BRICK BY BRICK: New TLM in a small town

Pope Benedict gave us a great gift in the provisions of Summorum Pontificum.

Get out there and USE THEM!

Now is not the time to fall back or hesitate or wring hands.

Organize! Stop whining! Make it happen!

From a reader:

The small town of Veneta, Oregon (population less than 5,000), which is 20 or so minutes from Eugene is home to an SSPX parish and St. Catherine of Siena Catholic church. Starting this Sunday, the TLM will be celebrated at St. Catherine’s every Sunday and on Holy Days. There is no TLM offered in the area and there are many large parishes in Eugene, but this priest has decided to take up this cross in order to allow a licit option (at least for the celebration of Mass) for those who want to practice and worship traditionally.

The New Evangelization.

Give that SSPX chapel some competition and bring those people back to greater manifest unity with the Roman Pontiff and the local bishop.

Fr Z Kudos to the priest.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick, Fr. Z KUDOS, Just Too Cool, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, The future and our choices | Tagged , ,
20 Comments

QUAERITUR: Is Mass valid if the priest is in mortal sin?

From a reader:

Sometime ago, I was told by a priest that if the priest is in mortal sin, the mass (primarily Holy Communion) is still valid, his argument being that you wouldn’t know that he was in mortal sin. I was taught if a priest is in mortal sin, he should not celebrate mass, but if he were, would it be valid?

It is a great mystery and a sign of God’s unfathomable love that He entrusts the most sacred thing imaginable to the hands of the most unworthy sinners.

The older form of Mass in the Roman Rite often reminds the priest that he is a sinner.  The newer form…. not so much.  Perhaps this is part of our problem today.  But I digress….

The efficacy of our sacraments and rites do not depend on the holiness of the human priest.  Christ is the true actor in the liturgy.  The holiness and efficacy of the rites depend on Christ’s holiness and action.   The priest, by his ordination, acts in Christ’s person, but Christ is the only Holy One.

So, even when a sinful priest, even a very sinful priest, says Mass or absolves sins, the Mass is valid and the sins are forgiven.

Would it be better were the priest only to fulfill his priestly duties when in the state of grace?  Sure.  But this is real life, friend.  Priests have work to do and they can’t always get to confession.  As a matter of act, for lots of reasons it can be harder for priests to get to confession than it is for most lay people.

Should the priest, a frail human being like everyone else, refuse to say Mass for the congregation who come to church on schedule to fulfill their own obligations?  Of course not.  He should make as perfect an act of contrition as he can and say Mass on schedule.  He should then try to get to confession as soon as he can…. just like everyone else who is aware of mortal sins.

Priests have to face judgment too, you know.  Their judgment will be more exacting because of what is entrusted to them.

I want to add a warning:

Don’t attach too much to the person of the priest or to his own holiness.  Priests don’t transmit their holiness to you.  This was an error that St. Augustine dealt with during the Donatist controversy in the 4th and 5th centuries.  Priests are God’s instruments and the holiness is entirely HIS.

The bottom line: When a priest who has committed mortal sins says Mass, Mass is valid.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Priests and Priesthood | Tagged , ,
33 Comments

Pope Francis heard confessions in a parish before Mass

On several occasions Pope Francis has spoken about the importance of the Sacrament of Penance.

Remember: Our Lord Himself established the Sacrament of Penance.  This is the ordinary means by which JESUS desires you to ask for forgiveness of sins.

During Pope Francis first visit to one of the parishes in the outskirts of Rome, he heard confessions.  HERE

It is also possible and entirely licit, and even a very good idea, where more than one priest is available, to hear confessions during Mass.   We’ve been over this ground here on the blog many times, so I won’t repeat myself.  Check this HERE.

Fathers!  Hear confessions!

Bishops!  Teach about the sacrament and ask your priests to hear confessions!  Hear confessions yourselves!

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Francis, GO TO CONFESSION, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , ,
9 Comments

QUAERITUR: Is a priest forbidden to be in the congregation?

Under another entry I posted an email from a priest about his experience of being in the congregation during the celebration of Mass according to the Novus Ordo, the Ordinary Form.  HERE

This raised, again in email, questions from priests about the propriety, or liceity, of priests participating at Mass in the congregation, in the manner of the lay faithful.

There is a paragraph in the Congregation for Divine Worship’s document Redemptionis Sacramentum which deals with this.

[128.] Holy Mass and other liturgical celebrations, which are acts of Christ and of the people of God hierarchically constituted, are ordered in such a way that the sacred ministers and the lay faithful manifestly take part in them each according to his own condition. It is preferable therefore that “Priests who are present at a Eucharistic Celebration, unless excused for a good reason, should as a rule exercise the office proper to their Order and thus take part as concelebrants, wearing the sacred vestments. Otherwise, they wear their proper choir dress or a surplice over a cassock.” It is not fitting, except in rare and exceptional cases and with reasonable cause, for them to participate at Mass, as regards to externals, in the manner of the lay faithful.

First, this says “not fitting” not “not licit”.

Second, a reasonable cause can be that a) the priest is not in the state of grace, b) he already said Mass that day c) he forgot his cassock, d) he got there late, e) etc.

So, as a general and important rule, priests should not be in the congregation unless they have a reasonable cause to be.

The flip side of the coin is that lay people should not be in the sanctuary unless they have a reasonable cause to be, a role to fulfill that requires their presence.

We must avoid the “laicization” of priests and the clericalization of the laity.

St. Augustine of Hippo taught that Christ speaks in every word of the psalms.  Sometimes Christ speaks at the Head, sometimes as the Body, sometimes as Head and Body together, Christus Totus.   This is a useful paradigm for understand our liturgical roles and also for the design of a church building.

The priest stands in persona Christi as the Head of the Body, the Church.  When the priest speaks on his own, Christ the Head is speaking.  The laity have their role as the Body.  When they respond, Christ the Body responds.  At times priest and people speak together.

The sanctuary is where the Head is found.  The nave is where the Body is found.   There is a meeting point where Communion is distributed and received.  The presence of a Communion rail helps to underscore this theological point: it brings special attention to that place where the Head and Body are in closest union.

But I digress….

In general, priests should not be in the congregation, particularly if they are in clerical clothing.  Sometimes it happens and, when it does, the world doesn’t crumble.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Mail from priests, Our Catholic Identity, Priests and Priesthood | Tagged , , , ,
32 Comments

The Feeder Feed: surprise Goldfinch

I am at the Met (big surprise) and I have been surprised by Christological Goldfinch in an unusual place.

On the one hand our finch is is in usual place: baby Jesus hand.

On the other hand, our finch is in the 16th century!

Here is Perino del Vaga (+1547)

20130531-163528.jpg

20130531-163541.jpg
It is interesting to see this topos transported into this period.

And this is promising!

20130531-165055.jpg

Posted in On the road, The Feeder Feed, What Fr. Z is up to | Tagged
4 Comments

Pink Lunch!

Ahhh Veselka!

I try to get here at least once per visit.

Cold Borscht!

20130531-125131.jpg

It’s too hot for anything else. GAH!

As I eat my crunchy and cold soup, I am processing last nights procession and wishing I had photos.

UPDATE

I may have a photo source.

I’m the meantime, supper…

Crispy fish in sweet sour!

20130531-211455.jpg
Shrimp dumplings and sesame.

20130531-211534.jpg
Wontons in inferno red oil.

20130531-211602.jpg

20130531-211800.jpg

Posted in On the road, What Fr. Z is up to | Tagged ,
11 Comments

GUEST POST: A priest on attending a Novus Ordo Mass in the congregation

Some people argue that the Traditional Latin Mass is too hard to follow because of A, B, or C.

Let’s turn that sock inside out.

It is actually, often, too hard to follow what is going on most celebrations of the Novus Ordo because there is just too much going on.

The following is from a priest who reads this blog.  He sent it by email:

For the first time in my eight years as a priest, I recently attended the holy Mass not as the presider, con-celebrant or while being vested in choir. The experience was quite illuminating, for it gave me insight to the regular obstacles many lay faithful face when attending Mass. The experience, while insightful, was also painful. The occasion was the baccalaureate Mass for my youngest brother’s graduation from high school. I purposely did not vest because I did not know what was in store, and I have a poor poker face when it comes to silly liturgy.

In all honesty, my attention was not to find any and all liturgical error or abuse, for I knew silliness was in store. That being said however, I quickly became aware of how difficult it was to enter into this busy, disoriented, error filled liturgy. Although this was a special Mass, I cannot say it was all that different from a typical Sunday Mass in my diocese. To be brief, it was near impossible to wade through the obstacles in order to pray, and the reason lay in three pieces: the music, the posture, and the manners of the ministers.

Although I routinely suffer through the gems of Break’n Bread, I am, more often than not, involved in sacred prayer at the moment allowing me to tune it out. The lay faithful do not have that choice. We have taken that away from them. This is tragically sad. The music was in no way effective in drawing the faithful out of themselves in to divine contemplation. It is like a locked door with no key. It was pure, ambient noise.

The second great obstacle lay in our diocesan norm to stand after the Agnus Dei until reception of Holy Communion, (or even after in some parishes). What I observed, as I exited the pew to let my family through, was a line similar to those at the entrance of a sporting event. Everyone was standing, and or talking, shuffling bit by bit to get to where they wanted to go, only to eventually sit down in padded pew comfort. They whole event was just like every other line they are daily in complete with background music and lines that move too slow. Again, it was in no way effective in helping the faithful to move beyond themselves into divine contemplation.

In regards to the priest, deacon and extra-ordinary ministers well, their ministry came across as task driven as opposed to worship centered. I am not trying to judge their piety, but their manners seemed to reflect they were just doing a job not ministering to God.

Let us face the facts. We are celebrating the Mass like a protestant liturgy, but we are doing it much poorer than most of them would ever dare to. If this is the environment we are constantly fostering to our faithful, it no wonder they are going somewhere else, or not at all. We are not proclaiming the truths of liturgy or fostering environments that point to these truths.

I know we are in a liturgical mess; I just forgot how poor it is until this experience. I am aware once again. After this encounter I am left with a profound respect for those faithful who routinely suffer through poor liturgy for their love of Christ and his Church.

They have the right to good, solemn liturgy, and we priests are too often failing them. I am truly, deeply sad for them, and now I am ever more resolved to fulfill my duties as a sacred minister. Lord, have mercy on us.

To steal your line Reverend Father, “Reason number 54,622 for
Summorum Pontificum”.

Posted in HONORED GUESTS, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Mail from priests | Tagged , ,
69 Comments

Bp. Nickless (D. Sioux City): we must “exorcize” the “spirit of Vatican II”

I have mentioned Bishop Nickless of Sioux City before.

This is from LifeSite:

Sioux City Bishop Calls for “Exorcism” of “Spirit of Vatican II”

By Kathleen Gilbert

SIOUX CITY, Iowa, October 16, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Catholics must learn to “exorcise” the so-called “spirit of Vatican II” to end the secularization that has “wreaked havoc” on the Church since the Council, says Bishop R. Walker Nickless of Sioux City, Iowa. [Do I hear an “Amen!”?]

In a pastoral letter issued Thursday to the lay and religious of his diocese, Nickless wrote that he has “no other desire” than to see the reforms of Vatican II implemented properly. However, he said, “It is crucial that we all grasp that the hermeneutic or interpretation of discontinuity or rupture, which many think is the settled and even official position, is not the true meaning of the Council.”

The “hermeneutic of discontinuity,” under the guise of the “spirit of Vatican II,” sees “the Second Vatican Council as a radical break with the past,” explained the bishop. However, “There can be no split … between the Church and her faith before and after the Council.”

We must stop speaking of the ‘Pre-Vatican II’ and ‘Post Vatican II’ Church,” continued Nickless, who agreed with Pope Benedict XVI that the Council’s meaning “must be found only in the letter of the documents themselves.”  “The so-called ‘spirit’ of the Council has no authoritative interpretation,” Nickless said.

“It is a ghost or demon that must be exorcised if we are to proceed with the Lord’s work.”

The bishop said the cultural upheaval of the 1960s and 70s precipitated a shift in perspective about the Church, and it began to seem that “nothing was certain or solid” in its teaching or liturgy. “Sometimes,” he said, “we set out to convert the world, but were instead converted by it. We have sometimes lost sight of who we are and what we believe, and therefore have little to offer the world that so desperately needs the Gospel.”

This “hermeneutic of discontinuity,” said Nickless, “emphasizes the ‘engagement with the world’ to the exclusion of the deposit of faith.”

“This has wreaked havoc on the Church, systematically dismantling the Catholic Faith to please the world, watering down what is distinctively Catholic, and ironically becoming completely irrelevant and impotent for the mission of the Church in the world,” he said.  “The Church that seeks simply what works or is ‘useful’ in the end becomes useless.”

Nickless devoted a portion of the letter to defending the family against this relativistic mentality, re-emphasizing the nature of the family as the union between man and woman, established by God for the good of the spouses and the procreation of children.

[…]

“We must have a distinctive identity and culture as Catholics, if we would effectively communicate the Gospel to the people of this day and Diocese. This is our mission.”

Click here to view Bishop Nickless’ full letter.

Fr Z kudos to Bp. Nickless!

Take some time to read both the whole LifeSite piece, which was a bit too long to include here, and then look at the pastoral letter.

Posted in Brick by Brick, Fr. Z KUDOS, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, The future and our choices, Vatican II | Tagged , ,
24 Comments

Nuns on the Bus: the pro-abortion sequel

It’s time again to break out that old fav:

The Nuns on the bus go ’round and ’round!

The last time these dissenters got on their political … hobbyhorse, they went ’round and ’round with a wymynpryst.  HERE 

This time they are going ’round and ’round with a pro-abortion congresswoman.

Joining the BusNuns this time is ol’ Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) who has a perfect pro-abortion record.  She is rated 100% by NARAL.  What a distinction!

These Nuns keep some odd company, don’t they?

But maybe we shouldn’t read too much into that perfect pro-abortion record.

Since DeLauro, one of the wealthiest members of Congress, was apparently into the hipster look for a while, I am guessing that she is along for the ride to give the BusNuns some fashion and makeup tips.

Rosa doing her best Voris imitation…

Posted in 1983 CIC can. 915, Dogs and Fleas, Emanations from Penumbras, Liberals, Magisterium of Nuns, Slubberdegullions, You must be joking! | Tagged , ,
16 Comments

Sobering photos

Sometimes when I hear talk, often vapid, about the New Evangelization, I cynically wonder when it was that we completed the Old Evangelization.

On the other hand, we are living in a post-Christian era, most of us in countries that were clearly Christianized.

What is the NEW Evangelization about?

It is in large part a project of RE-Evangelization.  It is also about our continuing need to evangelize in an authentic way.

From the MailOnline comes an article about what is going on with the demographics of religion in the UK.

One country, two religions and three very telling pictures: The empty pews at churches just yards from an overcrowded mosque
Two photos show Sunday morning services in churches in East London
The third shows worshippers gathered for Friday midday prayers outside a nearby mosque
The difference in numbers could hardly be more dramatic

Read the article there, but here are a couple photos to drive the point home.

To recover our Catholic Christian identity we must, first, revitalize our liturgical worship of God.  We must be prepared to articulate what we believe in the public square as well as in private.  We have to get involved in spiritual and corporal works of mercy.

I think that Pope Benedict set our liturgical worship on a new course because he saw the devastation to our Catholic identity that happened after the Council.  We must, must, must, proceed with what he launched.   In that light I think Pope Francis is pointing to what I mentioned above: spiritual and corporal works of mercy.

No sphere of our Catholic lives can be revitalized apart from our liturgical worship of God.  By the virtue of Religion, we owe God proper worship.  He Himself makes it possible for us to worship in a way that is pleasing to Him.  He has given us Holy Church and the Church has given us our proper rites, which must be followed lovingly and reverently.

To recover who we are, we must worship well.  To worship well, we must recover who we are.

A couple great books for reflection on these points:

Russell Shaw: American Church: The Remarkable Rise, Meteoric Fall, and Uncertain Future of Catholicism in America

George Weigel: Evangelical Catholicism: Deep Reform in the 21st-Century Church

I part ways with both authors on certain points, but their books drill at a burning issue. They are both directed to American readers, but it seems to me that the principles in them are useful to all readers of English.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, The future and our choices, Year of Faith | Tagged , , , , ,
73 Comments