Digging at the guts

You might recall that the computer which powered the Z-Cam is down and out.

I ordered an gizmo which allows you to connect a hard disk drive to a USB port.  This is a SATA/PATA/IDE Drive to USB 2.0 Adapter Converter Cable for 2.5 / 3.5 / 5.25 Inch Hard Drive / Optical Drive with External AC Power Adapter.  What a remarkably handy gizmo.  If you don’t need one at this moment, you probably will.

Fortified by a lunch of Gui Zhou Chicken hot enough to rouse the dead, I figured out the gizmo and plugged it in. .

20110518-121207.jpg

I am now transferring stuff from the disk.  I have just left it in the old computer for the time being.

20110518-121240.jpg

The Z-Cam.  What to do….   I knew things were going too smoothly for too long and Zuhlsdorf’s Law had to kick in.  What to do…?

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, LIVE STREAMING | Tagged , , , , , ,
18 Comments

Bishops must speak upalatable truths

First preliminary point. I have often suggested prayer not only for priests but for bishops. The Enemy of our souls hates priests, and hates bishops even more. Their burdens are very heavy and their mistakes can have grave consequences. They too have to cope with the world, the flesh and the devil, but their Judgement will be particular indeed.

Second. Some time ago, I wrote about the stir created by Archbishop Michael Sheehan of Santa Fe.  He issued a pastoral letter on cohabitation which stated Catholic truth in clear terms.  Fishwrap whined that he was being a meeeeanie.  Far meaner would have been for the Archbishop to have said nothing and left his soul and the souls of his flock in danger on this point.

Third.  St. Augustine once addressed a stern message to his flock (s. 17).  He was conscious that he was being stern.  He said… and we have his words because he had swift-writing stenographers recording him…

“So I tell you, I am saving my soul.  I shall be in a position, not of great danger but of certain ruin, if I have kept quiet.  But when I have spoken and carried out my office, it will be for you now to take notice of your danger.  What, after all, do I want?  What do I desire?  What am I longing for?  Why am I speaking? Why am I sitting here?  What do I live for, if not with this intention that we should all live together with Christ?  That is my desire, that’s my honor, that’s my most treasured possession, that’s my joy, that’s my pride and glory.  But if you don’t listen to me and yet I have not kept quiet, then I will save my soul.  But I don’t want to be saved without you.”

Now I read in the UK’s best Catholic weekly, The Catholic Herald, this story:

It is not enough for our bishops to be caring. They must speak unpalatable truths

Our bishops are generally holy men. But we ought to distinguish between private piety and the public office

By Francis Phillips on Wednesday, 18 May 2011

Following my blog about the restoration of the Friday abstinence, thanks to our good bishops – who are now also “reflecting” on bringing back our transferred Holy Days of Obligation – a friend has sent me this email (she is the recent widow of a Catholic priest, formerly an Anglican minister):

“I had a lovely surprise yesterday afternoon. I was just sitting down when the Archbishop of Birmingham knocked on the door. He was on foot, and looked just like an ordinary Catholic priest with nothing to show he was even a bishop; he just came to see how I was, as the widow of one of his dead priests. He had not even known my husband, because he was appointed archbishop too recently. He had already spoken to me twice on the phone since my husband died and also called at the house shortly afterwards, when I happened to be away. He is the kindest, most approachable, and genuinely concerned priest you could possibly hope to meet. When you consider the size of the archdiocese and his immense responsibilities, I felt truly humbled by his visit. We talked about all sorts of things. We are so blessed to have such men as our bishops.”

This is praise indeed and I felt a twinge of guilt in reading it. Why? Because I have often joined in negative conversations with Catholic friends that have begun with “Oh, our bishops…!” and then proceeded to list their many perceived failings in exasperated tones.

However, I think we must distinguish between private piety and acts of personal kindness and the public office. I am sure that our bishops are generally good and holy men and that my friend’s anecdote could be multiplied many times over. Nonetheless, thinking of the bishops in general – and not in any way pointing to the Archbishop of Birmingham in particular – I am reminded of the writer Philip Trower’s analysis of our episcopate in his excellent book, Turmoil and Truth: The Historical Roots of the Modern Crisis in the Catholic Church.

In his chapter entitled “The Shepherds”, he writes, inter alia:

“Misconceptions about the right way of being a servant have unfortunately resulted in the autocrat too often being replaced by the bishop who wants to be loved. The bishop who wants to be loved is frightened of losing his reputation for being ‘caring’ and ‘compassionate’ by doing something unpopular, even when this is what real love demands. Or he tries to ‘serve’ like a politician. When his flock goes into apostasy and heresy, he keeps it together by saying contradictory things to please all shades of opinion, or when the going gets tough, hides behind his diocesan bureaucracy. Or he becomes a kind of religious salesman. If he wants to attract Communist voters, he makes the faith sound as much as possible like Marxist Leninism. If, on the contrary, he is aiming at prosperous or hedonistically inclined sheep, he will refrain from speaking too harshly or too much about vice…”

We need our bishops to be braver in the public arena, when politicians enact anti-Christian laws; to proclaim the hard truths of the faith, however unpalatable to our hedonistic ears; to care passionately about the salvation of the souls in their dioceses, so we know that Heaven, not niceness, is the goal; to love their sheep more than their good standing with the bishops’ conference. And so on.

There I go, grumbling again. Memo: pray for bishops as well as priests.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , , ,
12 Comments

QUAERITUR: sign of Cross after Holy Communion – WDTPRS POLL

From a reader:

Some friends were having a discussion about whether or not making the sign of the cross after receiving Holy Communion is encouraged, discouraged, or doesn’t matter either way.  What say you ?

I saaaaay…. I sayyyyy…

Sure.  Why not?  Great idea!  But it is not obligatory.

I will wager that a large percentage of those who attend the Extraordinary Form make the sign of the Cross after reception of Holy Communion.

Let’s have a POLL and find out!

Please select your best answer and then leave a comment in the combox.

After I receive Holy Communion, I generally...

View Results

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Our Catholic Identity, POLLS | Tagged , ,
106 Comments

Of fish, dragons and pity

I needed a down day.

I had a half down day yesterday, too.  I met with my literary group, going on since 1997 now.  We are reading Gerard Manley Hopkins.  If anyone is interesting, drop me a line and I will read some.  He is REALLY hard, and rewarding.

At the Cathedral of St. Paul in St. Paul, there is a perfect copy of the … you know what it is.

20110517-093100.jpg

I light candles, by the way.

20110517-100023.jpg

Mary is beautifully crowned in her chapel in the Cathedral.

I went to confession, bought hosts and other needful stuff, and some specialized groceries, and enjoyed Xiao Long Bao for lunch, since after breakfast that is all I could imagine eating.

Back home I found tulips in abundance and filled three more vases.

20110517-093113.jpg

Tonight… a trout and broccholetti prepared by moi.

Garlic, onion, white wine.  Deglazed with white wine and sambucca, reduced, and whipped with a new version of Crème fraiche, this Philly “cooking cream” product.  Seen it?  Not quite Crème fraiche… but it worked.  Chardonnay.  Dessert?  No dessert.  I don’t have much of a sweet tooth.

20110517-093123.jpg

I will now catch up on cable news, having pity on my brain I used my blessed DVR to cut out commercials and fluff, of which there is a lot, have a tall glass of something… bourbon? scotch? … in a heavy glass, and a cigar, and go to bed early.

BTW… I saw There Be Dragons today.   Have you?

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Just Too Cool, Lighter fare |
43 Comments

QUAERITUR: Selling a rosary and other sacred things

Several readers have sent similar questions about the selling of sacred things.  I will simply answer rather than post excerpts of the questions.

Let’s start with the most sacred of all, the Eucharist.  Selling the Eucharist would be a terrible sacrilege.   The Code of Canon Law for the Latin Church uses the word “nefas” (“really really really bad”, “intolerable”).  The Eucharist is sacred in Itself.   If you sell the Eucharist, you incur automatically an excommunication.  The lifting of the censure is reserved to the Holy See or a confessor with a faculty from the Holy See.

Selling a relic also has he word “nefas” applied to it in the Code.  Relics are sacred things in themselves, because they are the remains of saints or blesseds or, if they are not part of the body, were objects associated with the saint.  If they are sold, they remain holy things.

Selling blessed objects is not necessarily a sin.  There are various decent reasons why one would sell a blessed object.  There are bad reasons as well.  Some things, such as statues or things of various age or artistic merit will have great monetary value.   Other things have a particular rareness or association which makes them valuable, even though they in themselves are not much to look at.

Selling of sacred offices is also a sin and a crime in the Church’s law, for obvious reasons.

Selling of “smaller things”.  When I go to a religious goods store, people will sometimes ask me to bless things such as small statues, rosaries, books, medals, etc.  I am happy to do so, but only after they have been purchased.  If you sell a sacred thing which was blessed with a constitutive blessing, it loses its blessing and must be reblessed or reconsecrated.  If I were to sell my, for example, chalice which was consecrated by the late Card. Mayer, the purchaser would have to have it reconsecrated.  The same would go for a rosary.  However, there is no question of “reblessing” something like relics of Sts. Nunilo and Alodia rescued from Ebay or a flee market: relics are sacred in themselves.  The reliquary, however, would be duly reblessed.

I hope that helps a little.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged , , , , ,
28 Comments

Sts. Nunilo and Alodia, pray for us

I was delighted to receive a little book from a reader in Pamplona, Spain, about Saints Nunilo and Alodia.

Our saints, little girls, were 9th c. virgin martyrs in Huesca, Spain.  They were born to a Muslim father and Christian mother.  However, they chose their mother’s Christianity.

During the Emirate of Abd ar-Rahman II it came to pass that these little girls were executed as apostates according to Sharia law.

20110517-064307.jpg

They were on my mind again as I had a conversation last evening which concerned the persecution of Christians in Egypt.

Posted in Just Too Cool, Linking Back, Saints: Stories & Symbols, SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , ,
5 Comments

Must watch and hear. Palestrina.

Tip of the biretta to NLM for this on Gloria TV.  It is a BBC show on Palestrina.  Fantastic views of Rome.

Posted in Just Too Cool, The Drill | Tagged , , ,
25 Comments

Card. Koch on Pope Benedict’s long term plan for the Roman Rite

For a long time I have thought that Joseph Ratzinger’s view was that side-by-side use of the older form of the Roman Rite and the newer Novus Ordo would eventually produce a tertium quid.  I wrote about that in the early 90’s.  I have written about it in the 10’s.  The reason I though this is because I actually had conversations with Card. Ratzinger about this.  I think, however, that his thought has shifted over time, though it runs along the same line.

Note: Don’t imagine for a moment that Benedict wants or thinks this will happen quickly.  It is going to happen, one way or another and whether we want it to or not.  For the good of the Church it has to happen over time.  I don’t think I will see it in my lifetime, frankly, and I am fine with that.  But I think it is going to happen.  And, if such a thing is going to produce something good, it MUST be guided with the strong influence of the Extraordinary Form.  More the Extraordinary Form than the Ordinary, in my opinion.

In any event, I saw today a story on CNS by fellow-Minnesotan John Thavis which deals with this question.  I mentioned the other day the talk given By. Card. Koch at the conference in Rome.  It was the talk I did not translate from the pages of L’Osservatore Romano.  My emphases and comments.

Pope’s ‘reform of the reform’ in liturgy to continue, cardinal says

By John Thavis
Catholic News Service

VATICAN CITY (CNS) — Pope Benedict XVI’s easing of restrictions on use of the 1962 Roman Missal, known as the Tridentine rite, is just the first step in a “reform of the reform” in liturgy, the Vatican’s top ecumenist said.  [A renewal of our identity through a renewal of our worship is also a dimension of ecumenical dialogue with separated Christians, especially the Orthodox.  Ecumenism goes in two directions.  They have to see that we are getting serious about our worship.]

The pope’s long-term aim is not simply to allow the old and new rites to coexist, but to move toward a “common rite” that is shaped by the mutual enrichment of the two Mass forms, Cardinal Kurt Koch, president of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity, said May 14.

In effect, the pope is launching a new liturgical reform movement, [Something he called for years ago in his Spirit of the Liturgy.] the cardinal said. Those who resist it, including “rigid” progressives, mistakenly view the Second Vatican Council as a rupture with the church’s liturgical tradition, he said.

Cardinal Koch made the remarks at a Rome conference on “Summorum Pontificum,” Pope Benedict’s 2007 apostolic letter that offered wider latitude for use of the Tridentine rite. The cardinal’s text was published the same day by L’Osservatore Romano, the Vatican newspaper.

Cardinal Koch said Pope Benedict thinks the post-Vatican II liturgical changes have brought “many positive fruits” [It would be good to list those.] but also problems, including a focus on purely practical matters and a neglect of the paschal mystery in the Eucharistic celebration. [I believe that some writer for the SSPX attacked the “paschal mystery” focus that emerged after the Council.  If I remember correctly.] The cardinal said it was legitimate to ask whether liturgical innovators had intentionally gone beyond the council’s stated intentions[The answer is, of course, yes – they did.]

He said this explains why Pope Benedict has introduced a new reform movement, beginning with “Summorum Pontificum.” [I call it part of his “Marshall Plan”.] The aim, he said, is to revisit Vatican II’s teachings in liturgy and strengthen certain elements, including the Christological and sacrificial dimensions of the Mass.

Cardinal Koch said “Summorum Pontificum” is “only the beginning of this new liturgical movement.” [Quite right.]

“In fact, Pope Benedict knows well that, in the long term, we cannot stop at a coexistence between the ordinary form and the extraordinary form of the Roman rite, but that in the future the church naturally will once again need a common rite,” he said.  [I think we could stop with that.  But I don’t think it will stop with that.]

“However, because a new liturgical reform cannot be decided theoretically, [Exactly what was tried during after the Council.  Disaster ensued.] but requires a process of growth and purification, the pope for the moment is underlining above all that the two forms of the Roman rite can and should enrich each other,” he said.

Cardinal Koch said those who oppose this new reform movement and see it as a step back from Vatican II lack a proper understanding of the post-Vatican II liturgical changes. As the pope has emphasized, Vatican II was not a break or rupture with tradition but part of an organic process of growth, he said.  [Not all will agree.  But Curial cardinals are not going to say something like this without including also the party line.]

On the final day of the conference, participants attended a Mass celebrated according to the Tridentine rite at the Altar of the Chair in St. Peter’s Basilica. Cardinal Walter Brandmuller presided over the liturgy. It was the first time in several decades that the old rite was celebrated at the altar.  [And may it happen far more frequently.  Perhaps the next time coram Romano Pontifice?]

After the devastation WWII the USA helped to rebuild Europe in order to foster trade and support a bulwark against Communism.  In the wake of the devastation caused by a hermeneutic of discontinuity after the Second Vatican Council, Pope Benedict is trying to revitalize our Catholic identity as a bulwark against the dictatorship of relativism.

The renewal of our Catholic identity requires a realigning of the Roman Rite.  This realigning requires the Extraordinary Form.  There is no way around it.  We have to renew our liturgical worship in order to be who we are within Holy Church, so that we can have an impact, as Catholic disciples of the Lord, on the world around us.  If we don’t know who we are, no one will pay attention to us or what we might have to offer.

Posted in Brick by Brick, SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , , ,
68 Comments

QUAERITUR: difficult to fulfill penance

confessionFrom a reader:

The priest I go to gives me a penance that I have to wait to do because it’s too long to do because of my lunch break, it involves something scheduled at a different time, etc. But before I can do it, I often fall back into mortal sin. So I go to confession with the intention of doing the prior penance once I am in the state of grace. Is this alright? Alternatively, is it okay to do my penance in the state of mortal sin? Should I ever go to confession without having done my prior penance.

I go to gives me a penance that I have to wait to do because it’s too long to do because of my lunch break, it involves something scheduled at a different time, etc. But before I can do it, I often fall back into mortal sin. So I go to confession with the intention of doing the prior penance once I am in the state of grace. Is this alright?Alternatively, is it okay to do my penance in the state of mortal sin? Should I ever go to confession without having done my prior penance.

It seems to me that you should ask your confessor to give you a penance that you can fulfill right away, so that you don’t have to worry about it or get sidetracked in any way.

Doing penance for sins is an obligation we have out of justice.  Doing penance is a necessary part of the sacrament of penance.  At this point, I would say the next time you make your confession, tell the confessor that you are not sure you adequately performed the penances you were given in the past.  Ask for a clear penance you can perform right away.

You can always chose to perform additional penances at other times.  A good idea anyway.

Confessors laudably desire to make the sacrament of penance “relevant” in some aspects to the penitents who request it.  They like to be able to tailor their counsel to the individual.  They like to assign a penance that pertains in some way.  However, what is more important by far is that the penitent not, at the end, be confused about what he or she is to do, or whether it can be done in a reasonable period of time.  I think that clarity is better than something which is nebulous or even postponed.

If you haven’t done your previous assigned penance, tell the confessor.  But you might explain briefly why you didn’t.   Don’t dwell on it.  Don’t ramble.  Don’t add lots of details.  Just say it and then ask for a penance you can be sure to do right away.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Brick by Brick | Tagged , ,
31 Comments

Patristiblogger Project: Augustine on 1 John – Intention

I have been wondering what to do with the blog and I have decided will soon to return to my Patristic roots, my Patristiblogger roots, for a time.  I will tackle St. Augustine’s Homilies on the First Epistle of John.  There are ten homilies.  We could do one per week.

I thought about the English version to use and decided on the free, online version available at New Advent, by H. Browne, in the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series, Vol. 7.  The translation has the advantage is sticking closely to the Latin.  You can find the Latin text for free online here.

There will be a combination of PODCAzTs and blog posts for discussion.  The work on the blog can be both in English and in Latin.

Before anything else, however, we will have to have some preparation.

The first step in a preparation would be to read in your handy New Testament, 1 John.  Obvious, no?  You can find the older Vulgate with the Douay English side by side here.  There are various sites which present the Greek New Testament.  There is an interesting inter-linear site here.  Another, in pdf, here.  Some other resources, including audio in Latin and Greek here.  If you want a study version, I rather like the Navarre Bible series.  Here is a link for the appropriate volume from amazon.

Reading an older English version of 1 John, such as Douay or the KJV might be a way of getting in English something closer to what Augustine had in Latin for his version.  What I’m saying is that Douay or KJV might be more helpful for getting into your ear the feel of the text of 1 John than, say, the Jerusalem Bible.

Augustine will cite the version of the Latin that he had.  He obviously didn’t have the Vulgate.

I will add more propaedeutic comments as we rev up the project.

Posted in Patristiblogging | Tagged ,
22 Comments