Too too muchly stupid

This is one of the stupidest things I have seen for a while.

NRO picked up on something from HuffPo. HERE

Adverbs are, apparently, evil.

Adverbs: They’re hurting people. According to a piece in the Huffington Post, the word “too” is sexist and hurts women by constantly making them feel like they’re not good enough. In a piece titled “The 3-Letter Word That Cuts Women Down,” University of Vermont freshman Cameron Schaeffer explains that she had an “epiphany” about the word after talking with a friend about how she should cut her hair. “Our conversation ended with, ‘Well you don’t want it to be too short or too long,’” Schaeffer writes. “There is no proper way for a woman to cut her hair, let alone do anything right in this world . . . Everything is too this or too that,” she continues. Now, when she says “everything,” of course what she really means is “everything as it applies to women.” After all, the very real damage inflicted by this word is yet another tragedy that only affects us: “In my experience, I rarely hear too thrown around about men,” she explains. “You hear someone say, ‘He’s short,’ but you seldom hear ‘too short.’” (To be fair, I don’t really hear a male described as “Too Short” very often either, but kind feel like that’s probably just because he hasn’t released an album since 2012 and isn’t really on the scene as much as he used to be.) If you think Schaeffer’s reaction to the word “too” is crazy, don’t worry. She thinks it’s crazy, too — crazy that a “a well-versed feminist” like her didn’t realize that she needed to be outraged sooner: “I never realized how deeply a three-letter adverb could cut,” she writes. “My internal opinion is always that I’m too this or too that,” she continues. “I, like most women, have been deprived of self-satisfaction and appreciation because of this word and this attitude.”

[…]

Good grief. I lost 30 IQ points just reading that part. Don’t worry. I can spare them.

Play video

Here’s a writing assignment for you.

Give me a 100 word essay on feminists using as many adverbs as you can possibly pack in. I want it to ooze with adverbs, like the mozzarella I cut into yesterday oozed milk.

Posted in Liberals, SESSIUNCULA, You must be joking! | Tagged ,
32 Comments

We must make the choice to persevere!

I share hereunder a note I received from one of you readers after my own post-synodal exhortation not to give up any ground in the Synod’s wake. We must persevere! In the face of what seem like decreasingly favorable odds, we must persevere.

From the reader (with permission):

Dr. Fr. Z., Yes, persevere! Do not give up in preaching the truth!
Souls are being saved by faithful priests. I know. My dear husband
left The Church 7 years into our marriage. Protestant co-workers
“enlightened” his mind and he discovered the “truth” in the protestant
church. He did his best to preach to me, ridicule me and the Catholic
Church, and recruit me and our young children to follow his path. I
refused. My own faith was ignited. I persevered in prayer and daily
Mass and rosary. I did not waver. Fought depression and panic attacks.
But stayed the course, clutching my rosary every step of the way. 25
YEARS WENT BY like this! Then, in Advent 2012, my husband went to Mass
and heard a powerful homily on the 4 Last Things. He went to
confession the next morning and received Jesus at Mass the following
day, for the first time in 25 years! Oh, how good God is! Yes, I
wanted to leave him during those difficult years. Our marriage was
terribly lonely and empty. He did not live up to his vows. He
endangered my faith and the faith of our children. But.. I stuck with
it and persevered by God’s grace and ONLY by God’s grace. My husband
is back and we celebrated 34 years of marriage this past August. And
so, Fr. Z, preach the truth! It matters! Don’t waver! Don’t give up!
People are listening! Souls are being saved! God bless you and all the
other faithful priests who are not afraid to do the right thing. As I
finish this email, I begin a rosary for you…for wisdom and courage
and perseverance to firmly adhere to what is true and good and
beautiful!

Posted in HONORED GUESTS, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices | Tagged ,
38 Comments

How liberals are handling their defeat at the Synod

I want to bring some stimulating reading to the readership’s attention, lest you miss it.

First, One Mad Mom has a serious rant and it is pretty entertaining!   Here’s just a small sample.

What sparked Fr. Martin banning everyone under the sun? He wasn’t too happy about the response to this tweet:

martin

Haters? Are you 15, Fr. Martin? Anyone notice the irony of calling faithful Catholics “haters”, talking about mercy, and then turning around and blocking all those “haters?” Where’s the mercy for them? Oh, yeah, they don’t deserve mercy, since they aren’t cheerleaders for sacrilege against the Eucharist and making people comfy with their sins. Now, I really don’t care if someone wants to give me a derogatory label, although it might be nice if it was something appropriate for their advanced years. For instance, I would say he’s a hypocrite. What annoys me is the actual hypocrisy of blocking people who disagree with one’s definition of “mercy.”

There’s more.  Don’t miss it.

Ross Douthat of the NYT really got under the skin of a whole raft of libs who, in typical lib fashion, reacted badly and are now trying silence him.  Douthat wrote about how the libs lost at the Synod, how they did not get their Church and doctrine changing agenda through.  HERE – go read it now.   That made liberal heads explode.  They signed on to a group letter whining to the Editor of Hell’s Bible that that sort of thing shouldn’t be permitted. After all, they sneered, Douthat doesn’t have a theology degree.

First, here is a sample of Douthat’s piece that has the spittle-flecked libs popping arteries out of their foreheads:

Nobody, of course, because there weren’t two “sides” or camps or (heaven help us) factions or anything so nasty as all that. It was all a dialogue, a moment of encounter and discernment, an opening to the Holy Spirit that set the Roman Catholic Church free to bechurch in a new way for the third millennium. It was a beginning, an overture, the first chapter in a neverending story, the first step on a permanent journey, because we are all sojourners together. So nobody won, because really everybody won.

As Saint Athanasius would say, LOL. No, look, what actually happened is that conservatives won what was probably the closest thing to victory that they could have hoped for, given that 1) the pope was against them, and 2) the pope stacked the governing and writing committees and the voting ranks, and did I mention that 3) the pope was against them. (People who still argue that Pope Francis was studiously neutral, that he just wanted dialogue, or that his views are unknowable, need to sit down and read the tongue-lashing he gave to conservatives in his closing address — and contrast it with the much more evenhanded way he closed last fall’s synod, when conservative resistance to the synod’s intended direction was much more disorganized.) Which is to say they produced a document that used unfashionable words like “indissoluble” to talk about marriage, that mostly avoided the subject of homosexuality, and that offered a few dense, occasionally-ambiguous, slightly-impenetrable paragraphs on welcoming and accompanying divorced and remarried Catholics without offering either a path to communion absent an annulment or proposing to devolve that question to national bishops conferences, as the German bishops and the rest of the progressive caucus at the synod clearly wished.

So the journalists covering the synod document as a setback for the innovators (and, because he elevated them, the pontiff) are mostly correct, given their ambitions going in. But so, in a certain way, are the journalists covering it as a kind of cracked-door to innovation, because the conservatives didn’t have the votes or the power to keep every ambiguity at bay. The most straightforward reading of the synod text supports the first interpretation, for the reasons that (among others) George Weigel and Robert Royal lay out: There is no abrogation of the ancient ban on communion for the remarried, and plenty of phrasings that indicate that ban is still in force. But at the same time, as Royal also notes, the text is not as plain as the document it quotes, John Paul II’s Familiaris Consortio, and it spends so much time talking about discernment and individual cases that it seems to sometimes come “right up to the edge” of communion for the remarried, as Royal puts it, without “crossing over into it in so many words.”

How you interpret that tiptoe act, in turn, depends on how you want to interpret it. If you want to read for continuity with the Catholic past, and interpret the synod document in the light of the prior teachings that it cites, you will end up with, well, a conservative, continuity-based reading. If you want to read for rupture, though, you’ll stress the direction of movement, the fact that the new text is somewhat less clear and more ambiguous than previous texts, and suggest that even such a modest change, by its nature, opens the door to further changes still. This is roughly how many of the documents of Vatican II ended up being read by liberal Catholics, as the English Latin Mass champion Joseph Shaw points out here; “spirit of Vatican II” interpretations of where the church should go after the council, he notes:

[…]

So the libs wrote a letter.  Here it is with the list of signatories I have at this time.

To the editor of the New York Times

On Sunday, October 18, the Times published Ross Douthat’s piece “The Plot to Change Catholicism.” Aside from the fact that Mr. Douthat has no professional qualifications for writing on the subject, the problem with his article and other recent statements is his view of Catholicism as unapologetically subject to a politically partisan narrative that has very little to do with what Catholicism really is. Moreover, accusing other members of the Catholic church of heresy, sometimes subtly, sometimes openly, is serious business that can have serious consequences for those so accused. This is not what we expect of the New York Times.

October 26, 2015

John O’Malley, SJ (Georgetown University)
Massimo Faggioli (University of St. Thomas, Minnesota)
Nicholas P. Cafardi (Duquesne University)
Gerard Mannion (Georgetown University)
Stephen Schloesser, SJ (Loyola University Chicago)
Katarina Schuth OSF (University of St. Thomas, Minnesota)
Leslie Tentler (Catholic University of America, emerita)

John Slattery (University of Notre Dame)
Megan McCabe (Boston College)
Thomas M. Bolin (St. Norbert College)
Kevin Brown (Boston College)
Alan C. Mitchell (Georgetown University)
Elizabeth Antus (John Carroll University)
Kathleen Grimes (Villanova University)
Fran Rossi Szpylczyn
Christopher Bellitto (Kean University)
Katharine Mahon (University of Notre Dame)
Corey Harris (Alvernia University)
Kevin Ahern (Manhattan College)
John DeCostanza (Dominican University)
Daniel Cosacchi (Loyola University Chicago)
Amy Levad (University of St. Thomas, Minnesota)
Christine McCarthy (Fordham University)
Sonja Anderson (Yale University)
Fr. Robert A. Busch (Diocese of Amarillo)
Brandon Peterson (University of Utah)
Heather Miller Rubens (Institute for Christian and Jewish Studies)
Daniel Dion (Rivier University)
Mark Miller (University of San Francisco)
William T. Ditewig (Santa Clara University)
Stuart Squires (Brescia University)
Gerald O’Collins, SJ (Gregorian University, emeritus)
Anthony J. Godzieba (Villanova University)
Terrence W. Tilley (Fordham University)
Michael J. Hollerich (University of St. Thomas, Minnesota)
Gerald Schlabach (University of St. Thomas, Minnesota)
Luca Badini Confalonieri (Wijngaards Institute for Catholic Research)
Francis Schussler Fiorenza (Harvard Divinity School)
Rebecca A. Chabot (Iliff School of Theology)
Mark Massa, SJ (Boston College School of Theology and Ministry)
James T. Bretzke, SJ (Boston College School of Theology and Ministry)
Anne Clifford (Iowa State University)
Jack Downey (La Salle University)
Sherry Jordon (University of St. Thomas, Minnesota)
Julia Lamm (Georgetown University)

Were I made Patriarch of North America by Pius XIII I might start with that list of signers as we began the clean up of Catholic schools.

Rod Dreher jumped into the fray with both feet HERE. Dreher also reproduced the whiny lib letter.

The McCarthyism of Liberal Catholic Elites

[…]

The Catholic layman Ross Douthat, according to these liberal Catholic academics, is too stupid to have an opinion about Catholicism, because he has not been trained in theology. And his opinions are invalid because they reach offer a conclusion offensive to the letter-writers follow a “politically partisan narrative that has very little to do with what Catholicism really is.” You will look at the October 18 column in question, and anything else Ross Douthat has written about Catholicism, and I very much doubt you will find anything contrary to the faith and morals magisterially proclaimed by the Roman Catholic Church. You will unquestionably find much contrary to the faith and morals magisterially proclaimed by the Faggioli-O’Malley crew.

Furthermore, and perhaps most embarrassingly to the letter-writers, they actually try to do the Catholic version of red-baiting Douthat, as if a newspaper columnist’s criticism of heresy (“sometimes subtly, sometimes openly”) actually stood to make a difference in the lives of those so accused. It is ridiculous. That term “sometimes subtly, sometimes openly” is downright McCarthyite. Read the actual column; the word “heresy” doesn’t appear in it, and if it did, so what? Heresy is a constant issue within Christianity, and has been since the beginning.

I must have missed the letters from this bunch complaining about the frequent columns from Douthat’s liberal Catholic colleagues Maureen Dowd and Frank Bruni complaining about Benedict XVI and anything to do with Catholic orthodoxy. George Weigel documented some of Dowd’s charges in her column here:

[…]

Bill Donohue of the Catholic League also got into it HERE.

Anyway… do some reading.  I think you will see that the libs are in panic mode.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
71 Comments

Welcome Aboard New Registrants!

To participate in the combox here, you must be registered and approved (by me).

Since the blog is under constant attack by spammers and nefarious ne’er-do-wells, I use the “about you” field in particular to screen registrations.

Welcome aboard recent registrants! (I think I got everyone.)

Since the last time…

John Valentine
asciiduck
starvingartist321
templar4
Ages
DorothyMay
Peggy F. Kulpa
dfp42
mhcavallo
Pops OB
prayfatima
dforte5102
maryp
pprimeau
MrCDCatholic
angelicjim
kc5grw
anrobin
Matt C. Abbott
Et Verbum caro factum est
mvcifrese
ichneimon
mammadiotto
Greg Schlueter
JohnC
awestruck.tv
smetheny
JoeHaydu
Bill_NY
loric

AND…

jlaws
thecharles
The Man Who Would Be Knight
Cathryn7
Fidelity1
Michael Gerard
snorow

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
Comments Off on Welcome Aboard New Registrants!

Synod thoughts and thanks to readers

Synod thoughts and thanks to readers

First, I am deeply grateful for the donations that have come in to defray the cost of my travel to Rome.  Some have been widow’s mites, some have been hefty, all have been warmly appreciated.   Since I have been on the run a lot during my time here, I haven’t had much of a chance to write all the individual thank you notes that I customarily send out.  I also haven’t updated the “thermometers”.  I will do more when I slow down.  That said, I will again say Mass for the intention of my benefactors for this trip tonight at Ss. Trinita probably between 6-7 Rome time CET (1200-1300 CDT).  UPDATE:  I had a call from the priest at Ss. Trinità who asked me to take the parish evening Mass at 6:30. I may have to take their intention for the Mass. But I still have tomorrow and my last day!   UPDATE: I was able to use my own intention!  So you got prayed for again.

Now to business.

Since I have a few really smart people writing to me about the Synod and its aftermath, I’ll share some of their points with you.  I can’t do much better than they are doing, frankly.

Here… much edited and cut… from a friend:

There is no keeping Cardinal George Pell quiet. He gave an extraordinary interview to Edward Pentin at the National Catholic REGISTER in which he builds upon his earlier, surprising comment (which I sent to you yesterday) to the effect that the Synod Final Document was better than a lot of us are thinking.  HERE

READ THIS CAREFULLY. Pentin asks the right questions, in the right order. Pell answers in Anglo-Saxon clarity but there are points beyond which he will not go and will not be drawn. Pell’s responses are carefully crafted. Whatever you think about his reasoning, this is a reasoned set of arguments. Remember, too, that Pell was there and that he showed outstanding courage in initiating and continually defending the 13 Cardinals’ Letter.

Some of you have already seen this op-ed piece by Ross Douthat. I didn’t see it until it was sent to me because I don’t dumpster-dive in the New York Times.  HERE

But Douthat would be incomplete without this repartee in the combox over at Andrea Gagliarducci’s blog MondayVatican.  HERE

In the combox an anonymous comment appeared that challenged Ducci for “special pleading” on behalf of Pope Francis, i.e., for trying to defend the Pope against the charge that he really is batting for the other side; that he is a Kasperite and worse….

Gagliarducci responds. I am not going to say that I agree with Gagliarducci; I don’t. But the matter is too important not to be careful and then careful again. So read Gagliarduccis explanation of why he refuses (so far) to conclude that the Pope is really with the Kasperites, and make up your own mind. But compare Gagliarducci’s arguments with Douthat’s. 

ONE MORE THING. I have been wondering for a couple weeks whether those of us who think in Anglo-Saxon terms don’t see matters in Rome in too black-and-white a set of terms. Gagliarducci calls us Manicheans and says we (Americans, British, Australians) lack subtlety in our judgments. While that may be true, we tend to win wars and not run away from them as the Italians do. But I raise the point again because I am struck at how very different American/British commentary on the Synod is from European.

Here’s the repartee at MondayVatican I am talking about:

Anonimo scrive:

26 ottobre 2015 alle 03:21

Thank you for your thoughtful analysis. However, whenever I read your articles, I am always left with one unanswered question: why do you always suggest, without any evidence whatsoever, that the adapters that placed the Pope in office, and that he has appointed to high positions, and that he has surrounded himself with, are not expressions of the Pope’s mind? The Pope is basically elected by them; the Pope makes them his closest advisers; the Pope appoints them to draft and control important documents; the Pope appoints them to the Synod when bishops’ conferences did not; they claim to speak the Pope’s mind, and he never contradicts them; the Pope severely criticizes the opponents of the adapters, likening them to men with hardened hearts, not alive with the Gospel. The Pope, against the numerical will of the majority of bishops does not clearly close the issues at variance with the adapters. Is it not a logical conclusion to draw to say that the Pope is in fact their man, and that they are the Pope’s men? Why do you refuse to draw the obvious conclusion? Perhaps you know something we do not. If so, you have never said it. 

RISPONDI

Andrea Gagliarducci scrive:

26 ottobre 2015 alle 09:04

Dearest,

thanks for your comment. For what I see, the Pope is mostly an old fashioned, even conservative man in terms of doctrine. There is always something that does not match between what he says and the people he is surrounded with. So I highlight the contradiction. When he speaks about openness and smell of the sheep and everything else, I always find him vague, certainly not on the adpaters side. On the other hand, the Pope showed appreciation for Caffarra during the last Synod, he did not demote Card. Bagnasco as Italian Bishops Conference president, he has a good relation with Cardinal Mueller, even though the Cardinal knows how to criticize him (but Cardinal Mueller has also a deep knowledge of Latin America). So, in the end, I have that sort of feeling that behind any populism, behind any moment the Pope expresses in a vague way thus grabbing the progressives attention and secular media headlines, the Pope have a sort of debt with the adapters who in fact campaigned for him. Because otherwise his thought or his way of doing is not what we can call a straight line, and it is often inexplicable. However, it can also be that the Pope does not follow a rationale. But I think that only time will tell.

Also, I think I predicted that a media onslaught would begin against certain figures who were perceived to have resisted the Kasperites.   Today I received this SMS:

New scandal book by Gianluigi Nuzzi purports to quote “gay Cardinal” with new revelations Vatileaks style.

Whatever this is about, it can’t be good for anyone.

Posted in Synod, The Drill | Tagged
28 Comments

Thoughts on the Synod: Saruman v. Ents, Orcs v. Fangorn

I am receiving one cri de coeur after another.

Lots of people are confused and angry and sad about what they are hearing.  Instead of firm foundations from bishops, we got sand.   Yes, can can make cement with sand, but right now it is nothing but sand.  Still, we have choices to make.  Leave it be sand or make cement?

Thus, I have received comments and notes such as this:

Well, how about that. Those of us who have lived and, according to Church teaching, in frater-soror partnerships, until the good Lord saw fit to resolve our situations Himself have been what the English call right mugs, haven’t we? Oh, I suppose the ban on communion in remarriage after divorce, that was right five minutes ago but it’s going to be wrong now? Or perhaps Our Lord was only joking, yes that must be it, ho ho ho, what fools we have been!

Sorry, Father.Sorry, Father.

No need for “sorry”!

That’s exactly the sort of thing that I am hearing from a lot of people right now.

Time and again in recently history faithful priests felt kicked in the teeth for preaching Catholic doctrine.  Day after day for a while there they were called every name in the book.  They were labelled as rigid and doctrinaire, without compassion.

Now, faithful lay Catholics, suffering in certain ways related to their relationships, also feel kicked in the teeth.

The cumulative effect is that people – including priests – start to doubt why the hell we have been fighting for all this time?

Friend, I understand your frustration. But… we must persevere!

Here is another note I received:

Please notice how parents just got thrown under the bus:

“it is therefore necessary to discern which forms of exclusion that are currently in practice in the areas of liturgical, pastoral, educative, and official responsibilities can be eliminated. ”

So, if I expect my kids will be taught by Catholic school teachers and parish catechists who are NOT in a public state of mortal sin, I’m out of luck? Maybe not – my own bishop is quite solid. But it sure looks like this passage means public adulterers ought not be excluded from teaching the Faith or in Catholic schools. Like that’s really going to strengthen our identity and effectiveness….

The members of the Synod could have made clear statements that, in themselves, would also encourage the Catholic faithful in addition to advise the Holy Father about what he might address in his own document.

They could have.   They didn’t.

It is true that the document “could have been worse”.   62 people survived the Hindenburg, too.  So, it was not as bad as it could have been.

What I want all of you to do now is… calm the heck down.

I have in mind a scene from the written version, real book The Lord of the Rings, not the wussified movie from the people who really didn’t get the book at all.

Sound and fury surrounded this Synod, much like the hurricane of violence unleashed by the Ents on Isengard.  Lay people and clergy with them did manage to stop the Kasperites.  It is interesting that the German newspapers say this was a defeat.  That’s enough for me.  Anyway.  There is this vast tumult surrounding Isengard and then, suddenly, it stops.  Bam.  Silence.  And from the tower comes the single little laugh of Saurman who really doesn’t know what sort of deep doodoo he is really in.

The hobbits recount the destruction of Isengard…

‘As soon as Saruman had sent off all his army, our turn came. Treebeard… went up to the gates, and began hammering on the doors, and calling for Saruman. There was no answer, except arrows and stones from the walls. But arrows are no use against Ents. They hurt them, of course, and infuriate them: like stinging flies….

‘When Treebeard had got a few arrows in him, he began… to get positively “hasty”, as he would say. He let out a great hoom-hom, and a dozen more Ents came striding up. An angry Ent is terrifying. Their fingers, and their toes, just freeze on to rock; and they tear it up like bread-crust. It was like watching the work of great tree-roots in a hundred years, all packed into a few moments.

‘They pushed, pulled, tore, shook, and hammered; and… in five minutes they had these huge gates just lying in ruin; and some were already beginning to eat into the walls…. I don’t know what Saruman thought was happening; but anyway he did not know how to deal with it.’….

‘He seems at one time to have got round them, but never again. And anyway he did not understand them; and he made the great mistake of leaving them out of his calculations. He had no plan for them, and there was no time to make any…. As soon as our attack began, the few remaining rats in Isengard started bolting through every hole that the Ents made. The Ents let the Men go, after they had questioned them, two or three dozen only down at this end. I don’t think many orc-folk, of any size, escaped. Not from the Huorns: there was a wood full of them all round Isengard by that time….

‘When the Ents had reduced a large part of the southern walls to rubbish… Saruman fled in a panic….

‘When Saruman was safe back in Orthanc, it was not long before he set some of his precious machinery to work. By that time there were many Ents inside Isengard… they were roaming about and doing a great deal of damage. Suddenly up came fires and foul fumes: the vents and shafts all over the plain began to spout and belch. Several of the Ents got scorched and blistered. One of them, Beechbone I think he was called, a very tall handsome Ent, got caught in a spray of some liquid fire and burned like a torch: a horrible sight.

‘That sent them mad. I thought that they had been really roused before; but I was wrong…. It was staggering. They roared and boomed and trumpeted, until stones began to crack and fall at the mere noise of them…. Round and round the rock of Orthanc the Ents went… storming like a howling gale, breaking pillars, hurling avalanches of boulders down the shafts, tossing up huge slabs of stone into the air like leaves…. I saw iron posts and blocks of masonry go rocketing up hundreds of feet, and smash against the windows of Orthanc. But Treebeard kept his head. He had not had any burns, luckily. He did not want his folk to hurt themselves in their fury, and he did not want Saruman to escape out of some hole in the confusion. Many of the Ents were hurling themselves against the Orthanc-rock; but that defeated them…. [They] could not get a grip on it, or make a crack in it; and they were bruising and wounding themselves against it. So Treebeard went out into the ring and shouted. His enormous voice rose above all the din. There was a dead silence, suddenly. In it we heard a shrill laugh from a high window in the tower. That had a queer effect on the Ents. They had been boiling over; now they became cold, grim as ice, and quiet. They left the plain and gathered round Treebeard, standing quite still. He spoke to them for a little in their own language; I think he was telling them of a plan he had made in his old head long before. Then they just faded silently away in the grey light. Day was dawning….

‘They set a watch on the tower… but the watchers were so well hidden in shadows and kept so still, that I could not see them. The others went away north.’

My friends, you are the Ents and the trees of Fangorn which went to Orthanc and to Helm’s Deep. When you band together and get into action you can do anything and the Enemy had better flee.

Be cool. Be watchful. None of this is over.

They are not going to win.  They have not seen your true strength yet.

We are now playing the long game.  We outnumber them.  We will not quit.  We will prevail.

It does out side no good to freak out and do things that will both help the enemy and weaken our identity.

Stay frosty.

Posted in ¡Hagan lío!, Be The Maquis, Cri de Coeur, Semper Paratus, Si vis pacem para bellum!, Synod, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices | Tagged , , ,
62 Comments

Fr. Z asks tech advice

I have always had a hard time getting movies/videos from my iPhone to my WordPress blog (this blog) and, therefore, I don’t post many or any.  Too bad!  I see some cool stuff.

I have one on my phone that I definitely want to post.

Any pointers from others?  I find iPhone and Mac super clunky for this sort of thing.  The video is mv4 and largish, to big to go straight through the WordPress app.  I have to compress or shrink the video and post it in a format that you can play.

Any ideas would be well received.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes |
23 Comments

Rome – Days 4 & 5: Jesuits and snakes – GOFUNDME for Pontifical Vestments

The other day I mentioned that I was upset enough by what I had heard about the Synod shenanigans that I walked for a few hours. One of the places I wound up was P.za di Spagna and the great column in honor of the Blessed Virgin and the definition the Immaculate Conception.  The moon was nice and bright so I took advantage.

Rome - Days 4 & 5: Jesuits and snakes - GOFUNDME for Pontifical Vestments

Where else can you find an ATM and an ancient statue.

Rome - Days 4 & 5: Jesuits and snakes - GOFUNDME for Pontifical Vestments

Inside the grand church of the once grand Society of Jesus.  The Jesuits are nuts now, for the most part, but this church is mostly still splendid.  The Gesù.

Rome - Days 4 & 5: Jesuits and snakes - GOFUNDME for Pontifical Vestments

The arm of St. Francis Xavier, who baptized so many.

Rome - Days 4 & 5: Jesuits and snakes - GOFUNDME for Pontifical Vestments  Rome - Days 4 & 5: Jesuits and snakes - GOFUNDME for Pontifical Vestments

A little side chapel with the painting of the Sacred Heart which has been copied and copied and copied.  Sorry… it’s a little dark.   But I said some prayers in there for a lot of people I know.

Rome - Days 4 & 5: Jesuits and snakes - GOFUNDME for Pontifical Vestments  Rome - Days 4 & 5: Jesuits and snakes - GOFUNDME for Pontifical Vestments

The tomb of St. Ignatius Loyola.  I wonder what he would say about the doings of his conferes today.  I think he’d be horrified by them.   But who am I to judge?   Am I a Jesuit?  No sirree.  I am not.

Rome - Days 4 & 5: Jesuits and snakes - GOFUNDME for Pontifical Vestments

To the right of the altar … by the way these dopey modernists removed the Communion rail while leaving the decorative metalwork… is a marble group depiction of Truth beating the stuffing out of Heresy.

The little angel is tearing up a bad book.   The ugly heretical bad guys shrink from the Cross and the light that Truth holds.

Rome - Days 4 & 5: Jesuits and snakes - GOFUNDME for Pontifical Vestments

Under the lower heretic, there is a book with a visible spine that says MARTIN LUTHER.  There used to be bronze letters which were quite legible, but the Jesuits, who now probably idolize Luther, took them out.  For shame.  You have to know they are there to make out the letters now.  Calvin is in another spot.

Rome - Days 4 & 5: Jesuits and snakes - GOFUNDME for Pontifical Vestments

No, this is not a rendering of a one of the Cardinals from the Synod whom I shan’t name.  But it is a good image to remember when thinking of heresy.

Rome - Days 4 & 5: Jesuits and snakes - GOFUNDME for Pontifical Vestments

After Mass yesterday, on my way out of church, I stopped to admire the concelebration that was going on at individual side altars.   There was a priest at one altar on the Gospel side of the nave….
Rome - Days 4 & 5: Jesuits and snakes - GOFUNDME for Pontifical Vestments

Two more at altars on the Epistle side.

Rome - Days 4 & 5: Jesuits and snakes - GOFUNDME for Pontifical Vestments

This is what concelebration should look like.  The other kind should be safe, legal and rare.

BTW… a cool thing in the sacristy.

Rome - Days 4 & 5: Jesuits and snakes - GOFUNDME for Pontifical Vestments

Since people have been good to me for this trip with donations, I got myself an early (by a couple days) birthday present.  I intend to leave it in the sacristy at the church where I am on weekends.   The selection of green sets, used for so many Sundays, is less than interesting.  This might provide some variety.   Thank you, readers, for helping to give Holy Mass some fitting ornamentation.

Rome - Days 4 & 5: Jesuits and snakes - GOFUNDME for Pontifical Vestments

I am staying near Campo de’ Fiori.  Here is a Latin inscription which some of you can work on.  Warning: it’s poetry.  Give it a shot.

Rome - Days 4 & 5: Jesuits and snakes - GOFUNDME for Pontifical Vestments

QUAE MODO PUTRIS ERAS ET OLENTI SORDIDA COENO
PLENAQUE DEFORMI MARTIA TERRA SITU
EXUIS HANC TURPEM XYSTO SUB PRINCIPE FORMAM
OMNIA SUNT NITIDIS CONSPICIENDA LOCIS
DIGNA SALUTIFERO DEBENTUR PREMIA XYSTO
QUANTUM EST SUMMO DEBILITA ROMA DUCI
*VIA FLOREA*
BAPTISTA ARCHIONIUS ET LUDOVICUS MARGANIUS
CURATOR VIAR
ANNO SALUTIS MCCCCLXXXIII

Alas, there is less in the Roman style in the windows these days, and more of the dreadful stuff.  I especially abominate the rainbow stripes on the Year of Mercy thing in the middle.

Rome - Days 4 & 5: Jesuits and snakes - GOFUNDME for Pontifical Vestments

Rome - Days 4 & 5: Jesuits and snakes - GOFUNDME for Pontifical Vestments

Blech.

On to Gammarelli, where I am having a new Pontifical Mass set in purple made for the Tridentine Mass Society of Madison.

I have set up a GOFUNDME drive to raise money for this project.  You can make TAX DEDUCTIBLE donations through this.  The TMSM is a 501(c)(3) organization.   >>HERE<<

Calculating expense of fabric and trim for the altar frontal or antependium.

Rome - Days 4 & 5: Jesuits and snakes - GOFUNDME for Pontifical Vestments

The set will have:

  • Chasuble in the “Philip Neri” Roman style with stole, maniple, burse, veil
  • Four dalmatics with 1 stole and 2 maniples.  They might squeeze a couple stoles extra from the fabric
  • Humeral veil
  • Cope and stole
  • Antependium
  • Gremial
  • Fabric for tabernacle veil should be sent.

Rome - Days 4 & 5: Jesuits and snakes - GOFUNDME for Pontifical Vestments

They have to order more of the purple, because this kind of set requires quite a bit.  I hope they may have it finished and sent by Advent.  I’d like to have Solemn and, hopefully, Pontifical Masses during the Year of Mercy.

In any event, since I have a short let apartment for this stay, I am cooking in rather than eating out all the time.  I am a stone’s throw from Campo de’ Fiori and the daily open market.  There is a great bakery on the corner and, nearby, a super cheese shop and butcher.   Today’s lunch was simplicity itself.  Un’insalata caprese.

Rome - Days 4 & 5: Jesuits and snakes - GOFUNDME for Pontifical Vestments

Posted in On the road, SESSIUNCULA, What Fr. Z is up to | Tagged , ,
9 Comments

Mass for Benefactors, some Synod Notes, and forming my Battle Plan

Mass for Benefactors, some Synod Notes, and forming my Battle Plan

While here in Rome, I have each day been saying Mass for my benefactors for this Rome trip.  Today I will be saying Mass for you sometime between 1800-1900 (I think) Rome time.   If I am not mistaken, in the USA the Daylight Savings is still on.  It dropped off here last weekend.  So, that would be 1200-1300 CDT.   The wavy flag gives you a page to send a donation.  My last full day here is 28 October (my birthday, by the by), Feast of Simon and Jude.

Again… I’m trying not to immerse myself too much in Synod stuff today or the last few days.  It was a pilgrimage for me and I am trying mostly for time with friends, prayer, rest and errands without getting down into the muck. I did that for a long time when I lived here. Still, some things have gotten under my skin. I can’t ignore the Synod completely while here. Frankly, last night I was upset enough that I wound up walking around town for a few hours reciting the Rosary.  It helped.  I am determined to form a battle plan in view of what I think is headed our way. I’m concerned.

Anyway, here is some analysis, rewritten here and there, edited a bit, from a friend who has been really paying attention. He begins thusly:

The most intelligent (meaning I agree with it) report that I have read this morning is by Robert Royal at The Catholic Thing: HERERoyal … has some paragraphs toward the end on the composition of the new Synod Council, which has the responsibility of preparing the next Synod (if we have to have more of them). [Quod Deus avertat.]Many of them are very good, meaning that the Synod appreciated the contributions of prelates like Cardinal Sarah, Cardinal Napier Fox, Archbishop Chaput, Cardinal Pell and others. Unfortunately some bad apples were also elected.  […]

Meanwhile, our Hero, Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke, has just given an interview to Edward Pentin. HERE The Cardinal says everything about the Synod Final Report on CDR (Communion for the Divorced and Remarried) that we all feared already.

But Cardinal Burke does more. He points out the ambiguous use of term “imputability” in Section 85. How responsible or culpable one is for the breakdown of their marriage does not have a bearing on the validity of that marriage. Hence, the exclusion from the Sacraments of those who are in irregular marital situations cannot be voided on the basis of the extent to which they are morally responsible for their divorce.

Of course, it’s this kind of clear, Catholic reasoning about sacraments that Pope Francis lashed out at for the umpteenth time on Sunday in his Final Address to the Synod (as reported above by Robert Royal) or in the homily at the Closing Mass of the Synod yesterday.

Finally for a more upbeat take on the Final Report of the Synod, there is this by Cardinal Pell, which will surprise some of you.  HERE

The Cardinal maintains that the Final Report is not as bad as people on our side are saying. I’ll leave you to ponder that conclusion and his reasons, but I’ll add that I am hearing similar views from others who were also “in the room” and who are certainly “on the side of the angels”.

So, that is some analysis and news.

Moderation queue is ON.

Posted in Synod, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged
19 Comments

ASK FATHER: Why were non-bishops voting at Synod of BISHOPS?

I received this from a priest reader.

QUAERITUR:

I am confused.

I thought that a Synod of Bishops was a group of Bishops. That is also what Canon 342 says.

But according to Fr. Thomas Reese the recent Synod also included nine priests and one brother as voting members.

I can understand the Synod inviting people who are not Bishops to provide input – but I cannot understand how a Synod of Bishops can be a Synod of Bishops if any people who are not bishops have voting rights.  HERE

So was it really a Synod of Bishops?

Perhaps next time a female Muslim will have voting rights.

Dear “confused” reader,

In your simplicity you don’t see the bigger picture.

This is easily explained.

Perhaps if you were a highly trained professional like me, you would understand.

You see… it’s like this….

… like this…

… ummmm…

I’ve got nothing.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box, Synod | Tagged
13 Comments