ASK FATHER: Does the Church “supply” what is lacking in doubtful absolutions?

ASK FATHER: Does the Church "supply" what is lacking in doubtful absolutions?

GO TO CONFESSION!

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

I’ve heard you say that one of the cruelest things a priest can do is hear your confession and not (at least) say “I absolve you from your sins in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.” Now, if the priest or penitent were unaware of this mistake wouldn’t Canon 144 apply and thus make the absolution valid?

That’s not quite what I have said.  I have said, and I’ll say it again, that one of the cruelest things that priests can do is leave someone in doubt about the validity of sacraments, such as penance or baptism.   Fathers, say the words as they are in the book!  Don’t fool around with the validity of sacraments by “improving” them with your own musings.  You do not have the knowledge, wisdom or authority to do so.   Say The Black and Do The Red when it comes to the sacramental forms.  Better: use Latin.

Can. 144 says:

The Church supplies, in both the internal and external forum, the executive power of governance in common error, in positive and probable doubt, whether of fact or of law.

This is the famous ecclesia supplet.

Canon 144 only refers to the Church supplying “potestatem regiminis executivam”, the “executive power of governance”.

Keeping with confession as an example, and one that involves internal forum, can. 144 covers instances wherein a priest who lacks the faculty to hear confessions at all, or he just lacks them in a particular place or situation, nevertheless believes he has the faculty and the penitent also believes he does.   Thus, it doesn’t quite cover the situation of SSPX priests, who know very what proper authority as instructed about their state: they lack faculties.  They, however, do not obey proper authority.   They might honestly believe that they can receive confessions because of some state of “emergency” that the Church is in, but, intellectually, they know that the Church has told them that they don’t.  They aren’t ignorant of the facts, though they – even with sincerity – may not accept them.  Some lay people are up to date on the controversy, though most are not.

Can. 144 is not meant to say that the Church supplies anything that is missing from a juridic or sacramental act, as it is often erroneously cited.  Imagine a priest who, when presented a ciborium full of unconsecrated hosts at the Lamb of God, put in a few consecrated hosts, covered it and shook it up, saying, “ecclesia supplet”!  Yes, that’s a true story.

Can. 144 would not supply validity to an invalid, or even to a doubtful, formula.

So in this situation, the formula of absolution is still doubtful.  That said, the penitent’s sins are more than likely forgiven.   Also to be considered is what God does in the soul of the penitent who is sincerely sorry and has done her very best in confession of her sins.

Lastly, it is rare indeed that the priest screws up the form of absolution so badly that he invalidates the sacrament.   That’s a separate issue from causing wonder in the penitent, however.

And…

GO TO CONFESSION!

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, GO TO CONFESSION, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, Priests and Priesthood | Tagged , , ,
10 Comments

Confraternity of Catholic Clergy’s “Statement in support ofMarriage”

The conference I attended in Rome, held by the Confraternity of Catholic Clergy, has concluded.   The CCC groups represented were from Australia, Ireland, the UK, and USA.

The CCC issued a joint statement, HERE, which follows (my emphases):

Statement in support of marriage

The International gathering of Confraternities of Catholic Clergy meeting in Rome (January 5th to 9th 2015), have discussed issues pertinent to the forthcoming Synod on the Family in response to the Holy Father’s call for reflection. The fathers pledge their unwavering fidelity to the traditional doctrines regarding marriage and the true meaning of human sexuality as proclaimed in the Word of God and set out clearly in the Church’s Ordinary and Universal Magisterium.
Confraternity priests from Australia, Great Britain, Ireland and the United States commit themselves to the work of presenting anew the Good News about marriage and family life in all its fullness and helping, with the Lord’s compassion, those who struggle to follow the Gospel in a secular society. The Confraternities, furthermore, affirm the importance of upholding the Church’s traditional discipline regarding the reception of the sacraments and that doctrine and practice must remain firmly and inseparably in harmony.

I urge you faithful priests to join your respective groups.  Not faithful?  Get your head and heart straightened out and then join.

US: www.catholicclergy.net

Australia: www.clergy.asn.au

UK: www.confraternityccb.org.uk

Ireland: www.confraternity.ie

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ACTION ITEM!, Fr. Z KUDOS, Mail from priests, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity, Priests and Priesthood | Tagged , ,
7 Comments

ROME DAY 4: priests and other bottom feeders

I had a lot to do in Rome today, many errands. I won’t bore you with them. Most of you want to know what I ate, anyway. I made breakfast in my own place: eggs over easy with prosciutto in the pan and a dollop of cream with gorgonzola on toasts with lots of really strong coffee.

Lunch… meh… nothing to say.

Now for the rest of the day….

… tonight I met a couple priest friends for supper at one of my favorite places in Rome.

We started with mozzarella… I haven’t found better mozzarella in Rome… with hand cut prosciutto.

This stuff oozes and moos.

IMG_4397.JPG

 

The first bottle.  Sagrantino is a favorite of mine.

 

 

 

IMG_4395.JPG

 

Scampi… grilled.  Think of really big crayfish, split in half lengthwise, and put over flames with herbs and oil and lemon.

IMG_4398.JPG

 

IMG_4401.JPG

At some restaurants, these come out like Pirelli products.  Not so here.  They were properly grilled, but like wonderful scampi butter.

Dessert was nothing more than their own biscotti and some amaro.

 

IMG_4402.JPG

 

I have a hobby: I take photos of old “no littering” signs.  This, however, is not quite that!  Look carefully.  Perhaps some of you will want to have a stab at translating it.

IMG_4405.JPG

 

The conference pretty much concluded today.  However, the conference collectively issued a STATEMENT.

More on that when I can post the text and comment.

Meanwhile, thank you, readers, for supper!

Posted in On the road, What Fr. Z is up to | Tagged ,
15 Comments

ASK FATHER: Conflict with parents about use of artificial contraception

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

I am 20 years old, and I believe that contraception is immoral. My parents do not. This has caused much strife at home. We went to our trusted parish priest together to discuss it. He told me that certain circumstances within marriage can make contraception justifiable. Now my parents believe the matter settled and think I am all the more unreasonable for not changing my mind. What should I do?

Your “trusted parish priest” is wrong.

Review Humanae vitae, Evangelium vitae, Donum vitae, and Dignitas personae for the definitive teaching.

There are narrow circumstances in which one spouse can without sinning endure its use when it is pretty much inflicted by the other spouse, but that does not justify its use.  Furthermore, invincible ignorance can mitigate the sinfulness of its use, but it does not justify its use.

 

If the issue is causing a lot of strife at home, it might be best not to discuss it. If your parents, having had guidance (bad guidance) from their parish priest about the advisability of birth control, are using it themselves, there’s nothing that you, their child, can do about it other than to pray that they receive more enlightened and better counsel.

You’ve discussed it, you’ve made your thoughts on the matter known, you’ve argued well (one hopes), and now might be the time to step back.  Fraternal correction doesn’t flow “upward”, as it were from children to parents in matters such as these.

Entrust them to the Holy Spirit.

Furthermore, Christ’s teaching about the indissolubility of marriage cannot be changed.

(I just thought I’d toss that in there, because I can.)

Moderation queue is, of course, ON for this.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Emanations from Penumbras, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity |
49 Comments

ASK FATHER: Parish fundraiser serves meat on 1st Fridays

GrilledT-BoneSteakFrom a reader…

QUAERITUR:

Every First Friday, a neighboring parish hosts a fundraiser dinner at which they serve beef or chicken, except during Lent. Many of our friends (homeschooling families) are parishioners there and attend every month. We hear that it’s delicious fare and as I know who’s doing the cooking, I’m sure it is. Nonetheless, advertisements go out via email and social media a few days before and every month it drives me to distraction!
I know that my homeschooling friends, at least, are aware that every Friday is a day of penance and know they need to do an alternate penance if they don’t abstain from meat. So I don’t want to annoy them or present myself as holier-than-thou with such a reminder whenever posts about the dinner circulate. The parishioners there are remarkably committed to supporting the pastor, who is a good priest, but doesn’t get this.

This parish is in the United States. Unlike England and Wales, which has – God be praised – gone back to abstinence from meat on all Fridays of the year (except for Solemnities), the requirement to do penance on Fridays in these United States is fatally vague.

Catholics are required to do penance on all Fridays (except Solemnities). However, the US bishops have, for the most part, been anything but clear or forceful in teaching about Friday penance. Catholics in America are permitted to choose another penance other than abstinence from meat. This is entirely at the discretion of the individual. All that was heard, and remembered, from 1966 when the US bishops (with the approval of the Holy See) changed the requirement was, “We don’t have to eat fishsticks anymore!”

The USCCB, while permitting Catholics to choose other options, still recommends abstaining from meat on Fridays.  But you would never know it.

It is bad form for a Catholic parish to host a fundraising dinner which goes against the recommendations of the bishops’ conference.

Mind you, fundraising dinners are optional events. No one is required to go, and those who do are not obliged to eat meat.  Still, it sends a bad message about our commitment to our Catholic identity.

It puts people in an awkward position.  Do I support my parish and go to a beef dinner on Friday? Or do I follow the bishop’s recommendation and abstain from meat?

It would be better for the pastor to think the matter through and either switch to non-meat options or move the dinner to another night of the week.  Admittedly, that might cut into profits.  Even as we understand that parishes must be creative about raising money – because Catholics are generally not as good as our Protestant neighbors at supporting parishes – in the end, it’s the right thing to do.

Meanwhile, I have an ongoing POLL:

Should the US Bishops have us return to obligatory "meatless Fridays" during the whole year and not just during Lent?

View Results

Loading ...
Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , ,
42 Comments

Nice Epiphany Mass image

Here is a wonderful shot of Holy Mass for Epiphany in Washington DC celebrated by my friend Msgr. Charles Pope.  They blessed Epiphany water, chalk and, I hope, gold frankincense and myrrh.  HERE

 

Screen Shot 2015-01-08 at 10.11.56

Did you have special blessings at your parishes?

Posted in Just Too Cool, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 |
20 Comments

ASK FATHER: Catholic funeral for Freemasons

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

Recently there was a huge funeral in our cathedral for a 32nd degree member of the Freemasons. The local TLM community is very upset and crying foul. It’s a mess. Could you offer some insight? I have friends in the TLM community, but I only occasionally go mass with them.

Go to the TLM more often and be a cheerful good example of holiness and devotion!

Under the 1917 Code of Canon Law (can. 2335), it was clear that Catholics who joined Masonic organizations were excommunicated.

When the Code was revised in 1983, this explicit condemnation was broadened to say,

“A person who joins an association which plots against the Church is to be punished with a just penalty. However, a person who promotes or directs an association of this kind is to be punished with an interdict” (can. 1374).

The automatic excommunication is gone, but membership in such organizations is still forbidden.

The day before the 1983 Code was promulgated, the CDF reiterated the Church’s prohibition on membership in Masonic organizations, saying that such people are involved in seriously sinful matter and should not approach Holy Communion. It stated firmly that local bishops and bishops’ conferences do not have the ability to prescind from this declaration.

Masonry is serious stuff, folks. In North America, Masons may be seen as those good-hearted, civic minded men who drive around in little cars at the Fourth of July Parade, who host a circus for the kids, and who spend a lot of time and money helping out at the children’s hospital.   Lately in these USA we have seen the money appeal commercials for Shriners Hospitals with the heart wrenching images of children.

Insofar as many of the members might be unwitting dupes whose primary interest is fraternity and civic pride, they seem innocuous. However, the philosophy that Masonry espouses is – at its core – opposed to the Church in every way.

In other parts of the world, where Masonry has stronger political connections, it fights the Church over the very heart and soul of the nation. The higher one gets in Masonry, the less able one is to excuse oneself as being an unwitting dupe.

Catholics should stay far away from involvement with Masons.

It’s unclear from the question whether the 32nd degree Mason was a Catholic or not. Since the excommunication is no longer automatic, but requires the intervention of the bishop, it is possible (but tragic, considering the consequences) that a Catholic could join the Masons, and even rise to such a high level, without the Church, out of mercy, applying a penalty to warn the individual of the peril he is putting his soul in.

The law requires that funerals be denied to three categories of people (can. 1184):

1) notorious apostates, heretics, and schismatics;

2) those who for anti-Christian motives chose to have their bodies cremated;

3) other manifest sinners to whom a Church funeral could not be granted without public scandal to the faithful.

The local ordinary (bishop or vicar general) is to have the final say if there is any doubt.

If the deceased Mason (and please, pray for his soul, even though it may be too late) was not Catholic, a funeral still may have been permitted to him in virtue of can. 1183: baptized persons belonging to a non-Catholic Church (e.g., Orthodox) or ecclesial community (e.g., Lutherans, Anglicans) may, in accordance with the prudent judgment of the local ordinary, be allowed church funerals unless it is established that they did not wish this. This canon is normally used when a non-Catholic spouse of a Catholic, who has dutifully attended Mass with his family for years, though never fully converted, has died and the family wishes the funeral to be in the Catholic Church. Or else, it could be applied when someone who belongs to a more obscure Orthodox or Oriental Church, living in a place with no real access to his own Church, turns to the Catholic Church for some spiritual support, but has not formally converted.

The law is relatively broad, and its interpretation is left to the local ordinary.

If an ecclesiastical funeral has been permitted to someone who had no right to it, or if the community is in disagreement with the local ordinary about the application of the law, an appeal could be made to the Holy See. It would be difficult to understand what could be gained from this. One cannot unring the bell.  Perhaps it might forestall similar events taking place in the future.

What to do?

One option would be to gather in small groups after Mass over coffee and doughnuts to gripe and complain about how wacky and liberal things have gotten. Mutter a few invectives (I’d suggest raising a fist while muttering through clenched teeth, “Why I oughta…”), and, thereafter, bask in the self-satisfaction that the truth has been defended.

Another option is to get on your knees and pray. Pray for the poor deceased man. Let’s hope he was deluded and confused and did not enter into the Masons with full consent of the will based on adequate knowledge.  Pray for his family. Pray for the local ordinary who may or may not have understood the full gravity of the situation when he made the call to permit the funeral, or who may not have been consulted at all! Pray for the priest who celebrated the funeral. Pray that the Church triumphs and defeats Masonry worldwide. Pray that our Church emerge from times of confusion and disarray that it may once again shine as a beacon for all those poor souls who have been deluded by dangerous philosophies.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , , , ,
28 Comments

VIDEO: How long can you stand it?

A priest friend of mine posted this elsewhere with the challenge… can you make it to the end of this video?  How long can you stand it before you click off?

Play video

And to think… some men don’t want to go to church. Who knows why?

Posted in Lighter fare, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , , ,
109 Comments

WARNING! If you suffer from Burke Derangement Syndrome™, DO NOT READ THIS.

At Emangelization there is a long interview with His Eminence Raymond Leo (which means “Lion”) Card. Burke.  His Eminence is not going quietly into the good night, as I am sure his enemies had wanted… since they couldn’t get more.  But I digress.

The interview is arranged around the theme of the state of men in the Church today.

This part is going to make some on the catholic Left have spittle-flecked nutty!

[…]

Sadly, the Church has not effectively reacted to these destructive cultural forces; [He has just listed a few.] instead the Church has become too influenced by radical feminism and has largely ignored the serious needs of men.

My generation has taken for granted the many blessings we were blessed with in our solid family lives and with the Church’s solid formation of us. My generation let all of this nonsense of sexual confusion, radical feminism and the breakdown of the family go on, not realizing that we were robbing the next generations of the most treasured gifts that we had been blessed to receive.

We have gravely wounded the current generations. As a bishop, young people complained bitterly to me, “Why we were not taught these things. Why we were not more clearly taught about the Mass, Confession and traditional devotions?” These things matter for they form a spiritual life and a man’s character.

Going to Confession and to Sunday Mass, praying the Rosary together as a family in the evening, eating meals together, all these things give practical direction in the Christian life. Learning that it is not manly to be vulgar or blasphemous and that a man is welcoming and courteous to others; these might seem like little things but they form a man’s character. Much of this has been lost.

Matthew:   Your Eminence, what has been the impact of this Catholic “man-crisis” on the Church?

Cardinal Burke:  [NB!] The Church becomes very feminized. [Here that repeated ‘popping’ sound?  Those are arteries bursting in the necks and heads of the Left.  Watch for swift retaliation in the liberal press.] Women are wonderful, of course. They respond very naturally to the invitation to be active in the Church. Apart from the priest, the sanctuary has become full of women. The activities in the parish and even the liturgy have been influenced by women and have become so feminine in many places that men do not want to get involved.

Men are often reluctant to become active in the Church. The feminized environment and the lack of the Church’s effort to engage men has led many men to simply opt out. [See my polls on the effect of all male service in the sanctuary on vocations.]

As an example, it became politically incorrect to talk about the Knights of the Altar, an idea that is highly appealing to young men. The Knights of the Altar emphasize the idea that young men offer their chivalrous service at the altar to defend Christ in the sacred realities of the Church. This idea is not welcome in many places today. [Guess who drives this sort of thing away?]

Aspects of the Church’s life that emphasized the man?like character of devotion and sacrifice have been deemphasized. Devotions that required time and effort were simply abandoned. Everything became so easy and when things are easy, men don’t think it is worth the effort. [Ain’t it the truth?]

There has been, and continues to be, serious liturgical abuses that turn men off.

In many places the Mass became very priest?centered, it was like the “priest show”. [Not in the TLM, however.  The priest is completely controlled and made subservient to the action and the true Actor.] This type of abuse leads to a loss of the sense of the sacred, taking the essential mystery out of the Mass. The reality of Christ Himself coming down on the altar to make present His sacrifice on Cavalry gets lost. Men are drawn to the mystery of Christ’s sacrifice but tune out when the Mass becomes a “priest show” or trite.

The rampant liturgical experimentation after Vatican II, much of which was not sanctioned by Vatican II, stripped the Rite of the Mass of much of its careful articulation of the Sacred Mysteries that had been developed over centuries. The Mass seemed to become something very familiar, performed by men; the profound supernatural sense of the Sacred Mystery became obscured.

The loss of the sacred led to a loss of participation of women and men. But I think that men were really turned off by the loss of the sacred. It seems clear that many men are not being drawn into a deeper liturgical spirituality; today, many men are not being drawn to service at the altar.  [Remember Card. Heenan’s remarks?   HERE]

Young men and men respond to rigor and precision and excellence. When I was trained to be a server, the training lasted for several weeks and you had to memorize the prayers at the foot of the altar. It was a rigorous and a carefully executed service. All of a sudden, in the wake of Vatican II, the celebration of the liturgy became very sloppy in many places. It became less attractive to young men, for it was slipshod. [Put the shapeless, characterless white sack on, tie it with a dopey rope cord thing, stand there while the talking and the commercial jingle-like music go on and on and on, carry a cruet over….]

The introduction of girl servers also led many boys to abandon altar service. Young boys don’t want to do things with girls. It’s just natural. The girls were also very good at altar service. So many boys drifted away over time. I want to emphasize that the practice of having exclusively boys as altar servers has nothing to do with inequality of women in the Church.

I think that this has contributed to a loss of priestly vocations. It requires a certain manly discipline to serve as an altar boy in service at the side of priest, and most priests have their first deep experiences of the liturgy as altar boys. If we are not training young men as altar boys, giving them an experience of serving God in the liturgy, we should not be surprised that vocations have fallen dramatically.

[…]

Yes, the Left will now have to issue their own hit pieces again Card. Burke, again.  They will be ad hominem, since they don’t usually deal with substance.  They don’t have to.  They suffer from BDS… BURKE DERANGEMENT SYNDROME™!

UPDATE:

I said that retaliation would start.  It has.   Here is an example.

RNS, not friendly to faithful Catholicism, posted a story on the interview.  Here is a screen shot, including the picture they posted with the story.

Screen Shot 2015-01-08 at 1.17.00

In the piece Gibson goes after Burke and disputes some points, but at least uses a little reason.   Fine.

Now… look at what catholic Crux does.  Another screenshot.  They simply repost David Gibson’s piece from RNS but the repackaged it a little for effect.

Screen Shot 2015-01-08 at 1.22.02

 

Here’s the larger photo chosen by Crux, not RNS.

Cardinal-Burke-Church-Feminine-C-717x450

 

See what they are trying to do?

CRUX: “Burke says the Church has become effeminate, but… tee hee… look!  He’s wearing lace!  See?  SEE?!?  And so are those other guys!  Who’s effeminate?  Tee hee!”

Never mind that people who make insinuations like this a) know nothing of Burke, b) are the same types who go weak-kneed watching people jump around in tights in the aisles of churches, and c) don’t get that the Franciscan Friars in this picture are tougher than nails, they live like mendicants, and don’t even wear shoes in the winter.  The FFI’s would only hang out with the Crux types out of pity and charity and as an act of their outreach and apostolate, but they respect and admire Card. Burke…because they’re men.

What is slimy about what Crux did here – as they show more and more their true colors – is that they did exactly what they would howl against were the tables turned.  Were a faithful Catholic comment on someone’s clothing and then suggest something about their sexuality, they’d have a cow.  Indeed, a series of cows.  A small herd, all mooing.

Finally, avoid the combox at Crux if you have to go over there.  It is as vile a sewer of anonymity-driven toxic waste as what you find at Fishwrap.  Instead, say a prayer for them, perhaps using the Memorare, asking our Blessed Mother’s help to turn some of these folks around before they die with the sins of their hate-filled calumnious and slanderous remarks rotting their souls as they go to the inescapable Judge.  May God have mercy on them.

I’m turning the moderation queue on here after seeing what they are doing in that fever swamp over there.  There may not be many comments visible for a while, since it is time to sleep here.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, New Evangelization, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity, Priests and Priesthood, Seminarians and Seminaries | Tagged , , , ,
47 Comments

GUEST POST: “Do blogs change lives?”

Here is some feedback and comments that will keep me going for a while.

“Do blogs change lives? They do when they pay honour to Holy Mother Church and draw us into her treasures. Back in 2006 I did not even know the TLM existed. But thanks to WDTPRS I became intrigued: what is this Traditional Mass about which Fr Z keeps posting?

Enthusiasm was not immediate because there was such a steep learning curve. But what captured me was reading time and time again posts or comments which affirmed that the TLM by its very form offers greater glory to God. If this were so, then I wanted to be there, especially while my country scorns God.

Furthermore, your posts explained that the TLM’s rites and prayers dare to address us as sinners in need of redemption. This kind of communication is what my soul responds to, for I know it is true. Novus Ordo spirituality seems frightened to go there. And what sealed the deal for me on the TLM is that these two realities which are so infinitely far apart—God’s glory and our sinfulness—are bridged by that very reality which is the essence of Holy Mass: the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ on Calvary. And the TLM is full of references to the Cross and to sacrifice, in too many ways to count. As there is nothing on earth more adorable than Christ on the Cross, then there is nowhere better to be every day than at a TLM.

Now I am a seminarian for an Ecclesia Dei community, and cannot thank God enough. Thanks too to you Fr Z for your blog, especially for those posts around the time of Summorum Pontificum, which insisted that if we hunger for God’s glory, if we hunger for Redemption, if we adore the Cross, then we simply must go and be present at Traditional Masses, again and again and again, and pray and work to understand the sacrifice and to consent to the sacrifice. And God does not disappoint.

For anyone out there who has the beginning of an interest, please please do go to the TLM, and don’t stop going. It will fulfil you.”

It is great that this young man found some inspiration and courage to check out the TLM.  I love this devout enthusiasm and zeal.  Zelus domus tuae!

My path into the Catholic Church was through the Novus Ordo celebrated in close continuity with our Roman liturgical tradition, and with great reverence and splendor.  It was the binding, blending, building experience of both my intellectual and affective conversion.

Posted in Seminarians and Seminaries, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM | Tagged
7 Comments