Behold how the Left thinks

At Daily Kos you can find a good example of how the Left thinks.  This is also an insight into how the catholic Left think, too.  For confirmation just watch the combox of the Fishwrap.  You see similar attitudes and tone.

Daily Kos attacked Card. Burke in an especially vicious way.  HERE Why? He stated, clearly, what we know about homosexuality.  Same sex-attraction is an inclination that is not a well-ordered inclination, according to human ecology, the natural law.  It is, as the Church has explained in rather clinical language, disordered.  The Kos writer, probably not up to date on any sort of technical language or the finer points of any language, leaped to conclusion that Card. Burke (or any of us) think that homosexuals are therefore deranged.

So… here is a sample of how the Left “thinks”, which includes also – in many cases – the catholic Left.  Thus, Kos, with my usual emphases and comments:

Hey, Cardinal F*ckwit, listen here: [With an intro like that, imagine what sort of brilliant reasoning and prose might follow!] The only “intrinsic disorder” here is your hatred and bigotry that belongs in the Dark Ages. [I suspect that, for the writer, “Dark Ages” is only a vague trope, a cliché.] The only thing that LGBT people suffer from is the efforts of people like you to condemn their lives at every turn, [Who did that?] and to fight with every ounce of your strength [I suppose the writer thinks that the world revolves around homosexuals.  We don’t really spend much time thinking about them.] their dignity, equality and civil rights. [No.  This is a canard.  Do not be taken in by the claim that this is a civil rights issue, as if it was on par with racial civil rights.] The only thing that makes them “profoundly unhappy” are your constant messages of hostility, animosity and condemnation for nothing else than who they are [?] and who they love. [It seems to me that only a profoundly unhappy person could write this stuff.] Something that actually scandalizes children is the rape and sexual abuse of them, which has been perpetrated, defended and covered up by your church for decades. [A drastic overplaying of that card.]

Homosexuality is not a mental disorder. [Card. Burke didn’t say that it was.  This is a straw man.] The beliefs that the Catholic Church holds about it is. [Try to follow that.  “The beliefs” are a “disorder”?  Does that even make sense?] The cure for this disorder is [This is where it gets really nasty.] to challenge them, shun them, shame them, ridicule them, mock them, condemn them, and make anyone who is considering holding them too embarrassed to do so. [You’ll have to try harder than this, I’m afraid.  This is simply rude slop which only paints the writer as the one with the problem.] And I’m tired of having the meaning of tolerance dictated to me by the right. Tolerance means that I don’t ban you from saying what you just said. [This person isn’t full of herself.  Nope.  Not a bit.] That’s it. I do not owe your sick beliefs one iota of respect. In my mind, they should be shoved to the absolute fringe of society, away from where any half-decent person can give them any consideration at all. They should have no place in mainstream society, in the same category as racism, misogyny and religious prejudice, [Of which the writer is deeply guilty.] and they deserve nothing but profound disrespect.

It’s the only way you’ll learn.

That’s your pitch?

It seems to me that this person may need counseling.

Meanwhile, that other liberal bastion quoted Michael Sean Winters of the Fishwrap, thus demonstrating that the Left and the catholic Left are at work in the same echo chamber.

In response to Burke’s declaration that gay relationships are “intrinsically disordered,” National Catholic Reporters’ Michael Sean Winters called the cardinal”tone deaf” and said such statements “make the Church look foolish and mean-spirited.”

This man’s inability to speak with even a whiff of human compassion is intrinsically disordered if you ask me,” Winters said.

Sound familiar?  Now compare and contrast the above with the Fishwrap’s combox.  You will need a mask and nitrile gloves for this one.  HERE

Cowards.  They hide behind their anonymity to pour all manner of spiritual poison out into the world.

We respond with,

Blessed are you when men revile you and persecute you and utter all kinds of evil against you falsely on my account. Rejoice and be glad, for your reward is great in heaven, for so men persecuted the prophets who were before you. “You are the salt of the earth; but if salt has lost its taste, how shall its saltness be restored? It is no longer good for anything except to be thrown out and trodden under foot by men. “You are the light of the world. A city set on a hill cannot be hid. Nor do men light a lamp and put it under a bushel, but on a stand, and it gives light to all in the house. Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works and give glory to your Father who is in heaven. (Matthew 5:11-16)

And to Card. Burke, I say:

I charge you in the presence of God and of Christ Jesus who is to judge the living and the dead, and by his appearing and his kingdom: preach the word, be urgent in season and out of season, convince, rebuke, and exhort, be unfailing in patience and in teaching. For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own likings, and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander into myths. As for you, always be steady, endure suffering, do the work of an evangelist, fulfil your ministry. (2 Tim 4:1-5)

Comment moderation is ON.

UPDATE:

The aptly-named Daily Beast has a piece by someone named “Barbie” in the same vein as Kos and HuffPo, but with a bit less bile.  HERE  These folks come quite simply unglued at the thought that people should have to rut constantly.

Posted in Liberals, Sin That Cries To Heaven, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , , , ,
36 Comments

Let there be color

I saw a rather cool series of photos from the B&W age which have been colorized. The colorized versions give an entirely different “feel” to the moment.

HERE

Posted in Just Too Cool, Lighter fare | Tagged
16 Comments

11 Oct: St. John XXIII

Today is the feast of the Pope who issued the Apostolic Constitution Veterum Sapientia.

Today is the feast of the Pope who didn’t like it when people clapped in church.

Today is the feast of the Pope who issued the Roman Missal of St. John XXIII.

His propers are HERE.

Posted in Saints: Stories & Symbols | Tagged
16 Comments

VIDEO: Card. Burke’s clear, articulate, blunt answers about divorce, remarriage, Card. Kasper

His Eminence Raymond L. Burke gave an interview to Raymond Arroyo of EWTN.

You don’t want to miss this. Arroyo does not lob softballs. He starts out with a question about Pope Francis praise of Card. Kasper!

This is refreshing and it gets better and better as it goes along.

It is about, in part, the “Five Cardinals Book”.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

As I post, it has 589 views.

Click to PRE-ORDER

Buy in USA HERE
Buy in UK HERE

The book is available for KINDLE (USA) for a reduced price of $9.99, which is much less than the paperback. HERE
Don’t have a Kindle yet.  What on earth are you waiting for?  USA HERE (for one type, a Paperwhite, you can surf to others) and UK HERE

Posted in Fr. Z KUDOS, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill | Tagged , , , ,
46 Comments

“Does it apply to murderers and pedophiles?”

There is a good post at Fr. Hunwicke’s place pertaining to the admittance of the civilly remarried to Holy Communion. With my emphases:

Updating

One gathers … as we grandly say in England … that brilliant ways are being mooted in Synodo for squaring the circle: formally maintaining Catholic sexual morality while letting people off the hook of having to try, with the help of grace, to adhere it. (There was a time when English Protestants claimed that ‘Subtle Jesuits’ could “prove that Black was White”.) One of these Brilliant Ways is Graduality or Gradualism.

Another is the old Liberal Protestant trick of talking about morality as an ideal rather than as a casuistic.

Another, that we must be more polite about people in certain situations and not call them Hurtful Names.

The Hunwicke test for diagnosing clever but shoddy dodges is threefold:
(1) Can you square it with the Sermon on the Mount and the ethical teaching of S Paul?
(2) Can you square it with the Lord’s parables and teaching about ‘we do not know the Day or the Hour’?
(3) Does it apply to murderers and pedophiles?

Whew.

Check his blog often.

Posted in Hard-Identity Catholicism, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged ,
13 Comments

ASK FATHER: Is a priest necessary for a burial?

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

When my Dad died in August we had his funeral mass. He requested cremation and he was cremated following the funeral mass.

With the process of interment in a national cemetery (he had served in the Air Force), we had to schedule a time with the cemetery when my out of town brother can be here. It is scheduled for the day after Thanksgiving.

My Mom (also Catholic) is not planning to have a priest for this. I think this is mostly related to shoddy treatment they received from their pastor. Is it necessary to have a priest there?

I know there would normally be graveside prayers.

Condolences.

The Praenotanda (explanatory section) of the Order of Christian Funerals says that “When no priest or deacon is available for the vigil and related rites, or the rite of committal, a layperson presides.”  In the older, traditional rite, clerics handle things.

There are prayers that are to be said at the graveside, which include the blessing of the grave itself if interment is not in a Catholic cemetery which has already been blessed. Though the rite is unclear (… and aren’t they all nowadays? …) it seems that this blessing, if it is to be considered a constitutive blessing, would need to be done by a priest or deacon.

Can the rites of committal be done by a layperson? Sure, if there isn’t a priest or deacon available. The Church is mindful of the reality that, around the world, many people only have access to a priest once a month, if that often. Sometimes they have to bury their dead without the consoling presence of a priest. Thankfully, in these United States, even with a declining number of priests at present, there is an abundance of priests compared to some part of the world.

Arguments and spats happen with priests.

Sometimes, the priest is at fault.

Some priests can be unpleasant. Some laypeople can be unpleasant too.

It would be a shame … no… it would be a really bad idea to deprive yourself and your late father of the priestly ministry of the Church because of an argument with some priest – even if he was totally to blame.  If the wounds of the argument are still too raw with that particular priest, contact another parish or ask the funeral director for advice.   Funeral directors often know retired priests or priests with non-parochial ministry who can be called on to help out in situations like this.  They are also among the world’s best diplomats.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Four Last Things | Tagged , ,
4 Comments

This morning… I want this guy’s job!

It’s about 8:30 a.m. and I have already had four phone calls about stuff having to do with the Synod and other related things.

It feels like the world and the the Church withing the world are flying apart at the seams.  So, let’s have a break.

Here’s the latest from Mat.

Mat isn’t doing anything in these videos, except just being there and being, probably, being happy, which is what I need.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

This morning… I want this guy’s job.  I could go to all sorts of places and make videos of me saying the traditional Mass.   Okay… maybe not quite so much with the whole crowd involvement thing.  Any better ideas?

Nothing actually goes on, but it is hard to take your eyes of this.

Unfamiliar with Mat?

Here is another one.  There are a few great moments in it, like the Bollywood thing. For all of them in one video HERE.

UPDATE:

And speaking of travel… click the waving flag to send a donation for my Rome trip in January for the Confraternity of Catholic Clergy meeting.

Posted in Lighter fare |
11 Comments

ASK FATHER: Convert confused about “private revelations”

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

Father, I am a fairly new convert to the Church and while I have studied theology, which led me here, I sure do get confused at times.

It seems Catholics, hesitate at studying the scriptures but jump on any and all mystical revelations. I am in a Bible study about Blessed Mary and 1 person kept bringing up Emmerich’s book which I found was at odds with historical facts..is this book of revelations accepted I thought it had been discredited because the poet who wrote down supposed dictation made it up

Please help my confused mind

Welcome to the Church!

Now that you’ve been received into Holy Mother Church, we can let you in on a little secret. We’re all a bit confused at times. Don’t tell anyone, but it’s true.

Depending on where you are and what circle you hang with, you’ll discover a vast variety of interests among Catholics.

Some people, indeed some parishes, are gangbusters about Scripture study. Some are into biographies of saints (hagiography), or even dogmatic (though that’s now a bad word, I guess) theology.  Within these categories, you’ll find a wide range of variations.

Blessed Anne Catherine Emmerich was a holy woman.  She was a religious who suffered with poor health.  She received the stigmata and had numerous visions throughout her life. Clemens Brentano, a poet, visited her over the course of several years and took notes of their conversations regarding her visions. Brentano and Emmerich spoke different dialects. Many of his notes were written well after his visits. Ten years after Blessed Anne Catherine’s death, Brentano completed his notes for publication. The last three volumes, on the life of Christ, were published after Brentano died.  Fr. Karl Schmoger produced these volumes after editing Brentano’s notes.

So, there are problems with attributing the books to Blessed Anne Catherine, who never even had a chance to look them over.

The Congregation for the Causes of the Saints excluded the books from their examination of the life of Bl. Anne Catherine. They made the recommendation to St. John Paul II for beatification on the basis of her life alone.  What portion of the books can be safely attributed to Bl. Anne Catherine is unknown.

Private revelations are tricky. We know, definitively, that the age of Revelation ended with the death of the last Apostle (John). All that is necessary for salvation has been revealed to the Church.

That doesn’t, of course, prevent God from revealing further things.  We cannot place limitations on God.

When the Church rules that a private revelation has indeed taken place, She merely declares that nothing in the revelation is contrary to faith or morals and that the circumstances of the revelation are such that it appears to be valid. No obligation is placed on the faithful to believe the content of the revelation.

The nature of private revelation is precisely that: private. God reveals something to that specific person or those persons. Were God to have wanted to impose the obligation of belief in some particular matter on all mankind, He would have done so through universal revelation (which, as stated above, ended with the death of the last Apostle).

Private revelations can sometimes help other people, bystanders like you and I, grow in faith.  They can be hindrances. Their utility is, first of all, for the one to whom the revelation occurs.

The old Catholic Encyclopedia, available at New Advent, has a good explanation of private revelation: HERE

In the meantime, welcome again to the confusion of Holy Mother Church. You’ll never get used to it.  You’ll never be bored by it.  You’ll may wind up adding to it yourself.  Christ is at the helm of our barque.  We can rest confidently knowing we’re headed for the right destination, provided we don’t pitch ourselves off the deck and into the cold drink on either the starboard side or to port (that’s right and left for those of you in Columbia Heights).

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Our Catholic Identity, Saints: Stories & Symbols | Tagged ,
28 Comments

Bl. J.H. Newman’s “To be deep in history” Mug (and a tease)

It’s the feast (in some places and for some groups) of Bl. John Henry Newman.  Who can forget his beatification by Benedict XVI?

Those of you who may be new readers may not know about the mug I made with a phrase of Bl. John Henry Newman: “To be deep in history is to cease to be a Protestant.

Thinking back on the course of my own conversion, the elements which made it easier to take the plunge, and considering the growing projects of the Anglican Ordinariates, and also remembering that Benedict XVI – the Pope of Christian Unity – beatified John Henry Newman…. I put the phrase on a coffee mug.

Fill yours with Mystic Monk Coffee as soon as humanly possible.

Here is a shot of the regular sized coffee mug… I’ll bet you could put your yogurt and granola in it too.

To be deep in history

The Z-Swag Store is HERE.

A shot of the larger coffee mug.. I’ll bet that you could put … hot chocolate in it too!

T

You see that for this mug I really wrapped the design across most of its surface.

Here is the largest mug, the stein.  I suspect that this might be coaxed into holding a beer.

T

The image itself (it’s larger on the mugs):

To be deep in history

Here are three shots of the ur-mug, the larger coffee mug.   It is made from the same durable stuff I punished for years in the microwave and dishwasher.  Though I don’t have a dishwasher now… other than my hands.

I also made another version, with the phrase tighter on one side to make it easier to read:

 

After years of treating these things with great brutality in the nuclear reactor and the bottom rack of the washer near the heat, I succeeded in getting a crack in one of them, cosmetic, but not fatal.

It might start a conversation.   But I suggest that before flashing it about, you might brush up on why being deep in history leads to the Catholic Church.

You can find all the links you need to Z-stuff HERE.

 

PS: I should have a NEW line rolling out tomorrow.  I was inspired by how some nitwits in the combox of the Fishwrap (a more vicious place on earth you will not find) were ridiculing YOU READERS!

Posted in In The Wild, REVIEWS, The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged , ,
12 Comments

ASK FATHER: How to have Masses said for me after my death?

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

What is the best way to ensure that part of whatever funds are left in my estate are used to have masses offered for the repose of my soul?

I think we all wonder about this.  I sure do.  Will anyone pray for me after I die?  Some of us with little family of our own, and they not Catholics… well.  Who will remember us?  So many “funerals” or “post-living life celebrations” these days neglect the one thing that is necessary: prayer for the dead.

I want prayers, darn it, not balloons and jokes.

Also, it is hard for many people to find priests who can take their Mass intentions for loved ones.  Pray for more priests, good holy, devout and faithful priests.

So, now to the question: making provisions for Masses to be said for you after your death.

If leaving funds for Masses to be said, be as specific as possible about what you want.

Can. 950 of the Code for the Latin Church establishes that if there is no indication of the number of Masses to be said, the presumption is that the number of Masses is determined by the offering prescribed in the donor’s residence.  For example, I leave $1,000 “for Masses” in my will without specifying how many. Based on the common custom of $10 per Mass in the Diocese of Black Duck (where I lived), I should have 100 Masses said. Otherwise, I could specify that I’m leaving $1,000 for 50 Masses. In that case the stipend per Mass is $20.

Perhaps one solution would be to establish an agreement with a monastic community.  You might create a foundation that would provide a steady flow of money to the community with the agreement that a Mass be celebrated regularly.

Canons 1299 – 1310 cover issues for a pious foundation.  Pay attention to details.  The Ordinary (usually the religious superior) is the executor of such foundations, and no other provision is acceptable (can. 1301, 3). The Ordinary is to see that the parameters of the bequest are carried out diligently. Provisions may be made for long-term obligations, such as a series of Masses (can. 1303, 1), but the Code no longer speaks of “perpetual obligations.”

A provision might be included in the will to make provisions for the reasonable termination of the foundation, or its transfer to another entity.  For example:

“I leave from my estate $50,000 to the Abbey of St. Exuperantia, to be held in a foundation, and from the interest of which foundation, $100 is to be taken per annum for ten Masses for my soul, for at least the next thirty years. However, should St. Exuperantia Abbey close its doors before that time, or be rendered incapable of fulfilling the requirements of this foundation, the remaining funds are to be transferred to St. Aceptisimas Abbey, or another Benedictine Abbey of the Federation of the Duchy of Grand Fenwick. After thirty years, if the Abbot makes a determination that the Masses should not continue, what remains in the foundation is to be dispersed to the Diocese of Black Duck for the support of elderly and infirm priests and, in particular, priest bloggists.”

Whatever provision is made in the will for something like really ought to be looked over by both a civil lawyer and a disinterested canon lawyer.

Finally, why wait until someone dies to have Masses said?  Have them said also while people are still alive!

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Four Last Things, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , , ,
28 Comments