I’m having a really hard day, but this lifted my spirits.
From a priest friend:

That settles it.
No more excuses!
For a while now, I have been looking for information about the miracle approved for the canonization of the two Fatima seerers, Francesco and Jacinta. The other day in Rome I even went to the Congregation for Saints to talk to a friend of mine there about the miracle. I learned that it was a Brazilian boy who received the miracle, but my friend didn’t know exact details. I got the information for the postulator, but received no response.
Strange. What’s with the secrecy? If I am not mistaken, there was one cause for a miracle which did not obtain approval. So… what’s up with the secrecy?
As you know, after a person who is not a martyr has been declared to have displayed in life “heroic virtues”, and that decree is approved by the Holy Father, a person is then called “Venerable”. Once a miracle through that person’s intercession is studied and approved (a rigorous procedure), he can be beatified. One more miracle is required for canonization.
I believe that Jacinta is the youngest person who is not a martyr ever to have been declared to have lived a life of heroic virtue and thereafter beatified. I think that goes for the canonization, too.
Although the approval of one miracle through the invocation of more than one person (Francesco AND Jacinta) is not usual, it is not unheard of.
Today there was a presser in Fatima. The details of the miracle were finally given:
Via AP:
Brazilian boy’s survival of brain injury is Fatima ‘miracle’
FATIMA, Portugal — The parents of a Brazilian boy whose recovery from a severe brain injury is being cited by the Vatican as the “miracle” needed to canonize two Portuguese children broke their silence Thursday to share the story.
Joao Baptista and his wife, Lucila Yurie, appeared before reporters at the Catholic shrine in Fatima, Portugal on the eve of Pope Francis’ arrival. Francis will commemorate the 100th anniversary of the so-called Fatima visions of the Virgin Mary by canonizing two of the three Portuguese children who experienced them.
The “miracle” required for the canonization concerns the case of little Lucas Baptista, whose story has to date been shrouded in secrecy.
His father said Thursday that in 2013, when Lucas was 5 years old, the boy fell 6.5 meters (21 feet) from a window at the family’s home in Brazil while playing with his infant sister, Eduarda. [This is a bit like the miracle for Juan Diego.]
The ambulance to the hospital took an hour, and when Lucas arrived he was in a coma and had suffered two heart attacks, Baptista said. During emergency surgery, doctors diagnosed a severe traumatic brain injury and a “loss of brain material” from the child’s frontal lobe.
Doctors said Lucas had little chance of survival, and if he did live, would be severely mentally disabled or even in a vegetative state, the father recalled.
Baptista said he and his wife, as well as Brazilian Carmelite nuns, prayed to the late shepherd children who said the Virgin Mary appeared to them in “visions” in 1917. Two of those children, siblings Francisco and Jacinta Marto, will become the Catholic Church’s youngest-ever non-martyred saints on Saturday.
The third child, Lucia dos Santos, Francisco and Jacinta’s cousin, became a Carmelite nun. Efforts are underway to beatify her, too, but couldn’t begin until after she died in 2005.
Joao Baptista, wearing a blue shirt and tie as he read a statement at the Fatima shrine and took occasionally pauses to compose himself, said doctors removed tubes from his son six days after Lucas’ fall.
“He was fine when he woke up, lucid, and started talking, asking for his little sister,” Baptista said. After another six days, Lucas was released from the hospital.
“He’s completely fine … with no after-effects. Lucas is just like he was before the accident,” his father said. “The doctors … said they couldn’t explain his recovery.”
Journalists were not allowed to ask questions. [Did you get that?]
Sister Angela Coelho, the Portuguese postulator who led the project to canonize the shepherd children, said her office was informed of the Brazil story about three months after it happened.
She said officials had to wait and see whether the boy’s recovery was complete before presenting the case to the Vatican’s Congregation for the Causes of Saints. The recovery must be medically inexplicable. [The requirements are also sudden, complete, and lasting.]
“We thank God for Lucas’ cure and we know in all faith from our heart that this miracle was obtained with the help of the little shepherd children Francisco and Jacinta,” Baptista said. “We feel immense joy to know that this was the miracle that led to this canonization, but mostly we feel blessed by the friendship of these two children that helped our boy and now help our family.”
[…]
I’m experiencing Zuhlsdorf’s Law today.
I’m just back from Rome. I fly out again tomorrow. I have an enormous To Do list and a lot of it involves internet.
Today… total internet service outage where I am. Internet, TV, phone.

Based on my experience over the last year or so, if you are ever tempted to use TDS… run cold water over your head and find another option.
So, I’m working from a tether to my phone. Not great.
Zuhlsdorf’s Law again.
Some of you may not remember it.
Murphy was an optimist. Therefore…
- Corollary 1: When you need your technology to work, that is when it will fail.
- Corollary 2: The extent of the failure is proportioned to the urgency of the need.
- Corollary 3: When you want to show someone the great gizmo or program you have, that is when it won’t work.
- Corollary 4: When the person to whom you wanted to show off your great gizmo or program departs, unimpressed, that is when it will once again begin to function properly.
Someone should update the Wikipedia list of eponymous laws. Of course that would probably bust the website.
From a cleric:
I bought Saturno and a black tassel that goes with it. I was hoping that if you can teach us how to put the tassel on the saturno.
Ahhh…. an important question. Not like those frivolous “how to make a good confession” questions, or “are sacraments effective in the state of mortal sin”.
First, allow me to preface this with admission that I don’t have a tassel for my Roman hat. Odd, no? Maybe that can be one of those things like buckles for my shoes that, someday, I’ll have.
I don’t believe there is any secret to the tassel. Loop it around the crown of the hat, and tighten it down. If you have to pin it, pin it.
Otherwise, the tassel should be on the left side, if I’m not mistaken, and shipped a bit to aft. So, if the front, over your nose, is 12 o’clock, then the tassel should be at about 7 or 8.
Enjoy!
PS: I still want a Jijin.
And don’t forget the BIRETTA project.
From a reader…
QUAERITUR:
Dear Father,
I am marrying a previously married woman who two weeks ago recieved a dissolution of her previous marriage in “favor of the faith” from the Holy Father.
Today she recieved the official decree from the CDF.
I’m curious how did this process work? Did the Pope actually read the case (it’s not signed by him, but stated he granted his “affirmative? Or does the CDF conditionally approve such decrees and they bring a stack to him and he approves them all at once?
With your background Vatican, I’d be curious about what exactly happened the last 4 months we were waiting on this privlidge of the faith case.
Finally, the decree has a notation in the upper lefthand corner (Prot. N . 39/17M). I assume that’s some archival notation but was just curious whatit actually means.
Anyway, I am a big fan of your blog. If you have the time to respond at all it would be most appreciated!
Since that kind of process was well outside my activity when I was there, I’ve asked help from one of my experienced, tame canonists.
GUEST CANONIST RESPONSE
Four months seems like a very fast turnaound time. This woman was fortunate (if one can be permitted to believe in fortune under such circumstances!).
I do not know how things are done under this pontificate, but the Holy Father would not personally read the cases, any more than a local bishop would personally read a formal nullity case or a Pauline Privilege case. These things are instead prepared by those who have the expertise to do so.
I assume, but do not know, that such cases are presented to the Holy Father in the course of the CDF’s routine (weekly? — in this pontificate I don’t know) meetings with him, and he simply gives a “yes” — much like when I present a formal nullity case to the Judicial Vicar or the Presiding Judge/Praeses and he knows I’ve done all the work correctly: he just says, “write the Sentence” — usually without even looking at it.
The Protocol Number is that this was the 39th Matrimonial case they received in 2017.
These are the norms: HERE
Now that I’m over my jet lag it’s time to head westward.

We are almost finished boarding and two seats are open by me.

It’s going to be a long one this time, longer than usual. There must be fierce headwinds. Sigh. I have a long layover so i’m not worried about my connection, especially with expedited entry at customs. But I’m going to be beat when I get home.
UPDATE
No luck. This could be bad. The kid might be 3.
UPDATE
The less said about the kid the better. Let’s just say that it wasn’t an easy ride.
I did get some reading done about Fatima. Every time I review it it never fails to amaze and challenge.
I saw a movie – don’t recall the title – about the contribution of three black women to the early NASA Mercury program.
The food was hideous, so I passed on it. But there was very little turbulence and we got in a bit early. Customs and baggage was, basically, a walk through. Re-security, on the other hand, was made unpleasant by constant shouting of TSA types. It irritates me to see older people, who might not be quite as familiar as the TSA agents are with the process, badgered in that way without a “please” or any other courteous phrase. I actually wrote out a comment card.
UPDATE

Finally boarding for the flight home.

This is the farthest back i’ve been in a plane for a long time. The trip was booked rather late so I get what I get.
A long layover sometimes feels like a hangover. When I do these international trips during the last couple hours I’m running pretty much on adrenaline and caffeine. It feels like I have Star Trek creatures crawling around inside my legs.
This crowd tonight are clearly battle hardened travellers. The boarding is swift.
UPDATE
My bag was loaded onto my flight! Yay!
Not long ago, a Belgian religious order which runs psychiatric hospitals approved euthanasia for their patients.
It seems that the Holy Father is going to let the CDF be the CDF. Let the investigation begin!
From LifeSite:
Vatican to investigate Belgian Catholic hospitals for deciding to euthanize sick people
BELGIUM, May 9, 2017 (LifeSiteNews) — The Vatican has launched an investigation into Catholic psychiatric care centers in Belgium run by a Catholic order after it quietly approved euthanasia for patients earlier this year.
The Vatican’s Secretary of State Cardinal Pietro Parolin is running the investigation of the Brothers of Charity after the board of the Brothers’ institutions made a decision to allow a doctor to kill their patients who “suffer.”
The head of the Brothers of Charity, Brother Rene Stockman, had strongly opposed the decision to begin euthanizing patients. It was he who brought the matter to the attention of the Vatican as well as Belgium’s Catholic bishops.
Stockman said that he hopes for a “clear answer” from his country’s bishops as well as from the Vatican.
“I wait for the clear answer of the church and that answer will be presented to our organization, in the hope that it will adapt its vision,” he told Catholic News Service May 4.
“I hope we will not have to withdraw our responsibility in the field of mental health care in the place where we started as a congregation with such care more than 200 years ago,” he added.
[…]
More there.
Ed Peters – HERE – has some observations about recent comments made by Card. Coccopalmerio – who, frankly, is becoming a bit a of a concern.
The Bitter Pill (aka The Tablet, the UK’s … not best Catholic weekly) has Coccopalmerio opining that perhaps Anglican orders are not invalid after all. You will recall that Pope Leo XIII determined that they are and that that is the position of the Church.
Peters looks at quite a few angles of the story. However toward the end he put his finger directly on the most serious problem:
That said, and as important as the above questions might be, the cardinal’s further statement, one directly attributed to him, also deserves a closer look: namely, that the Church has “a very rigid understanding of validity and invalidity: this is valid, and that is not valid. One should be able to say: ‘this is valid in a certain context, and that is valid another context.’”
That, folks, is huge.
Huge is right. Once we go down that path, we don’t know anything any more and we are pretty much Brother Billy Bob’s Faith Community in the old gas station down by the park.
Wow, what a couple days. Today we went to the amazing, and super amazing Pizzarium, which has the most amazingest of all amazing pizza. Wow.
This one has tripe.
What’s wrong with this picture in S. Maria della Vittoria?
There’s nothing wrong with this picture.
In St. Mary Major, Salus Populi Romani.
I spent a good deal of time in this chapel, praying for several things. I have personal petitions, but I also remembered readers “Urgent Prayer Requests” and I remembered benefactors.
Supper tonight. A friend an I did a “bis”. Artichokes and mushrooms.
Pajjata.
Meanwhile, I said Mass at this altar in Ss. Trinita this evening. Here are a couple charming details.
In the corner….
Closerrr………
A sacrarium drain.
Notice anything interesting here?
Meanwhile in the Basilica of the Twelve Apostles, the tomb of Philip and James (whose feast it will be when I travel).
And.. in the same basilica, the final resting place of CLEMENT XIV GANGANELLI!
There’s more, but that’s it for now.
I had a good time today, visiting churches and meeting with friends and having a couple great meals. Also, there was some pretty serious prayer involved. I am rethinking some things.
Anyway… tomorrow, I have to travel early. Please pray for me.
The other day I read about another dreadfully misguided and spiritually dangerous fraud perpetrated in North Carolina, another fake “ordination” of a woman. Women, of course, cannot every be ordained to any of the Holy Orders (that includes diaconate). A thousands male bishops with the laying on of hands chant prayers over a woman for a thousands days and yet the effect would only be fatigue and a pressed down hairdoo.
There is a good piece at the National Catholic Register which you might peruse about feminism. Here’s a snip:
Feminism and the Catholic Priesthood: What’s the Root of the Matter?
Although three popes (St. John Paul II, Benedict XVI and Francis) have declared women’s ordination to be impossible, this attack on the sacramental priesthood and the fullness of the Catholic faith simply refuses to die. Earlier this year, 11 German priests from the Cologne Archdiocese wrote an open letter urging the Church to open the priesthood to women.
In February the Italian Jesuit journal La Civilta Cattolica questioned whether St. John Paul II’s statement against women’s ordination is a binding statement of the Church’s magisterium. [NB: It’s a Jesuit journal… undermining the Magisterium of St. John Paul II.]
And just Sunday, a schismatic group “ordained” a woman to the Catholic priesthood in Charlotte, North Carolina. A spokesman for the diocese reminded the faithful of the Church’s teaching on the sacrament of holy orders.
Meanwhile, faithful Catholics are frequently called to defend the Church against charges like: “Why does the Church hate women so much?” And “Why won’t the Church let women be equal?”
Such loaded questions, which come from a highly sophisticated propaganda campaign against the Church, are designed to be unanswerable. They fall into the category of: “Have you stopped beating your wife?”
The entire question is based on a fantasy. The notion that women should be “allowed” to be priests is rooted in a radical misunderstanding of both feminism and the priesthood.
To answer such questions accurately as Catholics, we need to get radical. At their very foundations, feminism and the call to the Catholic priesthood are so diametrically opposed that the male priesthood isn’t even a feminist issue!
The word “radical” comes from the Latin radix, which means “root.” To be “radical,” then, is to return to the roots of things.
If modern feminists truly knew the fundamental values Catholic priests are called to embrace — and how deeply those values clash with their own — they would never covet the sacramental priesthood. On the contrary, they would flee from the office as from fire.
Let’s consider the roots of feminism alongside the roots of the priesthood to see how deeply the two differ.
[…]
The next paragraph starts with the loathsome Betty Friedan.
A lot of women have lied to a lot of women.
Speaking of the loathsome Betty Friedan, may I recommend a book that describes her awful influence? I often recommend Benjamin Wiker’s outstanding 10 Books That Screwed Up the World: And 5 Others That Didn’t Help.