Card. Cañizares: Observe Corpus Christi on Thursday, not Sunday.

One can understand why people might think it a good idea to transfer feast days which fall during the middle of the week to a Sunday observance.  More people can participate in them, right?

On the other hand, the transferal of a feast in that way also tells people that they don’t have to make any provisions to worship God or order their lives, even in part, to the rhythm of the year of grace.

And on  a mundane but important level, parishes lose a collection.

From Zenit with my emphases and comments.

Liturgy Official Backs Return of Corpus Christi to Thursday

Notes Desire That Christians Proclaim Christ’s Presence

VATICAN CITY, JUNE 28, 2011 (Zenit.org).- The prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Sacraments says he thinks the feast of Corpus Christi should be returned to its traditional Thursday celebration, to better highlight the link with Holy Thursday and show how Christ is the center of everything.

Cardinal Antonio Cañizares Llovera spoke to Vatican Radio about the feast, celebrated in many countries last Sunday, but traditionally marked on the Thursday before, as it still is in Rome.

“I think that to exalt the feast of Corpus Christi on its own, separate from Sunday, would be a very joyful and very hopeful reality, which would mean saying to all people in mid week that Christ is truly the center of everything,” he said.

Corpus Christi is lived as an obligatory day to attend Mass in countries where it is celebrated on Thursday, such as Mexico.

In countries where the feast is moved to the Sunday following, the celebration is combined with normal weekend Masses.

Shining more than the sun

Cardinal Canizares proposed that if the feast is lived intensely, even if on Sunday, the time will not be far off when “Corpus Christi will be celebrated again on Thursday, as it was historically, which evokes, in some way, Maundy Thursday.”

The 65-year-old Spanish cardinal also referred to an adage that reflects the popular tradition in Spain of celebrating the feast of the Eucharist: “There are three Thursdays in the year that shine more than the sun: Corpus Christi, Maundy Thursday and Ascension Thursday.” [And so, we should also start observing the Ascension on THURSDAY.  Otherwise, let’s just transfer Christmas to Sunday and have done. We already do that, incredibly, with Epiphany, which was in the history of these feasts, in many ways more important that Christmas.]

In the majority of Spanish cities today the feast of Corpus Christi is celebrated on Sunday; the preceding Thursday is a working day.

However, some local churches, such as Toledo, Seville and Granada celebrated the feast on Thursday.

“My personal wish has been for a long time that we return to Corpus Christi Thursday,” said the former archbishop of Toledo and primate of Spain.

For the cardinal, this feast means “to recognize that God is here.” To go out in procession through the streets with the Most Holy Sacrament is an invitation to adore the Lord, a public confession of faith in him and an acknowledgment that to go “with the Lord is what truly matters for the renewal and transformation of society.”

“It is a day of very great joy, especially in Spain,” he recalled. The cardinal noted his hope that all Christians would proclaim “that Christ is present in the Eucharist, that Christ is with us.”

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick, Just Too Cool, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices | Tagged , ,
19 Comments

The Saintly Patrons of Rome

20110629-072751.jpg

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
4 Comments

Roses for a memory of a martyr

From a reader in London.

Yesterday was the feast of St John Southworth, [the English priest and martyr whose body may be venerated in Westminster Cathedral] but today was the anniversary of his execution at Tyburn (1654).  I walked the bustle of Oxford Street to the site of Tyburn Tree where he and so many others were martyred and said a prayer at the site. Someone had left a dozen roses on the concrete slab in the traffic island.

Roses for a memory of a martyr

This little marker is set into the pavement in a traffic island.

Posted in Just Too Cool |
19 Comments

Schism in New Jersey

The Fathers of the Church had a real horror of schism.  Schismatics were dissenters who causes disunity.  Jerome wrote:

Between heresy and schism there is this difference, that heresy perverts dogma, while schism, by rebellion against the bishop, separates from the Church. Nevertheless there is no schism which does not trump up a heresy to justify its departure from the Church.  (Commentary on Titus 3,10)

From EWTN News.

Bishop urges NJ community to abandon schismatic path, return to Church
By Lorna Cruz
Trenton, N.J., Jun 28, 2011

Bishop David M. O’Connell of Trenton has urged members of a New Jersey church community to reconsider their decision to break from the Catholic Church and join an “independent” jurisdiction.

“I pray that you will re?consider the dangerous, schismatic path you have chosen and I invite you to return to full communion with the Roman Catholic Church,” Bishop O’Connell told members of Our Lady of Guadalupe Church in a June 24 statement.

He described members of the separated community as “no longer … interested or concerned with the canon law of the Roman Catholic Church.”  [Yah,,, that’s going to work really well.]

Our Lady of Guadalupe members left the Catholic Church when three churches were united into one parish earlier this year, a move that left many parishioners dissatisfied.  [Parishes are being consolidated everywhere.]

It is now affiliated with the American National Catholic Church, a group of six parishes calling itself an “independent Catholic jurisdiction.” [They don’t want canon law, but they are calling themselves a “jurisdiction”.  ROFL!  But wait! There’s more! … ] The “independent” parishes reject Catholic beliefs on subjects such as marriage, sexuality, and the priesthood.

In his statement, Bishop O’Connell explained that an “independent” Catholic Church was a contradiction in terms. By its very nature, he said, the Church involves “a communion of faith, governance and the sacraments.”

He said that members of Our Lady of Guadalupe were being “dishonest with themselves and, even more importantly … with others,” by claiming to be Catholic.

The Bishop of Trenton clarified that this group and the individuals leading or promoting it are not in communion with the Catholic Church. Citing the Gospel of Matthew, he warned the lay faithful against “false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but underneath are ravenous wolves.”

He said his “greatest fear” was that the leaders of the schism at Our Lady of Guadalupe “will take other well?intentioned Catholics down with them, leading them away from the true practice of their faith under the pretense of legitimacy.” [And that they will wind up in Hell.]

Members of Our Lady of Guadalupe have claimed that Spanish and Portuguese members felt displaced by the parish merger. Bishop O’Connell has maintained that that Masses and ministry in both Spanish and Portuguese continued to be offered despite the combining of parishes.  [If only we had a language which didn’t favor one special community or another.  Hmmm.]

“Christ the King parish has extended a warm welcome to all members of the merged parishes,” said the bishop. “There was a long and comprehensive study conducted and widespread consultation of the faithful prior to the decision to merge those parishes into one new parish.”

Posted in Patristiblogging, The Drill | Tagged , , ,
27 Comments

Dr. Peters on can. 915 and “catholics” who cause scandal and yet receive Communion

The Canonical Defender, Ed Peters, has comments on can. 915, a very important canon which has in the opinion of many been little observed.

Dr. Peters on can. 915 and "catholics" who cause scandal and yet receive CommunionGo to Dr. Peters page for his bit about Robert Mugabe’s reception of Communion at the Mass of Beatification of John Paul II.  I will assume that you know about this and who Mugabe is and edit that part out.

My interpolation of images, my emphases and my comments.

Questions over Canon 915 are not going away

As long as Canon 915 is so widely misunderstood and virtually ignored, neuralgic controversies over the public reception of holy Communion by certain notorious figures are going to keep arising, over, and over, and over again. And not just in America.

[…]

Now, about those flawed explanations of Communion discipline.From Vatican Insider (English, 28 June 2011) we read: Cardinal Wilfried Napier tried to throw water over the firestorm of problems, explaining that “for any Christian, the reception of communion is a personal matter, consciously made in front of God. As such, it is a matter for the ‘internal forum’, in other words the space between God and the believer. No one, except Mugabe, and perhaps his confessor, can know if he was in a state Dr. Peters on can. 915 and "catholics" who cause scandal and yet receive Communionof grace when he presented himself to receive communion in St. Peter’s Square. It is not up to us to ask Mugabe about his ‘internal forum’.  [A problem arises when the person is a public figure, well-known for some public activities which would exclude him or her from Holy Communion.  There is the matter of public scandal created when a person who are not publicly repented and tried to correct the damage she has done nevertheless receives Communion publicly.]

That’s mostly* true, but it’s also mostly beside the point. [* For example, no human being, not even a confessor, can ever know whether a sui compos adult is in the state of grace.]

Not all Communion-reception questions are answered by resort to Canon 916. Canon 915 is also relevant, and Canon 915 does not operate in the internal forum, rather, it operates in the external forum. One’s eligibility, or lack thereof, under Canon 915 to receive holy Communion does not depend on the state of one’s soul, it depends on whether one’s public actions manifest obstinate perseverance in grave sin.  [There it is.]

[Cdl. Napier] continued “Also, since Mugabe is not under interdict (as are some pro-choice politicians in the United States, at the discretion of local bishops) he can continue receiving communion. We should hope that his personal chaplain will provide him with adequate spiritual guidance”.

Dr. Peters on can. 915 and "catholics" who cause scandal and yet receive CommunionFirst, to my knowledge, no politician in the USA is under interdict, but if one were, it would not have been as a function of episcopal discretion, but as a function of objective canon law. Second, interdict (specifically, imposed or declared interdict) is not the only disqualifier for the reception of holy Communion under Canon 915, for excommunication or obstinate perseverance in manifest grave sin also disqualifies one from reception of Communion.

As I have said many times before, none of the above relies on “canonical rocket science”, nor does it take special divining skills to see that, someday, the chronic discrepancies between canon law and pastoral practice regarding Communion reception are going to have to be reconciled. + + +

Posted in 1983 CIC can. 915, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , , , , , , ,
22 Comments

Blog Registration Matters & Tips

Blame the registration process and moderation queue on Eve.  It’s her fault.

Some flaky and some incomplete blog registrations have been coming in.  I don’t automatically approve every registration for commenting ability here.

In the registration process, I ask people to include some information about themselves in the place provided.  Why?  That field helps me determine whether or not people are sincere or they are scuzzy trolls or reprobate spammers deserving of the red-hot fires of eternal roasting Hell with its incessant screams of piercing agony and hate-filled regret.

Personal information doesn’t have to be long or detailed.  However, if you write:

  • “I don’t care to share any”: RESULT: I don’t care to approve your registration.
  • “I want learn many thing”: RESULT: You can haz chezburgr too, but I won’t approve you.
  • “N/A”: RESULT: No/Approval
  • “Not much to say.” RESULT: Not much to approve.
  • “single” RESULT: Then, by all means, stay alone and unapproved!
  • “Blog reader.”   RESULT: Go read one, but I won’t approve you here.
  • jsdklfjklsdgl;adjlkasjflk RESULT: o4hrfdhnbidfjhoiprjy!
  • “professional time traveler” RESULT: Then you don’t have time to comment here.
  • “-“: RESULT: X

I think you get the idea.

Were I to turn off the registration and allow any comments from anyone, my already high traffic would become stratospheric.  But the combox would be impossible and this blog would thereafter rapidly disgust me.  I would either close it down or… turn the registration and moderation on again.  It is the only way to preserve some civility.  It is hard enough as it is.

Meanwhile,

Blog Registration Matters & Tips[CUE MUSIC]

… this month’s Coffee of the Month from the Carmelites in Wyoming is “Sumatran Mandheling Grade 1”!

Don’t have a coffee grinder?  The Monks have one for you here.

They sell TEA too. And great glasses for your cooold iced-tea! HERE

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
Comments Off on Blog Registration Matters & Tips

Benedictus qui pipiavit in nomine Domini

It isn’t very often that you see a Pope send a tweet.

Benedictus qui pipiavit in nomine Domini

Latin for “tweet” is pipio, -are.  A “tweet” is a pipiatio.

[wp_youtube]tty87WDBukk[/wp_youtube]

And this…

[wp_youtube]tC8s44MRGVA[/wp_youtube]

Posted in Brick by Brick, Just Too Cool, Lighter fare | Tagged , , , ,
23 Comments

Bp. Cordileone on Gov. Cuomo, NY legislature’s promotion of contrary-to-nature unions

The chairman of the USCCB’s subcommittee for the Promotion and Defense of Marriage has reacted to the Gov. Cuomo’s and the NY state legislature’s promotion of the legalization of contrary-to-nature unions.

This is the USCCB press release:

BISHOP CORDILEONE EXPRESSES GRAVE DISAPPOINTMENT OVER NY BILL REDEFINING MARRIAGE

Marriage redefinition bill an “abandonment of the common good,” says Bishop Cordileone

Bill passed 33-29, four days after normal end of legislative session
Religious exemption language released hours before final vote

WASHINGTON—In response to last Friday’s enactment of a law redefining marriage in the State of New York, Bishop Salvatore J. Cordileone, chairman of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops’ (USCCB) Subcommittee for the Promotion and Defense of Marriage, expressed “grave disappointment with the legislature’s abandonment of the common good.”
“Marriage, the union of a man and a woman, forms the foundation of social well-being by promoting love and respect between the two most fundamental representatives of the human community,” he said. [Distortion of marriage must result in the distortion of other societal bonds.] “The institution of marriage also affirms the vital and unique importance to children of receiving care from both their mother and father together.  Making marriage law indifferent to the absence of either sex creates an institutional and cultural crisis with generational ramifications yet to be seen.  [In Humanae vitae Paul VI and the Catholic Church were right about the consequences of contraception.  The Church is also right about this issue.  When you are right, you can’t be wrong.] To eliminate marriage’s very essence – its essence as the union of husband and wife – from its legal definition is to ignore not only basic anthropology and biology but also the purpose of law generally. Law is meant to uphold the common good, not undermine it. Now, New York’s government will be forced to ignore that children have a basic right to be raised by their mother and father together. Also, as demonstrated in other states where marriage redefinition has occurred, officials there will be in a position to retaliate against those who continue to uphold these basic truths.  This is a mark of a profoundly unjust law.”
The bill, entitled the Marriage Equality Act, was passed by a margin of 33 to 29 votes in the state senate and signed into law on June 24, four days after the legislative session was supposed to have ended. [Signed by a “catholic” governor.  For this and for other reasons, Gov. Cuomo should not attempt to receive Holy Communion or be allowd to receive Communion by ministers until he publicly repents and makes amends.] It dictates that “a marriage that is otherwise valid shall be valid regardless of whether the parties to the marriage are of the same or different sex.” The bill also directs that all other laws dealing with marriage or gender-specific subjects be reinterpreted to include two persons of the same sex who have obtained a marriage license. While the legislature included exemption language to give some protection to religious organizations—language made public only in the last hours before the vote—its actual legal effect will have to be scrutinized.  [How long will it be until someone challenges that language and challenges the Catholic Church on this issue?] Nonetheless, Bishop Cordileone noted, “Marriage is a fundamental good that must be protected in every circumstance. Exemptions of any kind never justify redefining marriage.”
Thousands of people at the grassroots level contacted key legislators in New York, urging them to oppose redefining marriage.  “Those courageous legislators and active citizens in New York who defended marriage should be applauded for their inspiring witness,” Bishop Cordileone said.  His comments follow recent statements by the Bishops of New York (available here and here.

Posted in 1983 CIC can. 915, One Man & One Woman | Tagged , , , , ,
14 Comments

Bp. Trautman is now 75 years old.

His Excellency Most Reverend Donald W. Trautman has attained the distinguished age of 75 years. In accordance with the Code of Canon Law, he has submitted his letter of resignation.  When his resignation will be accepted is a matter for conjecture.  He is, of course, still the Bishop of Erie.

I have, over the years, sharply disagreed with Bp. Trautman’s positions about liturgical translation.  That said, I admire His Sticktoitiveness.  His ability to make use of the rules of order and to work the conference has been masterful.  He has argued with ineffable tenacity.

A reader sent a link to an overly long article in the Pittsburghett Post-Gazette.  You read the whole thing there.  Here is a tidbit.

Retiring Erie bishop backs simpler English in Mass
Trautman opposes translations from the Latin backed by Vatican
Sunday, June 26, 2011
By Ann Rodgers, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

When he turned 75 on Friday Catholic Bishop Donald Trautman of Erie submitted his mandatory resignation to Pope Benedict XVI. No one knows how long the pope will wait to accept it from a bishop who has rattled Roman officials with his relentless opposition to impending changes to the English-language Mass.

Bishop Trautman is famous in church circles for opposing new Mass translations that he believes are so literal to the Latin that their English meaning is obscured. Though his quest for greater clarity and flow of language largely failed, he won the respect of his fiercest opponents.  [We have to reject the writer’s premise.  His Sticktoitiveness argued for his ideas.  But we don’t have to grant that his ideas in truth involved “greater clarity”.]

[…]

Bishop Trautman doesn’t regret the effort.

“I’m not a rabble-rouser. I’m not a radical. You talk to my priests and they probably think I’m the most conservative bishop in the country.” [?!?] Indeed he might be most known outside Erie for forbidding public supporters of legal abortion to receive honors from Catholic institutions. [Exactly right.  Good for him!]

[…]

The council’s Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy, which decreed that the laity must be able to easily understand the Mass, [Ummm…. it did?  Easily?] shaped his ministry. But critics of what has happened since Vatican II, sometimes including Pope Benedict, believe that some reforms went too far. They believe that simplistic translations rendered a sublime Mass mundane. [“simplistic”… not to mention inaccurate.  Mundane?  Or banal.  Take your pick.]

Bishop Trautman disagrees. He believes that because Latin syntax is so different from that of English, literal translations produce convoluted and awkward language. Further, he believes that the Vatican II documents calling for simple, clear wording have more authority than recent decrees that he says require “slavishly” following the Latin.  [ROFL!  Okay.  Fine.  But we must again reject the premise.  The new translation are not “slavish”.  They are closer to the Latin, but they are not slavishly so.]

“Maybe we shouldn’t be too surprised if it takes a long time for the council to be implemented. But we must not betray the 2,000 bishops who came. [Puhleeze.] This was the whole church, and it was a powerful statement that the Holy Spirit was present and breathed into those documents [The Holy spirit “breathed” into the documents of Vatican II?] what was needed for the church,” Bishop Trautman said.

[…]

There is a lot more. The article describes, inter alia, Bp. Trautman’s admirable position about pro-abortion politicians and Holy Communion.  You can read it over there.

We have no idea when the Holy Father will accept Bp. Trautman’s resignation, but when it happens WDTPRS wishes him well for a fruitful retirement.

Posted in 1983 CIC can. 915, Lighter fare, WDTPRS | Tagged
27 Comments

What is your good news?

Do you have some good news for all of us?

Something small from me: on a hot, muggy day iced sun tea goes down very well.

20110627-035949.jpg

Also, Irohamomiji is finally unfurling with some zeal.

Try some of your own sun tea with what the Mystic Monks of Wyoming will send you.

It’s swell!

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
54 Comments