QUAERITUR: Requiem on Sunday

From a reader:

Father, is it ever allowed in the Extraordinary Form that a Requiem
Mass be celebrated on a Sunday?

Perhaps for a private Mass.  If I, for example, were to learn of the death of a friend, I wouldn’t hesitate to say Mass as soon as I uncould, Sunday or not, for the sake of the deceased.  But there would not be a funeral on Sunday.  Nor would there be a Requiem on Sunday in the older form.

That said, I can think of a couple situations in which that might happen.

First, consider that when 2 November falls on a Sunday, in the older calendar the Mass for All Soul’s should be transferred to the next day.  With the Novus Ordo calendar, All Souls can, oddly, be observed for Masses on a Sunday. Otherwise, funerals and votive Masses for the dead should not be celebrated on Sundays.

However, I suppose if the diocesan bishop wanted to have all the Masses on 2 November be for All Souls, for both calendars, he could permit the use of the 1962 All Souls on a Sunday.   I also suppose that we could come up with some dire scenario in which, for pastoral reasons, the diocesan bishop would consider it opportune to permit a Requiem on a Sunday.  I struggle to imagine what that would be, however.  Most of the scenarios involve images of bodies stacked like cords of wood during time of plague, or praying for the dead inhabitants of a city that was nuked or slammed with an earthquake, hundreds of thousands of people pleading on their knees for forgiveness of the sins of their loved ones as smoke rises in columns from the shattered cathedral to obscure the red dying sun, sated crows no longer even to croak their ghastly calls in the cold mephitic air… the bishop so moved by the weeping of the children that… ummm… opps.  Okay, you get the idea.

This is one of those calendar conflicts between the traditional calendar and the post-Conciliar reformed calendar that should be worked out by Rome.   The tradition of prayer for the dead is so important that, in my opinion, people should be on the same page.  It makes sense to me that the traditional way of observing All Souls should be adopted in the newer calendar.  Sundays should be Sundays.  There are six other days for Requiem Masses.

On the other hand I can see the value of keeping both on the Sunday when 2 November is a Sunday.

For decades Catholics’ understanding of the need to pray for the dead, that it is a work of mercy to pray for the dead, has been eroded.  It has eroded under the constant din of hearing “for all” during the consecration in English, white vestments, funerals that are more like canonization ceremonies than moments of prayer for the soul of the deceased.   The realization that the Four Last Things are real has nearly vanished.

For this reason, I can see the sense in having All Souls on Sunday.   Exposing people to good preaching, black vestments, and even the somber prayers of the older form of Holy Mass could be very fruitful.

For the sake of repairing something of damage that has been done, I can see doing that.

In any event, for now it would be best to follow whichever Ordo is appropriate.

Meanwhile…

[CUE GLOOMY MUSIC]

When you’ve had a tough day of crawling out of the wreckage of a shattered metropolitan center, torn with despair and wondering if the end has come at last, not knowing if you will ever experience happiness again, if anyone will ever feel joy again, try some….

… well… just have some coffee.

It’s still swell.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , ,
11 Comments

Some recent posts of interest

TwitterSome recent posts of interest:

REGISTER to be able to post comments on this blog.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
Comments Off on Some recent posts of interest

SUNDAY SUPPER: Monday Edition

For this week’s Sunday Supper, I will on Sunday be making supper for 8 on Monday.   Is that how to put it?  The making is on Sunday, with prep on Saturday, while the eating will be on Monday.

Julia ChildIt is my turn to “host” our literary groups meeting in St. Paul.  Therefore I will make a double batch of Boeuf Bourguignon according to Julia Child’s version from Mastering the Art of French Cooking.  I’ve made it before and it is becoming comfortable.  I have adjusted the recipe according to my lights and am confident I can bring off a double batch.

At this point in our literary endeavors we are coming to the end of our reading of some of T.S. Eliot’s works.   I think we may move to Yeats.   We read aloud, share observations as well go, and then have a big meal.  The boeuf has the advantage of improving with a day’s rest.  You can then simply warm it and even put it out buffet style.

I will also prepare what Julia suggests, some little braised onions, sauteed mushrooms, peas.  Green salad.  I may go with buttered egg noodles rather than boiled potatoes.  I will also provide green salad with a vinaigrette and lots of good bread.   I am projecting a budget of about $50 for the whole.

I would dearly love to find a pumpkin pie for dessert.

What sort of coffee should I serve?

Posted in Fr. Z's Kitchen | Tagged , ,
16 Comments

The Pope’s hinge-men: a proposal about cardinals.

A great deal hinges on the naming of cardinals.  The very word comes from Latin cardo, “hinge”.  Cardinals are the Pope’s hingemen.

Phil Lawler made a proposal about the naming of new cardinals.  Here is a key passage.

Rather than appointing the heads of major metropolitan archdioceses—the so-called “red hat sees” that traditionally have been guided by a cardinal-archbishop—the Pope might look for bishops who have shown that they can instill new vigor and evangelical purpose into their dioceses, and bring more souls to Christ.

He also makes the observation that this should be the criterion for appointment to any position, any diocese.

Once, probably around the time of the surprise appointment of Card. DiNardo, I opined that there perhaps there should be in countries such as the USA a couple, three hats that “float” around.  Rather than automatically make, say, the Archbishop of Detroit or Baltimore cardinals (which may not be the case in the future), why not some one in the model of, say, Bp. Robert Finn of Kansas City-St. Joseph, MO.  Surprise!   Raise them to some cardinalatial diocese later, or not, as it is opportune.

That would keep bishops on their toes.

I also hold in my mind-eye the sight of a galero in the little cathedral of Fargo, ND, where Card. Muench returned to be bishop.

I think I might just name a couple priests cardinals, priests well under 80 years old.  Surprise!

Posted in The Drill | Tagged
13 Comments

Will the tables turn?

Have any of you seen this video ad from a group called Citizens Against Government Waste?

Play video

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
21 Comments

Sts. Nunilo and Alodia, pray for us!

Today is the Feast of Sts. Nunilo and Alodia, martyrs!  Hurray!

Sts. Nunilo and Alodia, pray for us in our time of political correctness run amok.  Intercede for us in this time of fear and tension.   Ask God to grant us courage and perspicacity in our daily lives when confronted with conflicts about the burning issues of our time.

Sts. Nunilo and Alodia

Saints Nunilo and Alodia were 9th c. virgin martyrs in Huesca, Spain.  They were born to a Muslim father and Christian mother.  However, they chose their mother’s Christianity.

And so during the Emirate of Abd ar-Rahman II it came to pass that these little girls were first put in a brothel and then were executed as apostates according to Sharia law.

Posted in Saints: Stories & Symbols, The future and our choices | Tagged ,
5 Comments

Anglican Archbp. Williams wants a joint commission to oversee Anglican conversions

A reader alerted me to the following story from the Telegraph:

Archbishop of Canterbury moves to flush out Anglicans plotting to defect to Rome

The Archbishop of Canterbury moved last night to counter secret plotting [!] among disaffected Anglicans who are planning to defect to Rome.

By Tim Ross, Religious Affairs Editor

In a surprise announcement, Dr Rowan Williams [Anglican Archbp. of Canterbury] said he wanted to establish a new joint group of Roman Catholic and Church of England figures to oversee the conversion process.  [A joint commission?  Cui bono?  Would this commission help to… what… transfer property?]

The proposed group would be designed to enable smooth and less painful transition for those who want to leave the Church of England to become Roman Catholics in protest at the ordination of women bishops.

It would also bring into the open the negotiations between disaffected Anglicans and the Vatican which have been taking place in secret for months.  [The title of the article suggests that this is the main purpose: identify in advance those who are thinking about transferring their flags.]

Dr Williams’s suggestion came in his first public remarks since a parish in Kent and a London bishop announced their intention to accept the Pope’s offer to convert to Roman Catholicism.

Last Friday, St Peter’s church in Folkestone and the Bishop of Fulham, the Rt Rev John Broadhurst, disclosed their plans to join the so-called English Ordinariate, a new body proposed by the Vatican as a home for disaffected Anglicans.

At least two more bishops are widely rumoured to be planning to join the Ordinariate when it is established next year, but their negotiations with Rome are taking place behind closed doors.

Neither Lambeth Palace nor the Roman Catholic authorities in England and Wales know the extent of the numbers of Anglicans who are likely to switch allegiance.

Under Pope Benedict XVI’s plan, Anglicans would be able to move into full communion with Rome while at the same time preserving some of their traditions and heritage.  [Perhaps Dr. Williams is edging closer to issuing Romanorum coetibus?]

In an interview with The Hindu newspaper, while on a trip to India, Dr Williams spoke of his frustration at the Pope’s decision to announce the Ordinariate to the public with little prior warning a year ago.

“I was very taken aback that this large step was put before us without any real consultation. And it did seem to me that some bits of the Vatican didn’t communicate with other bits,” he said.

“It caused some ripples because I think there was a widespread feeling that it would have been better to consult.  [Boo. Hoo.]

“As this is now being implemented, we are trying to make sure that there is a joint group which will keep an eye on how it’s going to happen. In England, the relations between the Church of England and Roman Catholic Bishops are very warm and very close. I think we are able to work together on this and not find it a difficulty.”

It is understood that neither the Church of England nor the Roman Catholic authorities in England and Wales have yet agreed to Dr Williams’s proposal for a joint group to oversee the Ordinariate.

In the interview, Dr Williams acknowledged that the ordination of homosexuals and women as bishops threatened to create “deeper divisions” within the world-wide Anglican Communion.

“I feel that we may yet have to face the possibility of deeper divisions,” he said.  [D’ya think?  When doctrine can be voted up or down, when prevailing societal trends are the wind in your sails, what else is going to happen?]

“I don’t at all like, or want to encourage, the idea of a multi-tier organisation. But that would, in my mind, be preferable to complete chaos and fragmentation. It’s about agreeing what we could do together.”

Perhaps such a joint committee could be useful in working out the details of transferal of ownership of property?   I don’t know how those things get worked out in England, where the state church is the Church of England.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged ,
34 Comments

BLOG RENEWAL: mobile theme

I have had a few notes from readers complaining about the mobile theme view of the blog.

I have tried a couple different solutions in the last month.  For the most part, they work pretty well for me.

I am willing to try another solution, such as WPtouch 2.0, … which isn’t free, btw.  Pitch in if you want me to try a new mobile theme solution.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
9 Comments

Followers of Fr. Feeney recently reconciled!

A reader alerted me this.  It is significant enough to let everyone know about it. This is from 14 October!

For your Brick by Brick file.

All friends and supporters of Saint Benedict Center are hereby informed that Father David Phillipson has been appointed to serve at Saint Benedict Center, Richmond. Father has been granted faculties by the Bishop of Manchester to offer Mass and hear confessions at the Center’s Immaculate Heart of Mary Chapel. Please join the Brothers and Sisters, Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, in our gratitude to Bishop McCormack for approving our chapel as a place of Catholic worship and for allowing Father Phillipson to serve here.

This concerns some of the descendants of the followers of Fr. Feeney who had not yet been reconciled with the Church.

Te Deum.

Posted in Brick by Brick | Tagged , ,
20 Comments

Blogs You Might Consider

I like Catholic bloggers who work and play well with other bloggers.  Some don’t, you know.

Here are three who have lately caught my eye.

  • Les Femmes – The Truth – What man isn’t going to give that mystery a shot?  Okay, so it’s a little different than what you think.  Fine.  Look anyway.
  • Love In The Ruins – Which title reminded me of the title of a novel by a very fine author.
  • Cowgirl’s Country Life – Holy Cow!  This gal can cook!  I am tempted to make a pilgrimage.  Years ago I did a little of her style of cooking, but she has command of the methods.

Go spike their stats and enjoy.

Posted in Blogs You Might Consider |
Comments Off on Blogs You Might Consider