Bishops of England and Wales about passage of same-sex ‘marriage’

From the Bishops of England and Wales (emphases mine):

Statement on on the passing of the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act

Statement by the President and Vice-President of the Catholic Bishops Conference of England and Wales

In receiving Royal Assent, the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act marks a watershed in English law and heralds a profound social change. This fact is acknowledged by both advocates and opponents of the Act.

Marriage has, over the centuries, been publicly recognised as a stable institution which establishes a legal framework for the committed relationship between a man and a woman and for the upbringing and care of their children. It has, for this reason, rightly been recognised as unique and worthy of legal protection.

The new Act breaks the existing legal links between the institution of marriage and sexual complementarity. With this new legislation, marriage has now become an institution in which openness to children, and with it the responsibility on fathers and mothers to remain together to care for children born into their family unit, are no longer central. That is why we were opposed to this legislation on principle.

Along with others, we have expressed real concern about the deficiencies in the process by which this legislation came to Parliament, and the speed with which it has been rushed through. We are grateful particularly therefore to those Parliamentarians in both Houses who have sought to improve the Bill during its passage, so that it enshrines more effective protection for religious freedom.

A particular concern for us has also been the lack of effective protection for Churches which decide not to opt-in to conducting same sex marriages. [They’ll be gunning for you guys over there now.] Amendments made in the House of Lords though have significantly strengthened the legal protections in the Act for the Churches. We also welcome the Government’s amendment to the Public Order Act which makes it clear beyond doubt that “discussion or criticism of marriage which concerns the sex of the parties to the marriage shall not be taken of itself to be threatening or intended to stir up hatred”. [For now.] Individuals are therefore protected from criminal sanction under the Public Order Act when discussing or expressing disagreement with same sex marriage.

In other respects, however, the amendments we suggested have not been accepted. We were concerned to provide legislative clarity for schools with a religious character. This was in order to ensure that these schools will be able to continue to teach in accordance with their religious tenets. Given the potential risk that future guidance given by a Secretary of State for education regarding sex and relationships education could now conflict with Church teaching on marriage, we were disappointed that an amendment to provide this clarity was not accepted.  The Minister made clear in the House of Lords, however, that in “having regard” to such guidance now or in the future schools with a religious character can “take into account other matters, including in particular relevant religious tenets”, and that “having regard to a provision does not mean that it must be followed assiduously should there be good reason for not doing so”. These assurances go some way to meeting the concerns we and others expressed.

We were disappointed that a number of other amendments to safeguard freedom of speech and the rights of civil registrars to conscientious objection were not passed. But Ministerial assurances have been made […riiiiiight…]that no one can suffer detriment or unfavourable treatment in employment because she or he holds the belief that marriage can only be between a man and a woman.

The legal and political traditions of this country are founded on a firm conviction concerning the rights of people to hold and express their beliefs and views, at the same time as respecting those who differ from them. It is important, at this moment in which deeply held and irreconcilable views of marriage have been contested, to affirm and strengthen this tradition.

For more information please visit our section ‘Speak Out For Marriage‘.

Well written.  Alas, I fear it will make little difference.

But, whether or not it is effective is not the point.

We must continue to struggle for religious freedom and for the truth about marriage.  Even if we lose, we retain our moral capital and – I hope – the friendship of Almighty God.

Posted in New Evangelization, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , , ,
23 Comments

SSPX ITALY condemns Pope Francis for visiting refugees – UPDATED – distorted news account?

UPDATE 18 July:

There are some comments in the combox which help us get to what SSPX Italy really said.   Take a look and decide if Gazzetta distorted the story.

______________

From Gazzetta del Sud (their translation):

Lefebvrists chide pope over visit to immigrant island

‘Against centuries of defending Italy from Muslim invasion’

Rome, July 16 – The Italian chapter of the Catholic traditionalist Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX) [So, this was not from the SSPX superior, Bp. Fellay.  It is hard to know if he was consulted.]condemned Pope Francis on Tuesday for visiting immigrants and refugees on the island of Lampedusa. In a statement, the Lefebvrist breakaway group criticized the pope for going against centuries of Church efforts to “preserve Catholicism” in the face of the “Mohammedan invasion,” recalling “popes, among whom many saints, who armed fleets to stop the (armed, of course) Muslims in Italy”. [Perhaps a distinction is in order: in centuries past Muslims invaded because they were intent on spreading Islam.  These illegal immigrants are probably not doing that.] Last week Francis chose Lampedusa, an island off the coast of Sicily, as the destination for his first official trip as pope, drawing attention to the plight of thousands who cross the Mediterranean – and the many who die in the process – each year trying to immigrate through Italy. SSPX said the visit reflected the influence of a “Masonic plot to create a multi-cultural society”. [Look.  Masonry in Italy is not what it is in the USA, or even in England.  It is far more virulent, anti-Catholic.  But… read that again.  Sounds pretty weird.] SSPX broke away from the Church over theological differences stemming from the changes it adopted with the Second Vatican Council of some 45 years ago. The Vatican is currently engaged in a process aimed at formally reuniting the group with the Catholic Church.

And this statement really helped that, I’m sure.

Posted in Francis, Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices, Throwing a Nutty, You must be joking! | Tagged , , , ,
43 Comments

St. Paul: A big small victory for religious freedom!

In my native place, more anti-Christian news, but with a small victory:

City of St. Paul stops fighting statue of Jesus atop bluff
by Bill Keller

ST. PAUL, Minn. (KMSP)

See Video HERE [Watch.  This man is an inspiration.]

There’s a marble statue of Jesus standing 17 feet tall on top of a Mississippi River bluff overlooking downtown St. Paul, and the owner says it’s there to stay now that the city has stopped fighting it.
“I’m very happy,” Tuan Pham said.
Pham told FOX 9 News he won his battle with the City of St. Paul after years of struggling over the 4-ton statue. The stony stalemate began with an anonymous complaint in 2011.
Pham bought his home in 2007 after emigrating from Vietnam with his wife and 10 children in 1980. He commissioned the statue as a replica of the 105-foot Christ of Vung Tao statue in his native country.
Initially, the city asked Pham to remove the statue because of its proximity to the edge of the bluff. They also denied his appeal because an ordinance required a 40-foot setback from the edge of the bluff.
Yet, comments made by one City Council member about religious statues on the bluff were what set the stage for a civil rights lawsuit.
“In our view, this case wasn’t about bluff setback,” explained James Magnuson, of Mohrman & Kaardal. “This case was about the right for a citizen to worship as he chose.”
So after losing his first fight with City Hall, Pham called upon a higher power – the U.S. Constitution.
Fundamentally, we think this is a case about religious liberty,” Magnuson said. “Tuan Pham was a man who escaped religious persecution in Vietnam and he came to this country, as he says, ‘to build a better life based on ability to exercise his religion freely.'”
With legal help from the Alliance Defending Freedom, Pham ultimately settled with the city without going to court. In fact, Pham was so excited he even had the settlement agreement bronzed to confirm the statue will stay for years to come. [I love this guy!]
“My reaction was, ‘Thank God,'” he said. “Here in the free country — no matter how big you are, how small I am, how rich you are, how poor I am — we have equal treatment.
Yet even as he struggled with the city, Pham also had to deal with an arsonist who damaged the statue by piling wood around the base and setting it alight in April 2012. While the statue escaped with a few streaks of soot and discoloration, the family was very shaken by the brazen vandal being on their property. The statue has since been restored and Pham said it looks “like new.”

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick, Fr. Z KUDOS, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, Religious Liberty, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged ,
8 Comments

URGENT PRAYER REQUEST: Tom Peters (american papist)

I am getting reports that the young papist, Thomas Peters, was injured – perhaps severely – in an accident of some kind.  Tom is the son of the great canonist Ed Peters, by the way.

More information will come in soon, but in the meantime, please stop now and say a prayer, perhaps the Memorare, for Thomas and his family.

UPDATE:

See Ed Peters comment below, which I reproduce here:

This is deeply appreciated, Pater. Thom fractured his neck in a swimming accident last evening. I’ll try to keep folks informed on my facebook page. Oremus pro invicem. EdP

At his Facebook page he said:

Thomas Peters was seriously hurt in a swimming accident Tuesday evening. He fractured his 5th cervical vert. and is at Univ. Maryland Medical Center (Baltimore).Natalie Zmuda Peters is there, and the moms Angela & Becky Z flew out a couple hours ago. He moved an arm on command and is undergoing more tests. He has responded pretty well to the immediate steps taken for him so far. I will stay in touch here. Your prayers and well wishes are deeply appreciated.

UPDATE 18 July:

From Ed Peters…

Thom can move his arms, docs are discussing the best treatment for his neck injury. Immediate concern is for the considerable water in his lungs.

And then later…

Thomas Peters remains in critical but stable condition with a cervical spinal cord injury. His lungs are looking better.

UPDATE 18 July 18:15 GMT

From Ed Peters:

Please continue your prayers for Thom. Docs are assessing range of motion issues today and need to decide about treating his neck injury. His temperature is returning to normal and his lungs look better which is good news!

I can scarcely imagine how difficult it must be for a young healthy man who is used to engaging in extensive work and service, in the blink of an eye, to suddenly have to become the pure recipient of all that attention, and to just have to accept others’ outpourings toward him.

More when I have it, and thank you all so much.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged ,
49 Comments

REVIEW: The book on Augustine which Pope Benedict would have wanted to write.

I am reading a new biography of Augustine published by a fresh, talented writer, Miles Hollingworth.

Don’t let the title, St Augustine of Hippo, An Intellectual Biography, fool you. This is not a highbrow book intended for college professors, with an avalanche of technical footnotes coming at you. In fact this is the most readable life of Augustine I have ever read (and I have read a few).

UK readers click HERE
USA HERE

There are two compelling features to the book. Its style is poetic. Moreover, the treatment Hollingworth offers to well chosen points in Augustine’s thought is meditative.

This is a decidedly fresh take on Augustine.

The first line from the book’s preface reads, “In writing this book I have had the sensation of having written the story of one of the world’s great novelists.” To my knowledge no one has ever looked at Augustine through that lens. This kind of original, deep thought about Augustine pervades the 250 or so pages of rich text.

The great difficulty in rendering Augustine’s thought is to translate it into our contemporary terms without debasing it. Hollingworth avoids the trap.  Sample what he offers about Augustine on Adam and Eve:

“In the original aesthetic of Eden, Adam and Eve lived as though humanity were God’s seeing of His own Goodness. Humanity, that piercing vale of sympathies, was God predicating something of Himself, though tantalizingly mysteriously. Augustine would see it of even greater moment still that Christ had been made man. Humanity for him was pluvia occultis, ‘hidden rain’.”

This book is not a fast read.

You will be forced, but not against your will, to take your time with this book, to ponder paragraphs, even sentences.

In Hollingworth’s biography, Augustine speaks to you, often interrogating you: “This is what I think, what do you think?”.

The book is a long conversation with Augustine’s reader. While evading morbidity completely, Hollingworth also focuses his attention on Augustine’s greatest concerns: love and death, which are the lodestones of his thought. These motifs wind through the whole book. In treating these and other intertwining themes, Hollingworth captures the pastoral essence of Augustine’s writings.  For example:

“To help his flock, Augustine began to go inside himself more and more to learn there what truly helps a distressed and fearful people … He studied himself: a man lying in bed at night remembering a lost lover and a lost son. And he started to see this activity as the wonderful thing, the crowning thing.”

The book itself is well bound and designed.  It even feels good in one’s hands.

This could be a good book to take on a retreat.

I hope Pope Benedict will be able to read it.

I think this is the book on Augustine which Benedict would have wanted to write.

Posted in Fr. Z KUDOS, Patristiblogging, REVIEWS | Tagged , ,
11 Comments

It’s Twofer Day!

Reason #6675 for Anglicanorum coetibus.

But wait!  There’s more!

Reason #367588 for Summorum Pontificum.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Remember: We are supposed to be more like them, right?

 

Posted in Lighter fare, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, You must be joking! | Tagged ,
71 Comments

When clowns attack

WARNING:

This may make your eyes and ears bleed.  No.  Really.

It is hard to know how to react to this.  I have so many thoughts and emotions at once.

Preliminary observations:

  • I think what you are going to see is not part of a Mass.  The book is a Bible and not a Lectionary.  Still.
  • This is a service presider over by a Catholic bishop.
  • What they are doing is culturally so far removed from my experience that I am left astonished.
  • But that is not quite true either: This is where what we were taught about “liturgy” in my seminary in the USA in ’80’s would eventually have lead.

Imagine going to a different planet, finding life, dropping off a couple missionaries and a subscription to the National Schismatic Reporter and then moving on.  You return a couple centuries later, open the door of your Tardis, and find…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxfO7a7_bWs&feature=player_embedded

Reason #7856642 for Summorum Pontificum!

Surely they are doing something they consider an expression of joy and of honor. I can’t, however, shake the thought that this is a different religion.

It is amazing how certain pieces of music come to be inextricably bound up with a certain activity or context.  This also shows how, over a long time, musical idioms can drift or take on an entirely different connotation.

The name of the march used in the video is really “Entrance of the Gladiators”.  Composed in the 19th century, it was originally a military march.  When played at a quicker tempo and removed to a different context, the sound of this particular march will invoke only one thing… at least to Americans.  What it means to Brazilians is hard to gauge.

At the same time, this event seems to have been at Aparecida, for their big feast day.  So this is what someone considers an exemplary liturgical moment.

UPDATE:

But wait!  There’s more!

Reason #7856643 for Summorum Pontificum:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0-9BAST1lw&feature=player_embedded

To think that we went from Stabat Mater to this in a generation.

UPDATE:

From Vatican Radio:

Aparecida awaits Pope Francis



(Vatican Radio) As Pope Francis prepares to travel to Brazil for the upcoming World Youth Day celebrations we bring you this Vatican Radio English translation of an interview done in Portugese with Cardinal Raymundo Damasceno Assis, Archbishop of Aparecida

Q: On July 24, the Pope will be in Aparecida.What will happen on this day?

A: I met Pope Francis at the Domus Sanctae Marthae, where I stayed this week, and found him very peaceful and happy about his trip to Brazil – Rio de Janeiro for the World Youth Day and in Aparecida for the visit to the National Shrine . The Pope wants to express his love and his devotion to Our Lady, called in Brazil under the title “Our Lady of Aparecida”, the patron saint of all our country and our people. The Holy Father will arrive in Aparecida around 10:00 am and Mass will begin at 10:30 am inside the Basilica. The Holy Father also told me that at the end of the celebration, he will look down from the balcony (christened with the name of Pope Benedict XVI) to pray with the faithful outside the Sanctuary who will follow the Mass on giant screens. The Pope does not remain aloof from the people. In addition to this meeting to be held immediately after the Mass, the Pope will travel in the ‘Popemobile’ to the line that separates the Basilica of the Seminary. The same will happen in the afternoon when Pope Francis will do the reverse path from the seminary to the Basilica to take the helicopter that will bring him back to Rio de Janeiro. Pope Francis will remain throughout the afternoon at the Seminary, where he will have lunch together with his entourage and in the company of seminarians. It will be a private dinner. After there is a moment of rest. The Pope will bless an image of St. Anthony de Santana Galvão (Frei Galvão, the first Brazilian saint, who was canonized by Pope Benedict XVI in 2007 in São Paulo), born in the city of Guaratinguetá, and is part of the Archdiocese of Aparecida. This image will then be carried in procession, probably in October, during the feast of the saint, in the place where in future there will be a shine built dedicated to him. Again at the seminary, Pope Francis will receive three nuns from cloistered monasteries of our region.

Q: Before Mass, there will be a moment of prayer before the image of Our Lady of Aparecida …

Before the Mass, the Pope will stop in the Chapel of the Apostles to contemplate the original image of Our Lady of Aparecida. The throne of the image is mobile, so if the Pope wants to, it can be turned, so that the image of the Madonna can be directed towards Chapel for him to say this prayer of consecration to Our Lady in the presence of guests and the priests that will be present. This consecration will, in practice, be the same as we do, although there will be slight variations. After the consecration, this will become the new official prayer that we will do every time at the end of a Mass to consecrate the people of Our Lady of Aparecida. Interview Silvonei Protz

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, You must be joking! | Tagged , , , ,
120 Comments

O frabjous day! They are BACK!

I buried the lead:

Twinkies!  They’re baaaaack!

As you know, they went off the shelves some months ago, a dark day for civilization.

As I have written before, I never cared much for Twinkies, but I was irritated that I couldn’t any longer buy them had I wanted to.  I was also disappointed that this limitation of my civil rights was caused by union problems.

I was so hoping that the recipe would be picked up by the Mexican company “Bimbo” (no… really… Twinkies by Bimbo… think about it).

Now it seems that Twinkies are back.  Alas, they are now politically correct.  They are, according to news accounts, smaller and less caloric!  O tempora!

Apparently, New Twinkies are 270 calories for two twinkies and weigh 77 grams (for those of you in Columbia Heights that’s 135 calories and 38.5 grams for one twink). I am sure you remember that before the dark days of dearth began, a single twinkie was 150 calories. Photos of boxes in the past reveal that the weight of one Twinkie was 42.5. Get it? 42.5 v. 38.5?

Will New Twinkies go the way of New Coke?

We must verify their presence in the grocery store.

Send photos if you wish.

Posted in Just Too Cool, Liberals, Lighter fare | Tagged ,
29 Comments

“I heard you’re idea’s and their definately good.”

Despite the less than elegant rhetorical flourish, this is pretty funny.  From XKCD.

I am reminded of how liberals insist that conservatives be nice even while they pour out the worst sort of bile (cf. my email inbox).

(I especially like the modil sentance with those apostrafee’s!)

And just because I posted one cartoon…

Posted in Liberals, Lighter fare | Tagged , ,
18 Comments