EWTN: Robert Royal and Fr. Gerald Murray on #AmorisLaetitia

Great commentary about Amoris laetitia from Robert Royal and Fr. Gerald Murray on EWTN.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

At about 20:00 Fr. Murray has gives a fantastic response to Arroyo’s toungue-in-check challenge after reading out a portion of AL 304.

Arroyo from 304-305: “It is reductive simply to consider whether or not an individual’s actions correspond to a general law or rule, because that is not enough to discern and ensure full fidelity to God in the concrete life of a human being….  For this reason, a pastor cannot feel that it is enough simply to apply moral laws to those living in “irregular” situations, as if they were stones to throw at people’s lives. This would bespeak the closed heart of one used to hiding behind the Church’s teachings…. [THEN]  Is that what you are doing Fr. Murray?  Are you hiding behind the Church’s teaching?”

Tune in for Father’s brilliant response.

Posted in The Drill | Tagged , ,
8 Comments

Must Catholic doctrine on marriage now be affirmed by every bishop and bishops conference individually?

At the peculiarly appellated Eponymous Flower there is (in addition to a poll on the sidebar about Amoris laetitia) a piece gleaned from Katholisches.info about a presser held by the honchos of the Spanish Bishops Conference on, yes, Familiaris divortio … ooops … the aforementioned Amoris laetitia.

A couple points:

All participants of the press conference stressed that the Church’s teaching “does not change”. Pope Francis had proposed to the bishops, however, “a new form of application” of this doctrine. The papal letter “recommends,” said Father Julio Martinez, Rector of the Pontifical University of Comillas and the second Jesuit at the conference table, not to divide the world into “Pure and Impure” and not in “good and bad”.

“The full recognition of the Magisterium is not inconsistent with an internal Church debate. We are facing a new style of Magisterium. It is about the harmonious coexistence between salvation and morality [does that mean “sin”? I think he means “sin”.] in order not to fall into a religious rigor.”

With this the Spanish Episcopal Conference seems to acknowledge the softening of the indissolubility of marriage. Because with the aforementioned “universal and equal criteria” that should be given to the priests in guiding, implicitly recognizing that there are situations in which the indissoluble marriage is still dissoluble. At the same time, the Episcopal Conference is trying to prevent anarchic situation that according to Amoris Laetitia, every priest could decide at their own discretion. The Episcopal Conference is expected to draw the question of “general and identical criteria” for the clergy itself.  [So… the Conference is going to draw up criteria by which priests will judge individual cases… hmmm…]

And… something pretty scary.

Pope Francis has burst the door open so that every Episcopal Conference and every diocesan bishop may adopt criteria to allow divorced and remarried to communion. The traditional doctrine must now be confirmed individually by each Episcopal Conference and every diocesan bishop. [AL doesn’t say that, but is that what is going to happen?  Frankly, wouldn’t each parish priest be the Bishops Conference of his own parish?] The probability that there will be at least only one Episcopal Conference or a bishop who softens the indissolubility of sacramental marriage is based on approximately 130 global Episcopal Conferences and Synods of Bishops and nearly 3,000 dioceses is quite likely. In any case, a question valid for the unity of the entire world Church is a question to be answered a hundred times.

Is the “lío” that Pope Francis called for? I honestly don’t know.

One of my interlocutors quipped:

 

 

 

Posted in ¡Hagan lío!, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , ,
7 Comments

This and That. It’s Friday after a bad week!

A few things all stuck together in no particular order.

First, there’s this quote, which I saw recently somewhere.

In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

– George Orwell

Yesterday I saw this on the news.  Holy cow!  Not good. HERE

Meanwhile… in SSPX news….

Fr. Franz Schmidtberger (formerly the SSPS Superior, now seminary Rector) sent out a letter to SSPXers (remember, only priests belong to the SSPX, which is a priestly fraternity) about regularization. HERE He does some Q&A about regularization. Some of it is sharp.

Excerpt:

3) In the future we will have to keep silent about all current errors.

Answer: We will not be silent, more over, we will point out the errors by name. Before and after our normalization. We would like to return from our”exile” in which we are today.
4) The reputation Pope Francis has among Catholics is so bad that recognition for their part would harm rather than benefit the SSPX.

Answer: Since the beginning we differentiated between the office and the person. If Francis is pope , which he is – then he also has the primacy of jurisdiction over the church. Whether he uses (jurisdictional primacy) it for the good of the Church or not. We must follow the path of usefulness for the Church; orient our actions not by human will and God will bless us.

And… ’tis the season.

I just learned that the disc of 13 Hours will be released in early June.

And… I’m not making this up… at Town Hall:

Judge Rules Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster Isn’t a Real Religion

A federal judge in Nebraska has ruled that the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster is not a real religion. [What is this you say?!?] In the case Cavanaugh-v-Bartelt, the justice found that Stephen Cavanaugh, a prisoner in Nebraska, could not use his belief in the Flying Spaghetti Monster as a legitimate claim for religious accommodations.

The Court finds that FSMism is not a “religion” within the meaning of the relevant federal statutes and constitutional jurisprudence. It is, rather, a parody, intended to advance an argument about science, the evolution of life, and the place of religion in public education. Those are important issues, and FSMism contains a serious argument-but that does not mean that the trappings of the satire used to make that argument are entitled to protection as a “religion.”

Cavanaugh tried to claim that his status as a “Pastafarian” entitled him to the rights to wear religious clothing (which the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster describes as a pirate outfit) [YAR!] and to partake in communion (spaghetti and meatballs). A judge rejected these claims as well as his claims that he faced significant burden in practicing his religious beliefs.

The Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster was founded in 2005 as a mockery to attempts to put intelligent design theories in school curriculum. Membership is acquired through the church website.

[…]

I almost wish he’d won.

In honor of this case, guess what I will have for supper tonight!

Posted in Random Thoughts |
5 Comments

Dem Sen. Barbara Boxer attacks Fr. Sirico of Acton Institute for questioning global warming – VIDEO – POLL

I have long contended that Sen. Barbara Boxer may be the dimmest light in that intellectual constellation called the U.S. Senate.  She has competition, I’ll grant.

I saw this at the Daily Caller, which, by the way, has a poll asking if she should apologize to Fr. Sirico.  HERE – Great video below.

Sen. Barbara Boxer Attacks Catholic Priest For Questioning Global Warming [VIDEO]

California Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer went after a Catholic priest in a Wednesday hearing for supposedly questioning the pope’s statements on the dangers of man-made global warming.

“So do you disagree with the pope when he says that climate change is one of the biggest issues,” Boxer asked Father Robert Sirico of the conservative Acton Institute.

“I’m very grateful for your defense of the pope. Perhaps not in all of his magisterial authority and the cherry-picking of this or that,” Sirico tried to respond before being interrupted by Boxer.

“I can ask you what I want,” she said. “Do you disagree with the pope on climate change, it’s a simple yes or no.”

Boxer, who is Jewish, was trying to get Sirico to say he disagreed with the pope on global warming. Last year, Pope Francis published an encyclical blaming humans for global warming and calling the Earth “an immense pile of filth.”

Environmentalists and Democrats were overjoyed with the encyclical. Former Vice President Al Gore even said he could convert to Catholicism because of the pope’s global warming activism.

Francis’s encyclical was not well-received by more conservative Catholics in the U.S., who saw it as out of place for the pontiff to speak out on a scientific issue — let alone an issue he was advised on by academics who support population control.

“When the pope says things that have to do with science, he does not speak from the magisterial authority of the church. When he speaks on moral issues, such as abortion and contraception and the like, then he speaks on magisterial authority,” Sirico responded before again being interrupted.

“So who’s cherry-picking?” Boxer said. “You’re saying that when the planet is facing all these problems, it’s not a moral issue.”

“I never said that,” Sirico said. “Where did I say that? Could you give me that quotation, senator?”

“You just said it, sir,” she said. “Sir, you receive money form the Koch brothers, from Exxon, you disagree with the pope… I think you ought to have a talk with Reverend Nelson.”

“Who is by the way, not a scientist,” Sirico responded.
Boxer was referring to the the Presbyterian minister who also paneled the hearing. Nelson told Congress he’s worry about global warming’s impacts and encouraged policymakers to push more wind and solar energy onto the grid.

“[T]here is no greater measure of God’s abundant provision than that of the energy provided by the sun and wind,” Nelson said, according to his prepared remarks.

You simply have to watch this.   The video has more than the article. Note how spectacularly RUDE she is.  Also, note how at the beginning the philosopher eviscerates her.  She didn’t react well.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Boxer is rude and should apologize.  HERE

16_04_15_Boxer_00

As of 1900 GMT:

16_04_15_Boxer_01

UPDATE:

Shall we have a count-down to when “The Wile E. Coyote of contemporary liberal Catholicism” jumps in with venom at the Fishwrap to champion the Senator for her insights and moral superiority over ACTON INSTITUTE?

 

 

 

Posted in ACTION ITEM! | Tagged , , , ,
22 Comments

In the wake of #AmorisLaetitia (aka #FamiliarisDivortio )

The other day I wryly wrote about what may take place in the wake of the now Post-Synodal Apostolic Letter Amoris laetitia (aka Familiaris divortio):

Benedict, in Summorum, emancipated both the older form of Mass and priests who say it!

With Amoris laetitia, Francis too has done something to emancipate priests from their bishops!

If by Summorum Pontificum the Pope laid down that priests can do something and their bishops have no say about it, then so too the Pope laid down something in Amoris laetitia and, again, bishops can’t do anything about it.

In the case of Summorum, priests can say the traditional Roman Rite’s Mass, etc., and bishops can’t stop them because the Pope said so.

In the case of Amoris, priests can now, it seems, tell people in the confessional that they can do whatever the hell they want, and bishops can’t stop them because the Pope said so.

What game changer. Now and in the future, sooooo many bishops try rein in their errant liberal priests as they hear confessions …. right? But, “NO!”, the priests will say, “Pope Francis says I can!”

As libs are reasoning now, Amoris is the huge game changer. Rules are out! Mercy is in! Who needs the laws of God and the perennial teaching of Holy Church? Priests can now affirm everyone’s conscience just as they are in the internal forum and no bishop can stop them!

Here are some things I have spotted as the division is rapidly growing.

First, there is a horrid piece in the LA Times about the Letter, filled with half-truths. Note:

So do remarried divorcees now get Communion or not?
Yes. And then again no. It is going to depend on your priest. [See what I mean?]

Francis states in The Joy of Love that he is not tearing up any rules, or writing any new ones, but says a little wiggle room is in order if people deserve it, [?] and that will be down to the good judgment of priests.

“It is possible that in an objective situation of sin,” he writes, a person can be helped to live in God’s grace, and in certain cases, “this can include the help of the sacraments.”  [This is from the Imfamous Footnote 351.]

Explaining who priests will give the nod to, [how condescending] Francis lists “unjustly abandoned” spouses, people remarrying for the sake of their children and anyone who is really sure their “previous and irreparably broken marriage had never been valid.”  [THEY don’t get to be the judges of that!]

See what’s happening here?  Doctrine and discipline effectively mean nothing and people can do whatever the hell they want. Bishops aren’t any longer able to make an impact on what their priests do.

Today I received this from a priest friend who works in a Tribunal:

I’ll bet he’s not the only one.

Again, I choose to read Amoris as a two-fold exhortation to even greater compassion than the great compassion which faithful priests have been and are showing to couples in scare-quotes situations (“irregular”), and to dissidents to conform their minds and pastoral practice to the teachings and laws of the Church as they still stand.

Friends, it is going to take immense resolve to stand strong in the face of the onslaught that is coming.   Begin to think about your spiritual lives in a new way and plan to include mortifications and acts of reparation for the sacrileges that will increase.  If you are confirmed, ponder deeply the effects of the sacrament.  If you are not confirmed, think about asking to be confirmed.

The moderation queue is ON.

Posted in Hard-Identity Catholicism, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices, The Olympian Middle | Tagged , ,
28 Comments

Wry observations about #AmorisLaetitia (aka Familiaris divortio) to make a point

First, we have now a nickname for the new Letter.

Familiaris divortio

Thanks to The Great Roman™!

Next, I am gobsmacked by something I heard.   US radio talk show host Michael Savage has been reading – on air – portions of Amoris laetitia.  He loves it!  Be clear: he has commented with brutality on Pope Francis’ notions about economy and the environment.  Savage does not like this Pope at all! But, Savage is positively impressed by Amoris laetitia on marriage!  I am looking for the podcasts.

Also, remember waaaaay back when … when Summorum Pontificum was issued in 2007?  It seems an age of the world ago, doesn’t it.

At that time I wrote that this was the first document in who knows how long that actually did something for priests.  Summorum Pontificum takes priests seriously.  For a change, Benedict did something positive and constructive to build up priests, instead of the incessant, obsessive focus on bishops ever since Vatican II’s Christus Dominus.

Benedict, in Summorum, emancipated both the older form of Mass and priests who say it!

With Amoris laetitia, Francis too has done something to emancipate priests from their bishops!

If by Summorum Pontificum the Pope laid down that priests can do something and their bishops have no say about it, then so too the Pope laid down something in Amoris laetitia and, again, bishops can’t do anything about it.

In the case of Summorum, priests can say the traditional Roman Rite’s Mass, etc., and bishops can’t stop them because the Pope said so.

In the case of Amoris, priests can now, it seems, tell people in the confessional that they can do whatever the hell they want, and bishops can’t stop them because the Pope said so.

What game changer.  Now and in the future, sooooo many bishops try rein in their errant liberal priests as they hear confessions …. right?  But, “NO!”, the priests will say, “Pope Francis says I can!”

As libs are reasoning now, Amoris is the huge game changer.  Rules are out! Mercy is in!  Who needs the laws of God and the perennial teaching of Holy Church?  Priests can now affirm everyone’s conscience just as they are in the internal forum and no bishop can stop them!

Similarly, as libs want to point out, very few people go to the Traditional Latin Mass since Summorum Pontificum!  

But wait!

Are liberals or fallen away Catholics or people in “irregular” relationships beating down doors to get into confessionals?

Maybe we don’t have such a big problem and not much has changed after all.

….

Okay… I’m sure that, by now, you figured out what I was doing there.

Amoris laetitia is, literally, an exhortation.  It prompts all of us, especially priests, both to compassion for people in rough times and (in the case of liberals and dissenters) to fidelity to the Church’s teaching as it stood before and still stands now.   Everything of value in Amoris has been said before.  Anyone who appeals to the compassion and mercy dimension of the Letter without also adhering to the truth of Catholic teaching that stands now as it has always stood is a hypocrite.  There is no true compassion and mercy in dissent from the Church’s teachings or in the breaking of her clearly promulgated laws, which uphold and defend those teachings.

Posted in Lighter fare, You must be joking! | Tagged , , ,
1 Comment

I have been remiss… cool stuff I have seen and received!

Lot’s of people send me stuff… to peddle for them, obviously. While I can’t do everything, I can occasionally bring some things to your attention.

Fathers… remember Agnus Dei Incense and Altar Breads. HERE

Here is something nice.

For scale.

And there is the spectacular BEER from the Benedictine Monks at Norcia!

Check our birranursia.com.  And, they have an American Online Store. Moreover, you can enroll yourself, or your parish priest!, in the Brewmonks’ Club.

But what is this I see?   Spiffy coasters on which to place your suds.

img_2797.jpg

And there are these great new editions of classics from Baronius Press.   They are beautifully bound.  Go HERE for more!

They are still in their plastic here.  There is a ribbon.

The great monks at Silverstream Priory have made beautiful altar cards!



I’m going to have these framed.

Also remember the great altar cards from SPORCH!

And have I mentioned the ULTIMATE Priest’s Gift – Super Cool Portable Altar lately?  St. Joseph’s Apprentice!

I was visiting a priest friend… he has a cool salt gun.  I blasts puffs of salt ostensibly to kill flies.   It could shoot Blessed Salt at demons.

And, as always, remember the wonderful Soap Sisters?

And…

Do explore some of the ads on my side bar.

And… please… remember to use my search box if you are going to purchase anything through Amazon.  That really helps a lot.

UPDATE:

This came today. A cook book put together by the PONTIFICAL SWISS GUARD!

USA HERE – UK HERE

ITALY HERE

Posted in Just Too Cool, The Campus Telephone Pole |
19 Comments

‘Behind the door was a painting that the owners did not know about.’

For your Just Too Cool file.

So, you want to fix a leak in your roof.  You go upstairs and discover what might be a long-lost 400 year old painting by Michelangelo Merisi, Caravaggio, worth about $140 million.

The subject of the painting is Judith Beheading Holofernes. I once gave a talk at the Detroit Institute of Art and spoke about this theme. There are quite a few depictions in paint from this era.

From the Daily Mail:

French family who wanted to fix their leaky attic find long-lost £100m Caravaggio masterpiece (with a very grisly subject matter)

A 400-year-old painting that might have been executed by Italian master Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio has been found in an attic in southern France. [in 2014 as it turns out]
Eric Turquin, the French expert who retrieved the painting two years ago, says it is in an exceptional state of conservation and estimates its value at 120 million euros (about £100m).
The picture, whose authenticity has not been established, had been left for more than 150 years in a property in the outskirts of Toulouse.
Called ‘Judith Beheading Holofernes,’ it depicts the biblical heroine Judith beheading an Assyrian general, and is thought to have been painted in Rome circa 1604-05.
Judith, a widow, was said to have seduced Holofernes before getting him drunk and killing him with his own sword.
Typically for a Caravaggio painting, it is the moment of the greatest dramatic impact – the decapitation itself – that it depicted.
Fitting with his mastery of light and shadow, which the Italian developed into a technique known as chiaroscuro, the painting is dramatically lit from the side to emphasise the facial expressions of the murderer and her maid, Abra.
Mr Turquin told a press conference today that there ‘will never be a consensus’ about the name of the artist.

[…]

Eric Turquin, an art expert in Paris, said the unidentified Toulouse family were investigating water damage and needed to access a roof. He said: ‘They broke a door which they did not have a key to,’ said Mr Turquin. ‘Behind the door was a painting that the owners did not know about’.

It’s a little hard to tell from this photo.  It doesn’t seem as well executed – *cough* – as one might expect.

Here’s an authenticated Caravaggio in Rome:

Very cool. Everyone… check all the doors in your house.

My favorite depictions of Judith, who gets a whole book in the Bible, by the way, are by Artemisia, who was strongly influenced by Caravaggio.  She did several versions, oneof which is in Detroit, my favorite… note the bending candle flame, the zig-zag lines of her arms and the blade and the arms of the servant, like the sawing that just took place…

Judith-with-the-Head-of-Holofernes-Artemisia-Gentileschi

And…

In Florence, at the Piazza della Signoria, you can see Donatello’s version, which probably has political overtones, as do the other statues there… facing Rome…

Lucas Cranach was a little less savage…

Klimt, whom I don’t like very much, frankly – he was a seriously weird guy – has a version.  Look it up yourselves.

And then there’s Botticelli, with those typically dainty footsteps.

But I digress.

In other artsy news, on this day in 1870, the Metropolitan Museum of Art was formally established. HERE

I will be able to visit the Met again soon, during an enforced exile from The Cupboard Under The Stairs. The Powers That Be are shutting down the power that is for some four days, and so I have to take a hike. I’m heading to NYC for R&R.

Posted in Just Too Cool | Tagged , ,
9 Comments

ACTION ITEM UPDATE! Pontifical Vestments Project new PHOTOS

I have posted about our Society’s project to have a full Pontifical set of vestments made in glorious red silk damask with bright gold serpentine column trim. I posted photos of the fabric being cut at Gammarelli in Rome and have other shots of the purple set to give you an idea of what we are making.  HERE

We will use these at least for 1 July, the Feast of the Most Precious Blood.  I would like to use them also for Pentecost.

At my request, I just received a few more photos from Gammarelli of the progress being made on the vestments.

This looks as if they are sewing trim onto a dalmatic.

16_04_13_vestments_02

It seems that they are almost finished!

16_04_13_vestments_01  16_04_13_vestments_03 16_04_13_vestments_04

I will have to pay for these soon. Right now the dollar is still strong against the euro, so we would like to get this going fast.  So, please donate!

I have started a GOFUNDME campaign.

Your donations will go to the Tridentine Mass Society of Madison, a 501(c)(3) charitable organization, and they are tax deductible.

CLICK HERE

Link to share this on your own blogs: https://www.gofundme.com/tutxmfak

You can choose that your name does NOT appear online in the list of donors.

 

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Si vis pacem para bellum!, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged ,
6 Comments

Beaten down. Demoralized. Confused. Frustrated. Let us now get up off the ground.

I’ve had a tough few days.  How ’bout you?

Conversations with friends and priests suggest that the Devil is working really hard right now to demoralize the Team.

And there is Amoris laetitia with its Infamous Footnote 351 (et al.) and the fallout which is on going.   So many people are frustrated, confused, beaten down.

This morning for Mass I read again the prayer for the 2nd Sunday after Easter in the traditional Roman Rite, a very ancient prayer:

Deus, qui Filii tui humilitate iacentem mundum erexisti: fidelibus tuis sanctam concede laetitiam; ut, quos perpetuae mortis eripuisti casibus, gaudiis facias perfrui sempiternis.

Namely…

O God, who raised up a fallen world by the abasement of Your Son, grant holy joy to Your faithful; so that You may cause those whom You snatched from the misfortunes of perpetual death, to enjoy delights unending.

The great L&S indicates that erigo, giving us erexisti, means “to raise up, set up, erect” and, analogously, “to arouse, excite” and “cheer up, encourage.” The verb iaceo (in the L&S find this under jaceo) has many meanings, such as “to lie” as in “lie sick or dead, fallen” and also “to be cast down, fixed on the ground” and “to be overcome, despised, idle, neglected, unemployed.” Humilitas is “lowness”. In Blaise/Dumas, humilitas has a more theological meaning in the “abasement” of the God Incarnate who took the form of a “slave” (cf. Philippians 2:7). Blaise/Dumas cites this Collect in the entry for humilitas.

Our Collect views us, views material creation, as an enervated body, wounded, weakened by sin, lying near death in the dust whence it came.

Beaten down.  Demoralized.  Confused.  Frustrated.

Because of the Fall, the whole cosmos was put under the bondage of the Enemy, the “prince of this world” (cf. John 10:31 and 14:30). This is why when we bless certain things, and baptize people, there was an exorcism first, to rip the object or person from the grip of the world’s “prince” and give it to the King. God is liberator. He rouses us up from being prone upon the ground. He grasps us, pulling us upward out of sin and death. He directs us again toward the joys possible in this world, first, and then definitively in the next.

We must get back to our feet: rise again.

Our Savior rose for this reason.

In many of our ancient Roman prayers we find a pattern of descent and ascent, of exit and return, exitus and reditus, proodos and epistrophe.

Before the Resurrection there is the Passion.

Before exaltation there is humiliation.

The descent, exit, Passion and humiliation bring an even more exalted joy which will embrace the entirety of man in both soul and body, the interior and the outward human person.

Are you frustrated and anxious?  Let us now get up off the ground.

Consider the beauty of a soul in the state of grace.

The baptized Christian is a Temple of the Holy Spirit, resplendent with Gifts and Fruits.   When deepened in the Sacrament of Confirmation we are made strong to stand up, first on our knees and then on our feet, though the world, the flesh and the Devil beat us down.  Nourished with the Eucharist and polished with the performance of works of mercy, we are soldiers arrayed in the armor of God’s light.  We can ask the Father many things in the Lord’s name and we can ask them with confidence.

Let not your heart be troubled. … Amen, amen, I say to you, he that believeth in me, the works that I do, he also shall do: and greater than these shall he do. Because I go to the Father: and whatsoever you shall ask the Father in my name, that will I do: that the Father may be glorified in the Son. If you shall ask me any thing in my name, that I will do. … Peace I leave with you: my peace I give unto you: not as the world giveth, do I give unto you. Let not your heart be troubled: nor let it be afraid.

Posted in ¡Hagan lío!, Our Catholic Identity, Si vis pacem para bellum!, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices |
42 Comments