From a reader at Wyoming Catholic College comes this:
In our Catholic Social Teaching course at Wyoming Catholic College, we are currently reading a number of the great encyclicals of Pope Leo XIII. These paragraphs from Diuturnum Illud (1881) struck us all as particularly relevant to the situation facing Catholics in the U.S. today, showing once again how perennially relevant is the Magisterium of the Church in diagnosing human realities:
———————–
15. The one only reason which men have for not obeying [their rulers] is when anything is demanded of them which is openly repugnant to the natural or the divine law, for it is equally unlawful to command to do anything in which the law of nature or the will of God is violated. If, therefore, it should happen to anyone to be compelled to prefer one or the other, viz., to disregard either the commands of God or those of rulers, he must obey Jesus Christ, who commands us to “give to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s,” (Mt 22:21), and must reply courageously after the example of the Apostles: “We ought to obey God rather than men” (Acts 5:29). And yet there is no reason why those who so behave themselves should be accused of refusing obedience; for, if the will of rulers is opposed to the will and the laws of God, they themselves exceed the bounds of their own power and pervert justice; nor can their authority then be valid, which, when there is no justice, is null.“16. But in order that justice may be retained in government it is of the highest importance that those who rule States should understand that political power was not created for the advantage of any private individual; and that the administration of the State must be carried on to the profit of those who have been committed to their care, not to the profit of those to whom it has been committed. Let princes take example from the Most High God, by whom authority is given to them; and, placing before themselves His model in governing the State, let them rule over the people with equity and faithfulness, and let them add to that severity which is necessary, a paternal charity. On this account they are warned in the oracles of the sacred Scriptures, that they will have themselves some day to render an account to the King of kings and Lord of lords; if they shall fail in their duty, that it will not be possible for them in any way to escape the severity of God: “The Most High will examine your work and search out your thoughts: because being ministers of his kingdom you have not judged rightly. . . Horribly and speedily will he appear to you, for a most severe judgment shall be for them that bear rule. . . . For God will not accept any man’s person, neither will he stand in awe of any man’s greatness; for he made the little and the great, and he hath equally care of all. But a greater punishment is ready for the more mighty” (Wis 6:4-6, 8-9).
“26. The Church of Christ, indeed, cannot be an object of suspicion to rulers, nor of hatred to the people; for it urges rulers to follow justice, and in nothing to decline from their duty; while at the same time it strengthens and in many ways supports their authority. All things that are of a civil nature the Church acknowledges and declares to be under the power and authority of the ruler; and in things whereof for different reasons the decision belongs both to the sacred and to the civil power, the Church wishes that there should be harmony between the two so that injurious contests may be avoided. As to what regards the people, the Church has been established for the salvation of all men and has ever loved them as a mother. For it is the Church which by the exercise of her charity has given gentleness to the minds of men, kindness to their manners, and justice to their laws. Never opposed to honest liberty, the Church has always detested a tyrant’s rule. This custom which the Church has ever had of deserving well of mankind is notably expressed by St. Augustine when he says that “the Church teaches kings to study the welfare of their people, and people to submit to their kings, showing what is due to all: and that to all is due charity and to no one injustice” (De mor. eccl. I, 30, 53).”
You can sign the online petition to rescind the HHS mandate at this link. http://wh.gov/kl3
Please pass the petition on to everyone you know. Unions shouldn’t get a pass on compliance with the healthcare law while average Catholic citizens are forced to violate their conscience wholesale. The Church gets its’ money to pay for any service with donations.
Pope Leo XIII`s Encyclical Libertas <(http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/leo_xiii/encyclicals/documents/hf_l-xiii_enc_20061888_libertas_en.html ) might be more in point.
It was expressly referred to and approved of by Blessed Pope John Paul II in Centesimus annus < (http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_01051991_centesimus-annus_en.html#-1R) where he celebrated the 100th anniversary of Rerum Novarum and Catholic Papal social teaching.
In Centesimus Annus, he interpreted Libertas and Rerum Novarum in the light of the events since Rerum Novarum and made observations on the right of conscience in civil society and the question of abortion
Pingback: Fighting Unjust Laws « Into the Colosseum
This is a sensitive topic for me, because of another issue that has been widely discussed recently which has resulted in tension between the Church and the state.
In the states where bishops and priests are speaking out against the laws addressing illegal immigration, I’ve heard some good reasons for their doing so and some bad ones. A serious problem arises when laypeople understand this dissent to be unconditional justification for their breaking laws or speaking openly about their approval of those who do so. Although Pope Leo here has brought up conditions on which Catholics may act unlawfully if prudence allows, many Catholics, in my opinion, are much too quick to express approval of unlawful acts. As such, they would benefit from serious reflection on the other side of Pope Leo’s statements:
“All things that are of a civil nature the Church acknowledges and declares to be under the power and authority of the ruler; and in things whereof for different reasons the decision belongs both to the sacred and to the civil power, the Church wishes that there should be harmony between the two so that injurious contests may be avoided.”
After reading this I thought to myself, “wouldn’t it be nice if we had a pope like him, today,” and my pleasant rebuttal to myself was, “we do.”
Thanks and praise to the Lord for Leos that roar like lions and Benedicts who bless justice and righteousness.
I read on CWN that courts ordered a Bishop in Normandy to destroy someone’s Baptismal records, and that there are an average of 1000 such requests per month in France. The Bishops must not buckle, lest they render to Ceasar that which is God’s.
Pingback: WEDNESDAY AFTERNOON EXTRA | ThePulp.it
Pingback: Über den Blogrand geschaut – Obama-Kulturkampf-Edition | Kreuzfährten: Wahrheit statt Mehrheit