Five wounds inflicted on Christ’s Mystical Body through our liturgy

Bishop Athanasius Schneider of Kazakhstan gave a speech on 15 January 2012 in which he listed  “five wounds” of the liturgical mystical body of Christ.  His whole address is on  Paix Liturgique.

His basic premise is that the rupture in our liturgical worship that has resulted in abuses after the Council and because of going beyond the Council’s 6 clear mandates in Sacrosanctum Concilium about liturgical reform, have resulted in wounds to Christ’s Body the Church.

Then he goes through “five wounds” of the liturgical mystical body of Christ.

You can read his explanations on your own, but here are my bullet points based on Bp. Schneider’s text:>

  1. Mass versus populum.
  2. Communion in the hand.
  3. The Novus Ordo Offertory prayers.
  4. Disappearance of Latin in the Ordinary Form.
  5. Liturgical services of lector and acolyte by women and ministers in lay clothing.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Mail from priests, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,
61 Comments

Obama Admin to force a $1 abortion surcharge on your insurance payments

Pres. Obama lied to Card. Dolan.  Don’t forget that.

Time and time again the White House makes sounds using words that, to reasonable, rational speakers of the English language mean one thing, but actually mean something else.

Again, I come back to the famous phrase of Mary McCarthy, adapted for the circumstances:

“Every word she writes is a lie, including ‘and’ and ‘the.'”

Look what his Administration is doing now and, for you liberals who read this blog because some part of you is still sane, contemplate the President’s blather about finding common ground.

The President’s stance ought to be familiar to liberals: “You are free… to agree with me!”

From LifeNews.

Obamacare $1 Abortion Payment Surcharge Upsets Pro-Lifers

Leading pro-life organizations are upset by the news that the Obama administration has issued the final rules on abortion funding governing the controversial health care law allowing for a $1 abortion insurance payment surcharge. [Get that?]

As LifeNews initially reported, the Department of Health and Human Services has issued a final rule regarding establishment of the state health care exchanges required under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

As a knowledgeable pro-life source on Capitol Hill informed LifeNews, as authorized by Obamacare, “The final rule provides for taxpayer funding of insurance coverage that includes elective abortion” and the change to longstanding law prohibiting virtually all direct taxpayer funding of abortions (the Hyde Amendment) is accomplished through an accounting arrangement described in the Affordable Care Act and reiterated in the final rule issued today.  [You, dear reader, will be forced to provide money for abortions.]

“To comply with the accounting requirement, plans will collect a $1 abortion surcharge from each premium payer,” the pro-life source informed LifeNews. “The enrollee will make two payments, $1 per month for abortion and another payment for the rest of the services covered. As described in the rule, the surcharge can only be disclosed to the enrollee at the time of enrollment. [Get that?  After that the disclosure disappears from your statement?] Furthermore, insurance plans may only advertise the total cost of the premiums without disclosing that enrollees will be charged a $1 per month fee to pay directly subsidize abortions.”

[…]

Read the rest there.

Friends.. and others… I don’t care if for the election in November 2012 you decide to support the corpse of Millard Fillmore, do not give support to Pres. Obama.

How much does it take to wake people up to what is happening?

Posted in Dogs and Fleas, Emanations from Penumbras, Our Catholic Identity, Religious Liberty, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , , , , , , , , ,
48 Comments

FSSP Sung Mass Training for Priests 7-11 May in Denton, Nebraska

Spring 2012 – Sung TLM Mass Priest Training

will be having its next Sung Mass Training Sessions from 7-11 May in Denton, Nebraska.

For more information, please visit http://fssptraining.org

Posted in SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM | Tagged , , ,
Comments Off on FSSP Sung Mass Training for Priests 7-11 May in Denton, Nebraska

Obama gives Amish complete exemption. Catholics? Talk to the hand! Why? Why do you think?

A few days ago Sr. Mary Ann Walsh at the USCCB Blog posted this:

Friday, March 9, 2012
Amish, Ok. Catholics, No.

The Amish are exempt from the entire health care reform law. So are members of Medi-Share, a program of Christian Care Ministry. Yet, when the Catholic Church asks for a religious exemption from just one regulation issued under the law – the mandate that all employers, including religious institutions, must pay for sterilization and contraceptives, including abortion-inducing drugs – the Administration balks.

[…]

Why?

The President sees the Catholic Church as a threat. The Catholic Church is an obstacle to his money-saving-through-baby-reducing agenda. Doubt that?  It is an obstacle to his plan for the state to grab control of vast swatches of the economy and social institutions which help people.

The President is part of a political party which has entirely embraced the culture of death. When you have given yourself to that agenda, you know that you must stop the Catholic Church. You must undermine, hurt it, hamstring it, extirpate it, drive it root and branch from the public square. You must attack the Church and her faithful members even while courting her quislings. You must obfuscate and fog and distort and lie and divide.

We must not now let up. We have to keep the pressure on the Administration while sticking with the bishops in defense of not just the teachings of the Church and the dictates of reason even without the aid of revelation, but the fundamental rights of Americans under the 1st Amendment. We have to make it clear to as many people as possible that if the President won’t uphold the Constitution, we who are both faithful Catholics and also good American citizens will defend it.

Pres. Obama is just the beginning.

Don’t let up and don’t get comfortable.

Posted in Dogs and Fleas, Our Catholic Identity, Religious Liberty, The Drill, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,
43 Comments

QUAERITUR: Can I be godfather to child of a former-Catholic, now Orthodox?

From a reader:

A childhood friend of mine formerly a catholic “converted” to an Eastern Orthodox Church to get married. Now they are expecting their first child and have asked me to stand as sponsor for their child in their Eastern Orthodox Church (Patriarchate of Antioch). I am firmly committed to my catholic faith and will never deny it. I wonder if it is permitted for me as a catholic to be the baby´s sponsor in the Eastern Orthodox Church?

I personally think is possible by virtue of what number 98 of The directory for the application of principles and norms on ecumenism of the Pontifical Council for Christian Unity says:

“A Catholic is not forbidden to stand as godparent in an Eastern Orthodox Church, if he she is so invited.”

I am very sad and worried because I am a really close friend of him and he greatly appreciates me, at the moment I told him I was not sure if this was possible we both reacted very sadly.

Life is replete with choices we must make that make other people who have done something wrong feel sad.

While it is possible, as you indicate, a Catholic can stand as a godparent, your friend is a schismatic (cf. can. 751).

Under ordinary circumstances, there would be no problem for you, a Catholic, to serving as a sponsor at an Eastern Orthodox baptism.

In this case, since one of the parents is a Catholics in a state of schism, sponsoring their child’s baptism into the Orthodox Church would be tantamount to condoning the act of schism.

I suggest that you politely decline the honor they have offered. Perhaps you could find a legitimate activity* as an excuse.  Try something like

“Sorry, friend, but we’ve already volunteered to help the priest at our parish rebuild the altar rail that day!”

or

“Too bad, we are taking Sr. Trixie for a wimple-fitting.  She decided to try Catholicism for a change.”

or

“I think that, for our sins, we are supposed to take the altar boys Chuck-E-Cheese.”

Otherwise, to split the baby as it were, you could still attend the baptism. Weigh the advantages and disadvantages.  Would refusing to attend shut the door at a possible future reconciliation of the Catholic parent with the Catholic Church? Would attending send a signal to your friend and his family that you tacitly approve the schism?

Whether you attend or not, send a gift. A good idea might be a medal or icon of the child’s baptismal patron (blessed by a Catholic priest after you buy it).

In the meantime, pray for the currently cuddly little heathen, soon to be a cuddly little Christian… and their schismatic parents.

And pray for an end to our sad separation.

UPDATE:

* Because some less than close-reading readers assumed that I recommended lying to get out of the baptism – I did NOT – I want to make a clarification.  I wrote “find a legitimate activity as an excuse”.  A legitimate activity.  Not some fiction or other.  Find something else that is legitimate to do at that time.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , , , ,
57 Comments

NOTA BENE

To all the arm-chair observers of the “Lesbian/Communion Denial” flap who, after having heard about Canon Law a few times think they have some pretty good ideas about it, you should go soon to read THIS.*

In the meantime, after irritating some of you, I’ll just make a shameless request for donations.

Sort of like Sunday Mass, right? The priest makes you mad right about the time the basket is passed.

I might as well pile on.

Fr. Z's Wish List

*I learn a lot from him and I studied it.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, 1983 CIC can. 915 |
Comments Off on NOTA BENE

ANNUNTIO VOBIS GAUDIUM MAGNUM! Habemus rivulum! (New iTunes feed available)

I am very grateful to readers who whinged at me about the problem with my iTunes feed for my podcasts.  This lead me to gripe to you about it.  This lead to my posting a question.  This lead to comments and, eventually, help from my friend Fr. Jay Finelli, aka iPadre (go spike his stats now!).  Yesterday, through skype, we together hashed out the problems with my feed.

I now have a new iTunes feed which works.  I can now see multiple episodes.

In the past, in the old feed which you should now abandon, all my audio projects have been scrolling off as they scrolled off the blog’s front page.

The new feed is here.

If you have iTunes, dump the old subscription and resubscribe with the new.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, PODCAzT | Tagged , ,
9 Comments

One of the coolest measurements of all: Zettameters!

Learn something new everyday, is what I always say.

Today I learned that there is a zettameter, which is a sextillion 1021 meters and there is a yottameter, which is a septillion 1024 meters.

There is also, for really small stuff, a yoctometer!  This is for really small stuff.

And do you want to see something soooo cooool that it will make you… I mean… you’ll just… it’ll completely….

Just go HERE.

(Let it load.)

(Don’t be afraid.)

(Fr. Finigan posted about this a while back, but he didn’t talk about yoctometers.)

Posted in Just Too Cool, Look! Up in the sky! | Tagged , , , ,
22 Comments

Bishop confirms 19 people at SSPX chapel. Can you say “Win Win Scenario”?

Our friends at Rorate have publicized that a French bishop, Most. Rev. Jean Bonfils, Emeritus of Nice went to an SSPX chapel in Ajaccio, Corsica and administered the sacrament of Confirmation to 19 people.

It seems that the local SSPX priest was on his way out of the SSPX door and that Bp. Bonfils did not have anything worked out with the SSPX Superior Bp. Fellay. The SSPX priest was working out incardination in a diocese.

That said, about a zillion people have emailed me asking my take on this.

My initial thought was, “OUTSTANDING! We need more of this!”

My second thought was, “OUTSTANDING! We need more of this!”

Then I consulted a canon lawyer to find out if there was something I might have over looked in my enthusiasm.

Here is a response I received back from the canonist (My usual stuff added.):

This would seem to be something of a canonical win-win situation for the bishop and the faithful. The bishop (-then administrator) of the diocese confirmed members of his faithful [they are his faithful even if they never go to a regular church] who had been duly prepared for the sacrament. The use of the Extraordinary Form for administering confirmation is clearly an option for bishops since Universae Ecclesiae. According to canon 881, the sacrament of confirmation ordinarily is to be celebrated in a church, which might give rise to the question of whether the SSPX church is indeed a “church” according to the law (cf. canons 1214 and 1215). However, canon 881 extends permission for confirmation to be celebrated “for a just and reasonable cause…in any fitting place,” so that question is, with regards to this question, a merely academic one.

I have long thought it to be a failing of most diocesan bishops to omit proper sollicitude for the clergy and the faithful who attend the SSPX chapels in their diocese. [Do I hear an “Amen!”?] Regardless of the irregular erection of some of these chapels and the irregular status of their clergy, the faithful remain subject to the diocesan bishop, who is bound to care for them. [Do I hear another “Amen!”? … QUAERITUR:] How many priests and faithful would be brought back to unquestionably full communion with the Church if the local pastors started acting more like Bishop Bonfils, or even bolder – just showing up appropriately vested ten minutes before Mass (leaving too-little time for the chain of command to issue a bureaucratic refusal) and even merely sitting in choir during the Mass. [OORAH!] Or inviting the SSPX priests to dinner at the bishop’s house (or a neutral site, if they are particularly paranoid – some of which are with good reason). One of the taglines that gets pushed at every parish and diocesan seminar seems to be “creating a welcoming community” – how have we done in welcoming the SSPX clergy and the faithful who go to their chapels back into a more regular status with the Church? Seems to me that this action of Bishop Bonfils seems to go a long way.

Just a few more canonical details – I hope that Bishop Bonfils makes certain that these confirmations are registered in the sacramental books of the territorial parish which covers the area where the SSPX chapel is or the diocesan curia, and that he’s made certain that the notices have been sent to the baptismal churches of the faithful who were confirmed so that the appropriate notations can be made (c. 894)

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, Universae Ecclesiae, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged , , , , , ,
26 Comments

WDTPRS Monday 4th Week of Lent – Oratio super populum

The 3rd edition of the Missale Romanum restored the Lenten “Prayer over the people”.  I haven’t given them much play this Lent so far, even though this is the first year that they are used in English because of the new, corrected ICEL translation.  I could look at them more frequently if people are interested.

If you go to daily Mass in the Novus Ordo in English, are your priests using this prayer?   I don’t believe it is an option.

The prayer today, however, has a Latin problem.

ORATIO SUPER POPULUM:
Plebem tuam, Domine, quaesumus,
interius exteriusque restaura,
ut quam corporeis non vis delectationibus impedire,
[sic – ALARM BELLS!]
spiritali facias vigere proposito.

The Veronese Sacramentary has this prayer for the month of September for the anniversary of the consecration of the bishop.  It is also listed as a prayer for Thursday of the 4th week of Lent for Vespers in the Fulda and the Prayer over the people for Saturday of the 4th week in some manuscripts.  It was longer, however: continuing… et sic rebus foveas transituris ut tribuas potius inhaerere perpetuis….

Propositum, from propono, can be “a plan, intention, design, resolution, purpose”, and even first premise of an argument, and sometimes the main point of an argument.  But there is yet another, less common, understanding: “a way, manner, or course of life”.

Impedire… hmmm… infinitive.  Really?

Impedio is ” to entangle, ensnare, to shackle, hamper, hinder, hold fast”.  The root idea is that feet “pedes” are impeded.  It doesn’t seem reasonable that God would ever desire to impede His own people, so we need to understand that impedio in a different way.

“But Father! But Father!”, you are doubtlessly shouting by now.  “What would you say if you change one letter?  Could that be the passive infinitive impediri?  That would make more sense!”

It would make a great deal more sense to have a passive infinitive, impediri.

And indeed that it precisely what it is in the Liber Sacramentorum Engloismensis.  In the Gellonensis it is impedire but the Gellonensis also has “vegitare“.   This is a mess.

The Engolismensis is doubtlessly correct.  Haudquaquam dubitandum’st.

The version appearing in the 3rd edition of the Missale Romanum is wrong.  I don’t have a corrected Latin edition, but we do have the new ICEL version for an indirect confirmation.

SUPER SLAVISHLY LITERAL VERSION:
Restore Your people, O Lord, we beg,
inwardly and outwardly,
so that that (people) which You do not desire to be entangled in corporeal delectations,
You may cause to thrive by a spiritual course of life
.

NEW CORRECTED ICEL (2011):
Renew your people within and without, O Lord,
and, since it is your will
that they be unhindered by bodily delights,
give them, we pray,
perseverance in their spiritual intent
.

That idea of “entangle feet” and “course of life” suggest forward movement thwarted.

Another understanding of impedio concerns being entangled in an amorous way.  This can give a deeper sense to the delectationes down the line.  If you allow your heart and mind to dwell on some created thing, something other than God, you get entangled in a kind of adultery.  The biblical image of fornication is used for God’s people (plebs) when they were unfaithful to Him.  Entangled feet indeed.

Posted in LENT, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, WDTPRS | Tagged , , ,
15 Comments