Archbp. Hart (Archd. Melbourne) fights for the Seal of Confession against anti-Catholic statists

From ABC:

Melbourne Archbishop Denis Hart stands by confessional despite abuse recommendationsThe Catholic Archbishop of Melbourne has stood by the church’s stance [good grief] on keeping information on abuse gained through the confessional secret, despite a Victorian Parliamentary inquiry recommending withholding information relating to child abuse be criminalised. [In other words, they want to criminalize protecting the Seal of Confession.]

Denis Hart says he supports all 15 recommendations made by the inquiry into institutional child abuse, but he will not commit to implementing them in full.

Archbishop Hart was speaking to the media hours after a parliamentary committee tabled recommendations that would criminalise the withholding of information relating to child abuse.

There is no exception within the recommendations for keeping information gained through the confessional secret, but the document does point out that evidence gathered in the confessional would be exempted under the existing evidence act.

“The confessional in the Catholic Church is sacrosanct,” Archbishop Hart said.

[…]

Expect more of this in the future.

 

Posted in Clerical Sexual Abuse, Dogs and Fleas, Fr. Z KUDOS, GO TO CONFESSION, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , , , ,
23 Comments

Archbp. Kurtz, as a “moderate”, fully supported the Traditional Roman Rite

I hope the libs at the NSR are celebrating Archbp. Kurtz’s support, as a “moderate”, of the older, traditional form of the Roman Rite.

True “moderates” are also true “traditionalists”.

Our long-time reader, friend, benefactor, commentator here Henry Edwards guides the Knoxville Latin Mass Community.  Archbp. Kurtz, the new President of the USCCB, had been Bishop of Knoxville.  Henry wrote:

Father Z,

The Knoxville Latin Mass Community is delighted with the election of Archbishop Joseph E. Kurtz as president of the USCCB. As Bishop of Knoxville, in 2005 (before Summorum Pontificum) he approved our request for a regular Sunday traditional Latin Mass here, having previously welcomed a 2003 arrangement for visiting FSSP priests to celebrate one monthly in Chattanooga. In 2006 he accepted an invitation to preside in choir at one of our early TLM’s in Knoxville.

Throughout his tenure as our bishop–before being named Archbishop of Louisville–Bp. Kurtz was a generous supporter of our traditional Mass, and we counted him a warm and encouraging friend of our Latin Mass community. Building on the firm foundation that he established here, we now–with the continuing support of his successor Bishop Richard F. Stika–have regular EF Masses celebrated by diocesan priests in five different parish locations in our small diocese.

More generally, Ab. Kurtz is an unwavering supporter of authentic Catholic faith, doctrine, and practice in all that he says and does. For instance, if a letter to his local diocesan newspaper misstated Catholic belief, it risked being immediately followed in print by a correction firmly stating the official Church teaching on the matter. Now the whole Church in this country can benefit from Ab. Kurtz’s open and plain (though always politely) spoken affirmation of the unchanging principles we hold.

I am grateful to Prof. Edwards for the informative note about their experience with Archbp. Kurtz.  This is exactly where “moderates” should be!  Full support for His Holiness Benedict XVI’s vision and provisions, which are just as valid and in force today as they ever were.

I note, as an epilogue, that Card. Castrillon Hoyos (former Pres. of the PCED and Prefect of Clergy) recently explained that Pope Francis is not against the traditional forms.

Cardinal assures traditionalists of Pope’s support for Extraordinary Form

The former prefect of the Congregation for the Clergy has told a traditionalist group that Pope Francis has no intention of restricting access to the Extraordinary Form of the Latin liturgy.

“I met Pope Francis very recently and he told me that he has no problem with the old rite, and neither does he have any problem with lay groups and associations like yours that promote it,” Cardinal Dario Castrillon Hoyos told members of Una Voce International (FIUV), who were in Rome for a general assembly. […]

Another source confirms what I suspected, and wrote, all along about the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate:

Castrillón also spoke about the issue surrounding the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate who were placed under the supervision of an external Commissioner. This triggered a great deal of controversy among “traditionalist” circles. “I would like to point out that I did not speak about this case during my meeting with Pope Francis. I have other sources but I think it’s safe to say that the insistence on the importance of celebrating the New Rite and the need for superiors to authorise the celebration of the Old Rite in this Franciscan community was in response to internal tensions within the order of the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate, and not due to any negative judgement of the traditional liturgy.”

Your Excellencys, Fathers, lay brothers and sisters: If you truly want to be “moderate”, in the middle, get with the Summorum Pontificum program.

You don’t want to be on the wrong side of history.

I must visit Knoxville some day.

Posted in Fr. Z KUDOS, Francis, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM | Tagged , , ,
17 Comments

How AP reported SSPX disruption of a Kristallnacht interfaith service in Buenos Aires

From not-so-Catholic-friendly AP via not-so-Catholic-friendly (unless liberal) HuffPo comes this bizarre train wreck:

Saint Pius X Catholic Group Protests Kristallnacht Interfaith Memorial In Argentina, Challenging Pope Francis

BUENOS AIRES, Argentina (AP) — Ultra-traditionalist Catholics [read: SSPX… but it is far more fun and damaging to call them “ultra-traditionalists”, or even “traditionalists”, which makes them sound like Nazis.  As a matter of fact, you are probably supposed to think “conservatives“.] have openly challenged Pope Francis by disrupting one of his favorite events, a ceremony that he and Jewish leaders led in the Metropolitan Cathedral each year to promote religious harmony on the anniversary of the beginning of the Holocaust. [Sigh… ]

The annual ceremony brings together Catholics, Jews and Protestants to mark Kristallnacht, the Nazi-led mob violence in 1938 when about 1,000 Jewish synagogues were burned and thousands of Jews were forced into concentration camps, launching the genocide that killed 6 million Jews.

A small group [It was a small group but they got a lot of attention from AP, didn’t they?] disrupted Tuesday night’s ceremony by shouting the rosary and the “Our Father” prayer, [Even were they speaking at a normal voice, AP would call it “shouting”.] and spreading pamphlets [“spreading” rather than “offering” makes it sound like they were infectious.] saying “followers of false gods must be kept out of the sacred temple.” [I thought we wanted followers of false gods to enter our sacred temples.  No wait… Jews are followers of “false gods”?!?  Ummm…]

Buenos Aires Archbishop Mario Poli, named by Francis to replace him as Argentina’s top church official, appealed for calm as others in the audience rose up to repudiate them, and the protesters were soon escorted out by police. [If they truly went into the church and disrupted the service, shame on them.  In these USA that would also be a violation of civil law.  They could be prosecuted. I would be tempted to press charges.]

“Let there be peace. Shalom,” Poli then said, urging everyone to take their seats for a ceremony that was also led by Rabbi Abraham Skorka, a close friend of the pope who co-wrote a book of dialogue seeking common ground between Judaism and Catholicism.

“Dear Jewish brothers, please feel at home, because that’s the way Christians want it, despite these signs of intolerance,” Poli said. “Your presence here doesn’t desecrate a temple of God. We will continue in peace this encounter that Pope Francis always promoted, valued and appreciated so much.”

The Rev. Christian Bouchacourt, the South America leader of the Society of Saint Pius X, said Wednesday that the protesters belong to his organization and that they have a right to feel outraged when rabbis preside over a ceremony in a cathedral. “I recognize the authority of the pope, but he is not infallible and in this case, does things we cannot accept,” Bouchacourt said in an interview with Radio La Red. [Sure.  They have – right or wrong – a right to be outraged, and even to express their outrage.  They don’t have a right to disrupt that service in that manner.]

“This wasn’t a desire to make a rebellion, [“This”, he said – pointing at a duck – “is not a duck!”  And this wasn’t “rebellion”.  Riiiight.] but to show our love to the Catholic Church, which was made for the Catholic faith,” Bouchacourt added. “A Mass isn’t celebrated in a synagogue, nor in a mosque. The Muslims don’t accept it. In the same way, we who are Catholics cannot accept the presence of another faith in our church.”  [I think Father is confused.]

The Vatican spokesman didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment emailed by The Associated Press.  [AP… eager to have something like this to write about….]
The Society of St. Pius X has no legal standing in the Catholic Church. [And liberals are all about doing things according to the book, right?  And I think they do have a “legal standing”.  They are baptized.] It’s a schismatic group of traditionalist Catholics [Hang on… AP doesn’t get to decide who is schismatic and who isn’t.  So far there hasn’t been an official decree that the SSPX is a “schismatic group”. So, this is inaccurate.] who are attached to Latin Mass and follow the late Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, who founded the Swiss-based society in 1969 in opposition to the modernizing reforms of the Second Vatican Council. The Vatican II meetings made a point of reaching out to Jews and people of other faiths.  [I think the intent here is to paint the entire SSPX, all its members, as anti-Jewish.  Also, keep in mind that the SSPX is a priestly fraternity or society.  It is not a lay society.  Wait.  AP wants to paint all conservatives as anti-semitic or racist or… puppy-eaters.]

Pope Benedict made reconciling with the society a priority, but Pope Francis has made clear he has little or no interest in courting the traditionalists. [How has he done that, exactly?  Has he said something like, “I have no interest in reconciliation of the SSPX?” or “I have little interest in traditionalists”  Is the writer psychic?  Moreover, I thought Francis was interested in everyone.  Am I wrong?] Francis has disparaged “restorationist” groups as being out of touch with today’s Catholic Church, and his decades-long friendships with Argentine Jews is a testament that he is fully a pope of the Vatican II church.  [This has devolved into editorializing…. even more than it editorialized before. Furthermore, can AP name which “restorationist” groups he meant?  Has Francis/Bergoglio named them?]

The same society was in the news in October when one of its Italian priests offered to celebrate the funeral of Nazi war criminal Erich Priebke after the Rome archdiocese refused to allow him a church funeral. The society’s funeral service was later called off at the last minute because protesters and Priebke’s supporters clashed outside. [See?  AP is saying “SSPSers are Nazi loving Jew-haters whom the most wondefullest Pope ehvur disparages.”]

Priebke had lived in Argentina, unnoticed, for nearly 50 years after the war until he was exposed as being a Nazi SS captain by an American TV station. He was deported to Italy in 1995 to stand trial for one of the worst atrocities of the German occupation, the massacre of 335 civilians outside Rome, and was serving a life sentence under house arrest when he died in Rome at age 100.  [I wonder…. Had Priebke died in Argentina even a year ago, after having asked for the last sacraments, if then-Card. Bergoglio would have refused to go to anoint him or would have refused to let him be buried.  I wonder.  Do you wonder?  For Pope Francis, are there things that you can do in your past that forever ban you from the Catholic Church in any way?  Would he have refused any sign of the compassion he is clearly demonstrating and asking to be demonstrated to everyone? I think AP would have you think so.  Why? Because it is unforgivable to be a conservative or a Catholic traditionalist.]

Since this will open up onto the SSPX fever swamp again, I will switch on the comment moderation queue.

I am in no way condoning what the SSPXers did to disrupt that service.  As a matter of fact, “Thanks heaps for making everything that much harder!”  Some trads can be their own – and our own – worst enemies.  But that is old news.

What really troubles me is how AP wrote about it.  My spidey-sense suggests that this is part of a project to undermine anything “traditional” in the Church, to associate anything “traditional” with something everyone hates: Nazism.

Posted in Biased Media Coverage, SESSIUNCULA, SSPX, The Drill, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , , ,
31 Comments

Consecration of a diocese to the Sacred Heart!

Consecration of a diocese to the Sacred Heart!I like this bishop.  He is the sort of bishop that Archbp. Mennini – Nuncio to England and Wales – is helping to appoint.   I remember his “inaugural” sermon as the newly “installed” bishop.  HERE

From the best Catholic weekly in the UK:

Bishop of Portsmouth to consecrate diocese to the Sacred Heart of Jesus Christ

The Rt Rev Philip Egan, Bishop of Portsmouth, has announced his intention to consecrate the Diocese of Portsmouth to the Sacred Heart of Jesus Christ.

Bishop Egan’s decision to consecrate the Diocese coincides with the conclusion of the Year of Faith. [Something concrete came out of it!] In a message to the clergy and people of the diocese, he acknowledged that, owing to “powerful forces of chaos and moral malaise” within society today, “the Catholic community in Britain is … entering the unknown, an alien land, and the road ahead over the next decades is unmapped and unclear.”  [Our Lady’s Dowry!]

His invitation to the clergy and faithful of the Portsmouth Diocese to consecrate themselves, both individually and in a communal act to the Sacred Heart, is intended to strengthen Christian identity.

“This consecration is not simply an act of piety,” Bishop Egan explained. “I want to ask everyone to put Jesus first, to acknowledge Him as their Lord, to profess Him alone to be the Way to human happiness, the Truth that sets us free, the Eternal Life for which we long.

“Our faith is never a hobby, an add-on to something else, something we think about when we can.”

The clergy and faithful of Portsmouth Diocese have been invited to consecrate themselves to the Sacred Heart on the Feast of Christ the King (November 24). Catholic teachers and schoolchildren have been invited to undertake this consecration in school, on the day after the Feast.

Fr. Z kudos to Bishop Egan.  Pompey is fortunate to have him.

I would add that more celebrations of the Extraordinary Form will help to revitalize liturgical worship, especially through the way learning the older form changes priests themselves.  The knock-on effect is a vital element in the renewal of our Catholic identity.

(Belated thanks to SM who sent me the press release from the diocese about this. I didn’t have the chance to post earlier.)

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Fr. Z KUDOS, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Just Too Cool, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, Year of Faith | Tagged , ,
4 Comments

“Affordable” Care Act advertisement

What mentality is really driving those who have pushed the ludicrously entitled “AFFORDABLE” Care Act (aka Obamacare)?

Here is a real ad.  Read it carefully and look with a critical eye at the imagery.  What is Pres. Obama’s and Nancy Pelosi’s and Harry Reid’s team trying to tell young people?

"Affordable" Care Act advertisement

But, hey!  Who are we to judge?

Posted in Liberals, You must be joking! |
61 Comments

Bp. Zubik refuses to facilitate a “moral evil”

Now that we have the fluffiest and most wonderfullest Pope ehvurr, Pope Francis, and now that bishops are supposed to be “pastoral”, liberals will start more and more often to claim that bishops should start caving in on the HHS mandate and Obamacare, ludicrously entitled the “Affordable” Care Act.

For liberals, being “pastoral” means compromising the Church’s teachings and lying to people. For liberals, being “pastoral” is like being “prophetic”. They proclaim themselves “prophetic” and then claim that their prophetic voice trumps what the “hierarchical” or “official” Church says and does. So, the pressure from the catholic Left will now be exerted on US bishops to be “pastoral” (as they see it).

This, however, comes from AP via the Modesto Bee:

Bishop [of Pittsburgh]: I won’t let insurer give disputed coverage
BY KEVIN BEGOS

PITTSBURGH — The Roman Catholic bishop of Pittsburgh said Tuesday that he will refuse to sign a document allowing its health plan to provide birth control and abortion coverage for employees of a diocese-related charity, even if it means paying fines.

The Pittsburgh diocese and its counterpart in Erie are challenging federal health care law changes that require contraceptive and abortion coverage in employee health plans. Tuesday’s hearing was focused on whether U.S. District Judge Arthur Schwab should block the government from enforcing the mandate while the dioceses pursue their lawsuits claiming the requirements violate their First Amendment right of religious freedom.

The Justice Department contends the church is exempt and that its charitable affiliates can be accommodated so they don’t have to pay for the coverage they object to. [Is that an accurate portrayal? I don’t think so. The fact is that the affiliates would be forced to provide the service to which the Church objects on religious grounds.  Payment is one thing.  Doing evil things is another.]

Last year a judge dismissed a previous lawsuit the Pittsburgh diocese filed over the same issues, saying it has not been harmed  [“Harmed” in what sense?  Monetarily?  That’s not the point.] by the new health care legislation and that the government had promised to take steps to address religious objections. But the diocese sued again, saying the final regulations that take effect Jan. 1 are worse than the proposed regulations that prompted the earlier lawsuit.

Bishop David Zubik testified that he wouldn’t be able to live with himself if he signed a form that allowed the disputed services to be provided to employees. Zubik said the church is being asked to violate an important belief and a matter of conscience.

The Rev. Scott Jabo, president of Cathedral Preparatory School in Erie, testified that even allowing a third-party company to provide the services to employees would be facilitating “a moral evil.” Jabo said that if he were to help that to happen, “I’m committing a sin.”

[…]

Of course secularists and catholic liberals who run along with them don’t care that the Church will be driven out of providing health care for the poor.  They want more big government.

Fr. Z kudos to Bp. Zubik.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Fr. Z KUDOS, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Liberals, Our Catholic Identity, Religious Liberty, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , , , , ,
22 Comments

Müller corrects Marx on the issue of Communion for divorced/remarried

From Andrea Tornielli:

The Prefect of the Congregation for the Faith, Gerhard Müller, has written a letter asking for the withdrawal and revision of the proposal to allow remarried Catholics to receive the sacraments

ANDREA TORNIELLI
VATICAN CITY
When the document made headlines across the world at the start of October for its reconsideration of the position of remarried divorcees, Fr. Federico Lombardi clarified that: “Nothing changes, there is no news for the divorced who remarry. The document comes in fact from a local pastoral office and does not touch the responsibility of the bishop. Therefore, it has jumped the gun, and is not the official expression of diocesan authorities.” Now the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith headed by Archbishop Gerhard Ludwig Müller has disassociated itself from the proposal presented by an office of the Diocese of Freiburg to allow remarried Catholics to receive the sacraments.  [But no doubt a lot of damage has been done because of that document, which came from a mid-level official in the Diocese of Freiburg under the aegies of Bp. Zollitsch.  But liberals often use this tactic: creeping incremetalism.  They make an outrageous statement, which must be retracted.  In the meantime, some people buy into it.  The next time the outrageous thing is forwarded, it sounds less outrageous.  And so forth.]

[…]

Müller recognises that the proposal Freiburg published at the start of October contains very correct and important pastoral teachings, but is unclear in its terminology and does not correspond with Church teaching in two points.” The first regards the possibility for couples who have remarried after divorce to “responsibly reach” a “decision of conscience” to receive communion. According to the document’s authors the parish priests and the community must respect this decision. Müller stressed that remarried divorcees must be encouraged to participate in Church life but they cannot be admitted to the Eucharist. To give them this right “would cause confusion among the faithful about the Church’s teaching about the indissolubility of marriage (pastoral reason).”

The second criticism is regarding the prayer and blessing of remarried divorcees. Such celebrations were expressly forbidden by John Paul II and Benedict XVI: “Due to the aforementioned discrepancies, the draft text is to be withdrawn and revised, so that no pastoral directions are sanctioned which are in opposition to Church teaching,” Müller writes.

[…]

Meanwhile, the Archbishop of Munich, Reinhard Marx, who is a member of Francis’ eight-member advisory Council of Cardinals openly criticised Müller’s article, stating: “The Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith cannot stop the discussions.” He also said Müller’s article was like a “fence” around Francis’ “field hospital” of mercy, an image Francis used to describe the duty the Church has towards the many wounded in today’s modern society.

Marx, and his side, will lose.  It is hard to conceive of any way around the issue of denial of Communion to the divorced and remarried, other than the usual solutions (i.e., separation, “sibling” relationship).  Eastern solutions seem to be non-starters.  The “lack of faith” solution seems also to be untenable.  And the fact remains: marriage is either indissoluble or it is not.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , , ,
26 Comments

Military chaplains harassed, mocked for quoting Scripture during chaplain training

From Citizen Link:

Military Chaplains Sue Over Harassment, Attack on Christian Faith
by Bethany Monk

Those who serve our country often greet reveilles before the sunrise. They don the uniform. They represent our country, and they continue to make sacrifice after sacrifice. With the onslaught of government intrusion on religious freedom, some of them are dealing with egregious attacks on their personal faith.

A legal group on Friday filed suit on behalf of two military chaplains. According to the suit, a supervisor with the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) mocked their Christian faith, repeatedly, during a chaplain training program.  [?!?]

Retired U.S. Army Maj. Steven Firtko and U.S. Navy Lt. Cmdr. Dan Klender began the Clinical Pastoral Education Center program at a San Diego VA last year. Shortly after, they say the program’s supervisor, Nancy Dietsch, began harassing their beliefs.

According to the suit, she told them they could not pray in Jesus’s name, and she shouted: “Do not quote Scripture in this class!” while pounding her fists on her desk.

“Not only was the treatment these men received inappropriate, it was also a violation of federal law and the religious freedom guarantees of the First Amendment,” said retired U.S. Navy Cmdr. J.B. Wells, executive director of Military-Veterans Advocacy (M-VA).

M-VA is representing the Conservative Baptist Association of America, the endorsing agent for the two chaplains.

According to court documents, Dietsch also insisted that God could be a man or a woman and stated that evolution is a fact. The suit says she stated three times that: “There is no room in this program for those who believe they are right and everybody else is wrong.”

“This is what happens when your actions as Commander-in-Chief say that morals and values don’t matter anymore in the military,” [Ohhhh…. they do matter.  But they have to be twisted.] said retired Air Force Col. Bill Spencer, a national representative of family policy councils for Focus on the Family. “And then you have all of these other people out there who will interpret that commander’s intent in extreme ways.”  [Or exactly according to the intent of the CinC.]

Klender withdrew from the program in February because of the harassment, according to the lawsuit. Firtko, who was placed on probation by Dietsch, received a letter — dated Feb. 15 — from the VA notifying him that he would be dismissed from the program on March 1.

“No American choosing to serve in the armed forces should be openly ridiculed for his Christian faith,” Wells explained. “That is most obviously true for chaplains participating in a chaplain training program.” [Indeed, no.  These are exactly the people you want to attack.  Drive chaplains out of the military and the battle is half won.]

FOR MORE INFORMATION
Read the complaint in Conservative Baptist Association of America v. Shinseki. HERE

Posted in Hard-Identity Catholicism, Liberals, Our Catholic Identity, Religious Liberty, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , , ,
30 Comments

QUAERITUR: Glass chalice…. really? This is still a problem?

QUAERITUR: Glass chalice.... really? This is still a problem?From a  reader:

Hello Father, I noticed one of the priests at my parish always seems to use a glass chalice for the Eucharist. Seems clear from more than a few previous posts I see here at WDTPRS that a glass chalice should not be used. I’m not sure how or even if I should bring this up. It’s just the one priest, so it must be his personal chalice? I noticed the pastor and other priests use what appear to be gold chalices, though can’t tell if they’re the same or not.

This priest seems so good otherwise, and I always love how he sings elements of his OF mass, but I worry about the most tactful to bring something like this up or if I even should. I don’t want to appear overly confrontational when shaking his hand after the mass and don’t want to “rat him out” to the pastor (or higher), so would appreciate your advice on if/how I should ask him about it. Maybe I just answered it for myself. Ask him politely…

First, the priest may not be aware that Redemptionis Sacramentum reprobated the use of such materials.

[117.] Sacred vessels for containing the Body and Blood of the Lord must be made in strict conformity with the norms of tradition and of the liturgical books. The Bishops’ Conferences have the faculty to decide whether it is appropriate, once their decisions have been given the recognitio by the Apostolic See, for sacred vessels to be made of other solid materials as well. It is strictly required, however, that such materials be truly noble in the common estimation within a given region, so that honour will be given to the Lord by their use, and all risk of diminishing the doctrine of the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharistic species in the eyes of the faithful will be avoided. Reprobated, therefore, is any practice of using for the celebration of Mass common vessels, or others lacking in quality, or devoid of all artistic merit or which are mere containers, as also other vessels made from glass, earthenware, clay, or other materials that break easily. This norm is to be applied even as regards metals and other materials that easily rust or deteriorate.

A key word here is reprobated.  This is a technical term meaning that it is abolished, or forbidden in such a complete way that no one can appeal to custom (‘but I’ve been doing this for years now!”) nor can anyone try to establish a custom by violating the law over a long period of time.

In other words…. NO GLASS CHALICES.

You could send Father, for his opportune knowledge, a kind note with a copy of the document, highlighting the relevant paragraph.  Ask him if he was aware of the paragraph.  Don’t level accusations or editorialize, etc.

If that does not produce results, or if it produces negative results, first get a photo of the priest using the glass chalice and file it away.  Then, send a note to the local bishop asking in a general way by what authority a priest may chose to use a glass chalice.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , ,
43 Comments

“I hate this game.”

Does anyone doubt that an increasingly large number of increasingly dumb, increasingly unsocialized, increasingly over-prescribed victims of the decades on war-on-boys (male and female victims) who play violent video games for hours every day may be a looming social problem?

Is this the alternative?

"I hate this game."

The other day a friend opined to me in a conversation over my smartphone about the value of having smartphones that cost hundreds of dollars so people watch cat videos more easily.

Speaking of cat videos, here’s a cat video.  (Yes, dear readers, this is what watching the live stream of the USCCB meeting has reduced me to today.)

Play video

and… the sequel …

Play video

I wonder if violent video games aren’t a kind of human catnip, as is the affliction of pornography, on which the USCCB had a discussion today. Moreover, watching USCCB meetings could be a kind of liberal, professional soft-identity Catholic catnip.

Just thinking aloud… you know … like… who am I to judge? … like…. it’s all so… simple…. once you….

What was the question?

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged ,
19 Comments