LifeSite posts verbatim interview with Bp. Sorondo of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences. It isn’t pretty.

Diane Montagna posted something at LifeSite that serves a good purpose.

She sat down with the controversial head of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences (you know, the crowd that has Jeffrey Sachs on speed-dial) who are musing about “transhumanism”, Bishop Marcelo Sánchez Sorondo. You’ll remember him as the guy who said that Catholic social teaching is being best implemented in China.

While I probably would have gotten into it with about China and transhumanism, Montagna asked Sorondo about the scandalous reception of Holy Communion to the openly pro-abortion President of Argentina, Alberto Fernández and his much younger concubine Fabiola Yáñez. Sorondo called Montagna a “fanatic” for pressing him on it.

Perfect.

She posted a transcript of their conversation.

Here’s part of it.

DM: How can you give them Communion? It’s Jesus. It’s Jesus. They’re living openly in adultery and he supports abortion.

BS: Sorry, sorry, do you know the canon law? Do you know the canon law? We need to follow canon law, not the opinion of some bishops. And the canon law says that you cannot not give – you are obliged to give Communion if somebody asks you for Communion. Only in the case that he is excommunicated. The President is not excommunicated, so I can give Communion if he asks me for Communion.

[…]

BS: And I didn’t know if he wanted to go to Communion. He asked me for Communion, and I didn’t have reason to say no.

DM: Not even if he’s pro-abortion and wants to pass pro-abortion legislation.

BS: No, it’s not a reason to say no for Communion according to canon law.

DM: Do you know which canon it is?

BS: Yes, I can give the canons. There are three canons. The first canon says we are obliged to give Communion to persons who ask for Communion. There is only one exception and the exception is when he is excommunicated. Of course, there are some cardinals like Cardinal Burke, but it is the opinion of the Cardinal.  [Who is it, exactly, who doesn’t know canon law?]

[…]

DM: But it would be an opportunity. This was a public scandal. The fact that a pro-abortion president who’s sleeping with his mistress…

BS: So you say…

DM: He’s living with his mistress!

BS: I don’t know. I don’t know.

DM: Everybody knows. She lives with him. She acts like the first lady.

BS: I don’t know.

DM: How can you not know? You’re Argentinian.

[…]

DM: Well, you don’t have to agree with everything President Trump does. But he’s saving babies. He’s saving babies.

BS: Please, lady, understand the Catholic ideas and do not be fanatic, do not be fanatic.

DM: Okay…

BS: If you continue to speak with me, do not be fanatic. Try to use reason.

I love that last part. Condescending much?

The whole thing, his snarky comments about Americans and Pres. Trump, reminds me of the attitude that Card. Kasper manifested about African bishops.    Remember how Kasper tried to wiggle out of it?  And that’s when Ed Pentin was able to report on his actual words.

Anyway, that’s how it’s done.

Posted in ¡Hagan lío!, "How To..." - Practical Notes, 1983 CIC can. 915, Canon Law | Tagged
31 Comments

Card. Sarah: The priesthood is in mortal danger. Wherein Fr. Z rants to priests.

Ed Pentin, still the best, working English Vaticanista hands down, posted at the NCReg an interview with Robert Card. Sarah.  The Cardinal talks about the book, to be released in English in March.

I’ve read it already (advance English copy and French).  Fathers, especially, it is WORTH your time!

US Pre-Order Soon HERE for 12 March 2020 release! – FRENCH HERE

The take away…

Your Eminence, why did you want to write this book?

Because the Christian priesthood is in mortal danger! It’s going through a major crisis.

Some important points.

[…] there is a deep flaw in their formation.  The priest is a man set apart for the service of God and the Church. He is a consecrated person. His whole life is set apart for God. And yet they wanted to desacralize priestly life. They wanted to trivialize it, to render it profane, to secularize it. They wanted to make the priest a man like any other. Some priests were formed without putting God, prayer, the celebration of Mass, the ardent search for holiness at the center of their lives.

[…]

[T]hey wanted to muzzle Benedict XVI. I must confess my revolt at the slander, violence and rudeness to which he has been subjected. Benedict XVI wanted to speak to the world, but they tried to discredit his words.

[…]

All these polemics are a diversionary tactic to avoid talking about the essential, the content of the book.

[…]

[T]he real problem in the Amazon is not the ordination of married deacons. The real issue is that of evangelization. We have renounced proclaiming the faith, salvation in Jesus Christ. Too often we have become humanitarian assistants or social workers.

[…]

The West is out of breath. The West is old, with all its renunciations and resignations. It waits, without perhaps being aware of it, for youth, for the rawness of the Gospel’s demand for holiness. So it waits for priests who are radically saints.

A few points of my own.

First, on the final clipping above, I have had recently a few conversations in which the topic of saints for our time has come up.  Where are the saints for our time?  Has not God always raised up saints in each time when the Church was in need of great reform?

Couple that with the old chestnut that “we get the priests we deserve”, and we have a rather grim prospect.

But we must never be downhearted about even grim prospects.

Of all the universes God could have created, He created this one, into which He called us into existence at exactly the right point in time and with exactly the right set of tools to carry out our little piece of His overarching, divine Plan.

If we dedicate ourselves to our state in life, as it is hic et nunc, here and now, God will give us all the actual graces we need to fulfill our part in His economy of salvation.

It is an honor to have been called by God to live in these difficult times.  Fidelity and the pursuit of His will bring greater graces than if our paths were smooth.

As for priests, just as a war-fighter in dire harm’s way is in the safest place spiritually he can be if he acts out of duty and love of God, family and country, so too the priest. Even if the priest is trodden on by his more powerful clerical brethren and unfairly attacked by world-mired laity, he is in the safest spiritual place he can be if he acts out of love of God, Church and patria. Perhaps this is why old soldiers and old priests tend to be great friends.

Next, while the world swirls and ebbs and crashes about us priests, I take note of the old Carthusian motto: Stat crux dum volvitur orbis… While the world spins, the Cross stands still.  The Cross, therefore the Sacrifice of Christ, is the fixed point of the fullness of time.  The priest and the Cross are inseparable, for the whole reason of the priest’s priesthood is to offer sacrifice, to renew the Sacrifice of Calvary as alter Christus, in persona Christi capitis.

If the myriad options for the priest in this heaving world are confusing, and if there have been deep flaws in the formation of priests – as Sarah and Benedict hold – there is one thing that the priest can always do, without dependence on the permission or approval of any other, to shore up the dikes and battlements, to fill in the gaps and the breaches.

He can learn the Traditional Latin Mass.

A compelling reason to learn it, Fathers, is because, clerical and lay alike, we are our rites.   Who is the Roman Catholic priest if he doesn’t know his own Rite?  Who is he?  If you don’t know your Traditional Roman Rite, then you don’t know the Roman Rite.

Next, an nonagenarian priest friend of mine,  has recounted to me what it was like at an all male Catholic academy and on the campus of a Catholic college when the changes to the Mass started to hit in the 60s.  He described how the attitude of the cadets and students changed almost overnight.  They began to lose discipline during Mass.  They started showing disrespect to the priests beyond mere young male testing.

That’s an anecdote.  But a telling anecdote.   I couple it with the remark of the late Card. Heenan.  When he saw the demonstration of the future Novus Ordo Missae, he quipped that men would not want to go to it.

My nonagenarian priest friend described the TLM as being like a suit of armor.  It both stands on its own and it protects the one who wears it.

As an aside which isn’t an aside at all, if there is a crisis in the Church and the priesthood, it is also due to a crisis of masculinity in the Church and across society.

Fathers, you don’t need permission to learn the TLM.  You don’t need permission or approval to learn it and to say it.

Time and again, priests have told me that learning the TLM changed them profoundly.  They began to grasp aspects of their priesthood which they hadn’t gleaned before.  In turn, that produces a knock on effect in other aspects of their work, in particular how they celebrate the Novus Ordo.  Congregations note the differences.  The knock on effect continues to knock.

For some of you priests out there, learning the TLM will be difficult.   Things that are worth pursuing usually are.

One thing that will be hard to overcome is the lack of Latin.

Ohhhh how the Enemy our souls brilliantly maneuvered his agents when Latin was eradicated from schools and seminaries!

The Enemy doesn’t want you to learn the TLM.  At all cost, the treasury door – nay rather, armory! – must remain slammed and barred.  You must be denied your priestly patrimony!  A thousand distractions will assail you.  Doubts will pop up.  The demonically oppressed, even your pastors or bishops and other clergy, will undermine you or persecute you or bully you into giving up.  This will happen to many of you.   When it does, invoke your angels and Mary, Queen of the Clergy, to protect you.

You can do this.  Latin isn’t a mystical Eldorado that only a few can attain.  As my old mentor Fr. Foster, famous Latinist, used to quip facetiously but factually, “In ancient Rome even the dogs and prostitutes knew Latin.”  Over the centuries, countless priests of room temperature IQ learned Latin for the Mass.   They didn’t have to dissertate with the eloquence of Leo the Great.  If St. John Vianney could do it, so can you.  And most of you may wind up being good at it.

Remember: Latin is a language, not multivariable calculus.  The subjunctive is just another mode of speaking about things, not the Collatz Conjecture or the Large Cardinal Property.

Well… it might be that last one.

I am firmly convinced that no project which we undertake in the Church will succeed unless it flows from, is connected to, and returns to our sacred liturgical worship.

By the virtue of Religion, we have to order our acts rightly.  This means pleasing worship of God.  Benedict XVI’s gift to the Church in Summorum Pontificum, was precisely intended to bring about a healing and renewal of the whole Church through a renewal and healing of her worship, such that we can create a bulwark in the face of future tumult.

Fathers.  You can do this.   It will be hard.  It has to be done.

One way to respond to what Card. Sarah and Benedict XVI wrote, and to respond to The Present Crisis in the Church, and to give something beautiful to God and his people is to…

… learn the Traditional Latin Mass.

Give it to yourselves.

Posted in ¡Hagan lío!, "How To..." - Practical Notes, Be The Maquis, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Latin, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Priests and Priesthood, Seminarians and Seminaries, Semper Paratus, Si vis pacem para bellum!, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged , , , ,
22 Comments

JUST TOO COOL: Judean date trees grown from 2000 year old seeds

Also for your Just Too Cool file, sent by a friend.

From Science Alert:

A Long-Lost Legendary Roman Fruit Tree Has Been Grown From 2,000-Year-Old Seeds

Scientists have cultivated plants from date palm seeds that languished in ancient ruins and caves for 2,000 years.

This remarkable feat confirms the long-term viability of the kernels once ensconced in succulent Judean dates, a fruit cultivar lost for centuries. The results make it an excellent candidate for studying the longevity of plant seeds.

From those date palm saplings, the researchers have begun to unlock the secrets of the highly sophisticated cultivation practices that produced the dates praised by Herodotus, Galen, and Pliny the Elder[I’m not sure what they had to compare them to, but I’d like to try what they thought was so good.]

[…]

In an ancient palace fortress built by King Herod the Great, and caves located in southern Israel between the Judean Hills and the Dead Sea, archaeologists retrieved hundreds of seeds from the date palm (Phoenix dactylifera).

Then, a team of scientists, led by Sarah Sallon of Hadassah Medical Organisation in Israel, sorted through this bounty.

They selected 34 seeds they thought were the most viable. One was separated out as a control; the remaining 33 were carefully soaked in water and fertiliser to encourage germination.

After this process, one more was found to be damaged, and was subsequently discarded; the remaining 32 seeds were planted.

Of these, six of the seeds successfully sprouted. They were given the names Jonah, Uriel, Boaz, Judith, Hannah and Adam. (A previous attempt by Sallon and colleagues published in 2008 produced a single sapling; it was named Methuselah.)

Seedlings in hand, the scientists could now run tests and analyses they couldn’t perform on seeds alone.

First, they collected fragments of the seed shells still clinging to the roots of the plants. These were perfect for radiocarbon dating – which confirmed the seeds date back to between 1,800 and 2,400 years ago.

[…]

Okay, I had a Jurrasic Park moment, but that’s pretty cool.

Speaking of dates… here’s a pre-prandial snack item.

Try cutting a medool date open, remove the pit, and stuff a little aged Manchego cheese into it. Pop it into the microwave for a 10+ seconds and then put some good salt on it.  Some people wrap bacon around the date stuffed with Manchego, but that’s a longer process… and not great for Fridays.  The salt helps in the absence of the bacon.

Or, Iberico instead of bacon.

Not all salt is the same, by the way.   For something like this, I’d preferfleur de selthough gray will do.

Posted in Fr. Z's Kitchen, Just Too Cool | Tagged ,
3 Comments

ASK FATHER: Right of appeal of a diocesan Catholic school

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

I pray that you will answer this query. Under canon law, is there any right of appeal regarding the closure of a diocesan Catholic elementary school, currently under the auspices of a particular parish. There are valid objections to this closure, and it is not simply emotional or irrational. If so, would the appeal be to the diocesan bishop or to the Congregation for Catholics Education, and what are acceptable objections? (The pastor in this case is not an advocate.) Thank you Father!

GUEST PRIEST RESPONSE: Fr. Tim Ferguson

Such an appeal is possible, but time is of the essence.

Canon 1734 establishes that an appeal against a singular administrative decree (which this closure would be) must be lodged within ten useful days of the notification of the decree. Useful days are generally understood to be business days, excluding weekends and holidays. So, about two weeks. The appeal should be submitted to whoever issued the decree closing the school – either the pastor, or more likely the bishop.

The process of appealing a decision can be difficult, and a happy outcome is far from guaranteed. I would strongly recommend getting the assistance of a good canonist to assist, and if there is no one immediately involved with the situation who could provide canonical assistance, the St. Joseph Foundation has done yeoman’s work for many years in providing canonical support to lay faithful in such situations.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, 1983 CIC can. 915, ASK FATHER Question Box, HONORED GUESTS | Tagged ,
4 Comments

Air Force Bases to change names: SPACE FORCE BASE!

For your Just Too Cool file.

From Florida Today

Air Force: Space Coast bases will change names to reflect Space Force

The Space Coast’s two Air Force bases will soon change names to reflect their connections to the military’s newly minted Space Force branch.

Patrick Air Force Base and Cape Canaveral Air Force Station will become Patrick Space Force Base and Cape Canaveral Space Force Station within 30 days, 45th Space Wing Commander Brig. Gen. Douglas Schiess said during his “State of the Installation” briefing early Friday. [How cool is that?  Space Wing!  If I were 40 years younger….]

“The names of the two bases will change,” Schiess said, adding that Secretary of the Air Force Barbara Barrett and Space Force commander Gen. John Raymond will attend a local name change ceremony. “When that happens, we believe we’ll probably be one of the first, if not the first, bases to do that.”

Other than switching from “Air” to “Space,” Schiess said the designations will retain their historic references.

“We’re not going to change the Patrick part,” he said of the beachside installation, which is named after Gen. Mason Patrick, first chief of the Air Force’s predecessor. “And we would never think about changing the name of Cape Canaveral.”

Schiess said he also anticipates a name change for the 45th Space Wing itself, though no final decisions have been made. Uniform updates and designs are still being decided, too.

Space Force!

Posted in Just Too Cool, Look! Up in the sky! | Tagged
13 Comments

Germans go to the zoo. Synod (“walking together”) and heresy. Wherein Fr. Z rants.

Weird German bishop (tautology?) of Osnabrück, Franz-Josef Bode, is for pretty everything that would tear the Church apart and remake her in the secularist image so hotly desired by the Left.

At katolisch.de we find that Bode, emerging puffed up from the Synod (“walking together”) has said that – I am not making this up

Christus sei “für uns Mensch, nicht Mann geworden”.

Christ became a human being for us, not a man.

Bode was paired up with a woman theologian Dorothea Sattler, who quipped that it is new to emphasize Jesus’ manhood. God could have become a woman, but it was only sociological conditions that … I dunno… forced? God to become a man.

Moreover,

“it was always about the incarnation of God, not about becoming man. The question of gender was of no relevance to theology of salvation in the history of tradition.”

This is both a lie and heresy.

This, folks, is what is coming from the German Church.  Caput malorum omnium.

This is what has been driving the Germans to force an agenda onto the whole Church through their virtual colonial approach to the people of the Amazon.

Consider the implications.

  • God has to bend to sociological conditions that we set.  We can constrain God.
  • Maleness is irrelevant to Christ’s salvific mission.
  • There is nothing particularly male about what He did that wasn’t, necessarily, culturally conditioned.
  • No one has paid much attention to Christ’s maleness until recently, but we can put all that aside as not relevant.
  • If sex (not gender) is irrelevant, then every aspect of the Church, in effect, can be overhauled, beginning with priesthood.

Once again we find the demonic attack on the priesthood that the Lutherans launched. Protestantism, deep down, is a sustained attack on the priesthood and Mass.

They might has well be dancing around a golden calf in that German synodal process.

Remember: In the history of the world only the Jews referred to God as male and only they had male priesthood.  In other highly patriarchal cultures there were also priestesses.  Not so with the Jews.  That in itself was not unnoticed over the millennia. Moreover, where there is a female priesthood there is, inevitably, temple prostitution.

Where are our LEVITES?

Exodus 32

And the people seeing that Moses delayed to come down from the mount, gathering together against Aaron, said: Arise, make us gods, that may go before us: for as to this Moses, the man that brought us out of the land of Egypt, we know not what has befallen him. [2] And Aaron said to them: Take the golden earrings from the ears of your wives, and your sons and daughters, and bring them to me. [3] And the people did what he had commanded, bringing the earrings to Aaron. [4] And when he had received them, he fashioned them by founders’ work, and made of them a molten calf. And they said: These are thy gods, O Israel, that have brought thee out of the land of Egypt. [5] And when Aaron saw this, he built an altar before it, and made proclamation by a crier’s voice, saying: Tomorrow is the solemnity of the Lord.

[6] And rising in the morning, they offered holocausts, and peace victims, and the people sat down to eat, and drink, and they rose up to play. [In other words, an orgy] [7] And the Lord spoke to Moses, saying: Go, get thee down: thy people, which thou hast brought out of the land of Egypt, hath sinned. [8] They have quickly strayed from the way which thou didst shew them: and they have made to themselves a molten calf, and have adored it, and sacrificing victims to it, have said: These are thy gods, O Israel, that have brought thee out of the land of Egypt. [9] And again the Lord said to Moses: See that this people is stiffnecked: [10] Let me alone, that my wrath may be kindled against them, and that I may destroy them, and I will make of thee a great nation.

[11] But Moses besought the Lord his God, saying: Why, O Lord, is thy indignation kindled against thy people, whom thou hast brought out of the land of Egypt, with great power, and with a mighty hand? [12] Let not the Egyptians say, I beseech thee: He craftily brought them out, that he might kill them in the mountains, and destroy them from the earth: let thy anger cease, and be appeased upon the wickedness of thy people. [13] Remember Abraham, Isaac, and Israel, thy servants, to whom thou sworest by thy own self, saying: I will multiply your seed as the stars of heaven: and this whole land that I have spoken of, I will give to your seed, and you shall possess it for ever. [14] And the Lord was appeased from doing the evil which he had spoken against his people. [15] And Moses returned from the mount, carrying the two tables of the testimony in his hand, written on both sides,

[16] And made by the work of God: the writing also of God was graven in the tables. [17] And Josue hearing the noise of the people shouting, said to Moses: The noise of battle is heard in the camp. [Hebrew euphemism for sex in concert with the worship of pagan idols.] [18] But he answered: It is not the cry of men encouraging to fight, nor the shout of men compelling to flee: but I hear the voice of singers. [19] And when he came nigh to the camp, he saw the calf, and the dances: and being very angry, he threw the tables out of his hand, and broke them at the foot of the mount: [20] And laying hold of the calf which they had made, he burnt it, and beat it to powder, which he strowed into water, and gave thereof to the children of Israel to drink.

[And now things get serious.  Whereas before all the men were priests, God strips them of priesthood and confers it on the Levites.]

[21] And he said to Aaron: What has this people done to thee, that thou shouldst bring upon them a most heinous sin? [22] And he answered him: Let not my lord be offended: for thou knowest this people, that they are prone to evil. [23] They said to me: Make us gods, that may go before us: for as to this Moses, who brought us forth out of the land of Egypt, we know not what is befallen him. [24] [And now the lamest excuse ever uttered in the Bible.] And I said to them: Which of you hath any gold? and they took and brought it to me: and I cast it into the fire, and this calf came out. [25] And when Moses saw that the people were naked, (for Aaron had stripped them by occasion of the shame of the filth, and had set them naked among their enemies,) [26] Then standing in the gate of the camp, he said: If any man be on the Lord’s side let him join with me. And all the sons of Levi gathered themselves together unto him: [27] [Note well!  This is tough.] And he said to them: Thus saith the Lord God of Israel: Put every man his sword upon his thigh: go, and return from gate to gate through the midst of the camp, and let every man kill his brother, and friend, and neighbour. [28] And the sons of Levi did according to the words of Moses, and there were slain that day about three thousand men. [29] And Moses said: You have consecrated your hands this day to the Lord, every man in his son and in his brother, that a blessing may be given to you. [The ordination of the Levites was through an anointing with blood.  Their ordination was the bloodbath of the idolatrous.] [30] And when the next day was come, Moses spoke to the people: You have sinned a very great sin: I will go up to the Lord, if by any means I may be able to entreat him for your crime.

[31] And returning to the Lord, he said: I beseech thee: this people hath sinned a heinous sin, and they have made to themselves gods of gold: either forgive them this trespass, [32] Or if thou do not, strike me out of the book that thou hast written. [33] And the Lord answered him: He that hath sinned against me, him will I strike out of my book: [34] But go thou, and lead this people whither I have told thee: my angel shall go before thee. And I in the day of revenge will visit this sin also of theirs. [35] The Lord therefore struck the people for the guilt on occasion of the calf which Aaron had made.

Because of this bloody episode, spiritual adultery by idol worship, God loaded onto the people all the additional laws of the Book of Leviticus.  He stripped all the men of their priesthood and gave it to the Levites.

Posted in Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged , , , ,
17 Comments

READ: NRO piece by Daniel J. Mahoney, “Pope Francis, Wayward Shepherd”

First, an image to set the scene.

Let’s now move along.

In the wake of posting about Robert Royal’s roundup of books on Francis, I read today at NRO a piece by Daniel J. Mahoney, “Pope Francis, Wayward Shepherd”.

The article is more than about ways in which Francis seems to be leading the Church into a secular NGO mode of action, obsessed with climate change, and through it, even population control (what the hell is Jeffrey Sachs doing at the Vatican all the time?) and the glossing over of perennial teachings.

It is about a wider element.

[…]

Political correctness — and hostility to the West as the West — pervades a good deal of what this papacy says and does.

[…]

Royal refers to these juvenile ideological clichés, and predictable policies, as manifestations of “simplistic progressivism.” This is a Vatican that conflates the truth of Christ with a “religion of humanity” that has become a substitute for a religion that affirms transcendence. Sober political thinking is not much in evidence, nor even a modicum of realism and moderation in human affairs. Love and charity have been hopelessly politicized, confused with a sentimentality that excuses every excess carried out in the name of a perfected “humanity.” When one sides with an atheistic and totalitarian regime that endangers the children of God, one has entered into morally and theologically troubled territory, indeed.

What is responsible for this steady evacuation of, this open assault on, classical Christian orthodoxy and moral-political good sense? To begin with, Francis and his cohort are partisans of a “new Christianity” that pays insufficient attention to the horizon that Christians call “eternity.

[…]

“The silence of most of the bishops in the Catholic Church on this embarrassing but destructive mixture of progressivism, reflexive activism, and casual dismissal of the deepest wisdom of the Church is disconcerting.”

And…

Instead of kneeling before the world and succumbing to the allure of a late modernity that has no place for elevating conscience and binding truth, Cardinal Sarah calls on the Church to fearlessly witness to the truth about man. It must witness, with evangelical zeal and fidelity to the natural moral law, against the terrible perversions that are gender theory and transhumanism. They are the “pernicious face” of totalitarianism in the 21st century since they, too, “hope to mutilate and control [human] nature.” The Church now should have one paramount mission: to defend human nature, moral responsibility, and a conscience informed by natural and divine truth (not pernicious self-will) as precious gifts that come from the Lord of Hosts. Sarah puts it so well: Men and women of good will would respond with enthusiasm and gratitude to a “splendid act of courage by the Church” to recover the true sources of human liberty, dignity, and responsibility. Without such an act of courage, the progressives will lead the Church of Christ down a path of gradual renunciation of everything that defines the Christian Church as a vehicle of divine truth, of the moral law, and of liturgical fidelity to the worship of the Most High. And as he argues in a new book, Des profondeurs de nos coeurs (From the Depths of Our Hearts), written with a contribution by Benedict XVI, the new Christianity undermines an authentic and faithful understanding of celibate priesthood, of priesthood truly sanctified by God. [US Pre-Order Soon HERE for 12 March 2020 release! – FRENCH HERE]

By becoming shrill, dogmatic, and moralistic practitioners of a politically correct religion of humanity, the Church follows the path of perdition. The political philosopher Leo Strauss, speaking in 1964 at the University of Detroit, a Jesuit institution, said that the Roman Catholic Church was the last remaining spiritual body or institution to truly appreciate all the pitfalls of a modern project that openly and self-consciously rejected natural right in the classical and Christian senses of the term. Strauss made that remark at the very moment when important elements within the Church were succumbing to modernity at its least wise, least sober, least admirable. This is what the political philosopher Eric Voegelin so aptly called “modernity without restraint.”

For generations to come, the Catholic Church will bear the shame of its capitulation before a totalitarian regime in Beijing, a regime that demands loyalty to state power and Communist ideology before fidelity to the saving grace of Christ.

[…]

It’s a sobering assessment.

On a macro level there is not a lot must of us can do, even though we know that prayer and charity have no borders.

On the micro level, the sphere we reach each day, there is a lot we can do in word and in deed, dicta et facta.

One thing we must do is assess where we are and where we want to go.   The piece above describes: “partisans of a ‘new Christianity’ that pays insufficient attention to the horizon that Christians call ‘eternity.’”

In geometry, when two lines diverge from the same point, the farther they extend, the farther apart they get.

In a journey, if you take a road leading the opposite direction of your destination, the farther you go from it.  If you are smart, and you really want to get to your goal, you have to turn around and find the correct road.  If you are smart.  Or … if you are not perverse.

I think that a false road was purposely created for our naive feet by the City of Man’s diabolical civil engineers and we were lead astray.

But we’ve now had time to study the map.

Heaven.  Not heaven.

On the path of the Church?  On the path of the world?

Do you like the direction we are going?

Friends, stay close to the sacraments.

Find good reading sources.

Form small “base communities”, to study good sources.

Participate well in your sacred liturgical worship.

Fathers, get serious about catechesis and get those altars turned back the right way.  Preach about the Blessed Sacrament in such a way that people of their own accord will never want to receive in the hand again.  Put rails back in.  Learn more about who you really are by learning the Traditional Latin Mass.  I virtually guarantee a knock on effect in your parish.

And hear confessions.

And GO TO CONFESSION!

Posted in Francis, Pò sì jiù, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged ,
7 Comments

Sequel to Mel Gibson’s “The Passion of the Christ”? RESURRECTION

This is pretty exciting.  I read at Messa in Latino that Mel Gibson is making a sequel to The Passion Of Christ about the Resurrection.

The cast should come back for this next offering.

Anyone know anything else for sure?

For the great movie…

US HERE – UK HERE

Posted in Just Too Cool | Tagged
21 Comments

IL MESSAGGERO: Archbp. Gänswein sacked? #BOOKGATE continues – UPDATED

UPDATE 6 Feb 2020:

Some updates at the bottom: how other newsies are treating this.

___ Originally published on: Feb 6, 2020 at 02:43

The Italian daily Il Messaggero of 6 February has run with the story that was in the German Die Tagespost, namely, that Francis has sidelined the head of the Pontifical Household, Archbp. Georg Gänswein, who is also the private secretary to Benedict XVI, because of the dust up over the book Benedict co-authored with Card. Sarah.  That book argues against what some people claim: Francis wanted to open the possibility of “married priests” through the upcoming Apostolic Exhortation following the Amazon Synod (“walking together”).   It was thought – based on a leak repeated without solid confirmation – that Francis would undermine priestly celibacy through the approval of “viri probati“.

That said, it seems that the upcoming document won’t break with tradition about celibacy.  Some folks got out over their skiis a little too far.

It is possible that the document did contain something about celibacy, but maybe the exceptionally good Sarah/Benedict book (out in French, in English, March) threw a spanner into the works and changes were made to the text.

The story goes that Francis was/is furious at Gänswein for #Bookgate. Gänswein has now effectively vanished from sight, been “disappeared” as it were.

In any event, here is the page from the 6 February Il Messaggero.

Gänswein has been seen less and less and is now, apparently, on a leave from his duties in the Pontifical Household for an indeterminate time.  However, Il Messaggero says that this is because of a “normal change” a new “redistribution of internal work”.

The writer at Il Messaggero used a grim Spanish word for Gänswein: “Una sorta di desaparecido … A kind of disappeared.”  As in “los desaparecidos” during the Argentinian “Dirty War”.  People considered to be ideological threats to the junta were “disappeared”, dropped alive out of airplanes into the Atlantic.  No bodies. No crime.  Just a shrug.

The writer of the piece guesses that another “head will roll”: Card. Sarah.   However, the writer also mentions that Sarah is just a few months from the obligatory age of retirement and it is unlikely that Francis will renew his mandate.

The writer for Il Messaggero archly concluded:

“The ultraconservative fringe of the Church which brought some of the bishops of the United States to threaten schism is in a state of alarm, but the text of Pope Francis (after some corrections [alcune correzioni], it seems) appears not to create any openings.  It seems that there isn’t a hint of married priests.”

American bishops?  Threat of schism?  After some corrections?  Perhaps the book made the difference.

However, it remains that Archbp. Gänswein is – right now – still officially Prefect of the Household.

Right.

And Card. Burke is – right now – still officially the Cardinalis Patronus of the Sovereign Order of Malta.

Speaking of desaparecido, as Il Messaggero suggested, at only 63 years of age Gänswein has perhaps not been given a golden parachute.

__

You should read this book, which caused a good deal of the sort of “mess” which Francis invited.  See what the fuss is about.

¡Hagan lío!

From the Depths of our Hearts

US Pre-Order Soon HERE for 12 March 2020 release! – FRENCH HERE

UPDATE: later 6 Feb 2020:

Die Tagespost today says that Gänswein has a leave of absence and that the papal spox says there are no openings for “viri probati” in the upcoming Exhortation.   But!  They end on a hopeful note for the libs!  Francis doesn’t have to use an Exhortation to announce married priests or deaconettes!  He could create “new commissions” to study these questions, and announce them in an apostolic letter.  Uh huh.

Il Fatto Quotidiano seems to go with the punishment scenario

Corriere della Sera goes with punishment, after a looong ramble to fill column inches.

From Il Simografo another take.   They try to “decode” what is going on with a simpler answer.  Benedict XVI’s health is declining and it was decided that Gänswein would take time off – he is still officially head of the papal household – to take care of Benedict.

 

 

Posted in The Drill | Tagged , , ,
10 Comments

BREAKING: SECRET PROTEST CALLED AGAINST FUTURE PAPAL CONCLAVE APP

On the heels of posting this – BREAKING: IOWA CAUCUSES AND PAPAL CONCLAVES! – I just received the following…

February 5, 2020 – (ROME, ITALY)

An unconfirmed source reported on Tuesday, 4 February, that Pope Francis has hired the Iowa Democrat Party to develop an app for use in the next papal conclave to count the votes of the cardinal electors. The progressive pontiff reportedly desires that conclaves should have more transparency.

The app, which was developed by former members of the 2016 Clinton campaign, caused widespread confusion during the recent Iowa caucuses, jeopardizing their future.

Conclaves, held in the Vatican’s Sistine Chapel, are historically closed meetings, literally meaning “lockup up together”.  By church law, electronic devices are not permitted in conclaves.  Many think that conclaves, like political caucuses, are outdated and undemocratic.

An anonymous informant stated that there is being organized a secret, by invitation only, protest at the development of the conclave app.  According that sole source, protesters will stand silently in a line at the entrance to the Vatican Museum, which is the usual public access to the Sistine Chapel.

“It should be moving,” the organizer said.  “This cannot be permitted.  Action is needed.  The integrity of conclaves is sacrosanct.   There mustn’t be leaks.”

An expert on the history of conclaves, Prof. Mario Rossi of Rome’s La Sapienza University, reacted to the news of the conclave app.  “Not good. The risks of disinformation would multiply by orders of magnitude.   Imagine the confusion of  voting miscounts because of a compromised app.  White smoke.  Then black smoke.  Then white again.  Chaos.”

The Vatican’s papal spokesman was questioned about the conclave app and Francis’s determination to bring transparency to conclaves.  At the time of publication no response had yet been received.

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged ,
4 Comments