QUAERITUR: I poured the Precious Blood down a sink

QUAERITUR: I poured the Precious Blood down a sinkFrom a reader:

I was reading your blog entry on "Graviora Delicta" and started to get a bit nervous. 

Awhile ago, I served as sacristan at a Jesuit high school.  With no disrespect to the Society of Jesus, you can imagine that the Masses were full of liturgical abuses. [Yes, I can imagine that.] After Mass, I was often asked by the campus minister and/or priest to purify the vessels.  Also, after every all-school Mass there was always a considerable amount of Precious Blood remaining; [That is the first mistake.] when I began to consume the Precious Blood remaining, I was told by the campus minister and priest to "just pour it down the sacrarium; that’s what it’s there for." [ARG!] 

Now I knew that purifying vessels was reserved to the priest/deacon, and I wasn’t positive–but fairly sure–that the Precious Blood should not be poured down the sacrarium.  But, out of confusion and fear, I did what they asked me to do (only once, however, did I pour the Precious Blood down the sacrarium; after that one time, I refused to).

I brought these sins to confession, and received absolution.  However, I now fear that I have incurred a greatly penalty than I originally thought.  I know it wasn’t intentional, but would this situation still be considered "desecration or profanation of the Blessed Sacrament").  And if so, how would I resolve this?  Write to the CDF?  Or my bishop?  While I don’t want to be overly scrupulous about this, at the same time I want to make sure I do the right thing.

From what you wrote I would say No, you did not incur the penalty. You were following the direction of another person who you deemed had authority.  You also cite confusion and fear.  To incur such a penalty, you had to have committed a mortal sin in doing what you did.  You did not have the obligation to know the truth of the matter (but the sacristan and the priests do!).  You were working from innocent ignorance.  The sacristan and priests, if they don’t know the law and theology of this matter, are in a state of culpable ignorance.

I suspect that someone has incurred a censure, but not you.

But, for a moment let’s assume that you did incur the censure, which is automatic excommunication.  Another result would be that you are irregular (if male) to receive Holy Orders licitly. 

The sin is forgiven in confession (since there are no more reserved sins).  The censure, however, is reserved to the Holy See.

You could go to Rome and go to the offices of the Sacred Apostolic Penitentiary, which has competence in this and the authority to lift the censure making you regular to receive Holy Orders licitly.  Otherwise, you could explain the situation to a savvy priest confessor who knows how to write to the Sacred Apostolic Penitentiary.  He would write a letter to describe the situation – using total anonymity in your regard – and then receive back from them the faculty to lift the censure the next time you come back to him as a confessor.

However… if you were already a cleric and you poured the Precious Blood of GOD down a SINK, and you incurred the censure of excommunication, you would be suspended instantly by the very fact of doing it if, in doing it, you committed the mortal sin in full knowledge and will.  You could function as a cleric, for example say Mass and hear confessions if a priest, only if you have started the process of getting that censure lifted.  That is all well and good if this was a private act, unknown to anyone else. 

BUT… if other people saw you do it, saw you doing it all the time, and they knew you knew it was wrong because you were told or you had read it, etc., then it would be possible that someone could denounce you to the CDF.  A canonical process could started in your regard, under the new norms for graviora delicta.  You could be removed from the clerical state and "laicized", if the tribunal of the CDF determined that was the best remedy for you and for others… for the good of your souls.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged , ,
31 Comments

SSPX Bp. Fellay claims Pope Benedict says the TLM privately

The fellow who sent the following added the mordant comment that if any Italian bishop were to resign because the Pope said the traditional form of Holy Mass, that would be reason enough for him to do it.

The English is rough and ready in the following but the meaning is crystal clear!

Pope Says Mass Privately Says Bishop Fellay

*Bishop Fellay says, " the Holy Father celebrates the old Mass privately" and that an Italian Bishop has said he will leave the Church if he celebrates it publicly. Bishop Fellay said this in a speech at the 2010 priestly ordinations.*

(Kreuz.net) Pope Benedict XVI. And his secretary George Gaenswein celebrate the old Mass. This is according to the General Superior of the Society of Pius X, Bishop Bernard Fellay, in a speech in the 8th of July in the Brazilian city of Bahia. [I wonder if the Holy Father also serves at his secretary’s Mass.  That would not surprise me in the least.  He is the sort of humble fellow who would do such a thing.]

You can listen to the speech on the page ‘4shared.com’ under user ‘fbmvm’.

This celebration will not be done because of inner-Church resistance against the old Mass.

Msgr Fellay also mentioned in his talk an example of the battle against the Roman Rite.

At a priest conference in Italy reported a priest, that his bishop had threatened to leave the church if the Pope ever publicly said the old Mass. [Arrivederci, Eccellenza Reverendissima!]

Msgr Fellay: "The Bishop leads a war against the old Mass." Simultaneously, he sees a line of good Bishops and priests,

At least the heart is in the right place said Bishop Fellay about Benedict XVI., that he has a Catholic heart and loves tradition, but suffers from a progressivist understanding.

Benedict XVI. is trying to save the Vatican Council at any price.

The Bishop also said that part of the Roman Curia and the neoconsevative led State-Secretariat have torpedoed traditional initiatives of the Pope.

As an example the Bishop described the traditionally restored Trappist Abbey of Mariawald in the German Alps.

The Pope had already permitted them to return to the old discipline and liturgy. Actually the secretary of State has intentionally set the Decree aside. [I believe that.]

Indeed the Bishop sees also that there are a great number of Prelates in the Curia who are well-disposed to the Society Pius X. In the Cathedral of St. Peter’s there are 20 old Masses celebrated daily. [Maybe not 20 every day, but there are quite a few.]

*Three Examples for the Decline*

Finally, Msgr Fellay illustrated the decline of the Church since the Vatican Council with a few examples.

He cited a chancellor of the Diocese of Trier. He has made known that 80% of the priests in the diocese deny the real presence of Christ in the Host. [I doubt that.]

In the Diocese Langres in north-east France every priest is entrusted with 60 parishes. [60?  Prove it.]

In the United States the number of religious men and women have shrunken to 10% of their original numbers.  [That can’t be right.]

Kreuz.net has the details.

And remember: Benedict XVI is the Pope of Christian Unity!

A WDTPRS biretta tip to Eponymous Flower!  o{]:¬)

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
51 Comments

What happens when you take a coffee mug to Starbucks?

For the Just Too Cool file…

A priest who reads the blog and who bought some "Oremus pro Pontifice" coffee mugs sent me this note and photo:

I use them at Starbucks, and "they" have led to one return to the faith and one regularization of a marriage.

In both cases, the first conversation concerned the mug, not my Roman collar.

What happens when you take a coffee mug to Starbucks?

I am picturing armies of wdtprs’ers occupying coffee shops with mugs and helping to get people’s marriages on track, start going to Mass again, making the first good confession in years….

 

“Oremus Pro Pontifice” stuff

Posted in Just Too Cool |
14 Comments

Just plain FUN!

Super biretta tip to Jimmy Akin!

Play video

Posted in Global Killer Asteroid Questions |
13 Comments

Wouldn’t it be fun to…

… tooooo… for example…

…

Rent a car with camper-trailer and follow the Giro d’Italia or Tour de France?

Sans head butts.

Great scenery, interesting people, fantastic food or ingredients for those who cook, fresh air.

I am channeling my experience here, of course.  And in the depths of time I seriously rode bikes, until a blow out on a downhill sprint.  I still have gravel in my shoulder.  brrrrr

Share your one-liners… wouldn’t it be fun to… [FILL IN THE BLANK!]

Posted in Lighter fare |
35 Comments

Your good news

As we go into our weekend, let us know what your recent good news is – especially about grace working in your lives.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
92 Comments

So much for the “relational wisdom of women”!

Remember that National Catholic Fishwrap piece, "Compromised hierarchy needs relational wisdom of women" by Charlene Spretnak?

There is a news story from Germany today that Lutheran Bishopette Maria Jepsen of Hamburg has resigned.

From AP:

Report: First woman Lutheran bishop to resign

By JUERGEN BAETZ (AP) – 2 hours ago

BERLIN — A German news agency is reporting that the first woman elected as a Lutheran bishop is resigning amid allegations of failing to thoroughly investigate sexual abuse cases.

The news agency DAPD, citing an anonymous source, reported Friday that the Protestant Bishop of Hamburg, Maria Jepsen, is set to announce her resignation.

A church official confirmed that Jepsen will hold a press conference Friday afternoon, but wouldn’t elaborate.

The 65-year-old bishop recently came under fire because she allegedly knew about cases of sexual abuse for several years, but failed to act.

Jepsen was elected Lutheran bishop in 1992, becoming the first woman worldwide to hold the post.

Sooo… she handled very badly an abuse case of a Protestant pastor.

So much for the "relational wisdom of women"!

And of course, this has nothing to do with celibacy.

What the article doesn’t say is that a witness has testified under oath that she told Jepsen in 1999 about the case. Jepsen doesn’t remember.

It is all over the German news and an Italian article is on the Papa Ratzinger Blog.

Jepsen was a liberal darling, having espoused all the usual causes.

BBC has this.

Posted in Brick by Brick, SESSIUNCULA |
12 Comments

OSV survey about “best of the (Catholic) web”

Our Sunday Visitor has a little survey going.

The number of Catholic-oriented websites out there has exploded, and keeping track of the ones that are truly useful gets harder as they proliferate.

OSV Newsweekly is pulling together a "best of the (Catholic) web" for its annual Catholic Internet Guide.

Tell us your favorites in four main categories we’ve chosen (spirituality, news and resources, opinion and community building) and if your pick makes the cut we’ll give you credit (either by full name or initials; your choice) and a free copy of the guide. If the sites you submit are hidden treasures (until now!), even better.

For fun, you’ll also have an opportunity to submit your favorite Catholic YouTube videos and mobile device apps.

Here’s the link to the survey. Don’t miss your chance for fame! And to help out your fellow Catholic web-pilgrims!

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
1 Comment

Card. Canizares Llovera: liturgical education, reintroduction to Christianity

From NLM we get the translation of an interview in German with the Prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship, His Eminence Antonio Card. Canizares LLovera for the 3rd anniversary of the emancipation proclamation Summorum Pontificum.

You can read the whole thing over there, but here are a few points I found particularly interesting.

Card. Canizares says that since the publication of Summorum Pontificum the climate has "remained essentially the same" but that a "movement is underway".

He says that in seminaries where the Extraordinary Form is also taught, the "liturgical education for all will always have to be aligned with Sacrosanctum Concilium."

When asked "What elements of the extraordinary form might also be integrated into the ordinary form of the rite?", he responded, "The sense for the mystery and of the sacred, and above all the sense for what God’s reign means."  He added, "Today liturgy often appears as something that man has a right to and in which he acts. This reflects the secularisation of our society, while other aspects fade behind it. This has led to the reform of the Second Vatican Council not unfolding its wealth and greatness as hoped."

Then….

Q: What do you recommend to the priests? Where should they start?

Card. Canizares: The priests should again prepare for Mass as provided in the extraordinary form. The same goes for the penitential rite and the awareness that we are essentially not worthy of celebration, but put our trust in the mercy and the forgiveness of God and thus approach God’s presence in the celebration. A treasure that we must not forget is the offertory as it is described in the prayer texts [sc. of the extraordinary form]. That expresses a deep attitude. We should internalise it.

If this is going to happen, if priests are going to do this, it stands to reason that they have to know what to do.  They, therefore, must learn the older form of Mass, so as to inform their preparation for the newer form of Mass. 

Does this implicitly lead to the conclusion that the older form is more of a "norm" than perhaps carefully weighed statements of Vatican officials usually state?

He answers a question about the illicit ordinations of the SSPX (which was a hot topic in Germany for a bit) and goes to World Youth Day in Madrid (Card. Canizares is Spanish) and young people participating in the older form of Mass.

Card. Canizares: The young people must be educated in the spirit of the liturgy. It would be a mistake to commit them to one or the otherCard. Canizares Llovera: liturgical education, reintroduction to Christianity form in a polemical way. They need to be introduced to adoration and the spirit of the mystery. Praise and thanksgiving should be taught to them – and the whole which has made up the liturgical celebration of the Church throughout the ages. Today the young people are lacking above all in liturgical education – regardless of the form which they defend particularly. This is the great challenge for the near future, also for the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments. Today we need a new liturgical movement, as there was in the 19th and 20th Century. [Which is what Papa Ratzinger called for in his book The Spirit of the Liturgy.] And this is not about one or the other form, but the liturgy as such.

This seems to me to say that young people need to be exposed to both uses of the Roman Rite.  If a sense of the sacred and mystery need to be reintroduced to the Novus Ordo through the influence of the older, traditional form – for priests – then it stands to reason that the same applies to lay people of all ages.

Going on….

Q: And how can this new liturgical movement become a reality?

Card. Canizares Llovera: liturgical education, reintroduction to ChristianityCard. Canizares: We need a new introduction to Christianity. [Does this sound like the new line about a "new evangelization"?  It is also reminiscent of the title of one of Joseph Ratzinger’s famous books.] Also for children and young people. An introduction to the liturgy does not only mean to know something about the celebration, although of course that is indispensable both theologically and doctrinally. Young people and children should participate in liturgies celebrated with great dignity, which are entirely permeated by the mystery of God in which the individual knows himself to be included. Active participation does not mean to do something, but to enter into the worship and the silence, into listening and also the prayer of petition and all that which really constitutes the liturgy. As long as that does not happen, there will be no liturgical renewal. We have to turn around one hundred eighty degrees. Youth ministry should be a place where the encounter with the living Christ in the Church takes place . Where Jesus Christ appears as someone of yesterday, neither liturgical education nor active participation is possible. As long as the awareness of the living Christ does not awake again, nothing will come of the much-needed renewal.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM | Tagged
15 Comments

Students ordered not to pray near Supreme Court

From FoxNews:

Students Ordered to Stop Praying Outside Supreme Court Building

By Todd Starnes

Published July 15, 2010

A group of Christian students was ordered to stop praying outside the U.S. Supreme Court building on May 5 because a court police officer told them it was against the law. [?!]

The students were part of a junior high school American History class at Wickenburg Christian Academy in Arizona. After taking pictures on the steps of the Supreme Court building, their teacher gathered them to a side location where they formed a circle and began to pray.

According to Nate Kellum, senior counsel with the Alliance Defense Fund, a police officer “abruptly” interrupted the prayer and ordered the group to cease and desist.

“They were told to stop praying because they were violating the law and they had to take their prayer elsewhere,” Kellum told FOX News Radio.

A spokesperson for the Court said the Marshal of the Court will look into the events alleged by the ADF.

“The Court does not have a policy prohibiting prayer,” said public information officer Kathy Arberg in an email to FOX News Radio.

So the group of 15 students and seven adults left the Supreme Court and relocated to a sidewalk – where Rigo said the children stood in a gutter – and continued their prayer.

 

Do I hear an "Amen!"?

Pray pray pray for SCOTUS… and Senators who have to consent to nominations.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
23 Comments