of the Cross.

Forgiveness and the Armor of God.

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 |
8 Comments

VIDEO – Meet the guy who boosted and “tiberized” Pachamama and “Pachamama meets the God of Surprises”

Corrispondenza Romana has a video introduced by Roberto de Mattei, in which the young Austrian man who tossed the wooden Pachamama demonic graven images into the Tiber. I saw the video at Rorate at first.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Fr. Z kudos to Alexander Tschugguel! He says he will have more videos. This is the sort of zeal of which our house is in sore need.

Meanwhile, in another video… different in tone… an American deals with the demon idol in a quintessentially American way. Enjoy.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

UPDATE:

Meanwhile… a correspondent sent a photo of something in a church in Washington DC with this comment”

Not to be outdone by the Pachamamas at S. Maria in Traspontina…

…the Basilica of the Real Absence on Wisconsin Avenue NW goes All-Siddhartha.

Posted in Lighter fare, Our Catholic Identity, Si vis pacem para bellum!, Synod, The future and our choices | Tagged , ,
27 Comments

New GREEN vestments from “Sacra Domus Aurea”

When you love someone, you lavish attention. You provide the best and the beautiful.

In Madison that is what we are trying to do with Holy Mass. Our Tridentine Mass Society of the Diocese of Madison (please donate! – 501(c)(3)) has been slowly building a treasury of vestments. This week I used for the first time the new Low Mass and Sung Mass set in green. I am loath to pull pieces out of larger sets on a regular basis. That way you wind up with worn chasuble and fresh dalmatics, etc.

And the church was pretty full, with new faces too.

You will want to know who made these vestments.  It was NOT Gammarelli, in Rome.

I am very pleased with them.  I think I will use this source again, happily.

There is a lady in Sardinia with a cottage business called

SACRA DOMUS AUREA

I contacted her after browsing photos of what she had made in the past, asking for an estimate for the set in green.   She responded quickly – you can write to her in English.  Her estimate was well within the budget I had set.  She was able to make some adjustments to the patterns according to my specifications.  I sent some money up front using PayPal so that she could get the fabric and trim, etc.  Badda bing!  She had the production of the vestments underway in no time.  Shipping was not a problem.  She was must faster than I had anticipated.

All in  all, these are high quality and beautiful and they won’t break your bank account.  I was delighted with what I used today.  I think I will make a few other adjustments for future orders (and I anticipate that there will be some).

The cope laid out before Mass…

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged ,
7 Comments

The numbers are growing and the “gravitational pull” is getting stronger

Did you all see the article in the Washington Examiner?

It tells us something that we all know. All of us, even the libs. Some day, more bishops are going to admit that this is a trend. Then we’ll see what happens.

Traditional Catholic parishes grow even as US Catholicism declines

Traditional Catholic parishes run by one society of priests are growing in the United States, defying the trend of decline in the broader American church over previous decades.

Over the past year, parishes run by the Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter, a society of priests dedicated to celebrating the traditional Latin form of the Catholic liturgy, have reported large increases in Sunday Mass attendance. The traditional liturgy that draws attendees is the form of the Mass celebrated before the reforms instituted at the Second Vatican Council, a meeting of the church’s bishops in the 1960s.

In Los Angeles, the fraternity did not have their own church until 2018, but Mass attendance over the past year doubled from 250 per Sunday to 500. The parish’s pastor, Fr. James Fryar, commented for the fraternity’s website that, after his parish added a fourth Mass on Sunday, “another 200 people came.”

The Naples, Florida, parish has been around for less than two years, but close to 400 people attend every Sunday, an increase of 20% from 2018. The pastor, Fr. James Romanoski, told the Washington Examiner the parish has been “averaging a new household — sometimes a family, sometimes an individual — every week” for over a year.

[…]
One Naples parishioner, Greg Colker, was a Protestant who converted to Catholicism but first attended a “standard” American Catholic parish, “not at all particularly traditional, not at all particularly liberal,” he told the Washington Examiner.

The traditional liturgy proved transformative for him, and he described it as “something that has formed from the heart of the church to form us into better people.” He added, “There’s this big lie that the traditional stuff is legalistic and rigid. I have found it to be anything but. I have found the teaching to be clear and useful.”

Sunday Mass attendance at the fraternity’s parish in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho increased by about 29% in the past two years, while the parish in Atlanta has grown by 30% in the last year.

[…]

I have been away from the parish for a month because of my sojourn in Rome.  This morning, the church was full and there were lots of new faces.  One couple with four children under 5 years old said that they have started attending the TLM rather than the later Novus Ordo.  They’ve been looking for “more”.

The number of priests saying the TLM is quietly growing.  The number of parishes with the TLM is quietly growing.

I’m tempted to give Pachamama the TLM “Salesdemon of the Year” award.

This will provide a “gravitational pull” on every aspect of the life of the Church.  Even if the priests still are mostly celebrating the Novus Ordo, there will be a huge knock-on effect through how the priest perceives himself to be at the altar.   In turn, congregations will be affected by the priest’s ars celebrandi.

We are our rites!

 

Posted in Just Too Cool, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged
24 Comments

Archbp. Cordileone answers some questions

Coming up in November, His Excellency Most Rev. Salvatore Cordileone, Archbishop of San Francisco, will celebrate a Pontifical Mass at the Throne at the Shrine of the Immaculate Conception.

Those interested can learn more about the Mass of the Americas at the National Shrine, and the conference to take place afterwards, at www.MassOfTheAmericas.org.

I wrote with questions to His Excellency concerning some elements of celebration of the Holy Mass with the traditional form:

The answers below are from Archbishop Cordileone:

Fr. Z: “In the traditional Roman Rite the vesting prayers recited by a Bishop, and the general attitude in a sacristy during the vesting of the bishop, both set a very different tone before Holy Mass than in the usual lead up to many Masses in the post-Conciliar Form. Has learning the vesting prayers, indeed the whole of the traditional Roman Rite, had an effect on Your Excellency’s self-understanding as a bishop at the altar? On your whole ministry as a bishop?”

Archbp. Cordileone: I learned the vesting prayers already when I was a young priest, and have prayed them every time I put on vestments before celebrating Mass. Or, at least, try to. Yes, you are correct: there is a wide divergence from the rite of the vesting of a bishop in the Traditional Mass, and what usually happens in a sacristy before Mass nowadays.

The noise and small talk that typically takes place before Mass has always been hard for me, I feel it as a deep wound in my soul, and often makes it impossible to recite those vesting prayers.

What makes it more difficult, ironically, is the fact that the people engaging is such small talk are of good faith: They love the Church and they love serving the Church, but they have not been formed well in terms of the sacredness of the liturgical action and the preparation that we should put into it.

I remember one occasion many years ago when I was still a young bishop. I was asked to celebrate an Ordinary Form Mass in a way that reflects continuity with the Traditional Mass (ad orientem, ordinary parts in Latin, sacred music, etc.) for a conference on the sacred liturgy. I had asked my very capable MC to insure that there be silence in the sacristy, so I could prepare, mentally and spiritually, for this solemn celebration. As I entered the church and turned toward the sacristy I did not recall that I had asked him to do this, and as I went to open the door to the sacristy, I was preparing myself for the usual onslaught. When I saw several people in the sacristy, and encountered perfect silence, I was thrown off for a second, until I remembered what I had said to my MC. The sacred silence conveyed a completely different mindset in preparing for the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. The words of the Good Shepherd Psalm come to mind: “He leads me beside still waters, he restores my soul.”

The demise of silence in church is yet another crisis the Church is facing insofar as it contributes to a loss of the sense of the sacred, and one which does not receive the attention it demands. Talking in church, especially after Mass concludes, has become the natural expectation. I’ve seen this happen even in Masses I’ve celebrated with a very traditionally-minded congregation.

While the loss of sacred silence is not an inevitable consequence of the change in the form of the Mass, the highly casual mentality that has ensued with the change has created the context for this problem that afflicts the Church now. The traditional form of the Mass does not lend itself to this casualness, given how tightly regulated it is, the use of the Latin as the universal language of the Church (no room for improvisations there!), large spaces of silence within the Mass, and the sacred quality of the music. But with either form of the Mass, respect for the true sacred nature of the Mass reinforces for me my true role and identity as a priest, and now as a bishop.

Fr. Z: “It seems that the demographics of the Church will shrink in the future, in some places rapidly and dramatically. However in many places where the Traditional Roman Rite is used, we see lots of young families with many children. There are also many converts to Holy Church, even in these troubled times, who bring in wonderful gifts and energy. They are now also discovering Catholic Tradition. How does Your Excellency see the role of the Traditional Roman Rite in the future?”

Archbp. Cordileone: I subscribe wholeheartedly to Pope Benedict’s vision of the mutual enrichment of the two forms of the Roman Rite. It is very clear in his writings that he sees the Church as having adopted the hermeneutic of rupture after the Council, and especially with the liturgy.

I would say that, even more than with how the liturgical changes were implemented, the actual change in the form itself was something of a rupture. But it is also clear to me that Pope Benedict understands that to restore what was lost, it is important to work gradually and organically, and not repeat the mistake of imposing drastic changes from above upon a people who might not be ready to accept it. Rather, having the traditional form of the Roman Rite a regular part of Church life, easily and readily available to our Catholic people, who can become accustomed to attending Mass in both forms, the sought after “internal reconciliation” that Pope Benedict proposes could come about in an organic way, which is always much healthier in the life of a large community of people.

Yes, it is very clear that traditional Catholic worship is connecting well with many people, especially young people. We need to see this as a powerful tool of evangelization, among others. The days of the old liturgy wars are now soon behind us. Middle-aged Catholics did not grow up immersed in this battle, and especially to young Catholics this is very foreign to them. Two young priests in my Archdiocese who recently assisted me with a Mass for high school boys and their parents at our seminary, in which the choir sang Gregorian chant and beautiful polyphony, asked me: “Why are there people who are opposed to Gregorian chant? It is so beautiful, holy, and reverent.”

We need to recapture the Church’s traditional worship, and especially in music, as a living tradition. It is not something meant to be left behind to history, or relegated to concert halls. This is classical religious music. Do we consider classical secular music as belonging to the past, and no longer pertinent to today? Do not the great orchestras throughout the world continue to perform symphonies by Beethoven, Mozart, Schubert, Brahms, and all of the other great composers throughout the ages? And do not new compositions of classical music continue to be produced?

It is for this reason that the Benedict the XVI Institute for Sacred Music and Divine Worship, which I founded five years ago, has begun to commission new compositions of sacred music that can speak to contemporary society but also with a sense of timelessness to it.

The first such composition by our composer in residence, Frank LaRocca, was written to celebrate the Solemnity of the Immaculate Conception last year in our Cathedral, which was also the day on which the whole Archdiocese celebrated Our Lady of Guadalupe. It incorporates the melodies and sounds of the popular music the Mexican people sing to honor our Lady of Guadalupe, but within the context of sacred polyphony. Even a special set of vestments was commissioned for this Mass. We have entitled the Mass, “The Mass of the Americas,” and we are beginning to “take it out on the road,” so to speak, in what we are calling a “Marian unity tour.”

It will next be celebrated at the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception in Washington, DC on November 16, but this time in an Extraordinary Form version of the Mass.

The music was adapted to this form of the Mass, and I will celebrate it as a Solemn High Pontifical Mass. The idea is to build up unity in the Church, in two senses: Our Lady as the Mother of all of God’s children who unites us into one family of God, and unity in the Church’s worship and witness. The Mass of the Americas, originally celebrated in the Ordinary Form, will now be celebrated in the Extraordinary Form with the same music and even the same vestments.

We see this as a wonderful opportunity to show that the Church’s traditional worship is a living, developing tradition, one in which great works of sacred music are yet to come. We are therefore also holding a conference after the Mass featuring speakers from different areas of art, music and literature, such as renowned choral conductor Richard Sparks (who will be conducting the choir at the Mass), award-winning artist Andrew de Sa, and Villanova professor and award-winning poet James Matthew Wilson, whom Dana Gioia calls “the future of catholic letters in America.” James Matthew Wilson has also written a song cycle commemorating the Mass of the Americas, published as a book entitled, “The River of the Immaculate Conception.” (Wiseblood Press, 2019), The conference will conclude with a book signing with Professor Wilson.

UPDATE:

Be sure to check out One Mad Mom‘s post about Archbp. Cordileone and how he is being attacked by catty, gossipy, probably effeminate priests of that Archdiocese via – what else – the National Schismatic Reporter.

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged ,
8 Comments

VIDEO: Summorum Pontificum Pilgrimage 2019 – review

LifeSite has a video about the Summorum Pontificum procession to St. Peter’s Basilica and the Pontifical Mass.

Posted in SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM | Tagged
2 Comments

@JamesMartinSJ twists the truth again… on purpose?

Fr James Martin, LGBTQSJ.   The Jesuit homosexualist activist.

There are so many things to say about James Martin.

Let’s focus today on the whopper he tweeted about Communion for pro-abortion politicians. Two tweets… connected.

FAIL!

Leaving aside the dopey string of moral equivalences the Jesuit draws in the first part, and focusing on the second part, we have to conclude that either a) his formation was so bad that he doesn’t understand the simplest distinctions to be made about this Communion scenario, or b) he is purposely trying to deceive people.

I want to give him the benefit of the doubt, so I’ll go with option a).   Therefore, let’s explain the situation to him in basic terms.

Denial of Communion to a person under can. 915 is NOT based on a Communion minister’s estimation of the state of a person’s soul!

As I wrote to a commentator here the other day, a priest cannot know with certainty the state of the soul of another.  I suppose one might make a really good guess if the person is in the act of committing a grave sin while he is standing there waiting for Communion. Even then it might be hard to say what the person’s state is.

However,…

can. 915 does not pertain to the state of soul of the person.

Can. 915 has to do with what is manifest and it has to do with scandal.

If a person has manifestly been committing grave sins, obstinately, in public (such as a politician who actively promotes abortion even though he has been instructed not to) then there is an open, public, manifest problem that must be openly and manifestly corrected before he can receive Communion.  He publicly committed scandal and that scandal must be redressed.

A priest doesn’t have to know the state of soul of the public person in front of him. If he knows that that public person, well known, has been doing very bad things without any move to correct the harm he caused, the priest, by can. 915, must deny him Communion.

On the other hand, there is can. 916 which pertains not to the priest but to the communicant.

Any person who knows himself to be in the state of sin is admonished by the Church not to present himself for Communion in the first place.

In short, can. 915 pertains to the minister of Communion and can. 916 pertains to the communicant. The priest judges open, public actions people know about at the time of Communion. The communicant judges his own state of soul, which is invisible to others.

The keys to reading the canon are the elements of obstinacy, perseverance, manifest character, gravity, and sinfulness.  Biden checked all those boxes.

I hope that clears it up for the Jesuit.

But… no.  It won’t make any difference to him.  Why?   Because he is a homosexualist activist.

Under can. 915 people wearing, for example, “rainbow sashes” who present themselves for Communion must be denied.  This isn’t just about abortion, it is also about open homosexual activity, such as civilly “marrying” someone of the same sex, of which I am pretty sure Martin approves.   It applies to parading around in favor of, in promotion of, homosexuality, even when the Church’s teaching has been made clear.  People who commit grave sins openly and obstinately are to be denied Communion.  This is to protect the integrity of the Church’s teaching and to avoid profanation of the Eucharist and to avoid scandal and to prompt the person in question to repentance, amendment of life and reparation for the harm caused.

The Jesuit homosexualist activist perpetrates a three card monte game with the truth about can. 915, trying to make it seem as if what is in play is the “state of soul” of the person, when it is actually what is publicly known about the person.

As a priest, James Martin is obliged to deny Communion to people whom he knows are civilly married to someone of the same sex.   Remember that civil marriage is a public act.  It is manifest.  It is grave.  It is a sin.  If the “couple” doesn’t separate and publicly try to repair the scandal they caused by their open same-sex behavior, they are to be denied Communion.  This is certainly the case at, for example, a funeral when, beforehand, a child of the deceased known to be in some open, homosexual relationship, announces her intention to receive Communion and then is told by the priest, beforehand, don’t present yourself for Communion.  That was a scenario a few years ago in Washington DC and the priest was hammered for it by Card. Wuerl (big surprise there).  It was entirely unjust and the priest was in the right.  The priest was bound by the law to act as he did.

And so would be Martin.  That’s probably why he distorts the truth in his tweets.

Maybe I should have chosen option b)?

Click me.

UPDATE:

Canonist Ed Peters has a column at The Hill about this. It confirms that I am right in my instruction of James Martin the Jesuit, and the Jesuit James Martin is wrong.

UPDATE:

Anthony Esolen gives Martin a thorough beating.

HERE

Posted in 1983 CIC can. 915, Canon Law, Jesuits, Liberals, Sin That Cries To Heaven | Tagged , ,
9 Comments

10 Dec now Memorial of Our Lady of Loreto (Novus Ordo) – LATIN PROBLEM ALERT

In the Bolletino yesterday, we read that Francis has made 10 December in the Novus Ordo an Optional Memorial (Memoria ad libitum) for Our Lady of Loreto.

The decree from the Congregation for Divine Worship is in the above-linked Bolletino in several languages, including Latin, which is indicated as the original language.  Yeah… right.

Putting aside the Latin of the decree, there is a glaring mistake in the new Collect for the Memorial, which is to be inserted into liturgical books… mistake and all.

Can you find it?  It slaps you in the face.

De Communi beatae Mariae Virginis

Collecta

Deus, qui promíssa Pátribus adímplens
beátam Vírginem Maríam elegísti,
ut matrem fíeret Salvatóris,
concéde nobis illíus exémpla sectári,
cuius humílitas tibi plácuit,
et oboediéntia nobis prófuit.
Per Dóminum.

Who are the yokels writing this stuff?

This must be the same team that screwed up the new Preface composed for the Novus Ordo Feast of St. Mary Magdalene. HERE

 

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, You must be joking! | Tagged ,
14 Comments

Try to do some task today with zeal, focus and excellence

We hear the phrase “Church Militant” often right now. Rightly so. We are in a war. War on the spiritual, angelic level rages around us constantly. The world, the flesh and the Devil war upon us as we struggle along in this vale of tears towards our patria, our heavenly fatherland.

Heck, we are even being warred upon by higher ups in the Church herself!

On this Feast of All Saints, I want to share something with you that moved me this morning as I read it.

Yesterday, Pres. Trump presented the Medal of Honor to Master Sgt. Matthew O. Williams, for his actions in Afghanistan. As I watched the blurb on the news I caught a view of his awards and decorations. He had already won a Silver Star and Bronze Star.  “Who is this guy?”, quoth I.

I read about the action he was in and the citation.

Read about him and Operation Commando Wrath and what happened on 6 April 2008 in the Shok Valley of Afghanistan. HERE

He said in the interview I saw on the news that he expects to return to his unit at Fort Bragg tomorrow and get back to work.

Friends, if you need something to inspire you on a hard day, if you need encouragement in living your vocation well, pick any MOH recipient and read the citation. If you are not moved thereafter to try to do some task today with zeal, focus and excellence, then you are not paying attention to the clock ticking on your time among us.

For our wrestling is not against flesh and blood; but against principalities and power, against the rulers of the world of this darkness, against the spirits of wickedness in the high places.

Ephesians 6:12 DRA

Posted in Be The Maquis, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Just Too Cool, Si vis pacem para bellum!, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices | Tagged
3 Comments