QUAERITUR: Using the orginal “main” altar rather than the “table”

Ironing-boardFrom a seminarian reader:

My present church is thinking on having a EF Mass as well as a Versus Deus [Deum] OF Mass. The Original High Altar is still in place with the Tabernacle.

There is however a smaller “fixed” “table” Altar in place a few feet in front of this. The “table” Altar is too small too accommodate a EF Mass. Is is still O.K. to celebrate a Mass in the OF & EF with the Old High Altar, while disregarding the “table” Altar.

It is always good idea to ignore iron-board altars whenever the main altar is still there and still usable.  The next step is to get rid of the interloper-altar and use the original main-altar exclusively, as was intended in the church’s design.

There was never a directive that table altars were to be set up in front of main altars or that main altars were to be abandoned or destroyed.

Furthermore, in an issue of the Congregation for Divine Worship’s official publication Notitiae in May 1993 there was some years ago an editorial article which stated:

The principle of the unicity of the altar is theologically more important than the practice of celebrating facing the people.

Clearly the main altar was intended to be the focus in the design of the church.  It is absurd to put up another altar, within the sanctuary, in front of the original altar.

But, yes, it is always appropriate to use the original, main altar of a church for either the Extraordinary or Ordinary Form.

As a matter of fact, celebration ad orientem is the way assumed in the rubrics of the Ordinary Form.  For example, in GIRM 154 we read that the priest turns to the people if he is going to use the option of inviting the people to make a sign of peace. thus: “… extendens et iungens manus, pacem annuntiat, versus ad populum, dicens… opening and tQUAERITUR: Using the orginal "main" altar rather than the "table"hen joining his hands he announces ‘peace’, having turned toward the people, saying…“.

Finally, as a seminarian, you should run, not walk, to get yourself your very own copy of Joseph Ratzinger’s The Spirit of the Liturgy. In this useful book, the future Pope lays out the theological significance of ad orientem worship.  You will want to study this section carefully and commit it to memory.  I have a few PODCAzTs on Ratzinger’s view.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged , ,
21 Comments

QUAERITUR: Gathering around the altar at school Mass

From a reader:

It was announced during our school Mass today, by the associate here at the parish where I teach, that henceforth, whatever class has “planned” the school Mass each week will be invited to gather around the altar for the Eucharistic Prayer and will remain until they have given the Sign of Peace to Father.

This is sloppy sentimentality.  This crude attempt at being “meaningful” demeans both the Mass and everyone involved.

I don’t believe there is an explicit prohibition in any document against this.  However, there are documents which describe who should be where.

For example, in GIRM 295 we read.

The sanctuary is the place where the altar stands, where the word of God is proclaimed, and where the priest, the deacon, and the other ministers exercise their offices. It should suitably be marked off from the body of the church either by its being somewhat elevated or by a particular structure and ornamentation.

Lay people are not to be in the sanctuary unless they have a ministerial role.  “Standing there” is not a role.

Furthermore, in the USA people are to kneel – not stand – from the Sanctus until after the Amen at the end of the Eucharistic Prayer.

Also, back in 1981 the Congregation for Divine Worships official publication Notitiae (No. 17 (1981) p. 61) responded to a question about this matter.

Query: At the presentation of gifts at a Mass with congregation, persons (lay or religious) bring to the altar the bread and wine which are to be consecrated. These gifts are received by the priest celebrant. All those participating in the Mass accompany this group procession in which the gifts are brought forward. They then stand around the altar until communion time. Is this procedure in conformity with the spirit of the law and of the Roman Missal?

Reply: Assuredly, the Eucharistic celebration is the act of the entire community, carried out by all the members of the liturgical assembly. Nevertheless, everyone must have and also must observe his or her own place and proper role: ‘In liturgical celebrations each one, minister or layperson, who has an office to perform, should do all of, but only, those parts which pertain to that office by the nature of the rite and the principles of liturgy’ (SC 28). During the liturgy of the Eucharist, only the presiding celebrant remains at the altar. The assembly of the faithful take their place in the Church outside the ‘presbyterium,’ which is reserved for the celebrant or concelebrants and altar ministers.

While this does not say explicitly that that people with no ministerial role mustn’t stand around the altar, it is pretty clear that that is the meaning of the response.

Furthermore, at no point is there an indication in the rite for the priest or anyone else to invite people to come into the sanctuary and stand (against the Church’s clear direction during the Eucharistic prayer) near the altar.

Moreover, the Ceremonial of Bishops 50 states,

“A minister who is not wearing a vestment, a cassock or surplice, or other lawfully approved garb may not enter the sanctuary during a celebration.”

The priest who has this in mind should be dissuaded from starting this, perhaps over a couple mugs of rich and aromatic Mystic Monk Coffee.  If he will not be dissuaded, then he should be compelled, either his superior if he is a religious and/or by the local diocesan bishop, whose task it is make sure that the Church’s liturgical directives are followed.   One could also explain the situation to the Congregation for Divine Worship and Discipline of the Sacraments and ask for advice.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 |
10 Comments

QUAERITUR: Can bishops forbid pastors to add a TLM to the schedule

I have of late received more than one email from readers with similar questions.

In effect, they have asked if diocesan bishops can forbid pastors to add a Traditional Latin Mass to the Sunday Mass schedule, or if the local bishop can force the pastor to eliminate an existing TLM from the schedule.

From what I am picking up, it may be that a few bishop are trying to restrict the use of the older form of the Missale Romanum to one church/parish only.  In doing so, they seem to be ignoring the existence of Summorum Pontificum.

A pastor (parochus) does not need the permission of the bishop to use the 1962 Missale Romanum or to place a TLM on the parish schedule.

Pope Benedict XVI’s Motu Proprio says (in my translation and with my emphases):

§ 2.  Celebration according to the Missal of Bl. John XXIII can take place on weekdays; on Sunday, however, and feasts there can be also one celebration of this kind.

Art. 5, § 1.  In parishes, where there is stably present a group of the faithful attached to the previous liturgical tradition, let the pastor willingly receive their petitions that Mass be celebrated according to the Rite of the Missale Romanum issued in 1962.  Let him see to it that the good of these faithful be harmoniously brought into accord with the ordinary pastoral care of the parish, under the governance of the Bishop according to canon 392, by avoiding discord and by fostering the unity of the whole Church.

[…]

Art. 7.  Where some group of the lay faithful, mentioned in art. 5 § 1 will not have obtained the things sought from the pastor, let the Diocesan Bishop be informed about the matter.  The Bishop is strenuously asked that he graciously grant their desire.  If does not want to provide for a celebration of this kind, let the matter be referred to the Pontifical Commission “Ecclesia Dei”.

In reading 5, § 1, pay close attention to that “avoiding discord”.  Few things create discord in a parish faster than changing the Mass schedule.  It is very important, therefore, that those who are inclined to the traditional form of Mass not be the source of the discord.

Keep in mind that 5, § 1 mentions CIC 1983 can. 392.

Can. 392 §1 Since the Bishop must defend the unity of the universal Church, he is bound to foster the discipline which is common to the whole Church, and so press for the observance of all ecclesiastical laws.

§2 He is to ensure that abuses do not creep into ecclesiastical discipline, especially concerning the ministry of the word, the celebration of the sacraments and sacramentals, the worship of God and the cult of the saints, and the administration of goods.

Thus, bishops cannot ignore Summorum Pontificum.  At the same time we could probably identity one or two bishops who, although they have not regulated very well the liturgical practice of their dioceses in respect to curbing obvious abuses, are willing to repress more traditional forms that are perfectly legitimate.

After consultation with a canonist about the meaning of can. 392, it seems that it would be abuse of power by a bishop to micromanage a parishes schedule so as to eliminate a TLM when there is not really a strong need to do so and provided that the schedule adequately and reasonably suits the other needs of the parishioners.   Common sense and charity should prevail.

When lay people are involved in a situation like this, they should remain very cool and avoid as much as possible creating problems for the parish priest.  On the other hand, lay people have the right to express their opinions, respectfully, to the bishop and to write to Rome, to the Pontifical Commission “Ecclesia Dei”.

People can at any time in a “dialogue” with a pastor or a bishop write directly to Rome.  However, they are well advised to try to work things out locally before they write to Rome, to the Pontifical Commission “Ecclesia Dei”.

Lay people also have the power of their wallets.  It may be that, if their legitimate aspirations are being repressed, they may choose to reduce their level of giving.  Alternately, if their needs are being met, they should be willing to increase their giving.  It is not unreasonable to let the bishop know what your giving plan is and why you have decided to change it.

If you are going to write to the Pontifical Commission “Ecclesia Dei”, you should send them documentation about what is going on.  Copies of letters exchanged with the pastor and bishop, parish bulletins are very useful.  They give the PCED something to work with beyond the statements of a few people.

It is not forbidden for more than one person to write.

Look also at my Tips for writing to bishops and to the P.C. Ecclesia Dei.

And don’t forget to pray to the guardian angels of all those involved if there is a conflict.  Old Scratch likes discord and will try to increase it.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM | Tagged
30 Comments

POTUS again omits “Creator” from Declaration citation

From Creative Minority Report with my emphases and comments:

Well, for all those who said it was just a slip of the tongue last time or that his speechwriters were to blame, Obama just made sure you knew that he meant it the first time. Yup. President Obama just omitted God again from the Declaration of Independence.

As Weasel Zippers said, “No denying it now.”

But while I take notice of what he doesn’t say, what he does say irks me a bit too. Check it out.

CNS reports:

Just seven days after he sparked controversy by omitting the word “Creator” when he closely paraphrased the passage from the Declaration of Independence that says all men “are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights,” [Perhaps the one quote people really know well.] President Barack Obama again omitted the Creator when speaking about the “inalienable rights” that “everybody is endowed with.”

This time the president was speaking at a Sept. 22 fundraiser for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) at the Roosevelt Hotel in New York City, and his reference to “inalienable rights” was not as close a paraphrasing of the Declaration as it had been the week before.

“And what was sustaining us was that sense that, that North Star, that sense that, you know what, if we stay true to our values, if we believe that all people are created equal and everybody is endowed with certain inalienable rights and we’re going to make those words live, [But they are dead if they exclude God.  They are dead because they rely only on ourselves, on finite humans who, by themselves, cannot create or endow anything. ] and we’re going to give everybody opportunity, everybody a ladder into the middle class, every child able to go as far as their dreams will take them–if we stay true to that, then we’re going to be able to maintain the energy and the focus, the fight, the gumption to get stuff done,” Obama said at the DCCC/DSCC event, according to the transcript posted by the White House.Kinda’ weird for a practicing Christian like him to make such an error twice, huh? One would almost start thinking he was doing it on purpose.

Once you omit the Creator from a discussion about rights the rights are immediately quite alienable. They become merely common beliefs which can change over time.

But for Obama to say that the Declaration of Independence is there to give everyone “a ladder” into the middle class. That’s a pretty fundamental misunderstanding of rights if you ask me. And from a President that’s pretty scary.

POTUS again omits "Creator" from Declaration citation

Not a surprise, however.

Posted in The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged ,
57 Comments

2 October – Kansas City, KS – FSSP Ordination

Have you ever seen an ordination to the priesthood with the older, traditional Roman Rite….

A reader sent notice of the following:

FSSP ORDINATION KANSAS CITY THIS SATURDAY, OCTOBER 2
Rev. Mr David Kemna will be ordained to the priesthood by Archbishop Emeritus Keleher at St Anthony’s Church, KCK, on Saturday, October 2 at 10:00am. All are welcome. (Low Mass at Blessed Sacrament at 7:00am)

Fr Kemna will celebrate his first Solemn Mass at Blessed Sacrament Church on next Sunday, October 3 – External Solemnity of the B.V.M. of the Holy Rosary at 11:00am.

Posted in The Campus Telephone Pole |
9 Comments

Wyoming Catholic College update

Some of you will recall that I visited Wyoming Catholic College last winter.  I found it splendid.

Here is an update from the WCC blog (in case you know young people trying to figure out where to go to college).

They might have called it “Theology on Top”.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
9 Comments

RATS IN THE RECTORY: Not so sudden DEATH!

Previously on RATS IN THE RECTORY (here).

On the blog Southern Orders I saw that Fr. M has some news, as well as a very satisfying and at the same time disgusting photo.

Well, I got access to a computer to update you on the continuing saga of “As the Rat Turns” or if you like, “Another Rat!” I post this as I look out of the window of my hotel overlooking the magnificent Gulf. In fact in the post below, I’m in the high rise hotel that is horseshoe shaped. It is wonderful. But I digress!

When I departed the rectory as we had a missionary priest preach this weekend for Mission Coop Sunday, I told Fr. Justin to call the priest who is from Viet Nam and tell him of our rat problem and that we would put him up in a hotel if he felt uncomfortable staying in our rectory that is hospitable to priests and rats alike. He said he was from Viet Nam and rats don’t bother him–he said it not me so don’t castigate me–he has a sense of humor too!

At any rate, on Saturday morning, Fr. Justin awoke to go downstairs and at the bottom of the first flight of stairs he noticed  [CUE MUSIC] a rat trap that wasn’t there and he noticed that a rat trap that was under a curio in our bedroom hallway was gone! This is by the bedroom door of our Vietnamese visitor! So he went down and found a dead rat attached to the trap. The rat struggled with the trap around his neck and got all the way down the stairs from the hallway upstairs!  [Serves him right.]

This is rat number five that we’ve executed and he is a big one!!!!!!!!!!!!

[…]

Go read the rest over there spike their traffic.  Tell ’em hi from Fr. Z!

BTW… I sent the priests two of my coffee mugs.  Perhaps some of you would send them some coffee!

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged ,
5 Comments

BLOG RENEWAL: Preview of comments

For those of you who like to have that last shot at previewing your comments before hitting that submit button… I believe I have a working Preview function up and running.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
Comments Off on BLOG RENEWAL: Preview of comments

Fr. Thomas Dubay, RIP

I just received word that Fr. Thomas Dubay, SM, has died.

Please pray for the repose of his soul.

Fr. Dubay was a fine author on issues of the spiritual life.  His books are very good.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
25 Comments

REVIEW: “Annunciation” by artist Daniel Mitsui

I am sure you remember my review of artist/illustrator Daniel Mitsui’s Crucifixion.  Mitsui has a blog called The Lion and the Cardinal, an obvious Patristic reference which never fails to delight me.

Today I received another print from him, a polychrome print of the Annunciation.  It is found on his religious art page here.

These are taken with my phone, so they are not perfectly clear.

Here is the print, taken from his site.

A couple details from my new print taken with my phone (so they are a tad fuzzy):

REVIEW: "Annunciation" by artist Daniel Mitsui

Around the figure of the angel and the Blessed Virgin are Old Testament figures, foreshadowing the Annunciation.   This one is of Gideon and the fleece soaked with dew.   You might recall my post about St. Ambrose’s exegesis of the “dew” during the period when certain bishops were protesting the new, corrected translation.

You can see the detail in the background./

REVIEW: "Annunciation" by artist Daniel Mitsui

You can see part of Mitsui’s signature.

I was also very impressed by the way the print was wrapped up, between multiple layers of cardboard, everything carefully taped up so that the print could not be damaged.

REVIEW: "Annunciation" by artist Daniel Mitsui

This would make a fine gift for, say, some seminarian, or a convert… anyone.

Posted in REVIEWS | Tagged ,
5 Comments