Defense of marriage in Minnesota

The Winona (Minnesota) Daily has an opinion piece about the defense of true marriage, and the attacks on true marriage by proponents of relationships that are contrary to nature.

My emphases and comments.

Dick Houck: Marriage based on children, not love

By DICK HOUCK | St. Paul | Posted: Wednesday, June 29, 2011

Recent letters to the editor allege that support for maintaining the traditional definition of marriage in the eyes of the law is based on fear and bigotry, particularly religiously motivated bigotry. [Which would make resistance to contrary-to-nature unions a… hate crime.  Right?  That’s the next phase, folks.]

However, a closer examination of the institution of marriage and the reason government recognizes it shows those claims are false.

Man and woman naturally complement each other physically, emotionally, psychologically and spiritually. They were made to give themselves completely and fully to each other, for the two to become one. Marriage is merely one man and one woman making a complete and total gift of self to the other, for the rest of their earthly lives, and this is consummated in the act of sexual intercourse, which reflects and echoes this two becoming one in a physical way.

The two literally become “one flesh” and this one flesh union is the sole means by which human life is transmitted. [There are a lot of people trying to change that.] This procreative capacity of marriage is the reason the government recognizes and bestows financial and legal benefits on it that are not bestowed on any other union. Those benefits are given to bind the husband and wife together, to bind the children to their mother and father, and to help the mother and father financially support their children, because children do best when they grow up in a stable home with their mother and father.

Recognizing marriage and endowing it with government benefits helps guarantee such an environment for children, and government has a compelling reason to do this in virtue of its responsibility to safeguard and promote the common good.

Government is justified in denying same-sex relationships as equivalent with marriage for the simple fact that same-sex sexual acts, such as sodomy and mutual masturbation, are inherently sterile and can never under any circumstances result in the transmission of human life.

In the words of a venerable law professor from Minnesota “The government is not in the love business, but the baby business.” [Stop here.  Do you see a problem with this?  What contrary-to-nature unions involves is not.really.love.  It isn’t love, properly understood.  Whatever it is it is something … and there’s no denying that it could be strong or emotional.  But it isn’t truly love.]

Moreover, when the government changes the legal definition of marriage, all laws that mention marriage are automatically changed, and some of these changes jeopardize the religious freedoms of religious organizations and individuals.

For instance, in Washington, D.C., and in Massachusetts, Catholic Charities was forced to abandon its adoption services because it would not place children with same-sex couples in contravention of Catholic teachings. [Could that actually be a form of child-abuse?  Allowing children to be adopted by same-sex couples?] A more ominous example is found in Canada, where a Catholic bishop was brought before a human rights tribunal accused of hate speech on several occasions for preaching homilies that merely articulated and explained Catholic teaching that same-sex sexual acts are sinful.  [What did I say?]

Although he was acquitted, in a similar case from Sweden, a Protestant pastor was convicted of hate speech for preaching a similar homily and his conviction was upheld by the highest court of Sweden and only overturned on appeal to the European Court of Human Rights.

Proponents of same-sex marriage claim this is a matter of civil rights, but what about the religious freedom of religious organizations and ordinary citizens? Isn’t that a civil right? Yet recognition of same-sex marriage would imperil that civil right. [It won’t be for long if they have their way.]

Lastly, where is the discrimination? All men and all women are treated equally. There are many things the law prevents us from doing, murder for example. “Marrying” someone of the same sex is one of those things and that does not discriminate.

We thus encourage all people of goodwill in this great state to support the Minnesota Marriage Amendment.

Dick Houck is president of the Catholic Defense League.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
19 Comments

The Feeder Feed: some Orioles and a not-Oriole

Just a couple shots.

The young Orioles are still around.

The Feeder Feed: some Orioles and a not-Oriole

They fight over the grape jelly.

The Feeder Feed: some Orioles and a not-Oriole

You lookin’ at me?

The Feeder Feed: some Orioles and a not-Oriole

Really blue.

The Feeder Feed: some Orioles and a not-Oriole

The Feeder Feed: some Orioles and a not-Oriole
Posted in Lighter fare, The Feeder Feed | Tagged ,
3 Comments

AFP: China detains Vatican-backed Catholic priest

From Agence France-Presse:

China detains Vatican-backed Catholic priest

(AFP) – 6 hours ago

BEIJING — Chinese police detained a Vatican-backed Catholic priest and blocked his ordination as a bishop, a parishioner said Thursday, in a move likely to raise tensions with the Holy See.

The detention of Joseph Sun Jigeng came as China’s state-run Catholic church reportedly ordained another bishop without the consent of the Vatican, which stipulates ordinations can only go ahead with the Holy See’s blessing.

“Joseph Sun Jigeng was taken away by police on June 26 and he has not been released,” a member of the Handan Catholic church in northern China’s Hebei province told AFP by phone.

“On June 29, we had planned to have the ordination ceremony, but the police have blocked the road and no ceremony can be held. Police said it was an ‘illegal activity’,” said the church member, who refused to be named.

But the Chinese Patriotic Catholic Association (CPCA) — which controls the state-backed church — denied Sun, 43, had been detained when contacted by AFP, while police in Handan refused to comment.

[…]

Last week, the Beijing-backed church said it wanted to ordain at least 40 bishops “without delay”.

On Wednesday, Paul Lei Shiyin was ordained without Vatican approval as the bishop of Leshan in a ceremony held in southwest China’s Sichuan province, the Vatican-linked AsiaNews website reported.

Liu Bainian, deputy head of the CPCA, confirmed Lei’s ordination but was noncommittal about Vatican approval.

“We have not contacted the Vatican on this, but I think they know it. I’m not sure whether they agreed to this or not,” he said.

China’s 5.7 million Catholics are caught between staying loyal to the ruling Communist Party or showing allegiance to the pope as part of an “underground” Church not recognised by the authorities.

Posted in The future and our choices | Tagged , ,
8 Comments

How to make your parish more self-centered

Tim Drake, a columnist for the National Catholic Register (Register – Good.  Reporter – Bad.) has 14 points for how to make your parish more self-centered.

(The point is: Parishes should not be self-centered.)

Here are the points.  You can read his commentary on each point over there.

14. Community Center
13. Move the Music to the Front
12. No More Smells and Bells
11. Ditch the Artwork
10. Remove the Stations of the Cross
9. Scrap the Kneelers
8. Favor the Horizontal over the Vertical
7. Technologize
6. Better Bread
5. Turn the Mass into a Talk Show
4. Get Rid of Reconciliation
3. Social Center
2. Play with the Liturgy
1. Move the Tabernacle

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , ,
45 Comments

Protest blasphemy

This came in my email from American Needs Fatima.

Caution: blasphemous material.

Please protest the Southern California Premiere of the blasphemous show Jerry Springer: The Opera, which is full of profanity, impurity and blasphemous content, such as

  • The Crucifixion is mocked and the Eucharist is trashed
  • There is a lady singing “Jerry eleison” (mocking the Mass: Kyrie Eleison)
  • Jesus is introduced as “the hypocrite son of the fascist tyrant on high.” He wears a diaper, is fat and effeminate.
  • Eve gropes Jesus in a manner too indecent to describe while the Annunciation is described as immorality.
  • God is a fat man in a white suit who complains about being blamed for everyone’s problems.  He invites Jerry Springer to join Him to “sit in Heaven beside me, hold my hand and guide me.”  At the end, Jerry emerges as the true savior of mankind.

You and I cannot accept such insults to Our Lord and the Catholic Faith!

Send your e-protest message to the Chance Theater in Anaheim California

I suggest also praying the maledictory psalms for their conversion.

I note that this theater receives funding from the Anaheim Arts Council, which is an organization of the City of Anaheim.  I assume that this blasphemous show is receiving support of taxes on the people of Anaheim.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged
Comments Off on Protest blasphemy

Lose the bear.

Another view.

Lose the bear.

Posted in Lighter fare |
5 Comments

Pope Benedict, the lark and the raven

Pope Benedict, the lark and the ravenI picked up something from Ignatius Insight which caught my eye.  They posted an excerpt from Pope Benedict’s autobiographical Milestones: Memoirs 1927-1977.

His Holiness recounted something that happened during his ordination to the priesthood, sixty years ago today as I write.  The Pope wrote:

We were more than forty candidates, who, at the solemn call on that radiant summer day, which I remember as the high point of my life, responded “Adsum”, Here I am. We should not be superstitious; but, at that moment when the elderly archbishop laid his hands on me, a little bird—perhaps a lark—flew up from the high altar in the cathedral and trilled a little joyful song. And I could not but see in this a reassurance from on high, as if I heard the words “This is good, you are on the right way.”

Now for a personal anecdote of my own.

In April 2005 for Pope Benedict’s first big Mass in St. Peter’s Square to inaugurate his pontificate, and when people were still buzzing a bit about why he chose the name “Benedict”, another interesting bird event occurred.

For that Mass I happily had a break from work for Fox News (I was on a lot as a contributor and doing “color commentary” in those days).  For the Mass I was in the press section on top of one of the big “arms” which stretch out from the Basilica, rather close to the Basilica itself in the straight part before the arm curves.

I believe it was just after the sermon of the Mass, in a silent aftermath … no choir singing, no organ playing, no one talking… a raven flew out from behind the Basilica, on our arm’s side, swooped in a couple circles over where the altar was positions, cawing loudly, and then disappeared whence it came.

Pope Benedict, the lark and the ravenBenedict chose the name “Benedict” in part because of the pivotal figure of St. Benedict of Nursia, whose monastic tradition played such an important role in the developed of liturgical worship and in the preservation of Western civilization.

St. Benedict is very often depicted with a raven in artistic representations.

“But Father! But Father!”, some of you are surely saying.  “A raven? Isn’t that a bad bird?  Isn’t a raven is sign of something …  ummm…. bad?”

Yes, the raven has developed some bad P.R. over the centuries.  But the raven also has its good press.

Consider, for example, the Bible.  Elijah was fed by ravens in the wilderness.

Pope Benedict, the lark and the ravenSt. Gregory the Great (+603) wrote of the life of St. Benedict.  Gregory in his Dialogues tells how in the wilderness Benedict fed a raven with some of his meager bread.  Later, when a wicked priest tried to kill Benedict with poisoned bread, Benedict asked the raven to take the deadly morsel away and put it where it couldn’t harm anyone.

Gregory writes:

Then the raven, opening its beak wide and spreading its wings, began to run around the bread, cawing, as if to indicate that it wanted to obey but was unable to carry out the order. Again and again the man of God told him to do it, saying, ‘Pick it up, pick it up. Do not be afraid. Just drop it where it cannot be found.’ After hesitating a long time, the raven took the bread in its beak, picked it up and flew away. Three hours later it came back, after having thrown the bread away, and received its usual ration from the hands of the man of God.

Pope Benedict, the lark and the ravenToward the end of the sermon at that inaugural Mass, Pope Benedict – newly and reluctantly elected – said:

At this point, my mind goes back to 22 October 1978, when Pope John Paul II began his ministry here in Saint Peter’s Square. His words on that occasion constantly echo in my ears: “Do not be afraid! Open wide the doors for Christ!” The Pope was addressing the mighty, the powerful of this world, who feared that Christ might take away something of their power if they were to let him in, if they were to allow the faith to be free. Yes, he would certainly have taken something away from them: the dominion of corruption, the manipulation of law and the freedom to do as they pleased. But he would not have taken away anything that pertains to human freedom or dignity, or to the building of a just society. The Pope was also speaking to everyone, especially the young. Are we not perhaps all afraid in some way? If we let Christ enter fully into our lives, if we open ourselves totally to him, are we not afraid that He might take something away from us? Are we not perhaps afraid to give up something significant, something unique, something that makes life so beautiful? Do we not then risk ending up diminished and deprived of our freedom? And once again the Pope said: No! If we let Christ into our lives, we lose nothing, nothing, absolutely nothing of what makes life free, beautiful and great. No! Only in this friendship are the doors of life opened wide. Only in this friendship is the great potential of human existence truly revealed. Only in this friendship do we experience beauty and liberation. And so, today, with great strength and great conviction, on the basis of long personal experience of life, I say to you, dear young people: Do not be afraid of Christ! He takes nothing away, and he gives you everything. When we give ourselves to him, we receive a hundredfold in return. Yes, open, open wide the doors to Christ – and you will find true life. Amen.

In another connection, it was at that inaugural Mass that Pope Benedict received his pallium as Bishop of Rome, just as today, on his 60th Jubilee and the Feast of Sts. Peter and Paul, he conferred the pallium on others.

Do say prayers for the Holy Father, asking God to give him the graces he needs not to be afraid in his role as Vicar of Christ.

Posted in Just Too Cool, Linking Back, Patristiblogging | Tagged , , ,
19 Comments

Gov. Cuomo talks to Maureen Dowd. What could go wrong? Dr. Peters explains.

The Canonical Defender, Ed Peters, has another post about NY State Gov. Andrew Cuomo, aggressive promoter of contrary-to-nature unions.  Cuomo is, he claims, catholic.

Dr. Peters doesn’t have an open combox on his excellent blog In The Light of the Law.  So do go over there and spike his stats and look at his archive of excellent entries.

Today’s episode has a surreal tinge to it.  I am trying to get my head around the idea that Gov. Cuomo can have a picture of St. Thomas More in his office and nevertheless still do what he does, from open public concubinage to the promotion of contrary-to-nature sex to the insistence on receiving Holy Communion publicly.   The dissonance of these elements calls to mind a Salvador Dali landscape, where clocks melt on the edges of tables.

Take it away Dr. Peters…. with my emphases and comments.

A note on Gov. Cuomo’s devotion to St. Thomas More

NY Gov. Andrew Cuomo, per this interview with Maureen Dowd, [The nutty Id of the Washington Beltway… and now Albany as well.] keeps a portrait of St. Thomas More (which had once belonged to his father Mario) in his Albany office. I am glad to hear it, for St. Thomas, I am sure, intercedes especially for Catholics in high political office. Any Catholic in political life today needs St. Thomas More’s prayers.

Cuomo, we read, has “shrugged off the shrill complaint [I read Dr. Peters’ notes about Cuomo.  Nothing shrill there.  I think the “shrill” came from the speaker’s own guilty conscience.] of Vatican adviser Edward Peters that he’s living in ‘public concubinage’ with his girlfriend in their Westchester home” adding that “[Peters] was a blogger, not from my state. [What difference does that make?] I didn’t want to give it too much credibility.’ [Right.  Don’t bother Cuomo with the facts.] As for whether Lee was hurt by the crude, archaic term, [Cuomo] conceded, ‘It was not a pleasant conversation for anyone.’”

No, I don’t imagine it was.

Gov. Cuomo talks to Maureen Dowd. What could go wrong? Dr. Peters explains.As a devotee of St. Thomas More, doubtless Cuomo has seen the great film, A Man for All Seasons (1966). It’s required viewing around here every June 22. I and some friends have most of the dialogue memorized. There is a famous exchange in Man for All Seasons between Sir Thomas More and his would-be son-in-law William Roper.

More plainly calls Roper a heretic.

“That’s not a word I like, Sir Thomas!” retorts Roper.

“It’s not a likeable word,” replies More, “It’s not a likeable thing.”

Seems to me, the same observation would apply to the dislikable word “concubinage”, no?

The real problem was then, and is now, not the correct use of an accurate word, but one’s participation in the identified activity. And the real solution is not to stop calling things by their names, but to correct the behavior. No?

WDTPRS KUDOS to Dr. Peters… Canonical Defender!

If you don’t own the DVD of A Man For All Seasons, click here now.

So, Gov. Cuomo doesn’t like the word “concubinage”.  It is “crude… archaic”.  What he really doesn’t like is the meaning of the word.  Words, however, do have meanings.

Except perhaps “marriage”.

Posted in 1983 CIC can. 915, Biased Media Coverage, Fr. Z KUDOS, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, Throwing a Nutty | Tagged , , , , ,
34 Comments

Dissent into Hell – Fr. Z rants

Lately there has been a sharp uptick in the media – even “Catholic” media – in open and cavalier dissent from the Church’s teaching and the authority of her duly ordained pastors.  Much of it seems to revolve around the two poles of personal claims of self-determination and autonomy from anything outside one’s own skull or one’s groin.

Many who dissent from the Church’s teachings and authority simply don’t know any better.  They were, perhaps, never taught or they were taught error.  I tremble for those who are responsible for their ignorance.

Some dissenters know full well what they are refusing to accept.  I worry that they are in peril of going to Hell.   Tragically, they are dragging people into confusion with them and putting their souls in peril as well.  Tragically, some of the Church’s pastors are watching it happen.

In so doing we make ourselves slaves of the world, the flesh and the devil and we could wind up in hell as a result.

It is a terrible thing to even think, much less say, but I suspect that in our O-so-sophisticated-age, this time of picking and choosing, not many people are actually going to their judgment in the friendship of God.

St. Teresa of Avila was granted a vision in which she saw souls falling into hell “like snowflakes”.  If memory serves, the three children of Fatima were given the same vision with the same sight of falling souls so numerous that they were like a snowfall.

Many saints have said this in the past.  Is the situation worse now?  I don’t know.  It might be, because the prevailing attitude today, at least in wealthy regions, seems to be autonomy and self-determination without regard for anything transcendent, even while what is truly transcendent is being replaced by concern for the environment, or chimeric personal “rights”, blah blah blah.

Give the way the dissolution of mores is accelerating and given the weakening of the bonds of society ad intra and ad extra regarding even the Church, I don’t know if we can reverse the trend anymore. Nevertheless, the one important challenge that has never changed for everyone through all ages remains.  In accord with our state in life we must do our best to get to heaven.  We have to do what small things we can for ourselves and loved ones and those immediately in our sphere.  We simply must persevere.

The terrible alternative should be a point for daily reflection.

Christ, God, gave us the Catholic Church.  It is the Church He founded.  He gave us the sacraments as the ordinary means of salvation.  He gave His own authority to the Church to teach about faith and morals.  He gave us a visible point of reference for unity and security of knowledge for our membership in His Church: Peter and his successors and the apostles and their successors with Peter.

Knowingly reject the Church – and Peter – and the Church’s teaching and her discipline of Christ’s sacraments, and you place yourself on a path that might just land you in hell for eternity.

If nothing else from this rant gets through to readers, and this is especially my plea to priests and bishops, I beg you on my knees, I implore you: make it a habit to think about the Four Last Things at least once a day.  We are all going to die.  We must all go before our Judge to give an account of the gift of life and the graces we have been offered.

Nothing will change this vector we are on within the Church and throughout the world until Catholics engage in a serious renewal of our liturgical worship of Almighty God.  And that might not work either, frankly.   It may, however, save some souls who would otherwise be lost.  That’s not nothing and it is worth our effort.

Posted in Our Catholic Identity, Pope of Christian Unity, The Drill, The future and our choices, Wherein Fr. Z Rants |
50 Comments

Irish “Catholics” and our future choices

A new video from Michael Voris.

Weep.

[wp_youtube]SaGj1rJdPKo[/wp_youtube]

Posted in New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , ,
73 Comments