QUAERITUR: Are deacons “ministers of the cup”?

From a reader:

I am a Candidate for Holy Orders as I prepare for ordination to the diaconate in 2015. We are being told that as deacons we are ministers of the Cup. For our formators this means when there are EMHC we should distribute the Precious Blood. Here is the question, how far do we take this phrase within the Liturgy? It seems odd for an ordinary minister to be set off to the side with the chalice while an EMHC distributes the Body of the Lord next to the priest.

Oh, that phrase… “minister of the cup” makes my eyes and ears bleed.  It’s better than “minister of the wine”, I guess.

I once wrote about Archbishop Sample’s letter on the diaconate (HERE) and his pertinent comment that the primary role of a deacon is not a liturgical one.

That said, a deacon is an ordinary minister of Holy Communion. If present at Mass, the deacon should assist with the distribution unless there are enough priests or there is no need for a second minister other than the priest (probably the case most of the time).

Some liturgists talk about the deacon as “minister of the cup” but it is hard to see good reasons for that other than aesthetics (priest with the hosts, deacons with the Precious Blood).  Holy Communion is Holy Communion.

Whether one is distributing front and center where everyone can see, or off to the side, anyone is privileged to be administering the Sacred Body and Blood of Christ.  Where a person is standing, or which accidents in which Our Lord has hidden his substance one is chosen to distribute does not alter that reality.

Since you seem to be preparing to be ordained as a transitional deacon, your liturgical role ought to be emphasized.  (That is not to suggest that permanent deacons are not as much deacons.) Yet, a transitional deacon’s role is ancillary to the priest,’s.  It seems to me  appropriate that – if Holy Communion is being distributed under both species – you (transitional deacon, that is) be positioned near the priest… if for no other reason than to observe and learn.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , , , , , ,
25 Comments

Benedict XVI’s new Motu Proprio about the Conclave

The Holy Father – Pope Benedict XVI now gloriously reigning – released a Motu Proprio (in Latin) by which he empowers the Cardinal Electors to move forward the day of the beginning of the conclave.

The canonist Ed Peters has looked at the Motu Proprio Normas nunnullas.  My emphases:

In the wake of Benedict XVI’s startling resignation, a problem arose: the 17-day delay between the announcement and effective date of the resignation, followed by a minimum 15-day delay before the conclave could legally begin (per UDG 37), meant that the Church was to be, de facto, leaderless for over a month, with basically nothing to do but fret about being leaderless for over a month. As a way around this problem, some speculated (not unreasonably, but wrongly) that the cardinals charged with running skeleton operations during the sede vacante could, on their own authority, advance the start date of the conclave. This apparently simple idea, however, raised some very serious canonical and indeed ecclesiological issues.

Benedict’s motu proprio Normas nonnullas (22 feb 2012) solves the problem, as follows:

37 [Revised]. Praecipimus praeterea ut, ex quo Apostolica Sedes legitime vacat, antequam Conclave incohetur, mora sit interponenda quindecim solidorum dierum, facta tamen Cardinalium Collegio potestate Conclavis initium anticipandi, si constat omnes Cardinales electores adesse, vel etiam proferendi per aliquot dies, si graves obstant causae; tamen viginti diebus ad summum elapsis ab initio Sedis vacantis, cuncti Cardinales electores praesentes ad electionis negotium procedant.

Derogating from UDG 37, the pope has authorized an earlier start of the conclave if all the electors are present. Such a decision now falls squarely within the pontifical provisions for a conclave, and one may leave the choice of a start-date to the competent authority without further concern for the legality of the assembly.  [Therefore, it is more likely that there could be a new Pope before Easter and – importantly – there is no question now that the Conclave could have any stain of illegality were the date to be moved up.  The question is resolved.]

Time-permitting, I have a few more thoughts later.

Updated:

Another aspect of Benedict’s motu proprio catches my eye, namely, its reiteration that no otherwise-eligible elector can, for any reason, be barred from participation in the conclave. Over the weekend I saw several chattering heads speculating about Cdl. Mahony arriving in Rome only to be politely shown the door. [They wouldn’t do that.] Nonsense. Mahony’s right to admittance is indisputable. As the pope will not disbar an eligible elector at this late date, only Mahony can resolve the complications that his participation in the conclave occasion.  [Card. O’Brien of Scotland has voluntarily chosen not to participate because of allegations.]

Recap: As of this moment, there are 118 eligible electors. By Thursday, 8 pm Rome time, there will be 117. One of them, Darmaatmadja, has declared that he will not participate because of physical infirmity (as such, he would be allowed to change his mind and be admitted even if the conclave had started); another, O’Brien, has declared he will not participate for reasons unstated but apparent to all (as such, he would not be allowed to change his mind and be admitted once the conclave has started).

 

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , , ,
25 Comments

Card. O’Brien’s resignation – Cardinal Electors down to 115

We read that – because of allegations “of inappropriate behaviour towards priests dating from the 1980s” – His Eminence Keith Card. O’Brien, Archbishop of St Andrews and Edinburgh, is resigning his see and will not participate in the conclave even though he has not yet turned 75.

115 Electors now.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Benedict XVI | Tagged , ,
35 Comments

…tick… tick… tick… tick…

From xkcd:

...tick... tick... tick... tick...

GO TO CONFESSION!

Posted in GO TO CONFESSION, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , ,
2 Comments

Berlin, NJ: Mater Ecclesiae (EF) parish prepares to say farewell to Pope Benedict (as Pope)

My friend Fr. Robert Pasley of Mater Ecclesiae parish in Berlin, NJ sent this:

 We, at Mater Ecclesiae, in Berlin NJ, owe a great debt of thanks to Pope Benedict XVI. We will always have a very special place for him in our hearts. On Wednesday, February 27, the day before his abdication, we will have an evening of thanksgiving to Almighty God for all he has done and offer our loving prayers for him. The schedule is as follows:

7:00PM –Penitential Procession singing the penitential psalms – for the intention of obtaining the Lord’s mercy during Lent and these very difficult times.

7:30PM – A Solemn Mass offered for Pope Benedict XVI and in thanksgiving for his humble and profound Pontificate. The Propers of the Mass will be for Wednesday of the second week of Lent, with two commemorations –one for the Pope, and the other in thanksgiving. The complete musical repertoire has not yet been finalized, but the Tu es Petrus by Palestrina will be sung at the End of Mass in Honor of Pope Benedict XVI.

May God bless him and keep him. May our Lady, Mater Ecclesiae, always watch over him. Long live the Pope!

Viva il Papa!

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Benedict XVI, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Mail from priests | Tagged , ,
6 Comments

QUAERITUR: Extraordinary Ministers of Communion giving blessings as if they were priests

QUAERITUR: Extraordinary Ministers of Communion giving blessings as if they were priestsFrom a reader:

I talked to our parish Director of Liturgy today about our 12 (!) Eucharistic Ministers who routinely bless children and adults. She informed me that this has been approved by our bishop, and then berated me for my lack of charity (apparently I don’t want little children to receive blessings).
She went on to say if the practice was wrong, then it is the Vatican’s fault for not letting the American bishops know. [So, anytime “the Vatican” is silent about some particular thing, it is permitted?  That’s just dumb.]

Should I pursue this by writing to the Vatican…at the risk of getting everyone in my parish mad at me?

QUAERITUR: Extraordinary Ministers of Communion giving blessings as if they were priests

Please VOTE daily!

It has been said that liturgists are raised up by God so that those who have not yet had the opportunity to suffer for the Faith may do so.

Anything that confuses the roles of lay people and priests (or deacons) should be avoided.

While it is true that any person can ask God to bless anyone else, and while it is true that parents should bless their children, lay people cannot bless in the manner of priests. Lay people ought not do anything which resembles blessing in the manner of the priest, such as making the sign of the Cross over people as a priest would do. That’s bad. B-A-D.

To suggest that lay people bless in the manner of a priest reveals a lack of understanding of their roles and dignity. Many people think that for lay people to have “dignity” or “equality” in the Church, they must do things that pertain to the priest. This is the same as saying that lay people have no dignity of their own unless they imitate priests. That is a form of clerical condescension.

The moment of Holy Communion is NOT the proper time to give blessings.

There is nothing wrong with blessings. Blessings are good! However, in the sacred action of the Mass, there are times for things in their proper order. Communion time is for Communion. The old adage is “ubi maior, minor cessat… where the greater things is, the lesser thing gives way.” At the end of Mass the priest is supposed to impart a blessing. That is the time for blessing people during Mass. Communion time for Communion. Blessing time for blessing.

Also, take a look at this good entry HERE, wherein many of the issues about blessings at Mass are covered.

A quote:

In 2008, the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments received a letter asking precisely this question. The congregation responded in a private reply with five observations on why this practice is not permitted.

That entry also deals with the issue of large numbers of unnecessary ministers of Communion.

If you wanted to write a respectful letter to the pastor of the parish or to the local bishop asking by what authority lay people are giving blessings in the manner of a priest at Holy Communion time, you might get an answer back, in writing.  Save it and all correspondence on the matter.  I have tips for writing to ecclesiastical authorities HERE.

UPDATE 25 Feb 16:49 GMT:

Over at his place, Rev. Mr. Kandra has chimed in:

[…] when confronted with a child (or sometimes an adult) who seeks a blessing instead of the Eucharist, I prefer this formula: “Receive Jesus in your heart”—which is not a blessing, but an admonition.  It could be said by a priest, deacon or lay person.  And it fits. [Fr. Z approves… provisionally… since there is no rubric about saying anything in that situation.  Still, good approach.]

Until the faithful can be properly catechized on this, I don’t think flat-out refusing a blessing is helpful. It certainly doesn’t do much to advance the cause of evangelization.

But meantime: EMHCs (and for that matter, deacons) have no business blessing anyone during Mass.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Linking Back, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged ,
73 Comments

Tu es Petrus (a nice tribute)

From my friend John Sonnen:

Play video

(322 views as of this posting)Many have gotten these.

Tu es Petrus (a nice tribute)

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
12 Comments

Bp. Sheridan: the Fishwrap is “an embarrassment to the Catholic Church”

You know that I am now calling Fishwrap (aka National catholic Reporter) the National Schismatic Reporter.

You know that Bp. Finn of the Diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph finally called out the NSR and pointed out that his predecessor determined that it was not a Catholic paper. The NSR HQ is in KC.

This is in from LifeSiteNews:

Colorado bishop: National Catholic Reporter ‘is an embarrassment to the Catholic Church’

by Patrick B. Craine

COLORADO SPRINGS, Feb. 22, 2013, (LifeSiteNews.com) – A Colorado bishop is supporting the local bishop in his call for the National Catholic Reporter to drop the name “Catholic.”

Bishop Michael Sheridan of Colorado Springs told LifeSiteNews.com in an interview this week that the national paper is “an embarrassment to the Catholic Church.”  [oorah!]

In January, Bishop Robert Finn of Kansas City, where NCR’s offices are located, published a column reminding the paper and the faithful that NCR has been forbidden from using the name “Catholic” since 1968.

[…]

“I believe exactly what [Bishop Finn is] saying,” said Sheridan. “That is a big deal for me…I don’t understand why some of these publications use the word Catholic when in some of their editorial stances they stand absolutely opposed to Church dogma.”

Even if the paper continues to defy the bishop, he continued, churches should “absolutely not” make it available to parishioners on their magazine racks.

[]

Nevertheless, the paper has remained defiant. “NCR is proud to call itself a Catholic publication,” wrote Thomas Fox, the paper’s publisher, on January 27th. “We report and comment on church matters including official teachings. We also report and comment on those who call into question some of these official teachings.” [Note the code language… “official” teachings.  For the NSR there is the “official” church, which they can ignore or diss as they will, and there is the, what to call it, “groovy” church of Chicago-style voting on doctrine, etc.]

Fox also pointed out that NCR is a member of the Catholic Press Association, which is approved by the Catholic Church.

The National Schismatic Reporter… journal of record for schismatics and heretics.

Fr. Z kudos to Bp. Sheridan!

Bp. Sheridan: the Fishwrap is "an embarrassment to the Catholic Church"

Posted in Brick by Brick, Fr. Z KUDOS, Liberals, Linking Back, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill | Tagged , , , , , ,
34 Comments

On this day in 1945…

On this day in 1945, Marines from 3rd Platoon, E Company, 2nd Battalion, 28th Regiment, 5th Division of the United States Marines Corps raised the American flag on the summit of the 500′ high Mount Suribachi on Iwo Jima.

A second flag was later raised and photographed.

22,000 Japanese defended Iwo Jimo. Only 200 were taken alive.  6000 Marines died and 17000 were wounded.

On this day in 1945...

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , ,
19 Comments

Great video on the “Dome of Home”

Here is a great video about the “Dome of Home”, a large church near Liverpool, England, in the Diocese of Shrewsbury entrusted now to the Institute of Christ the King.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pc9o_TBwqs&feature=player_embedded

And please remember to VOTE today.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , , , ,
19 Comments