This has a sort of Battlestar Galactica like feeling to it.
Meet Mabel.
[wp_youtube]xlOwk6_xpWo[/wp_youtube]
This has a sort of Battlestar Galactica like feeling to it.
Meet Mabel.
[wp_youtube]xlOwk6_xpWo[/wp_youtube]
From CNA with my emphases and comments:
Cardinal Canizares: Vatican II was not a break in Church’s tradition
Lima, Peru, Aug 15, 2011 / 05:55 pm (CNA).- The prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, Cardinal Antonio Canizares, recently explained to CNA that Vatican II “was not at all a break” with the tradition of the Church.
The cardinal’s comments came in response to a question about the main obstacle preventing dialogue between the Holy See and the Society of St. Pius X. In 2009, Pope Benedict XVI lifted the excommunication against four bishops ordained in 1991 by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, who died excommunicated.
The Lefebvrists have held since their founding that Vatican II was a break with the Church’s tradition, and therefore they have rejected the magisterium of every Pope beginning with John XXIII. [Is that accurate? I wonder.]
The Spanish cardinal said the main obstacle is that the Lefebvrists do not accept “that there has been no break at all with tradition; tradition continues to be alive and open, and Vatican II is (part of the) tradition.” Unity in the Church cannot be achieved by ignoring the council’s place in the Church’s tradition, he said.
Cardinal Canizares explained later that while he is unfamiliar with the specifics surrounding the dialogue with the Lefebvrists, “I do know one thing, which is that the Pope and the Church are very willing and have a great desire for there to be unity and for those who have left the Church to return to full communion.” [That point cannot be underscored enough.]
Society of St. Pius X
On July 5, after the Society of St. Pius X ordained 20 men to the priesthood in Switzerland, Germany and the United Sates, Vatican spokesman Father Federico Lombardi told CNA the ordinations were illegitimate. [But they were valid. They will illicit, but valid.] He reiterated what the Vatican said in 2009, “As long as the Society does not have canonical status … its ministers do not exercise a legitimate ministry in the Church.” [Except … with they do?] Fr. Lombardi added that such status could not be defined “until doctrinal matters are clarified.”
[…]
The rest rehashes some older news. You can read it there if you are not familiar with the issues.
For your Just Too Cool file, this from History blog.
Divers doing an inventory of underwater archaeological sites off the coast of Pantelleria, an island in the Straights of Sicily between Sicily and ancient Carthage (modern Tunisia), have found almost 3500 bronze Punic coins lying in the sand.
The inventory project started in June, with divers exploring the sea off the Cala Tramontana (the east coast of the island) in order to create an itinerary for scuba tourism. They expected to see ancient artifacts, especially ceramics and amphorae which the area is known for, but the enormous quantity of coins was unexpected. They first discovered just a few hundred Punic coins (already an immense treasure, of course), but then day after day they just kept finding more until they reached 3,422.
All the coins were minted between 264 and 241 B.C., the exact dates of the First Punic War, and they all have the same iconography: the Carthaginian fertility goddess Tanit wearing a wreath of wheat on the obverse, a horse’s head flanked by symbols like a star, letters and a caduceus.
The coins were scattered on the sea floor relatively close to shore. There was no container or cache. Divers retrieved every individual coin by hand.
[…]
Read the rest there.
I was so shaken by my account of Hignett and the Evil Professor, that I had to seek comfort food.
No Mac n Cheese for me, nosirree!
Shanghai Juicy Buns!
Grrrrrr…. platitude cookie.
You might want to surf over to News.va today to listen to an mp3 by Msgr. Philip Whitmore who speaks about Palestrina, John Tavener, and about the doctrine of the Assumption of Mary, through music. Sadly, he needed more time to develop his theme. It is only about 6 minutes long, so it is only a surface surf across some music connected to today’s feast, but it may give you a few ideas for music to search out.
While visiting a priest friend, the mighty Fr. George Welzbacher of St. Paul, one of the 5 smartest men I know and owner of nearly every book ever written, I took my ease of an evening in a comfy chair surrounded by a tiny percentage of said books and in pleasant conversation involving many and polysyllabic words. Ice and scotch tinkled in the glass. Wit and word-jousting abounded.
And then it happened. It was a moment so harrowing as to bring me back to the brink of a long-escaped but not forgotten black hole on the edge of Delta Quadrant. As I write, my throat constricts.
There in my comfy chair, taking my ease, Fate struck.
I innocently turned slightly to my right, as is my wont, and I spied it. The Enemy Book. The Book which caused me more suffering, more irritation and anxiety than any book I have before or since encountered.
I hate some books. I really hate this book.
Leap back with me three decades.
I was a grad student in the Classics Department and for my black sins I had to take also ancient history courses from, yes, the History Department. Therein we poor grads found an Ogre of a prof – of Irish extraction, by the way, which has tainted me in regard to that Island ever since, who announced above his mustache-less beard on the first day of class that he detested grad students from the Classics department, didn’t want them in his classes, and that he was determined to make our lives a living hell. He openly opined, smiling malevolently over the cringing, puling, now whey-faced undergrads, that we would never get a decent grade out of Himself.
He wasn’t kidding.
And thus we come to the tale of Gradstudent Zuhlsdorf and The Book of Loathing and Scorn.
The prof, as lethal and relentless as Species 8472, assigned us one book after another to read and review. And he was brutal. These weren’t fluff pieces. Fine. We did it. We were graduate students, after all, used to hardship, inured to abuse, seasoned in pain, suffering, humiliation.
Then, toward the end of the quarter, he wrote upon the board…
Hignett, Charles. A History of the Athenian Constitution.
O the black grief of the world.
He, Prof. Species 8472, had – with his stupid little beard – checked out any and all copies from the campus libraries. He knew also that the other schools in town did not have it. He’d had a plan, you see.
It was like a movie about a spaceship with a self-destruct thing that had to be switched off while battling the monster.
We all searched. In vain did we search. We searched, before you ask, both high and low. There was no chance, back in the day, of getting things from other large universities… and no time, such was his malevolent plan, long in the devising, deep in treachery, deadly in execution. This was the age before amazon.com and Google. And there was no time.
Finally, I despairing went to the Law School Library and asked, nay rather, grovelled before the librarian much as Aeneas consulted Cumaean Sibyl. The prof had their copy, and if only they would… re… re… recall the book, then we students could…. defeat the black-hearted Fiend. No dice. However, there came a ray of comfort from out the light-devouring singularity.
What Prof 8472 didn’t know, and what the librarian did know, is that the Law school had acquired a law library still in boxes and in storage. We found the catalogue and determined that in the myriad boxes was, in fact, Charles Hignett’s Tome of Despair.
I was permitted to hunt.
Xenophon would have cowered before this march through mounds of boxes.
I searched until my hands cracked and bled from the drying effects of cardboard. I breathed dust which I am still coughing up decades later. Had I known of the maledictory psalms in those dark days, O the sorrow and woe, I would still have them memorized now.
Then…. I came within sight of the sea. I had found it.
Charles Hignett’s A History of the Athenian Constitution… was mine.
I wept. I exalted. I danced a jig. I photocopied every damn page. Copyright? Pffft. This was war.
In my true entrepreneurial spirit I then sold copies to my fellow grad students.
In truth, I think they would have given me promises of their first born children or endless supplies of their own blood for a glimpse, yea even a saving touch, much less the Hated Book Itself. My demands were actually quite modest.
Who can guess what substance abuse the others engaged in to get it read and the summary written? For my part, I replaced my blood with coffee and, having propped up the book on a chair, knelt on my sweat-soaked hardwood floor with arms in cruciform and a notebook on the seat in front of me just to get through one soul-annihilating page after another.
We all turned in our papers on time.
History Ogre 8472 said, I am not making this up, “I shall not send you to hell”.
We received passing grades for our full, conscience and active participation in that hated class.
Charles Hignett’s A History of the Athenian Constitution.
From a reader:
Father, I was in the seminary 14 years ago and completed firsttheology. I so badly want to return to the priesthood. I wrote my bishop andvocation director 10 times and NEVER received an answer.What does the church have about older candidates?I believe they have more experiences that those men just graduating from high schoolPlease comment.
I don’t know the circumstances of your diocese or your time in seminary. Provided that you have a clean record, are able intellectually to do the work, can live in the state of grace for extended periods of time, are free to be ordained without anything to make you irregular for orders, and that your time in seminary back then and after seminary wasn’t fraught with grave problems, I would say keep trying until you either get in or get a reason why not.
You are going to have to adopt the attitude of the the old woman in the Lord’s parable. She beat upon the judge’s door asking for her judgment until she got an answer. Similarly, in the Gospel reading for Mass in the Ordinary Form yesterday, the Canaanite woman persisted in her cries for mercy, even taking on herself in ultimately winning humility the hard word the Lord used, “dog” (actually in Greek it was softer, more like “puppy” or “pet dog”, but do nonetheless). Their persistence paid off in both cases, one a parable one an actual encounter.
Older men can bring great life experience to the priesthood. I don’t know many dioceses which can afford to reject willing, able and acceptable candidates.
My question is, I think, pretty straightforward. One of the precepts of the Church is that we attend Mass on Sundays and Holy Days, and rest from servile labor. From what I’ve read, family obligations are exempted from this, but what about the case of parents requiring children to do chores that could be done on another day? Would you consider this something the children should obey, or an abuse by the parents?
Your question may be straightforward but I am not sure that any answer I can give can be.
Depending on the circumstances of the rest of your Sunday, I cannot bring myself to write that little stupor mundi, or your multiple bundles of joy, should not have to do chores.
In the case of real chores, such as those which are connected to the care of animals on a farm, something simply must be done, and they must be done by someone, and children are involved. When it comes to the harvest and the weather is right, the work must be done.
At the urban or suburban home, I suppose you could have stupor mundi mow the lawn on a weekday, but after a large meal there is washing up to do. I don’t consider washing the dishes servile work. I don’t think Sunday is the day to send stupor mundi out to scrape and paint the garage, however.
Works of mercy are certainly not out of order on a Sunday. Yet some of those works can be servile in one sense of the word, in that through them you serve God and neighbor. And some of those works can be real work.
Cooking, cleaning up, straighten things up for the coming of guests, even some yard work is not, in my book at least, servile. Shifting the six foot high pile of pavers for the driveway probably would be. Taking out the garbage or recycling on Sunday night is not, as I see it, a violation of the sabbath precept for rest.
Arrange your week so that you can keep Sunday free for other things, always including your obligations to God and time for friends and family and not forgetting works of mercy.