Archd. Philadelphia: Catholic High School might wrestle girl in tourney

How stupid do things have to get before we either come to our senses and start behaving normally or have violent whiplashes?

From CBS in Philly.

Catholic League Wrestler Will Not Wrestle Girl In District Tournament

PHILADELPHIA (CBS) — After the Philadelphia Archdiocese revised its rule and for the first time was going to allow a Catholic league male wrestler to take on a female wrestler, a new development has switched things up.  [The Archdiocese revised its rule?]

Another wrestler had to drop out of the tournament. Now, Tatyana Ortiz, from Mariana Bracetti Charter School, will take on a male from the public league.

For Catholic high schools in Philadelphia, men and women competing in contact sports has been a no-no. That rule almost meant a potentially career-ending forfeit for Tim McCall this weekend.

That is until a surprising change of heart.

Eyewitness News reached out to the Philadelphia Archdiocese earlier in the week and prompted this response:

“The decision to take part in any post season individual championship PIAA wrestling match will be at the discretion of the individual student and his parents.” – Ken Gavin, Archdiocese of Philadelphia Spokesperson.

Meaning Tim McCall could wrestle Tatyana Ortiz after all. But again, with the bracket revision, she will now take on a boy from the public league instead of Father Judge’s McCall.

Who thinks this is a dreadful idea?

What does a guy do in a situation like this?   Go into the ring and bust her in half?  Would that be right?   Go into the ring and risk losing because you can’t do what is necessary to win and still be … decent?

I am reminded of Chariots of Fire… of Sandy Koufax….

Posted in Pò sì jiù, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices, You must be joking! | Tagged
30 Comments

Super Good News!

I just had some super news – truly – about a great development for the New Evangelization.

I can’t say what it is yet because the right people have to make this public.  Still it is exciting enough that I want to say something good happened and then ask…

… do you have good news?

I know I asked recently.

Posted in Just Too Cool, New Evangelization, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM |
35 Comments

ASK FATHER: Must sterilized couple seek reversal?

From a reader…

With contraception back in the news, a hypothetical question came to my mind. If a couple that has sterilized themselves converts to the faith, what would the church require of them? Contraceptive marital acts are immoral, so would the church require them to abstain from marital acts? To get the sterilization reversed (which can be cost prohibitive)? Or would the church see it more as a medical condition (albeit one that the couple brought upon themselves)?

Having repented of their sinful actions and having confessed their sins and having received absolution, they may receive Holy Communion and continue in their vocations to help each other get to heaven.

Now that the sterilization is a fact, they are not obliged to seek a reversal of the procedure. It is praiseworthy that they do and they may, but they are not strictly obliged.  It is now and existing condition and they are not strictly obliged to reverse it.

They may engage in marital relations.

It seems to me that it would be good for that couple to live a continent life and pay close attention to penances and mortifications in an ongoing way.

At this point it is necessary to remind people that God cannot be fooled.   Someone who would go in for a sterilization thinking “I’ll just confess it later and I am off the hook for good!” would be committing a truly appalling sin.  Such an attitude would be perilous indeed and I would tremble for such a person’s fate.  It shows a callousness about God’s mercy that might verge on being unforgivable without a sincere and deep conversion.

There is nothing that we poor little mortals can do that is so bad that God will not forgive it and remove the stain of the sin from our souls in confession provided that we are truly sorry and that we intend to amend our lives.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, One Man & One Woman | Tagged
10 Comments

ASK FATHER: A committed Church of England man, Steve, married Jenny…

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

A committed Church of England man, Steve, married Jenny, a Catholic who had baptism, 1st communion, confirmation in the Faith. She in full knowledge of her large Catholic family did not seek a dispensation for their wedding in a CofE church. She has blocked their 2 children from being baptized in the CofE but didn’t agree to Steve’s suggestion of baptism in a Catholic church. She never moved away from her family geographically or emotionally. Jenny only ever goes to church some distance away from her home area. He has been a good father and husband, but she is now suing for divorce. No 3rd parties are involved. He is quite rich and suspects an in-law conspiracy, especially after I told him of Catholic marriage law – English non-Catholics really do not know any problems can possibly exist. As a Catholic in those circumstances, can Jenny be accused of entering into the marriage in bad faith?

Cutting through all this drama…

As Catholics, we are obliged to follow the Church’s laws on marriage. If we (or rather you, since my attempt at marriage would be invalid for other reasons, can. 1087), marry outside the Church without a dispensation, the marriage is not valid.

In this case, regardless of whether Jenny entered into her union with Steve out of good faith, or bad faith, or a mix of the two, the marriage is invalid in the eyes of the Church because one party was Catholic and did not observe canonical form.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Canon Law, One Man & One Woman | Tagged , ,
4 Comments

Dissident priest’s talks cancelled in diocese

Here’s some good news!  Via Church Militant.

His Excellency Most Reverend Michael Burbidge, Bishop of Raleigh, has forbidden a dissident priest from talking at a Catholic institution in the diocese.

Bishop Michael Burbidge is rescinding an invitation to Fr. Michael Crosby, OFM Cap
RALEIGH, N.C. (ChurchMilitant.com) – The head of the Raleigh diocese is rescinding a speaking invitation to a dissident priest.

Father Michael Crosby, a Franciscan priest well known for dissenting on Church teaching with regard to clerical celibacy, female ordination and homosexuality, was scheduled to give a Lenten mission at St. Stephen the First Martyr parish in Sanford March 12–16.

He was going to be the homilist for the weekend English Masses, and then give talks for the following three days. The title of his mission was “Obstacles and Occasions of Grace to Fulfill the Great Command.”

Earlier this week, ChurchMilitant.com contacted Bp. Michael Burbidge, head of the Raleigh diocese, to inquire about the event. Thursday morning, we received an email from William Atwell, diocesan communications director, informing us that Fr. Crosby’s speaking engagement was being canceled.

“We have reviewed this matter with all appropriate parties,” Atwell stated, “with the result being that Father Crosby will not be speaking in the Diocese of Raleigh.”

[…]

Fr. Z kudos.

There are still reassuring indications of sanity in some places.

Posted in Brick by Brick, Fr. Z KUDOS, Liberals | Tagged , , ,
17 Comments

ASK FATHER: “My Lord and my God!” at the elevation

elevation mass host 05From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

I’ve been reading the Celebration of Mass by J.B. o Connell and at the section concerning the consecration of the Host O’Connell writes that a priest should not say a vocal prayer at the elevation, obviously, but the annotation on the bottom of the page continues to say that the priest should not even say “my lord and my God” in a low voice (and implied even saying it mentally) as to be in accordance with the (old) canon law (818, to be exact). So my question(s) are bit of a tricky one. Can a priest say the ejaculation now that we don’t follow the old code? Is the old code still valid? Does it affect the Mass if it is?

The old Code is not in force now.  That doesn’t mean that it doesn’t contain good guidance in many matters.

If you flip open the pages of the Missale Romanum to the consecration you will not find any indication that the priest must, can, should, could, may add his own prayers during the elevation. Unless you are a Fishwrap reader, most would agree that the two-fold consecration and elevation is a pretty important part of Mass. As such it deserves precision and restraint. Father shouldn’t impose his own devotional practices on everyone present when the rubrics themselves give indications of what he should do in favor of the devotion of the faithful.  This is a greater danger in, I think, the Novus Ordo, which has an inherent looseness born of optionitis and which is mostly celebrated versus populum, which can lead a priest to drift into exhibitionism.

That said, there are a lot of things that are left undescribed in the Missale Romanum, such as how long an elevation ought to be.  There is a bit of room for personal choices even at this moment.  I admit to varying the length of elevations, depending on the occasion and mood and my sense of how Mass is proceeding.

It seems to me that if Holy Mass is celebrated ad orientem, where there is little chance that the congregation will see that the priest is saying something during the elevation – which could lead to distraction, confusion, questions, speculation, imitation, etc. – not much harm is done were a priest to say or mouth the words, “My Lord and my God!” Just why he would think it so important to utter them aloud at that moment is not clear to me.  I would like to think that most priests are capable of thinking something without actually having to say it aloud.

Over the years I’ve been able to summon the self-control to think “My Lord and my God!” during the elevation, and ponder the weight of the moment and reality, without saying anything aloud.  Yes, yes… it strains credulity. We all know clerics who suffer from a version of ecclesiastical Tourette’s.

The wisdom of our forebears should inform our choices in these matters. They were experts on humanity, after all. If they said DON’T do this, there are good reasons.

So, in this case, Say The Black, Don’t Say The Stuff That’s Not There, Do The Red.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Mail from priests, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , ,
11 Comments

The Girl Scouts, Cookies, and an Archbishop. Fr. Z opines.

The Girl Scouts have gone crazy, which was predictable.  Too bad.

 

His Excellency Most Reverend Robert Carlson, Archbishop of St. Louis has cautioned the faithful under his charge about involvement with the Girl Scouts.  Material has been posted on the archdiocesan website.

Of course one of the questions at this time of year will be…

Can I still buy Girl Scout Cookies?

Each person must act in accord with their conscience. It is also our duty to form our consciences and learn the issues. Here are a few things to consider when making your decision:

There is a licensing fee attached to each box of Girl Scout cookies produced, paid to GSUSA. Licensing fees paid to GSUSA on all trademarked Girl Scout items (cookies, Girl Scout curriculum books and badges, ice creams, coffee creamers, etc.) amounts to millions of dollars every year. (See: Does any of the money from cookie sales go to Girl Scouts of the USA?) On average, only 10-20% of the total cookie revenue remains with the troop selling the cookies. (See: How can I be sure that Girl Scout Cookie Program revenue supports the local Girl Scouts in my community?)

We echo the statement of Girl Scouts of Eastern Missouri, that it is important not to debate these issues with individual girls who are selling cookies.  These conversations must “remain among adults”.

I’ll say this.

I won’t buy their cookies.  Ever.

Also, I would never think of explaining why to one of the girls selling them.   “No thanks.  Not today”, is enough.  I might to an aggressive mother apart from the kids.  There are a bunch of them with the bairn array in my local grocery store.  I get to walk past them often.

 

Posted in Our Catholic Identity, Sin That Cries To Heaven, The Drill |
41 Comments

Fr. H to Fr. L with Fr. Z – “Latin Mass”

My friend Fr. Richard Heilman has a good post at his place, Roman Catholic Man.

Fr. Heilman responded to something asserted by Fr. Dwight Longenecker at Pathet… at Patheos. HERE Fr. Longenecker writes: Is the Latin Mass the Magic Bullet? The title is somewhat confused, since he clearly means the Traditional Latin Mass, in the Extraordinary Form. Latin Mass can and should also indicate the Novus Ordo as well. But I digress.

Fr. L:

While I support those who promote the Latin Mass, I must say that I find it odd that some of them seem to think the answer to all the church’s problems is more reverence at Mass. I think this is mistaking the symptom for the disease.
The problems in the Catholic church are not due to lack of reverence at Mass. The lack of reverence at Mass is due to the problems in the church.

To which, Fr. H:

Reverent Masses are not the magic bullet, Fr. Longenecker contends. I could not disagree more. I have watched and heard from countless people who tell their stories of having had a complete conversion, once exposed to a heavenly, sacred and reverent Mass. Virtually all of them speak of being agnostic, at best, until they were exposed to the “true beauty and reverence” of the Mass as it should be offered. In that moment, they talk about a light going on inside them, and they knew (and I will paraphrase here) that they had been making their faith “no big deal,” but now they have truly recognized God in these Masses (for the first time), and now they knew this was a “very big deal.”

Be sure the read both offerings in their entirety. The brief excerpts point to the content of each but there is more to be said.

I add this.

No initiative we undertake in the Church, in any of the Church’s spheres of activity, will bear good and lasting fruit unless we revitalize our sacred liturgical worship of God. Everything starts there. Everything returns there. Revitalization of our liturgical worship is the first act of New Evangelization. It is the best means of communication and evangelization both ad intra and ad extra.

This is why we need the Extraordinary Form far and wide, often and everywhere.

Apart from the fact that the Traditional Latin Mass is in itself pleasing to God, from a practical viewpoint, its knock on effects are manifold.  I have enumerated them here on many an occasion and need not recite them again.

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Mail from priests, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices |
30 Comments

“Brain death” apparently not so dead as some would like

Be sure to read what I have posted in the past about PVS patients, people in a “Persistent Vegetative State”.  HERE

Especially, I urge you to look at this article.

Read everything and THINK about end of life decisions.

And remember…

I have written many times about planning for the end of your life, especially about having the last sacraments.

From the American Thinker:

Myth of ‘brain death’ exposed in Michigan

“Brain death” sounds so scientific when uttered by a medical authority, an indication that the real life of a patient is over.  But it is a judgment call with so little scientific basis that (via the New York Post):

A 14-year-old girl wounded during the shooting rampage in Kalamazoo, Mich., was declared brain-dead and about to have her organs harvested when she suddenly showed signs of life, according to a new report Monday.

The girl remained hospitalized in critical condition and “fighting for her life,” ABC News said.

Michigan State Police Lt. Dale Hinz told ABC that the girl’s family said Bronson Methodist Hospital was preparing to remove the girl’s organs for donation when she squeezed her distraught mom’s hand.

The girl squeezed her mother’s hand again when the mom asked if her daughter could hear her, Hinz said.

She also gave thumbs-up signs with both hands when a doctor asked her to give him a thumbs-up if she could hear him, Hinz said.

Keep in mind when you read about “brain death” that hospitals dread the prospect of expensive long-term treatment to maintain the lives of severely injured patients with brain injuries, while the prospect of organ harvesting offers the opportunity to perform glamorous transplants and help patients with good prospects of recovery.  This is not to say it is exclusively a financial consideration, but rather that perspectives are influenced by these considerations.

“Brain death” is a term that is entirely misleading in its pretense of finality, as this tragic case in Kalamazoo proves.  It is time to euthanize its use.

Go to confession.

Posted in GO TO CONFESSION, The Coming Storm, The Drill | Tagged , ,
39 Comments

5 Facts about the Little Sisters of the Poor SCOTUS case

From the Becket Fund For Religious Liberty:

Dear Friends,
The world watched while the Pope, during his US tour, made a surprise visit to the Sisters “in support of the Sisters’ legal fight.” As you may know, on Holy Wednesday, March 23, the Supreme Court is scheduled to hear Little Sisters of the Poor case in Zubik v. Burwell—a case that also includes several other ministries.

I am writing today to invite you to visit our new resources on this case:
• Website: New website that explains the case: thelittlesistersofthepoor.com
• Rally: On March 23, there will be a rally in front of the Supreme Court. For rally coordination details, please contact Meg McDonnell at Women Speak for Themselves.
• Meet the Little Sisters in this series of 90 second videos.

The fate of the Little Sisters is the fate of all Americans. I hope you will partner with us in educating the public about the importance of this case and in fighting for religious liberty!

FIVE FACTS ABOUT THE LITTLE SISTERS’ SUPREME COURT CASE

1. 1 in 3 Americans are not even covered by the mandate HHS is fighting so hard to force the Little Sisters to follow.
2. Exxon, Chevron, and Pepsi—as well as other large corporations—are exempt from the mandate, because they never changed their plans and are “grandfathered.” Family plans with the U.S. military, the largest employer in the world, are also exempted.
3. If the Little Sisters do not provide these services, the government is threatening to fine them with $70 million in fines per year.
4. This case does not endanger or affect the Affordable Care Act (ACA). It only deals with a regulation created by an agency—Health and Human Services—which would force the Sisters to provide services like the week after pill, ella, to its employees.
5. The government claims it offered them an “opt out.” The Sisters wish that were true. The government’s plan is an “opt in” that uses the Little Sisters’ healthcare plan. This is why the government insists it needs the Sisters’ signature.

Learn more at thelittlesistersofthepoor.com.

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras, Liberals, Religious Liberty, SCOTUS, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , , , , , , ,
8 Comments