Wherein Fr. Z praises Jamie Manson of the Fishwrap

Over at Fishwrap, Jamie Manson deserves our praise.

Are are shocked?

Our Jamie seems to be the only one over there who isn’t in denial about Pope Francis!

See her piece (I am not making this up):

Time to face facts: Pope Francis agrees with the doctrinal assessment of LCWR

Take away quote:

The similarities between Francis’ quotes and Müller’s statement demonstrate clearly that Müller’s talking points are coming directly from the pope.

She gets it!

Jamie is the first one to cross the finish line among the contributors to the National Schismatic Reporter. It took her a while, but she did it.

Fr Z Kudos to Jamie!

Posted in Fr. Z KUDOS, Francis, Liberals, The future and our choices | Tagged , , ,
6 Comments

Eucharistic Procession at St. Paul’s at Harvard

Some years ago I was hanging around outside the Paul VI audience hall (Vatican) during a plenary session of the Italian Bishops Conference. I was waiting for my bishop to emerge. As I waited I chatted with fellow journalists, the bishops’ drivers and secretaries, a couple bishops who had fled the hall in the despair of boredom. The day before, I had been to a Eucharistic procession held by the Teutonic College, next to the Paul VI Hall, that went up through the Vatican gardens. Swiss Guards carried the canopy. Deep in his chest one old bishop rumbled:

“Meno chiacchiere – più processioni. … Less jabbering – more processions.”

Perfect.

This isn’t rocket science.

I received some photos of a Eucharistic procession from the chapel at MIT in Boston to St. Paul’s at Harvard.

My correspondent wrote:

Just a few pictures from the Eucharistic procession from MIT to Harvard last night. Turnout was amazing; St. Paul church was literally overflowing into the street.

I was at that church just over a year ago to sing a Mass and give a talk sponsored by the group Iuventutem.  It was a great experience.

Here are some images of their procession.

More photos HERE including one with them passing by a McDonald’s.

Posted in Just Too Cool, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices | Tagged , ,
23 Comments

ASK FATHER: A dying man’s confession, death and YOU.

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

My father-in-law recently passed away. Before he died, he received Last Rites and a confession, but my wife is concerned about the validity of the confession. He suffered from a couple of strokes before he died, which took away his ability to speak. Can one make a valid confession without being able to speak? Your thoughts would be appreciated.

I think you can all be at ease.  If the man received “Last Rites”, by which I think you mean that he was also anointed after being given the opportunity to confess, he was probably in pretty good shape to meet his Lord.

In normal circumstances, that is when a person is not dying, non-verbal communication is okay for making a confession.  If a person has to write something, or indicate only by signs, perhaps as responses to questions, that’s okay.  That is valid matter for the sacrament.

If a person is dying, however, it is possible to absolve the person even if he is unable to speak.  The priest can ask for some sort of non-verbal sign.  “Are you are truly sorry for all your sins? Do you love God and ask for His grace and mercy?  Nod your head… squeeze my hand… blink your eyes….”  Priests know what to do in these cases.

Even if the person cannot respond, the Sacrament of Anointing also has the power to forgive sins which the dying person cannot confess.

I think we all remember the moving scene in Evelyn Waugh’s Brideshead Revisited with the priest finally gets in to see Lord Marchmain as he is dying. [I added a video clip, below.]

The last moments of life are mysterious.  It is hard to know what goes on during those last breaths between the soul and God.  I imagine that stupendous graces are offered.  We trust in His great mercy.

That said, dear readers, it is likely that most people die much as they have lived.

We develop habits throughout a lifetime.  We accustom ourselves to turn to God to ask for mercy or, on the other hand, not to think much about God at all.

Do not… do not… presume that God’s mercy will be given to you automatically, without you doing your part to prepare for your own death.

Do not be presumptuous.

We have this lifetime to prepare for the moment when we come before the Lord and receive His judgment.

Foster habits of prayer and of life which will make you more and more conscious of God’s love and mercy.

In our death, His justice we are going to get whether we want it or not.  But, in this life, His mercy is always there for the asking.

Listen, people.  You may die suddenly, in a place and time that you cannot anticipate.  Death can come from any direction and in any moment.  Read the papers and watch the news.  It is always somebody else… until it is YOU.

For good reason we Catholics have for centuries prayed in the Litany:

“A subitanea et improvisa morte… From a sudden and unprovided death, spare us O Lord.”

A sudden death can be a blessing. A sudden and unprovided death – death without recourse to the Sacraments – is a frightening prospect.

When it is your time, you may not be anywhere near a priest.  Got that?

Examine your consciences and, regularly, …

GO TO CONFESSION.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, GO TO CONFESSION, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , ,
19 Comments

Bp. Galantino opines

There was a puzzling piece at the Italian site Formiche, with comments by Bp. Nunzio Galantino, whom Pope Francis appointed as General Secretary to the Italian Bishops Conference.

Let’s see a few quotes from His Excellency:

I hope that the Italian Church can talk about any topic at all, about married priests, the Eucharist for the divorced, homosexuality, without taboos.

“Without taboos”.   Were this from someone other than a Catholic bishop, I would suspect the use of code language.  “Without taboos” sounds like code language for adapting doctrine to worldly trends.  Also, Pope Francis signed off on the excommunication of the Australian heretic, the former-Father Greg Reynolds.  He is still excommunicated.

“In the past we were exclusively focused on ‘no’ to abortion and euthanasia.  It can’t be like this, in the middle of this there is existence which develops.

I think this means that, because we live in 2014, we have to focus on other things because, “in the middle of this there is existence which develops… in mezzo c’è l’esistenza che si sviluppa”.  Hey, life goes on!  We evolve.  Right?  We move beyond the past.  It is unthinkable that he is saying that we have to “develop” to a point where we say “yes” to abortion, instead of “no”.

I spent a lot of time in Italy.  I am unaware that bishops and priests there were exclusively focused on abortion or euthanasia.  As a matter of fact, you would hear about those horrors from the pulpit so rarely that you would have thought the Church to be indifferent to them.  On the other hand, there were great groups of lay people who banded together to create some extremely well attended public days of demonstration in favor of life.  They even recited the Rosary.

More about those people who recite Rosaries:

I don’t identify with the blank faces of those who recite the Rosary outside of clinics which practice the interruption of pregnancy, but with those young people who are against this practice and struggle for the quality of persons, for their right to health, to work.

“Interruption of pregnancy”?  This is a very odd expression in Italian for someone – a Catholic bishop – whose default position must be staunchly pro-life.  And I wonder what bishops in these USA would think about one of their brothers in the episcopate describing them as reciting the Rosary with blank faces.

I am sure that we will be able to learn more about what Bp. Galantino really means to communicate.  When people are not accustomed to interviews, and they speak off-the-cuff, they can sometimes say things in a way that they don’t really intend.

The Holy Father will visit the Diocese of Cassano allo Jonio next 21 June.

UPDATE:

Reactions to Bp. Galantino’s remarks, in Italian:

HERE

HERE

HERE

Posted in The Drill | Tagged , , , , ,
40 Comments

ASK FATHER: “Baptismal Stoles” or “Confirmation Stoles”

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

I heartily agree with you regarding cassocks and surplices on “altar girls”. [More on that HERE] But I have another concern, and I wonder if I am right. I also do not believe that “Baptismal Stoles” or “Confirmation Stoles” should be conferred on those receiving these Scaraments. This happens in my parish at the Easter Vigil when several adults are Baptized and/or Confirmed. The following is from the Catholic Encyclopedia:

The stole is worn only by deacons, priests, and bishops. For deacons and priests it is the specific mark of office, being the badge of the diaconal and priestly orders. The wrongful use of the stole by subdeacons, therefore, would imply the usurpation of a higher order, and would constitute an irregularity. (…) As a liturgical vestment, the stole signifies the “yoke of the Lord” whose “burden is light.”

If the wearing of a stole by a subdeacon (which order is now suppressed) constituted an “irregularity” how much more so does it constitute an “irregularity” for a lay person to wear one? The wearing of the stole by a lay person. regradless of age, it seems to me would demonstrate a confusion of roles. The argument is presented to me that this just a manifestation of the “common priesthood of the laity”? I emphatically say, NO! There must remain a clear distinction of roles, and wearing a stole in the manner of a sacramental priest simply confuses those roles. But I get shouted down on this issue and also regardiong our “altar girls” attire, which is, ugh, the cassock and surplice.

It seems to me that the “confirmation stoles” and “baptism stoles” are an even more egregious error than young girls in cassocks and surplices.

The use of these stoles confuses the royal priesthood of the faithful with the ministerial priesthood of the ordained.

Since bishops possess the fullness of the priesthood, shall we give little miters to the newly baptized? Of course not!

The mark of the royal priesthood of the faithful is the anointing, which is already done in baptism and confirmation.

Furthermore, putting stoles on laypeople like that just seems… condescending.  It is as if the cleric is saying, “Aren’t you cute, you good little lay people.  I’ll dress you up like me!”

The baptized and confirmed laity have their own dignity.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged ,
21 Comments

ASK FATHER: Altar girls also Communion ministrices

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

I went to Mass today in the diocese of [removed] as a visitor. The priest had 4 teen age alter girls and I actually received communion from one of them. This brought tears of sorrow to my eyes. I have never even seen an alter boy serve communion, let alone a girl. I am so shocked, I am thinking of writing a letter to their new bishop to let him in on this. What to you advise?

I presume the author is asking about “altar girls” rather than alter girls, or worse, altered girls.

While this is possibly permissible, it is unusual.

Leaving aside the issue of females serving at all, if the girls are confirmed, then they fit the minimum requirement for Extraordinary Ministers of Holy Communion.  Hmmm… feminine of minister is ministrix, so, plural ministrices.

Those on the Left usually harp on and on about not “mixing ministries”, namely, lectors should not distribute Holy Communion, ushers should not serve Mass, puppeteers should not ply their tambourine skills, etc.

The new bishop of [that diocese] has many, many challenges on his plate.  Pray for him.

I suspect that this situation, while odd, would not amount to something he could begin to attend to.

How about writing to the new bishop of [that diocese], saying that you recently attended Holy Mass in his diocese and became aware of how much work he has before him. Instead of mentioning specific problems, could you promise him a daily decade of the Rosary for the next year?

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged
16 Comments

Luke 19: Zacchaeus

I think we could benefit from a discussion of the moment in the Gospel of Luke when Zacchaeus meets the Lord.  The Pope recently used this pericope when addressing the UN delegation.  It made me scratch my head.  The Pope was advocating “legitimate redistribution of economic benefits by the State”.

Of course you know that Zacchaeus was a publican, a tax collector, a representative of the State, the Romans.

As I read Luke, the lesson to be learned from the Zacchaeus encounter is that if even a Roman collaborator tax collector can convert and receive the kind words of the Lord, then anyone can be saved.  What I find puzzling is how this episode can bolster an argument for State redistribution of wealth.

In any event, Luke 19:1-10 has Zacchaeus telling the Lord, using Greek present tense verbs (Latin Vulgate also has present tense), about his giving to the poor and his restoration of money to those whom he cheated.

Authors are divided about whether Zacchaeus was already giving half his wealth to the poor before the Lord came along or whether he made the decision in the Lord’s presence to give to the poor in the future.

On the one hand, the language is fairly clear.  But the context suggests that Zacchaeus is making an on the spot decision.

The Greek of the dialogue in Luke 19 says in 19:8:

σταθεὶς δὲ Ζακχαῖος εἶπεν πρὸς τὸν κύριον Ἰδού, τὰ ἡμίση τῶν ὑπαρχόντων μου κύριε δίδωμι τοῖς πτωχοῖς καὶ εἴ τινός τι ἐσυκοφάντησα ἀποδίδωμι τετραπλοῦν

The verbs δίδωμι and ἀποδίδωμι are both “present”, though Greek present doesn’t necessarily mean that the action is exactly contemporaneous.

RSV:

1 He entered Jericho and was passing through. 2 And there was a man named Zacchae’us; he was a chief tax collector, and rich. 3 And he sought to see who Jesus was, but could not, on account of the crowd, because he was small of stature. 4 So he ran on ahead and climbed up into a sycamore tree to see him, for he was to pass that way. 5 And when Jesus came to the place, he looked up and said to him, “Zacchae’us, make haste and come down; for I must stay at your house today.” 6 So he made haste and came down, and received him joyfully. 7 And when they saw it they all murmured, “He has gone in to be the guest of a man who is a sinner.” 8 And Zacchae’us stood and said to the Lord, “Behold, Lord, the half of my goods I give to the poor; and if I have defrauded any one of anything, I restore it fourfold.” 9 And Jesus said to him, “Today salvation has come to this house, since he also is a son of Abraham. 10 For the Son of man came to seek and to save the lost.”

Douay-Rheims

1 And entering he walked through Jericho. 2 And behold, there was a man named Zacheus, who was the chief of the publicans: and he was rich. 3 And he sought to see Jesus who he was: and he could not for the crowd, because he was low of stature. 4 And running before, he climbed up into a sycamore tree, that he might see him: for he was to pass that way. 5 And when Jesus was come to the place, looking up, he saw him and said to him: Zacheus, make haste and come down: for this day I must abide in thy house. 6 And he made haste and came down and received him with joy. 7 And when all saw it, they murmured, saying, that he was gone to be a guest with a man that was a sinner. 8 But Zacheus standing, said to the Lord: Behold, Lord, the half of my goods I give to the poor; and if I have wronged any man of any thing, I restore him fourfold. 9 Jesus said to him: This day is salvation come to this house, because he also is a son of Abraham. 10 For the Son of man is come to seek and to save that which was lost.

VULGATE

1 et ingressus perambulabat Hiericho 2 et ecce vir nomine Zaccheus et hic erat princeps publicanorum et ipse dives 3 et quaerebat videre Iesum quis esset et non poterat prae turba quia statura pusillus erat 4 et praecurrens ascendit in arborem sycomorum ut videret illum quia inde erat transiturus 5 et cum venisset ad locum suspiciens Iesus vidit illum et dixit ad eum Zacchee festinans descende quia hodie in domo tua oportet me manere 6 et festinans descendit et excepit illum gaudens 7 et cum viderent omnes murmurabant dicentes quod ad hominem peccatorem devertisset 8 stans autem Zaccheus dixit ad Dominum ecce dimidium bonorum meorum Domine do pauperibus et si quid aliquem defraudavi reddo quadruplum 9 ait Iesus ad eum quia hodie salus domui huic facta est eo quod et ipse filius sit Abrahae 10 venit enim Filius hominis quaerere et salvum facere quod perierat

Again, the tricky part here is to determine what the Greek “present” is doing.

Once again, many commentators think that Zacchaeus already was giving to the poor and restoring to those who were defrauded.

Perhaps we can have some intelligent investigation.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, The Drill | Tagged ,
37 Comments

The Vandals would be impressed: Univ. of Dayton chapel

I received a link to an article at Catholic Beat about the slated renovation of the chapel at the University of Dayton.

There are before and after pictures which are striking.  The Vandals couldn’t have done a better job of destroying this chapel.

The upcoming renovation is rather strange in some of its aspects.  For example, the tabernacle will be removed from sight:

According to the flier put together by concerned students, who say they are not a formal group, the carved wooden altar will be moved toward the transept and the tabernacle will be placed behind it (accessed by a door to be cut in the center of the altar) for a “reservation chapel” with room for a handful of adorers. The walls of the apse will be moved out, requiring the demolition of the painted ceiling and the removal of the wooden pulpit, parts of which will be used to clad a baptismal font. The choir loft will be lowered, and the cast iron pillars holding it up removed, along with the church’s organ.

Have a look at the plans.

I’ll bet that the students would want a restoration rather than a wreckovation.

What the place looked like before the wholesale devastation of the 1970’s.

Posted in Liberals, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged
34 Comments

Another liberal writer turns on Pope Francis

The repulsively lefty Maureen Dowd has a piece in the Irish Times… it’s like a perfect storm, no?… in which she lays into Pope Francis.

This is how the Liberal catholic Left will be talking about Francis before too long.

Let’s have a peek at her green-inked piece with my emphases and comments:

American nuns at rough end of Pope Francis’s mixed messages

So much for all the cozy hugs and soothing cold calls and fun selfies and humble gestures and talk of mercy, love, inclusion, equality and justice. Pope Francis appears guilty of condoning that most base Vatican sport: bullying nuns.  [We don’t, of course, accept her absurd premise.  But we are sure that she believes what she wrote.] The cool pope suddenly doesn’t seem so cool, allowing Rome’s grand inquisitors to torque up the derogation this Mother’s Day [Ummm… Maureen?  This happened some days before Mother’s Day.] of the American sisters who have mothered so many – even as an endless parade of ghoulish priests were shielded as they defiled vulnerable kids in their care. [She conveniently leaves about the part about nuns who violated children.]
Pope Benedict XVI’s Vatican was determined to rein in American nuns inspired by Vatican II, accusing them of pushing “radical feminist themes” [which is true] and caring for the sick instead of parroting church teaching opposing contraception, gay relationships and the ordination of women. [“parroting”?  Fidelity to the Church’s teaching is mindless repetition, it seems.]
Although some conservative American bishops have politicised the abortion issue, [HAH!  There she goes!  Now she is parroting liberal talking points.] punishing liberal pols who were pro-choice, [“punishing” liberal pols?  Name 10 who have been “punished”.] they were furious that some uppity nuns supported the president’s healthcare plan, including his compromise on contraception for religious hospitals.  [She has conflated various issues into one, hasn’t she?  The Holy See’s CDF recently addressed the LCWR leadership about doctrinal and spiritual issues.  That is not the same thing as concern about how some American nuns gave cover to pro-abortion politicians so that they could betray their Faith and vote for ObamaCare.  BTW… has your insurance been cancelled yet?]
On Monday, we learned that German cardinal Gerhard Müller, the Vatican orthodoxy watchdog, upbraided the officers of the largest group of American nuns, [I doubt Maureen actually read Card. Müller’s remarks.  In no way can he be fairly described as having “upbraided” them.] the Leadership Conference of Women Religious, which has been investigated and reprimanded by Rome.
He objected to their plan to honour Sr Elizabeth Johnson, a Fordham theology professor, who has written that women are uncomfortable with “the dominant images of God as father, lord and king” and would prefer “non-authoritarian” female language for God. [But, Maureen, try to follow… that’s not all she wrote.]
Last year, Francis said he would let the Vatican’s coercive reform of the nuns’ group continue. And this past week, he was silent after Müller’s mauling of the nuns. [So?] The odd thing, as his biographer Paul Vallely told me, is, “He basically agrees with the nuns.” [Now turn the sock inside out.  If someone like Pope Francis wants his deputy to talk to you like that, then how far off the rails are you?] The new pope’s focus on the poor and social justice, his “Who am I to judge?” cri de coeur on gays, [I suspect Dowd has no clue about the actual context of that remark.] his critique that the church has become too “obsessed” with abortion, gay marriage and contraception [That is a mischaracterization.  He has never said that “the Church has become too ‘obsessed’ with abortion”.] – all these shocking and refreshing moves echo the Gospel-infused spirit for which the nuns are being punished.

Butterfly of delight
“This latest slapdown raises a big question about Pope Francis’s character,” said Kenneth Briggs, the author of Double Crossed: Uncovering the Catholic Church’s Betrayal of American Nuns. “Is he content projecting a Mr Nice Guy image while giving the green light to the Vatican big boys to pursue a hard line? Is he the butterfly who delights everybody, or is he also the strong arm?[The Left are turning on Francis.]
Although the 77-year-old pope has said that women could gain greater power in the church, other comments have been typically atavistic. While praising women for their “sensitivity,” “intuition” and mothering skills, he said flatly that women’s ordination to the priesthood “is not a question open to discussion”.

It is fitting that she ended with that last point.

The holy grail of the catholic Left is the ordination of women.  They will never be content until that happens.

It is never going to happen.

Posted in Francis, Green Inkers, Liberals, Women Religious | Tagged ,
29 Comments

Summorum Pontificum. It won’t be stopped.

Here is some news to cheer you in these otherwise chaotic and troubling times.

From HPR:

Seven Years after “Summorum Pontificum”: Nearly 500 North American Churches Offer the Traditional Latin Mass

For those Catholics who are seeking even more regular access to the Traditional Latin Mass, sacraments, and accompanying parish and liturgical life, there are 75 parish locations that offer this access daily [Such as that perfectly located, spiritual oasis Holy Innocents in Manhattan] … the ideal and ultimate goal for Catholics who desire to truly live out the liturgical life of the Church in its fullness.

The upcoming seventh anniversary of the implementation date of Summorum Pontificum has been noted with nary a whisper from likely traditional-minded media outlets and blogs. [Maybe we aren’t talking about it much – yet – because it will be, after all, in September?] I suppose with both the mainstream and Catholic media’s feeding frenzy on covering Pope Francis’ every waking moment, movement, and spoken word, this shouldn’t be a surprise.
Has it really been seven years since that momentous date that provided juridical recourse to Catholic laymen directly with their parish priest to provide access to the Traditional Latin Mass and sacraments? What kind of results have we seen in the United States (including Puerto Rico) and Canada in dioceses and parishes offering the Traditional Latin Mass?
The Coalition in Support of Ecclesia Dei, keeps a comprehensive list of these locations, and their data are used for this story. At last count, in 191 dioceses in North America, there are about 485 parishes that offer the Traditional Latin Mass with some frequency (monthly, twice-per-month, or weekly). There are 335 parish locations that offer a weekly Traditional Latin Mass to Catholics albeit, more often than not, in afternoon or evening time slots. But still, 335 weekly offerings in 191 total North American dioceses seem to be a positive commentary on the fruits of Pope Benedict’s motu proprio.
For those Catholics who are seeking even more regular access to the Traditional Latin Mass, sacraments, and accompanying parish and liturgical life, there are 75 parish locations that offer this access daily (or close to daily, sometimes with the summer being an exception, for instance). This is, of course, the ideal and ultimate goal for Catholics who desire to truly live out the liturgical life of the Church in its fullness. And of those 75 parish locations, a total of 38 are provided for by the Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter (FSSP), and another 13 by the Institute of Christ the King Sovereign Priest (ICR).
This brings us to the heart of this article. That leaves a mere 24 diocesan, or other, venues (such as St. John Cantius Canons in Chicago) where the Traditional Mass is regularly offered daily (again, noting some occasional exceptions).

[…]

This article will focus on a diocesan parish offering the Traditional Latin Mass in one of the most unlikely of places—what is often referred to as “the buckle of the Bible Belt”—Greenville, South Carolina (more broadly, the Greenville-Spartanburg-Easley-Anderson “Upstate” area). While Prince of Peace is a parish without the benefits of a personal parish served by a group of priests such as the FSSP or ICR, the parish’s evangelical liturgical approach is beginning to attract national and international attention.
Following is an interview with Rev. Christopher Smith, the pastoral administrator at Prince of Peace Catholic Church, which serves nearly 2,000 families in Taylors (Greenville), South Carolina. Not only is this parish attracting families seeking access to doctrinal and liturgical sanity in the wasteland of the postconciliar debacle, it is beginning to be recognized by even the non-Traditional Catholic audience as perhaps a beacon of the “New Evangelization” due to the number of converts and reverts it attracts, but with methods and techniques borrowed from the “Old Evangelization.” Of course, the apparent irony here will not be lost on longtime readers of The Remnant. Average daily Mass attendance (Monday through Saturday) hovers around 40 with weekly Sunday Mass attendance edging as high as 200-plus, but with regular attendance around 170.
Note that Prince of Peace also has a burgeoning school, a round-the-clock adoration chapel, and numerous other flourishing apostolates one would expect from a parish with parishioners on fire for the faith. Prince of Peace is also home to numerous processions on special feast days and adoration and benediction of the Blessed Sacrament.

[…]

Read the rest there.

I have been saying for decades, not years, that the real impact of the older form of the Roman Rite will be felt across the whole breadth of the Church when diocesan priests take it up and implement it in parishes.

As much as I like and appreciate the good work of groups such as the FSSP and the ICK, they are specialists, in a sense.  Diocesan priests – let’s call them “garden variety” priests although so many of them are also exceptional – make the greatest impact simply because they are far greater in number, they have parishes, and they are more stable within a region.  Would that they were also more stable in assignments.  This 6 year thing… well… don’t get me started.

The good news is this: everywhere I go, the large majority of young priests and seminarians I meet tell me that there is great interest in the traditional forms amongst their ranks.  Seminarians, especially, have related that almost all their classmates are now at least open to the learning how to use the Missal of St. John XXIII.

As a matter of fact, the men who are well along in their formation, or actually preparing to be ordained would, if they could, say their 1st Mass in the traditional Roman Rite.

This will spook liberals something fierce.   I know of a bishop who actually quizzes deacons about what form of Mass they will use for their 1st Mass: the implication being that it had better not be a TLM and that their ordination may depend on it.  Nice, huh?

You know, while I would rather have a somewhat smoother path in the growth and implementation of Summorum Pontificum, maybe it is – in the large scheme of things – good that we can from time to time report that some bishop or even curial official actively oppresses people who want the traditional forms.  Yes, it hurts.  Yes, it is unjust.  Yes, we wish it weren’t so.  BUT… in doing that they only serve to toughen up those who will, in the end, undo their liberal catholic agenda.

Go ahead and tell seminarians that they can’t attend the old Mass anywhere.  Go ahead and threaten them.  All you are doing is making them want it even more.  Deny them the chance to learn the older Mass in classes in the seminary, will you?  Fine, they will learn it in their rooms, with the help of young priests who are already using it.  Bully them all you want.  It won’t work.  They are the maquis and you can’t stop them.

It is possible to get mired in all the bad news or in the news about strange and controversial things that this or that highly ranked churchman might spout on a bad day.

What I have seen, and what encourages me, is that a lot of the younger guys, young priests and seminarians, are really not paying a whole lot of attention to goofy prelates and mixed messages.  These men do not lug around a lot of baggage.  They do not have the scars of the wars that some of us who are older have gained.  They really took notice of what Pope Benedict did and they took it on board.  In turn, this has a knock on effect among their peers.  As the newer seminarians come in, they will see that the older guys, whom they admire, are learning, and saying, the older Mass and they will want to do so too.

Do everything you can to encourage seminarians and young priests to learn and say the Extraordinary Form.  A good first step could be to make sure that they all have the Missale Romanum of St. John XXIII.  Be ready to send them off to a workshop.

¡Hagan lío!  This cannot be stopped.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Be The Maquis, Benedict XVI, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Mail from priests, Our Catholic Identity, Priests and Priesthood, Seminarians and Seminaries, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, The future and our choices, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged , , ,
40 Comments