Your Sunday Sermon Notes – GO TO CONFESSION! – VIDEO

Was there a good point made in the sermon during your Mass of Sunday obligation? Let us know.

For my part, I had a note early this morning from the scheduled celebrant, our VG, who succumbed to some ailment (get well soon!) and, subsequently, could I take the Mass.  Hence, I saluted, combed my hair, and headed off to an early morning Missa Cantata on this 5th Sunday after Pentecost.   Full disclosure: I was going to be there anyway, so that I could take the diaconal slot and we could have a Missa Solemnis.  But I had not planned on preaching.   What follows is off the cuff.

GO TO CONFESSION!

Posted in GO TO CONFESSION, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 |
7 Comments

SSPX video of their amazing new US church project.

There is an amazing video available of an amazing project mounted by the SSPX in these USA.  They are building a huge and beautiful new church.

One of the things I find interesting about this video is the intelligent commentary on what it takes to plan and to build the sort of church they are projecting in the place where they want to build it. I’ve thought quite a bit about these same issues.

Building a Home Worthy of The Immaculata from Society of St Pius X on Vimeo.

Each group in every age of the Church’s life has built churches which reflect their faith, which communicate an answer to the question: “Who is the Church?”

Yes, today it is still possible to build amazing churches worthy of the name. They don’t all have to look like municipal airport terminals.

I would also like to recommend a book by Fr. James W. Jackson, FSSP, which begins with a view of church architecture based on the tenets of St. Charles Borromeo.

Nothing Superfluous: An Explanation of the Symbolism of the Rite of St. Gregory the Great 

US HERE UK HERE

Posted in SSPX, The future and our choices | Tagged , ,
19 Comments

BOOK: In Praise of the Tridentine Mass and of Latin, Language of the Church

What a great title!

The nice folks at Angelico Press sent a copy of

In Praise of the Tridentine Mass and of Latin, Language of the Church

by Fr. Roberto Spataro, Secretary of the Pontifical Academy for Latin.

US HERE – UK HERE

Table of contents.  This is a collection of talks given around Italy.   Note that the introduction by Patrick Owens is significant.  Inter alia he provides a history of Latin in the Church.

In the section “Desperate Times Call For Desperate Measures”, the author argues that spreading to use of the Vetus Ordo is a “work of mercy”.

Fathers, these essays could help you to prepare the way for the implementation of Summorum Pontificum in your parishes.  They could help lay people bring their priests around to what must be done.

He’s right.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, REVIEWS | Tagged , , ,
18 Comments

WDTPRS – 15th Ordinary Sunday: Too far right or too far left, we wind up in the ditch in the dark

This week, the 15th Ordinary Sunday in the Novus Ordo calendar, we have a good example of the dramatic difference between the old, Obsolete ICEL version we suffered with for decades, and the Latin with the Current ICEL version.

The Collect or Opening Prayer for this 15th Sunday of Ordinary Time in the Ordinary Form of the Roman Rite is also used in the Extraordinary Form on the 3rd Sunday after Easter.   In the Ordinary Form it is also the Collect for Monday of the 3rd week of Easter season.

Today’s prayer goes back at least to the ancient Gelasian Sacramentary.  My trusty edition of St. Pius V’s 1570 Missale Romanum, and the subsequent 1962MR, shows the insertion of a word – “in viam possint redire iustitiae” – not present in the more ancient Collect in the Gelasian (though it was present in some other ancient sacramentaries).

The Ordinary Form editions of the Missal drop iustitiae.

Stylistically, this is a snappy prayer, with nice alliteration and a powerful rhythm in the last line.

Deus, qui errantibus, ut in viam possint redire,
veritatis tuae lumen ostendis,
da cunctis qui christiana professione censentur,
et illa respuere, quae huic inimica sunt nomini,
et ea quae sunt apta sectari.

It is hard to know what might be the sources influencing this prayer.  There is John 14, which we shall see below. Can we find a trace of the Roman statesman Cassiodorus (+c. 585 – consul in 514 and then Boethius’ successor as magister officiorum under the Ostrogothic King Theodoric)?  Cassiodorus wrote, “Sed potest aliquis et in via peccatorum esse et ad viam iterum redire iustitiae? But can someone be both in the way of sins and also return again to the way of justice?” (cf. Exp. Ps. 13).  Note especially the presence of “iustitiae” in Cassiodorus’ phrase.  Might we infer a touch of Milan’s mighty Bishop Ambrose (+397) or even more probably Augustine of Hippo (+430) who use similar patterns of words?

The thorough Lewis & Short Dictionary informs us that the verb censeo, though quite complicated, is primarily “to estimate, weigh, value, appreciate”.  It is used for, “to be of an opinion” and “to think, consider” something.  There is a special construction with censeo, censeri aliqua re meaning “to be appreciated, distinguished, celebrated for some quality”, “to be known by something.”   This explains the passive form in our Collect with the ablative christiana professione.   Getting this into English requires some fancy footwork.   Censeo here retains a meaning of “be counted among” (think of English “census”).  We can get the right concept in “distinguished” since it can mean both “be counted as” as well as “be celebrated for some quality.”

Christianus, a, um is an adjective with the noun professio. When moving from Latin to English sometimes we need to pull adjectives apart and rephrase them.  We could say “Christian profession”, but what this adjectival construction means here is “profession of Christ.”  We find the same problem in phrases such as oratio dominica, which is literally “the Lordly Prayer”. In English it comes out more smoothly as “the Lord’s Prayer”.

Respuo literally means “to spit out” and thus “reject, repel, refuse”.  The fundamental meaning gives a strong enough image for me to say “strongly reject, repudiate”.  The deponent verb sector indicates “to follow continually or eagerly” in either a good or bad sense.  Sector is used, for example, to describe a group of followers who accompanied ancient philosophers, which is where we get the word “sect”.

The word via needs our attention.  It means, “a way, method, mode, manner, fashion, etc., of doing any thing, course”.   There is a moral content to via as well, “the right way, the true method, mode, or manner”.

That’s a lot of vocabulary.  On the other hand, that’s what the prayer contains and words have meanings.

VERY LITERAL TRANSLATION:

O God, who show the light of Your truth to the erring so that they might be able to return unto the way, grant to all who are distinguished by their profession of Christ that they may both strongly reject those things which are inimical to this name of Christian and follow eagerly the things which are suited to it.

Now look at this!

OBSOLETE ICEL (1973):

God our Father,
your light of truth
guides us to the way of Christ.
May all who follow him
reject what is contrary to the gospel.

I’m inspired!  Aren’t you?

What were they thinking?!?   No wonder so many Catholics today are so screwed up, after decades of that rubbish.

CURRENT ICEL (2011):

O God, who show the light of your truth
to those who go astray,
so that they may return to the right path,
give all who for the faith they profess
are accounted Christians
the grace to reject whatever is contrary to the name of Christ
and to strive after all that does it honor
.

Some initial associations to my mind.

Ancient philosophers (the word comes from Greek for “lover of wisdom”) would walk about in public in their sandals and draped toga-like robes.  Thinker theologian/philosophers such as Aristotle were called “Peripatetics” from their practice of walking about (Greek peripatein) under covered walkways of the Lyceum in Athens (Greek peripatos) while teaching.  Their disciples would swarm around them, hanging on their words, debating with them, learning how to think and to reason.  They would discuss the deeper questions the human mind and heart inevitably faces and in this they were theologians.

We must be careful not to impose the modern divorce of philosophy and theology on the ancients.  In ancient Christian mosaics Christ is sometimes depicted wearing philosopher’s robes, his hand raised in the ancient teaching gesture.  He is Wisdom incarnate and the perfect Teacher.   He is the one from whom we should learn about God and about ourselves.  After Christ Himself, we also have His Church, who is Mater et Magistra – Mother and Teacher.  Sometimes a small Christ is seated upon His Mother as if she were His teaching chair, or cathedral.  When so depicted, Mary is called Seat of Wisdom.

I am also reminded of the very first lines of the Divine Comedy by the exiled Florentine poet Dante Alighieri (+1321) who was heavily influenced by Aristotle’s Ethics and the Christianized Platonic philosophy mediated through Boethius (+525) and St. Thomas Aquinas (+1274).

The Inferno begins:

Midway in the journey of our life
I came to myself in a dark wood,
for the straight way was lost.
Ah, how hard it is to tell
the nature of that wood, savage, dense, and harsh –
the very thought of it renews my fear!
It is so bitter death is hardly more so.

Dante, the protagonist of his own poem, describes his fictional self.  His poetic persona, in the middle of his life (35 years old), is mired in sin and irrational behavior.  He has strayed from the straight path of the life of reason and is in the “dark wood”.

If you haven’t read the Divine Comedy, Esolen translated it into English and did a great job. You could start with Part 1, Inferno – US HERE – UK HERE – or perhaps with Dorothy Sayer’s fine version – Part 1, Inferno, US HERE – UK HERE

The life of persistent sin is a life without true reason, for human reason when left to itself without the light of grace is crippled.

Dante likens his confused state to death.  He must journey through hell and back.  He then experiences the purification of purgatory in order to come back to the life of virtue and reason.  In the course of the three-part Comedy he finds the proper road back to light and Truth and reason through the intercession of Christ-like figures such as Beatrice and Lucy and then through Christ Himself.

In the Comedy, Dante recovers the use of reason.  His whole person is reintegrated through the light of Truth.

Don’t we often describe people who are ignorant, confused or obtuse as “wandering around in the dark”?  This applies also to persistent sinners.

By their choices and resistance to God’s grace they have lost the light of Truth.  God’s grace makes it possible for us to find our way back into the right path, no matter how far off of it we have strayed in the past.

When we sin, we break our relationship with Christ.

If in laziness we should refuse to know Him better (every day), we lose sight of ourselves and our neighbor.

The Second Vatican Council teaches that Christ came into the world to reveal man more fully to himself (GS 22).

Christ, the incarnate Word, tells us in the person of the Apostle St. Thomas:

“‘Let not your hearts be troubled; believe in God, believe also in me. In my Father’s house are many rooms; if it were not so, would I have told you that I go to prepare a place for you?  And when I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again and will take you to myself, that where I am you may be also. And you know the way (via) where I am going.’  Thomas said to him, ‘Lord, we do not know where you are going; how can we know the way (via)?’ Jesus said to him, ‘I am the way (via), and the truth (veritas), and the life; no one comes to the Father, but by me.  If you had known me, you would have known my Father also; henceforth you know him and have seen him…. He who has seen me has seen the Father’” (cf. John 14:1-6 RSV).

We have not only the words and deeds of Christ in Scripture, but God has given us in the Catholic Church herself a secure marked path to follow towards happiness.

We can stray off this sure path either to the right or to the left.  Either way, too far right or too far left, we wind up in the ditch in the dark.

When we have gone off the proper path and have left Christ, the Way, we can return to our senses again and be reconciled with God and neighbor through the sacraments entrusted to the Catholic Church, especially in the Sacrament of Penance and then good reception of Christ in Holy Communion.

We Catholics, who dare publicly to take Christ’s name to ourselves, need to stand up and be counted (censentur) in public and on public issues and even sharply refuse (respuere) whatever is contrary to Christ’s Name.

In what we say and do other people ought to be able to see Christ’s light reflected and focused in the details of our individual vocations.

To be good lenses and reflectors of Christ’s light, we must be clean.  When we know ourselves not to be so, we are obliged as soon as possible to seek cleansing so that we can be saved and be of benefit for the salvation of others.

GO TO CONFESSION!

We must also practice spiritual works of mercy, bringing the light of truth to the ignorant or those who persist in darkness either through their own fault or no fault of their own.

QUAERITUR: When people look at us and listen to us, do they see a black, light-extinguishing hole where a beautiful image of God should be?

 

Posted in GO TO CONFESSION, WDTPRS | Tagged
4 Comments

“Damn!”, quoth I.  “That’s the spirit.” Coasties getting the job done.

Last night I saw on the news a video of a Coastie jump onto a moving surfaced submarine hauling narcotics to these USA and pound the hatch till it opened.

“Damn!”, quoth I.  “That’s the spirit.  That’s an object lesson.”

This is fantastic.  The admiration meter is now broken.

Fr. Z Kudos to the US “Semper Paratus” Coast Guard.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

A somewhat “raw” account, HERE.

The analogies for our attitude in The Present Crisis are multiplying rapidly in my mind.

With what kind of courage must parents raise their children today, given the not-even-submerged poisons being hauled to their souls?

With what sort of determination must priests have in preaching and teaching the truths of the Catholic faith and in their celebration of the sacred mysteries?

THAT KIND.

You, dear reader, have a vocation.  How are you living it?

 

Posted in Be The Maquis, Fr. Z KUDOS, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Semper Paratus, Si vis pacem para bellum!, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices | Tagged ,
8 Comments

How credible is “credible” in allegations against priests?

The accusations – based on a repressed memory of something 40 years ago – about Fr. Eduard Perrone in the Archdiocese of Detroit continue to raise questions.  Dark questions.

Something is not right about this.

Michael Voris is digging in.  He attends Fr. Perrone’s parish, but this case is far far bigger than allegiance.  It concerns how accusations against priests are being handled everywhere, according to or not according to Canon Law the the Dallas “Norms” (which infamously don’t apply to bishops).

Voris has posted a couple of video commentaries at Church Militant.

In today’s video – “Anatomy of a Takedown” – there is something that everyone should listen to or read.  He provides transcripts of his videos.   Voris remarks today on the phrase “credible allegation”.

What he says should raise red flags and alarm bells in every Catholic everywhere in these USA.

Here’s the text.  If you want, you could swap out the proper names.  It seems to me that this could be applied pretty much everywhere right now, not just in Detroit.  My emphases:

[…]

The word “credible” which Msgr. Bugarin bandies about freely is, for all intents and purposes in American diocesan chanceries, a very dangerous word because it is being commonly employed in alleged clergy misconduct cases in an entirely different way than authorized by canon law.

In regular usage, it means exactly what it sounds like: “worthy of belief.”

But in the arcane language of canon law, it is a higher standard than what canon 1717 of the Code of Canon Law actually requires as a criterion to be used: “semblance of truth.” That is a positive determination, not a negative one. This gets a little into the weeds here, but allow us to explain because it’s important. God is, after all, in the details.

Currently, American diocesan officials are using the terminology “unless an allegation be manifestly false or frivolous” as the definition of a “credible” allegation.

This non-canonical definition actually shifts the burden of proof to the accused priest to demonstrate, not just allege in his defense, that any allegation made against him was “manifestly,” “obviously,” “evidently” false or frivolous, as opposed to the diocese actually having positive or affirmative evidence in support of a claim of sexual abuse.

That is a vast difference between common chancery Orwellian “newspeak” and the official canonical criteria legislated by the popes over many centuries.

When Abp. Vigneron and his non-independent review board and Msgr. Bugarin approved the use of the language against Fr. Perrone that the charge had a “semblance of truth,” that is grossly misleading.

In reality, the term, “semblance of truth,” according to the AOD itself in its own documents, is defined as “it is not manifestly false or frivolous” or “serious” or “substantive.” That’s from the AOD’s outdated Sexual Abuse of Minors Policy dating back to 2007.

Again, the phrase “semblance of truth” in canon law carries a vastly different meaning. It does not mean that any allegation is credible unless it can be rebutted as
“manifestly false or frivolous” by the accused priest.

However, according to the AOD’s and most diocesan sex abuse policies currently in effect, the practical bar that needs to be crossed in a case like this is extremely low — so low in fact that it’s almost laughable.

So for Abp. Vigneron to approve a press release with language like “credible” and “semblance of truth” is massively disingenuous and dangerous and a misleading account taken of what those terms actually mean, in the context of the AOD’s own actual policies, practices and posted Q&As found online on its website.

In short, they deliberately let the public think they mean something that they themselves say they don’t mean.

[…]

Did you get that?

I would very much appreciate comments of canonists on this.

Here’s how I read that.  The way “credible” is being used lowers the bar and results in placing the burden on the priest himself to disprove the allegation.  Meanwhile, a diocese/bishop, in effect, throws the priest to the wolves and has circumvented due process.  The are attending to secular advisers (lawyers, insurance companies) and worrying about the press more than the advise of sound canonists and in the interests of truth.

But it’s an efficient way to get rid of a troublesome priest.  And, these days, we know what “troublesome” means.

Here’s the video, which I have set to start just before the part I quote, above.

Posted in Canon Law, Clerical Sexual Abuse, Priests and Priesthood, The Drill | Tagged ,
8 Comments

Tour Talk – #TDF2019 @Le_Tour Stage 6

SPOILER WARNING (if you haven’t watched your recording)

The Tour continues.  Peter Sagan had an amazing sprint to win Stage 5 and Alaphilippe is still, as I write, in the Yellow Jersey.  Wellens is King.

They have moved from Alsace into the Vosges.  Stage 6 goes from Mullouse to La panche des belles filles, an uphill finish where stages have ended in the past.   One of the great things about the Tour coverage is the focus on landmarks along the way.  This morning, for example, they looked outside and inside a beautiful gothic church, the Collegiate Church of St-Thiebault.  Another they showed is a Cluniac priority founded by Peter the Venerable.

The finish of this stage, with its many climbs, is brutal.  It’s 160.5km and it has been extended an extra kilometer to wind even higher to the finish on a 24% grade.

The physics of the race is also interesting. A biker can consume around 7000 kcal on a day with lots of climbs.  That means that they have to be eating constantly, even during the race, not to mention hydration.  A sprinter like Sagan can generate some 1500 watts in a sprint.

Meanwhile, I’ve been thinking about one of my old bikes, stolen from the basement of St. Agnes rectory while I was away.  A Raleigh, Reynolds tubing, Campagnolo Super-Record parts.  It was a great bike.  May the thief, if unrepentant, be tormented by boils and may his hand grow from the ground out of his grave.

Anyway, the graphics during the TV coverage is spectacular, especially the maps.

Campagnolo… hmmm… I have one of those BIG Campy corkscrews in my storage area.  I should dig it out for use during the Tour.

UPDATE: That was agonizing to watch.    New wearer of the Maillot Jaune tonight and tomorrow, the Italian Ciccone.

Posted in Just Too Cool | Tagged ,
6 Comments

What the ‘c’atholic Left is up to on Twitter

Like the world, the flesh and devil, the catholic Left never sleeps. They are fierce users of social media. What are they up to today?

Here’s something from relentless self-promoter and catty provocateur, Beans. I’m blocked by Beans, btw.

This is simple nastiness.   Did Beans ever receive a formal mandatum to teach in the Archdiocese of Philadelphia?

A while back Francis gave a reliquary with bones of St. Peter to the Patriarch of Constantinople. Look how this Jesuit member of the New catholic Red Guard interprets the move. I’m blocked by Spadaro, btw. However, everyone can still access the site he personally runs in honor of infamous Italian homosexual writer Pier Vittorio Tondelli.

Did you get that? “Unfettered DISINVESTMENT” … “SYMBOLIC authority”. What the “its” refers to is puzzling, but I think we know what he is driving at.

And what about Jesuit homosexualist James Martin? I think I know the answer: “Render unto Caesar….”, or in other words, “Obey the law.”

We have to be aware of what these corrosive voices incessantly promote.

Posted in Liberals | Tagged , , ,
16 Comments

ASK FATHER: Should Catholic parents attend wedding of daughter outside the Church?

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

Father, should Catholic parents even attend the wedding of their Catholic daughter to a non-Baptized man outside the Church? Unitarian, to be exact.

The father is going to walk his daughter down the aisle, and Catholic family members will attend.

Advice, please for this prevalent situation in this day and age . . .

~ A distraught grandmother ~

Alas, I’ve answered this question many times on this blog.  It is a widespread problem.

I’ll leave aside the issue of dispensations, etc.

There is no “one size fits all” answer.  Every case must be considered according to its own circumstances.  Each family has its own set of dynamics.

While I think that it is possible to attend a shower and a reception in most cases, what about the wedding itself?   It depends.

Must depends on how parents and grandparents and godparents and extended family have lived their Catholic faith and provided a Catholic environment in which children matured.   Did they give their children the Faith?   No? And then are they shocked that they are not living the Faith they never got?

Another point.  Will staying away from the wedding do more harm than good in the relationship insofar as being able to have future influence is concerned?

Perhaps in some distant decade it was easier to form a more standardized answer.  Today, however, I don’t think it is wise or possible.

My advice is, whatever decision you make about attendance, find the best way to keep a strong line of communication open with the couple so that you can still have some influence.

  • Be kind, but be clear.
  • Always express joy about your Catholic Faith and demonstrate it in your own way of living.
  • Be inviting to them about Mass or devotions.
  • Never underestimate the power of an invitation.
  • Be prepared always to answer all manner of questions, concerning doctrine, practices or controversies.
  • Pray for them and offer mortifications for them.  Ask their Guardian Angels to guide them.

Best wishes.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged ,
17 Comments

ASK FATHER: “Funeral Liturgy Outside Mass”

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

Earlier this week, my wife attended what she thought would be a Funeral Mass for a Catholic relative, but was dismayed to find that it was merely a Liturgy of the Word service, followed by schmaltzy songs and a eulogy by a family member (who seemed to have some old scores to settle), all taking place inside the church.

I’d never heard of this kind of service before, but I subsequently
learned that it is called a “Funeral Liturgy Outside Mass”. It seems that this is primarily meant for occasions when it isn’t possible to celebrate Mass, but in this case the priest was present throughout and took part in the lunch afterwards.

My question is this: given that the CCC 1689 emphasizes the centrality of the Eucharist in Catholic funerals for the good of the soul of the departed and the community of the faithful, why is this type of liturgy allowed apart from cases of grave necessity? It disturbs me greatly that this appears to be a common practice, and that many of the faithful go to their rest without the benefit of a Mass.

GUEST PRIEST RESPONSE: Fr. Tim Ferguson

The law is clear in stating that a funeral Mass is the preferred prayer to offer on behalf of the deceased as well as for the spiritual edification and benefit of the mourners. The rite outside of Mass may be used when a funeral Mass is not permitted (i.e., on Holy Days of Obligation, during the Triduum, and on Sundays of Lent, Advent, and Easter), when a priest is not available, or when “for pastoral reasons the pastor and the family judge that the funeral liturgy outside Mass is a more suitable form of celebration.” (c.f. the Order of Christian Funerals, n. 178).

It’s hard to imagine those circumstances when, outside of those times listed, a priest who is available to offer a funeral Mass would opt not to do so. Perhaps if the deceased were a convert and there was some hostility among some family members to the deceased’s Catholic faith (but that would seem to me to be the perfect time to use the funeral liturgy as a means of evangelization!). Perhaps if the priest already had obligations to offer two Masses that day (presuming it was a ferial day) and could not licitly offer a third. Perhaps if the cineplex in town was offering a one-time only showing of Las Noches del Hombre Lobo with Paul Naschy as Count Waldemar Daninsky at 3:00 p.m., and in order to make it to the theatre on time to get a decent box of Raisinets and an RC Cola, a shorter liturgy would be preferable…

Even with the Funeral Liturgy Outside of Mass, there is no rubrical indication permitting eulogies, which are truly foreign to our funeral tradition, though sadly, in some places, they have become commonplace.

Certainly, having a Mass offered for the repose of one’s soul is a most salubrious thing. I would encourage our interlocutor, thus disturbed by the deceased person having been deprived of this benefit, to seek out a good and faithful priest and offer a stipend for a Mass to be said for the repose of his soul.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged , , ,
8 Comments