QUAERITUR: Surprised by a Communion Service with a lay leader

From a reader:

Whilst on holiday in Bournemouth, UK I called into one of the RC churches to say a few prayers. It seemed as though Mass was about to begin but, to my great shock, a lay woman went up onto the Sanctuary and said that, since the priests were away, they would celebrate the Liturgy of the Word and also receive the Eucharist as the Blessed Sacrament was reserved in the tabernacle. To my increasing shock she led the congregation in all of the opening parts of the Mass including the penitential rite and, when the time came, read the Gospel herself from the pulpit. She did not say the eucharistic prayer but led everyone in the Our Father using the words from the Mass whilst standing at the altar, arms raised in the same fashion as the priest.
I did not participate but knelt at a separate altar of Our Lady somewhat flabbergasted. At this point I had to leave anyway but have been quite thrown by this, so I ask; is this allowed in a Catholic Church?

It is permitted for lay people, in the right circumstances, to have a Communion service in the absence of a priest or a deacon.  They cannot just decide to do it on their own and they cannot make it up as they go.  There are conditions, an order of prayer, etc.

However, at this point I must confess my ignorance of what is included in that order of prayer.  I have never been involved in one of these, of course.  Why would I be?  And I have been anywhere where these services were necessary.  I haven’t delved into what is done.  I imagine that the first part is going to be rather like Mass, with a penitential rite and readings of scripture.  I simply don’t know if the leader must later stand at the altar or pray with arms in the “orans” position in the manner of a priest.

Readers here will be able to chime in and clear this up.

And before they do, I hope everyone reading this will stop and say a prayer for an increase in vocations to the priesthood.

If there are many Communion services with lay leaders going on, something is deeply wrong and the whole local Church must mobilize and foster vocations.

It isn’t rocket science.

Fostering worthy worship, traditional worship, with male-only service at the altar, is a first and necessary step.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, Priests and Priesthood, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , , ,
37 Comments

QUAERITUR: Priest DIES between consecrations in the EF

From a reader:

I was just thinking today after reflecting on the fact that many priests aren’t taught Latin, nor can many of them even pronounce it properly and simply not know what they are saying.

That being said, with the shortage of priests who are trained to celebrate the EF Mass (some of whom are very old, and not of the greatest health), combined with the shortage of priests who don’t know Latin, if it came down to an emergency situation where the priest passed out dead after the the bread was consecrated, but not the wine, and the only priest reasonably available to celebrate it doesn’t know a lick of Latin or how to even pronounce it, may he finish the Mass using the English translation found in the new Missal?

Yes, a priest, if present, should finish what was started.  Even he has to say the words of consecration in English, he should finish what was started.

But in any normal situation, the older form of Mass should not have English integrated in where it is not permitted.

This isn’t a far fetched question.

I have been at a Mass when a priest died. He came down from the pulpit and died on the spot.

If a priest can die then, a priest can die between the consecrations.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 |
13 Comments

QUAERITUR: Priest denied me Communion in the hand

From a reader:

I tend not to be  legalistic but when visiting that church the priest pressed my hand quite rudely and hissed “We do not take it in the hand here”. I wonder if I should send him a note. God bless you.

Brief, but I think we get the idea.

I strongly doubt that the priest hissed.  What is this, Harry Potter?

However, the choice of the word “hissed” underscores how sensitive people are to liturgical moments.  Communion is… should be… a vulnerable moment.

I loathe Communion in the hand.  On the first full day of my pontificate as Pius the Tenth the Second, or maybe Clement XV, or perhaps John XXIII… I will abolish it by means of a Bull, which I shall also read from the central loggia of St. John Lateran… with full social media coverage and live internet streaming.

Priests should not deny people Holy Communion in the hand if they are in a place where the bishop has given permission for Communion in the hand.

It can happen that, in the course of distribution, the altar boy may be holding the paten in such a way that the priest doesn’t see the hands, the surprised tongue pops out, BAM, on we go.  That happened to me at least once this morning, but it was pretty clear that this was just a mechanical thing, and not Father-denied-Communion, etc.

However, from the better readings of Summorum Pontificum and Universae Ecclesiae it seems that during celebrations of Holy Mass with the Extraordinary Form, communicants are not to receive in the hand, even where it is permitted.  That said, I think that even in EF celebrations, priests should be very careful not to bruise the sensibilities of newcomers, who, by the time of Communion, probably think they are on another planet.

They are right.  They are on another planet is some sense.

But let’s be careful and gentle with them.

And may we also review how PROPERLY to receive in the hand?

We do NOT receive one-handed.
We do NOT use pintcher fingers.
We do NOT cup hands next to each other.
We do NOT lick the Host up.
We do NOT swap the Host back and forth.
We do NOT rattle Jesus around in the hand before popping Him.

In the meantime… dear readers…

… please please please just STOP receiving Communion in the hand.

Please?  You are making me sad.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, Universae Ecclesiae |
58 Comments

QUAERIT… well… Cri de Coeur: Convent closing for lack of vocations

From a reader:

I need to thank you for encouraging us all to attend the EF of the mass. Although there is no EF mass within a few hours drive of where I live (so sad, I know) I have been traveling this week and was able to attend my first Latin mass. It was beautiful, if not a bit confusing.
Thank you so much for encouraging us all for attending this beautiful mass, which I am sure I would not have attended if it wasn’t for your encouragement. I fully intend to attend the EF from now on whenever the opportunity presents itself.

Now, for my sad question. During my travels I was able to visit my two remaining grandparents. I was informed that the local Benedictine Convent is closing.
The convent has been in decline from a failure in new vocations and it is not a surprise that severe action is being taken. However, in the description I received, I was told that the sisters were released from their vows and advised to go home to family (although this did come from an elderly woman, so the facts may be a bit muddled). Is this truly what happens when convents and monasteries close? It seems so sad, especially since most of these nuns took vows when they were young and are now beyond retirement age. It makes me feel hurt and angry, even though I haven’t lived in that town in years, but a commitment to God should mean something more that what is being done here. I suppose I don’t have a question, just a heartache. Any words of wisdom you can supply would be greatly appreciated. If nothing else, please pray for these sisters that they have dignity in this most difficult transition.

Sad.

I’m tired, and I bet you have good consoling words.

Posted in Cri de Coeur, The future and our choices | Tagged , , ,
39 Comments

QUAERITUR: A Catholic leaves for the Orthodox Church, is ordained, and wants to return

From a reader:

A person [a man] who WAS Catholic, baptized and confirmed in Latin Rite, left the Church and became Orthodox and was ordained in the OCA then latter returned to the Latin Rite Catholic Church, desires to serve as a priest in the Catholic Church. Is this possible since he is validly, albeit illicitly, ordained from the OCA. Or, since there was formal schism in becoming Orthodox, does this bar him from functioning as a priest in the Catholic Church even though he was formally received back into Her?

I seriously doubt it he would be able to function as a priest.

It is possible. It would, I believe, require the personal intervention of the Supreme Pontiff.

In all the cases I know of Catholics who leave the Church, are ordained outside the Church, and then want to return to the Church, the men are readmitted to the Church “ut laicus“, as if they were a lay person.

It would be a rare case where an exception would be made.

It is not impossible. But it would be rare.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , ,
54 Comments

How liberals see the world: If you are pro-life you are now a racist.

If you are a liberal these days, you are losing most arguments that are based in facts. Liberals therefore are resorting to the ad hominem attack, which involves attacking the people they oppose instead of their positions.

For example, I say “2+2=4”, to which a liberal responds “No, 2+2=5”. I demonstrate by handing her 2 $2 bills that 2+2=4 and ask her to explain how she can buy a $5 coffee at homosexual supporting Starbucks with just $4. She then explains “Shut up!”.  I then walk with her into the Starbucks and ask her to buy herself the $5 coffee with the the gift of my $4 dollars.  The Starbucks droid, a free-market capitalist, declines the opportunity to let our liberal buy her coffee at a discount.  After our liberal has a little nutty, she turns to me as says, “You are a poopy-head.”, thus crushing me in the iron jaws of her logic and winning the argument.  MSNBC has a party.

A similar thing on a larger, and far more vicious scale, happens when conservatives make a pro-life argument. Liberals resort to the ad hominem and call us racists.

Here is a great example I picked up from LifeNews:

Liberal writer: Saving minority babies is racist
BY BEN JOHNSON

WASHINGTON, D.C., September 4, 2012, (LifeSiteNews.com) – The pro-life movement’s desire to save children of any race is a secret manifestation of racism and constitutes a war on “minorities and the poor,” according to a writer for The Atlantic.

Brian Fung, who serves as the prestigious magazine’s associate editor, made that claim in an article entitled “The Quiet Racism of Abortion Bans.”

Fung wrote the Republican “war on women” is “really an attack on women of a specific stripe: those from disadvantaged minorities and the poor.”

“An abortion ban would disproportionately affect women from non-white and low-income backgrounds,” he wrote, proving the pro-life movement’s “inherent racial and socio-economic unfairness.”

[…]

See how easy that was?

If you are pro-life, you are a racist.

You don’t want to be a racist do you?

How long have you been a racist!?

Therefore, we should all support abortion on demand and also give tax dollars to Planned Parenthood, which was started in order to wipe out black people.

Pro-lifers are racist.

Shut up.

Posted in Biased Media Coverage, Emanations from Penumbras, Liberals, Lighter fare, The future and our choices, Throwing a Nutty | Tagged , , , ,
34 Comments

England: Bishop urges Catholics to pause and pray publicly on Fridays at 3 o’clock

Bp. Kieran Conry of the Diocese of Arundel and Brighton as a good idea.

From The Telegraph:

Catholic Church calls for public prayers in offices on Fridays
Millions of Roman Catholics are being urged to stop and pray publicly at 3pm on first Friday of every month as public expression of faith.

By John Bingham, Religious Affairs Editor

A bishop is recommending that they set the alarms on their mobile phones to remind them of the new observance as part of a move to promote faith in the workplace ahead of the Church’s “Year of Faith”.
It comes in the week that British government lawyers went to the European Court of Human Rights to defend the right of employers to ban the wearing of public symbols of faith such as the cross in the workplace.
The Rt Rev Kieran Conry, the Bishop of Arundel and Brighton and chair of the Church in England and Wales’s evangelisation committee, said the plan drew on traditions of saying special Friday prayers dating back to the 17th century.
He said: “I would like to invite every Catholic, especially during the Year of Faith, to pause for a moment of prayer of praise and thanksgiving at 3pm if possible, or perhaps when you break for lunch, on the first Friday of every month. [How about EVERY Friday?  For that matter, how about – also – every day for the Angelus?]
“Whatever you are doing, as your responsibilities allow, stop, perhaps close your eyes, bow your head and prayerfully and silently meditate on the sacrifice that Jesus made on the cross out of love for you and everyone.
“You might even want to set your mobile phone to ring at 2.55pm to remind you to pause for prayer.”
He added: “The exact words used are not so important as just pausing to be with Jesus in that moment. In this way you are not only deepening your relationship with him, but quietly and confidently witnessing to your faith to those around you.” [Or, people could memorize a prayer. Remember memorizing? Something people did before the internet? We should also strive to obtain indulgences while we are at it.]

In the Enchiridion Indulgentiarum there is an appendix in which are listed useful “Pious Invocations”, which we can all use, all the time.  No one need know we are doing so.  You can use them all day, in your normal activities.

First General Grant

partial indulgence is granted to the faithful who, in the performance of their duties and in bearing the trials of life, raise their mind with humble confidence to God, adding even if only mentally — some pious invocation.

This first grant is intended to serve as an incentive to the faithful to put into practice the commandment of Christ that “they must always pray and not lose heart” and at the same time as a reminder so to perform their respective duties as to preserve and strengthen their union with Christ.

Here are some examples of traditional Pious Invocations:

  • We adore you, O Christ, and we bless you; because by your holy Cross you have redeemed the world. (Roman Breviary)
  • May the Holy Trinity be blessed. (Roman Missal)
  • Christ conquers! Christ reigns! Christ commands!
  • O Heart of Jesus, burning with love for us, inflame our hearts with love for you.
  • O Heart of Jesus, I place my trust in you.
  • O Heart of Jesus, all for you.
  • Most Sacred Heart of Jesus, have mercy on us.
  • My God and my all.
  • O God, have mercy on me, a sinner (Lk 18, 13).
  • Grant that I may praise you, O sacred Virgin; give me strength against your enemies. (Roman Breviary)
  • Teach me to do your will, because you are my God (Ps 142, 10).
  • O Lord, increase our faith (Lk 17, 5).
  • O Lord, may we be of one mind in truth and of one heart in charity.
  • O Lord, save us, we are perishing (Mt 8, 25).
  • My Lord and my God (Jn 20, 28).
  • Sweet Heart of Mary, be my salvation.
  • Glory be to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Spirit. (Roman Missal)
  • Jesus, Mary, Joseph.
  • Jesus, Mary, Joseph, I give you my heart and my soul. Jesus, Mary, Joseph, assist me in my last agony. Jesus, Mary, Joseph, may I sleep and rest in peace with you. (Roman Ritual)
  • Jesus, meek and humble of heart, make my heart like your Heart. (Roman Ritual)
  • May the Most Blessed Sacrament be praised and adored forever.
  • Stay with us, O Lord (Lk 24, 29).
  • Mother of Sorrows, pray for us.
  • My Mother, my Hope.
  • Send, O Lord, laborers into your harvest (see Mt 9, 38).
  • May the Virgin Mary together with her loving Child bless us. (Roman Breviary)
  • Hail, O Cross, our only hope. (Roman Breviary)
  • All you holy men and women of God, intercede for us. (Roman Ritual)
  • Pray for us, O Holy Mother of God, that we may be made worthy of the promises of Christ. (Roman Ritual)
  • Father, into your hands I commend my spirit (Lk. 23, 46; see Ps 30, 6).
  • Merciful Lord Jesus, grant them everlasting rest. (Roman Missal)
  • Queen conceived without original sin, pray for us. (Roman Ritual)
  • Holy Mother of God, Mary ever Virgin, intercede for us. (Roman Breviary)
  • Holy Mary, pray for us. (Roman Ritual)
  • You are the Christ, the Son of the living God (Mt 16, 16).
Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick, Just Too Cool, Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices, Year of Faith | Tagged , , , , , , , ,
16 Comments

EWTN: The World Over – Arroyo interviews head of Catholics for Obama and Bp. Morlino (Fr. Z comments)

CLICK to buy Car Magnets & Stickers

The present episode of EWTN’s The World Over with Raymond Arroyo features Dr. Stephen Schneck, Chairman of Catholics for Obama, and Most Rev. Robert C. Morlino, Bishop of Madison.

The video of the whole episode is HERE.

Arroyo challenges Dr. Schenck especially about how he can support the Democrat Party’s platform.  It gets a little fiery.  Interesting.

One of the things that Arroyo asks Bp. Morlino concerns Sr. Simone Campbell’s claim that the US Bishops condemned Rep. Paul Ryan’s budget proposal.  Morlino clarifies that a committee of the Conference, not the US bishops, offered an opinion.  He also talks about the different roles of bishops and laity in making prudential judgments about moral contingent choices which don’t necessarily concern the promotion of intrinsic evils (e.g., job creation or entitlement reform v. promotion of tax-payer funded abortion).

One of the best quotes is that “laypeople do not need the bishops permission to do authentic lay ministry”.  Bingo.

Bp. Morlino also reminds us that women religious (e.g., Sr. Simone Campbell) are technically lay people, but we don’t look to them, as someone who is called to live the consecrated life, to engage in political issues in the same way that lay people must.

He also gets into the problem of politics becoming a pastoral problem. There is a polarization between pro-life Catholics and pro-social justice Catholics. This is something I wish he had had more time to expand on. He brings up the point that, this political season sees an even deeper polarization. Moreover, “Why are political considerations more basic in a believer than faith considerations?”

If I can be so bold as to comment on the issue raised by Bp. Morlino, …

… I respond saying that the root of the problem is the separation of abortion from social justice.

The right of an innocent child to life, no matter how the child was conceived, is THE social justice issue! There is nothing more basic to justice (that which is due) than the right to life itself, as God has given it. Those who promote abortion have successfully tricked people into thinking that abortion is a women’s issue. We must reconnect our moral arguments about abortion and the right to life to properly understood social justice.

UPDATE:

The USCCB committee letter, from the Committee on Domestic Justice and Human Development, to the US House of Representative’s Committee on Agriculture is HERE.

This is the letter some claim represents a condemnation by “the bishops” of Rep. Paul Ryan’s budget proposals.

Posted in Magisterium of Nuns, New Evangelization, Religious Liberty, The Drill, The future and our choices, Women Religious | Tagged , , , , , ,
42 Comments

Wherein Fr. Z rants

Our Lord promised us that Hell would not prevail against the Church.

He did not promise that Hell would not prevail in the USA, or in your town or parish.

Today we are seeing a shrinking of Holy Church in many places.  The rise of relativism and secularism, and the decades-long devastation of our Catholic identity due to poor catechesis, deficient shepherding, and unworthy worship have taken their toll.

We need the New Evangelization that Pope Benedict has called for.  We need it desperately.  We are duty bound to carry out the Lord’s “great commission”.  We are bound in charity to be concerned for the souls of our loved ones and strangers who are at risk of the loss of Heaven and the pains of Hell.

If we are going to be a minority, then let us be what Pope Benedict called a “creative minority”.  We must keep putting bricks back together, one brick at a time if it need be so.

When we have to deal with a bad wound, sometimes we have to cut things off in order to save the rest.  St. Augustine, when speaking about Christ as medicus, the Physician, used the image of the medicine of his day, the early 5th century.  When it comes to the pain of being corrected, the suffering we must endure when we convert or reform our lives and which Christ allows us to have for our own good, Augustine said, “the doctor doesn’t stop cutting just because the patient screams for him to stop.”

Many parishes are facing hard choices.  They can’t keep their doors open because they don’t have adequate income.  It’s a hard fact: parishes need YOUR money to stay open.  Another hard fact: many Catholics think that everything should be free.

“But Father! But Father!”, some of you are about to gripe, “Dioceses and parishes are incompetent when it comes to money!  I don’t want to give my hard earned money to these nitwits!  I don’t want to give my money so that it can go to pay off lawyers because of evil priests and bishops who hurt children!  If I give money, I want to know that it is going to something… good!”

You have my sympathy.  But what is the alternative?  Cut off giving and therefore cripple the Church’s ability to keep the doors of institutions open?

We are in a pickle, friends.

We have to keep our parishes open.  We have to support our priests.  We have to promote vocations.  We absolutely need our parishes to remain open so that we have access to the sacraments, without which we cannot be who we are supposed to be.

Sadly, to keep some parishes some, we will have to close others.  How very sad.  We have squandered the gifts and hard work and loving sacrifices of our forebears who, often in their true material poverty scrimped and saved and gave to the Church to build those parishes, and schools and hospitals.

When I think about all the money wasted on ridiculous and sometimes even evil wreckvations of churches I SEE RED.  When I think of the money thrown away because of the wickedness of priests I feel rage and sorrow and shame rise in my gorge.

Today I read this story about what Archbishop Chaput has to do in the once mighty Archdiocese of Philadelphia.

From CNA:

Archbishop Chaput urges ‘deep changes’ in Philadelphia archdiocese

Philadelphia, Pa., Sep 8, 2012 / 08:03 am (CNA/EWTN News).- Celebrating the first anniversary of his role as head of the Philadelphia archdiocese, Archbishop Charles J. Archbishop Chaput is calling for “deep changes” in how the local Church thinks, behaves, and is organized.

“We can no longer allow ourselves the complacency of the past. ‘The way things have always been’ needs to become ‘the way things need to be’ if we have any hope of preaching Jesus Christ to the world around us,” Archbishop Chaput writes, signaling the ongoing reformation of his archdiocese.

“The task of renewal will require deep changes in the thinking, behaviors, structures, procedures and organizational life of the archdiocese,” he says in a Sept. 8 letter to the faithful of the archdiocese.

[…]

The archdiocese has been profoundly affected by a sexual abuse scandal since 2005 and has had serious budget problems in recent years. The archdiocese faces a projected deficit of $6 million for the 2012 fiscal year.

In addition, many of the parishes in the archdiocese are struggling. “Many of those parishes simply can’t be sustained,” Archbishop Chaput says in his letter, pointing to the possibility of further parish closings and mergers.

[…]

Refresh Your Supply

Sound familiar?

In a great Italian novel, Il gattopardo (The Leopard), about the changing of the times in Sicily during the forced unification of Italy in the 1800’s, the son of the Duke, Tancredi, tells the old man,

“Se vogliamo che tutto rimanga com’è, bisogna che tutto cambi … If we want everything to remain as it is, then it is necessary that everything change.”

The key to any renewal of Holy Church where we live is the revitalization of our worship of Almighty God.

At the summit of the hierarchy of all our relationships is God.  The virtue of Religion, related to Justice, obliges us to give God what is His due.  This is done by us, collectively, in our liturgical worship.  Justice and Religion help us to order all other relationships in our lives.  If we get our worship wrong, many other things in our lives will go off the rails.

We need a Marshall Plan to rebuild our Catholic identity.  A renewal of our liturgical worship is a sine qua non for any project for a New Evangelization.

Posted in "But Father! But Father!", Four Last Things, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, Priests and Priesthood, The Drill, The future and our choices, Wherein Fr. Z Rants, Year of Faith | Tagged , , , , , ,
35 Comments

Excellent piece by Fr. Blake on hope and what Holy Mass is all about.

My English blogging priest friends have had a good innings today.  (I hope I used that phrase correctly).

I posted about a great entry on Fr. Finigan’s blog (HERE).  Now I am compelled to post as well about Fr. Ray Blake’s fine piece HERE.

Fr. Blake reflects on what Holy Mass is, and what it is not.  He touches on themes I have often hammered away at in writing and when I give talks to groups.  As a matter of fact, I gave one last night to a group of 100+ men and touched on some of the very same points.  Eerie similarity.  GMTA, I suppose.

I’ll share some of Fr. Blake’s good work, with my emphases. He starts with a reference to 1 Peter 3:15, which you should all know by heart.

[…]

[Fr. Blake had] a conversation … with an old Irish man some years ago came back to me. He said he stopped getting up on Sunday mornings, “when I realised Mass was about our community, I didn’t think it worth getting up for that“, he was talking about the time of the liturgical changes and they had recently knocked down and rebuilt his parish church.

The Mass is not about us, it always has been about Jesus and giving us glimpse of heaven, “and so with Angels and Saints we sing…”, it is a vision of the triumph of the Lamb, it is about our ultimate re-orientation, the end of our earthly pilgrimage.

[…]
I wouldn’t enter into a discussion about which form of the Roman Rite speaks more clearly about the heavenly mysteries, the things we are called to hope in and for but the ars celebrandi should point to these mysteries, in either form. When the Mass merely celebrates us, “the community gathered”, when music is about community singing, or is trite and sentimental, when participation is more about action than interiority, when as Joseph Ratzinger says we “form a closed circle” or a “significant absence of silence”, then there are problems with the Eternal. The loss of hope in the Church does seem be related to how the liturgy is celebrated when it is done badly it destroys hope.

FR Z KUDOS to the distinguished parish priest of Brighton.

Among other things, Father offered a good argument for ad orientem worship, connected to hope.

Do take the time to read his whole piece (HERE).

 

Posted in Fr. Z KUDOS, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Mail from priests, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill | Tagged , , , , , ,
6 Comments