EGYPT: Graffiti marked Christian places to be burned

From the Practitioners of the Religion of Peace…

The story is from the Christian Science Monitor:

In Egyptian village, Christian shops marked ahead of church attack (+video)
The Saint Virgin Mary Church in Al Nazla is one of 47 churches and monasteries that have been burned, robbed, or attacked in a new wave of violence against Christians in Egypt.

Before the violence that shook this small village last week, there were warning signs.

On June 30, when millions of Egyptians took to the streets to protest against now ousted President Mohamed Morsi, residents of Al Nazla marked Christian homes and shops with red graffiti, vowing to protect Morsi’s electoral legitimacy with “blood.”

Relations between Christians and Muslims in the village, which had worsened since Morsi’s election in 2012, grew even more tense as Islamists spread rumors that it was Christians who were behind the protests against Morsi and his ouster by the military on July 3.

Finally, on the morning of Aug. 14, the tension erupted. In Cairo, the police attacked two protest camps full of Morsi supporters, using live ammunition and killing hundreds. When the news reached Al Nazla, a local mosque broadcast through its loudspeakers that Christians were attacking the protesters, say residents. Hundreds of villagers marched on the Saint Virgin Mary Church. They broke down the gate and flooded the compound, shouting “Allahu akbar” and “Islam is the solution,” according to Christian neighbors.

“First they stole the valuable things, and then they torched the place,” says Sami Awad, a church member who lives across the narrow dirt alley from the church. “Whatever they couldn’t carry, they burned.”

[…]

Mosque broadcast

On the morning of the attack in Al Nazla, says Awad, a local mosque broadcast a message around 9 am. “Your brothers in Rabaa El Adawiya are being killed by Jews and Christians,” the loudspeakers boomed, according to Awad and other Christian residents. The crowds attacked the police station before attacking the church, say residents, possibly part of the reason the police did nothing to stop the attack that lasted from around 9:30 am until 7 pm. The attackers even brought trucks to carry away their loot. The police guards that had been posted outside the church walked away when the angry crowds approached, say neighbors. One fire truck that tried to approach the church was repelled by the crowd, and the police never came.

Some Muslim neighbors tried to help put out the fire raging in the church, including Magdy Shaaban. They also successfully protected against attempts to break into or set fire to Christian homes and shops, but near the church, “there were so many attackers, we couldn’t stand against them,” he says.

[…]

Read the rest there.

Sts. Nunilo and Alodia, pray for us.

Posted in The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices, The Religion of Peace | Tagged , , ,
11 Comments

Sunday Sermon Notes

Was there a good point in the sermon you heard for your Sunday Mass obligation?

Share it!

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
8 Comments

Of the LCWR and nostril-rings

The Fishwrap (aka National Schismatic Reporter) reports that the LCWR nuns had a conclave.  I’d report it myself, but the nuns rejected my request for media credentials.

It seems that they locked the doors, posted specially-hired security guards, eschewed wireless microphones, and forced the IT people to sign non-disclosure agreements.  Maybe they were worried that I would come anyway and hack into their sound system.

The picture is worth … you know…

"EXTRA OMNES!"

Archbishop Sartain, the CDF’s Nun-Overlord, spoke to the assembly for a little over a half hour.

The same Archbishop Sartain celebrated Mass for the sisters for Assumption -it being a Holy Day of Obligation… at least for Archbishop Sartain. He preached about obedience.  But I digress.

I read at the official organ of the LCWR, the National Schismatic Reporter, that the sisters weren’t happy with what Archbp. Sartain told them.  What a shock.  Can you imagine why?

One member said Sartain did not respond in any detailed way to questions about the specific allegations made in the Vatican doctrinal assessment of LCWR, preferring instead to talk about his general sense of the role of religious life in the church. Most of his talk, this person said, focused on Jesus. [OMG!]

At one point during his talk, one LCWR member said, Sartain told the sisters their role “is to be thinking with the church and fidelity to the magisterium of the church.”

Meanwhile, as I posted in another entry, the sisters had a pharmaco-cosmo-theological talk by their keynote speaker. HERE  I especially liked Sr. Ilia Delio’s line: “There is no cosmos without God, and no God without cosmos.”  Sr. Delia needs a refresher in “God 101”.

How do we explain the antics of the LCWR nuns?

I have the impression that – and mothers can correct me about the right age for this sort of thing – I have the impression that the sisters are rather like 13-year-olds right now.  They push and push at the boundary of what is acceptable (acceptable for the Holy See, that is, from whom they crave approval).

Is it that they need attention? Even if it is negative attention?  In that case, I suppose we have to admit that we white male hierarchs truly did fail them.

It is as if their leadership is saying: How weird can we be before something snaps?  (Speaking of SNAP, are they protesting abuse of children by nuns at the meeting again this year?)

The sisters aren’t going to push the boundary and cry for attention through the use of – I dunno – goth-black eyeliner and eye-brow rings.  Instead, as they use the mature nunny equivalent: they import for their assembly’s focus – under the eyes of the CDF – the weirdest theology they can find.  Then they coo at it.

They normally can’t stand not being in the lime-light.   They have become professional dissenters. They have a reputation to maintain.  They have media to court.  They mustn’t let their “publics” down (e.g., the cool-kids-table theology departments at places like Fordham, the with-it feminists of a certain age, religion-column writers, newsies on the spirituality beat, etc.).  They can’t wait for that next controversial subject to jump into.  Their conflict with the CDF is a chance for them to smear on that theological gothic eyeliner, get another nostril-ring, and crank up the volume on the music they know Dad hates most.

Posted in Liberals, Magisterium of Nuns, The Drill, Women Religious | Tagged ,
52 Comments

OREGON: Govt. official: those who resist “gay” marriage must be “rehabilitated”

"Hold high the great red banner of Mao Zedong Thought--thoroughly smash the rotting counterrevolutionary revisionist line in literature and art" - 1967

During the Cultural Revolution in China (1966-1976 – the time when the greatest damage was being done in the name of the Spirit of Vatican II) people were bullied into rejection of the sì jiù, the Four “Olds”: Old Customs, Old Culture, Old Habits, and Old Ideas.  The Four Olds were equated with monsters and demons, “cow ghosts and snake spirits”, that had to be purged.

The conforming hoards, taken up in a frenzy of fear and zeal, marched in the streets chanting slogans, pasting up posters, such as “Beat down the bad elements!”, “Beat down Jesus following!”, “Beat down the counter revolutionists!”.

Those who were perceived – usually through denunciation – to adhere to the Four Olds, counter-revolutionists, were seized.  The lucky ones were forced into public self-criticism, humiliation, physical abuse and re-education.  The less lucky were killed. Many “intellectuals” (just about any with more than a high school education) were sent to re-education camps in the country-side where they were “educated” by the purer proletariat through forced-labor and more self-criticism and abuse.

Re-education camps.

I read sometime today at the site of the National Organization for Marriage:

Oregon Official Says Bakers Who Support Traditional Marriage Need ‘Rehabilitation

Despite the fact that Oregon bakers saw a huge boom in business after standing up for their belief in marriage (proving that many other Oregonians feel the same way), Labor Commissioner Brad Avakian says the state government’s goal is to “rehabilitate” them:

A lesbian couple filed a formal complaint against “Sweet Cakes by Melissa” in Portland after the owners – Aaron and Melissa Klein – declined on the basis of their Christian faith to provide services for a lesbian “wedding.”

“To say that this couple needs to be ‘rehabilitated’ for believing and practicing the values on which this nation was founded is entirely beyond the pale,” says [Tim Wildmon, president of the American Family Association].

“This sounds like Stalinist Russia or China under Mao, where those who thought for themselves were forced under government coercion into re-education camps. This is not the America that was given to us by our Founders.”

Matt Barber [vice president of Liberty Counsel Action] says the “rehabilitation” remark connotes some kind of ailment, mental illness or physical ailment. “You know, we rehabilitate criminals,” he explains. “Are they saying that Christianity is criminal here and we have to rehabilitate those who embrace the Christian sexual ethic? That’s what this official in Oregon is saying.”

Wildmon wonders what might follow if the bakery owners refuse to be “rehabilitated.” –One News Now

Please say a prayer for Archbishop Alex Sample, who has the heavy pastoral mandate in the Archdiocese of Portland.

Let’s be clear about something: we are not yet being truly persecuted, in the strong, physical sense.  We are not in N. Korea or China.  Our churches are not yet being systematically burned, as in Egypt.  Our priests and bishops are not yet being hunted down and “disappeared”.

But the storm clouds are gathering.  Soft-persecution is rising.

Pò sì jiù!

 

Posted in Hard-Identity Catholicism, Liberals, New Evangelization, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity, Pò sì jiù, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,
65 Comments

Churches burned in Egypt. Everyone should know about this.

At The Blaze I saw a list of churches burned by the practitioners of the Religion of Peace.

Sts. Nunilo and Alodia, pray for us.

Alexandria

  1. Father Maximus Church

Arish

  1. St George Church | Burned | Source

Assiut

  1. Good Shepherds Monastery |  Nuns attacked
  2. Angel Michael Church | Surrounded
  3. St George Coptic Orthodox Church | PhotoPhotoPhotoYouTube
  4. Al-Eslah Church| Burned | Source
  5. Adventist Church | Pastor and his wife kidnapped | Photo
  6. St Therese Church | Photo
  7. Apostles Church | Burning | Source
  8. Holy Revival Church | Burning | Source
  9. Qusiya Diocese | MCN

Beni Suef

  1. The Nuns School | Photo
  2. St George Church | al-Wasta

Cairo

  1. St Fatima Basilica | Heliopolis | Attempted Attack
  2. Virgin Mary’s Church | Hakim Village | Burned | Photo

Fayoum (Five churches)

  1. St Mary Church | El Nazlah | Gallery
  2. St Damiana Church | Robbed and burned
  3. Amir Tawadros (St Theodore) Church | EgyNews (Arabic), Twitter
  4. Evangelical Church | al-Zorby Village | Looting and destruction
  5. Church of Joseph | Burned | Source
  6. Franciscan School | Burned | Source

Gharbiya

  1. Diocese of St Paul | Burned | Source

Giza

  1. Father Antonios
  2. Atfeeh Bishopric

Minya (Around twelve churches)

  1. Church of the Virgin Mary and Father Abram | Delga, Deir Mawas | Source
  2. St Mina Church | Abu Hilal Kebly, Beni Hilal | Sourcephoto
  3. Baptist Church | Beni Mazar | Source
  4. Monastery | Deir Mawas  | Ahram (Arabic)
  5. Delga Church | Attacked (Previously attacked with fire)
  6. The Jesuit Fathers Church | Abu Hilal district
  7. St Mark Church | Abu Hilal district
  8. St Joseph Nunnery | Photophoto
  9. Amir Tadros Church | Photophotophotoalbumphotophoto
  10. Evangelical Church | Photo
  11. Anba Moussa al-Aswad Church | Photo
  12. Apostles Church | Source

Qena

  1. St Mary’s Church | Attempted Burning

Sohag

  1. St George Church |Photo albumphotophotovideosourcesourcevideo
  2. St Damiana | Attacked and burned | Source
  3. Virgin Mary | Attacked and burned | Source
  4. St Mark Church & Community Center
  5. Anba Abram Church | Destroyed and burned | Source

Suez

  1. St Saviours Anglican Church | Source
  2. Franciscan Church and School | Street 23 | Burned |Photophotosource/photosphotos
  3. Holy Shepherd Monastery and Hospital | Photo
  4. Good Shepherd Church (molotov cocktail thrown)- Relationship with Holy Shepherd Monastery unknown.
  5. Greek Orthodox Church | PhotoPhoto

Christian Institutions

  • House of Father Angelos (Pastor of Church of the Virgin Mary and Father Abram) | Delga, Minya | Burned | CBN NewsAhram (Arabic)
  • Properties and Markets of Copts | al-Gomhorreya Street, Assiut
  • Seventeen Coptic homes | Delga, Minya | Burned | SourceSource
  • YMCA | Minya| Burned | Photo
  • Coptic Homes | Qulta Street, Assiut | Attacked
  • Offices of the Evangelical Foundation & Oum al-Nour | Minya
  • Coptic-owned shops, pharmacy, and hotels | Karnak and Cleopatra Streets, Luxor | Attacked and Looted
  • Dahabeya Nile Boat | Minya| Church-owned | Source,PhotoPhoto
  • Bible Society bookshop | Cairo | Burned | Photo
  • Bible Society | Fayoum | Photo
  • Bible Society | al-Gomohoreya Street, Assiut | PhotoPhoto
  • Ezbet el Nekhl | Sourcesourcesource (Arabic)

Posted in Cri de Coeur, The Drill | Tagged , , ,
80 Comments

Do I hear an “Amen!”?

From CNA:

Saved from abortion, Chilean twin brothers are now priests

Santiago, Chile, Aug 16, 2013 / 04:12 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- Two twin brothers in Chile say that their mother’s determination in protecting them from abortion despite the advice of doctors helped to foster their vocations to the priesthood.

“How can I not defend the God of life?” said Fr. Paulo Lizama. “This event strengthened my vocation and gave it a specific vitality, and therefore, I was able to give myself existentially to what I believe.”

“I am convinced of what I believe, of what I am and of what I speak, clearly by the grace of God,” he told CNA.

Fr. Paulo and his identical twin brother, Fr. Felipe, were born in 1984 in the Chilean town of Lagunillas de Casablanca.

Before discovering her pregnancy, their mother, Rosa Silva, had exposed herself to x-rays while performing her duties as a paramedic. Consequently, after confirming the pregnancy, her doctor conducted ultrasounds and informed her that he had seen “something strange” in the image.

“The baby has three arms and its feet are sort of entangled. It also has two heads,” he told her.

Although abortion for “therapeutic” reasons was legal at the time in Chile and doctors told her that her life was in danger, Rosa opposed the idea and said she would accept whatever God would send her.

“The Lord worked and produced a twin pregnancy. I don’t know if the doctors were wrong or what,” Fr. Felipe said.

[…]

Read the rest there! Do… read it!

Hint:

Now, a year after their ordination, Fr. Felipe serves at the parish of Saint Martin of Tours in Quillota, and Fr. Paulo serves at the parish of the Assumption of Mary in Achupallas.

“God doesn’t mess around with us. He wants us to be happy, and the priesthood is a beautiful vocation and that makes us completely happy,” Fr. Felipe said.

Following Jesus is not easy but it is beautiful, added Fr. Paulo.

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras, Just Too Cool, Priests and Priesthood | Tagged , ,
9 Comments

I’ve been thinking about the LCWR meeting, which – sadly – is in its final hours.

I’ve been thinking about the LCWR meeting, which – sadly – is in its final hours. (Have I mentioned that they rejected me?)

What greater sign that the CDF take-over is really working, and that it is game over for the LCWR, than their celebrant for their first Mass?

Who would have been their top choices for presider for that first “liturgy”?

  1. Roy Bourgeois
  2. Roy Bourgeois, and
  3. Roy Bourgeois

No, it was the Papal Nuncio, Archbishop Viganò.

Whose idea was that?  Patty Farrell’s? Deacon’s? Peg Farley’s?

Hey!  Next year do you think we can get them to do the Extraordinary Form?

Posted in Lighter fare, Magisterium of Nuns, Women Religious | Tagged , ,
18 Comments

QUAERITUR: Of canonical digits and purifications

From a reader:

Our priest does a fantastic job of guarding his thumb and index fingers once he has touched the Host. I was wondering if this is a symbolic gesture, as I have never seen our Eucharistic Ministers or Deacon wash their hands? [The proper term is really “Extraordinary Minister of Holy Communion”, not “Eucharistic Ministers”.] In my prideful / judgemental way I sometimes get a bit angry at their lack of reverence and I know I could be way off here. Thanks and God Bless.

So many people have been hurt and are hurting, friend.

Your description of what the priest is doing, by keeping his index and thumbs together, is consistent with what priests have been required by the rubrics to do during Mass after the consecration.  Priests are still, in the Extraordinary Form, required to keep index and thumbs pressed together at the “pads”, as it were, lest any recognizable particle that might have adhered to the fingers were to fall some place outside the corporal (the square linen cloth spread out on the altar on which the chalice and Hosts rest).  This is also why, after the consecration, the priest was to keep his hand as much as possible over the corporal.  This is also why it is good during Mass when the chalice is uncovered for the priest gently to rub his fingers and thumbs together over the chalice, for the sake of letting particles fall into the chalice rather than elsewhere.  It becomes habitual and it takes no effort or delay to do it.

These gestures are not required by the rubrics of the Novus Ordo.

It is a good thing to do anyway.

First, it makes sense.  Second, it’s what priests do.

Some will object that this practice seems fussy or even – gasp – scrupulous.

I respond saying that recognizable particles remain the Body and Blood, soul and divinity of the Lord.  I think the Eucharist deserves our care and attention.

On a number of occasions I have felt a particle remain on my fingers, pressed between the pads of my thumb and index.  This can occur more frequently when the hosts are dry or have edges that are rough or not well “sealed”.

I am a sinner, but when I come before the Lord for His judgment He won’t tell me I was careless with the Him during Mass.  Shame on those priests who are careless.

Fathers!  People see what you do when you are up there and what you don’t do.  Be careful with the Eucharist!  Purify vessels properly!  Don’t leave fragments all over everything!

I have had concerned sacristans show me patens for chalices that have particles left on them.  For the love of GOD!  Purify carefully!

In any event, about washing hands, let’s run with that for a moment or two.

The priest – in the older way of doing things – ought to wash his hands before vesting while saying the prayer “Da, Domine, virtutem manibus meis ad abstergendam omnem maculam immundam; ut sine pollutione mentis et corporis valeam tibi servire. … Give virtue to my hands, O Lord, that being cleansed from all stain I might serve you without impurity of mind and body.”  Alas, some sacristies don’t have sinks, much less sacraria!  Grrrr.  Then, during Mass, he purifies his fingers after preparing the “gifts”.  In the new rite he says simply, “Lava me ab iniquitate mea et a peccato meo munda me … Wash me of my iniquity, and cleanse me from my sin.” In the older rite he recites the Lavabo, from Psalm 26. In the older form of the Roman Rite he continues, as I mentioned above, to cleanse his fingers after the consecration. Finally, after Communion and during the ablutions when he is purifying the vessels he again purifies the tips of his fingers. During the course of the ablutions before wine and water are poured over his fingers held over the cup of the chalice, say says “Corpus Tuum, Domine,… May Your Body, O Lord, which I have received, and Your Blood which I have drunk, cleave to my inmost parts, and grant that no stain of sin may remain in me, who have been fed with this pure and holy Sacrament….”  Everything having to do with purification of the fingers, vessels and safeguarding of the Eucharist is to be performed with serious focus.

Regarding, however, the reverence of the priest – you can’t know for sure what he has in his heart or mind.  You can only see the outward reflection of his inward full, conscious and active participation, which, because he is the priest, should be exemplary.  

The priest should carefully instruct the deacon concerning purification of the vessels.  Sadly, the training that some permanent deacons received was … sub-optimal.  Diaconal programs are improving, but, there for a while…. damn!

And if there are Extraordinary Ministers, they should of course be instructed with extra care.

I will have to leave aside that I don’t think that the non-ordained should handle sacred vessels with their bare hands, much less the Eucharist, unless absolutely necessary.  That’s the stuff of a different rant on another occasion.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, Priests and Priesthood, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged , ,
15 Comments

QUAERITUR: Pontifical Mass in the Novus Ordo?

From a reader:

This may be a stupid question, but in the Novus Ordo, if a bishop of the diocese celebrates Mass, would it technically be defined as a “pontifical Mass” since he would be the pontiff?

Not a dumb-question at all.

Let’s get a term straight.  All bishops are “pontiffs” in the liturgical context.  A bishop need not be the ordinary of the diocese to celebrate “Pontifical Mass”.  An auxiliary, or retired, or visiting bishop would all celebrate “Pontifical Mass”, though they may not all be able to use the crozier or sit upon the local bishop’s throne or cathedra.

So, in a loose sense, any Mass celebrated by a bishop is a “pontifical Mass”.

However, “Pontifical Mass” is a technical term.

In the older, traditional Roman Rite there are different kinds of “Pontifical Mass”.

First, there is Pontifical Mass “at the throne”.  This is a solemn Mass sung by a cardinal (anywhere) or a bishop in his own diocese or an abbot at his abbey or elsewhere by permission of the local bishop.  It is quite elaborate and represents the summit of the Roman liturgy.  This is the paradigm for the Roman Rite, not the silent Low Mass of a priest, which most people think is the standard.

In such a Mass the pontiff/bishop is vested in his pontificalia, or “pontificals”, that is, the vestments and ornaments proper to a bishop.  These include the pectoral cross and ring, which bishops always wear no matter what, the miter and crozier, buskins (a kind of slipper), gloves, tunicle and dalmatic beneath the chasuble.

A little less fancy is the solemn Pontifical Mass “at the faldstool”, a special kind of chair that is placed in the sanctuary before the altar.  Most of the action takes place there and there are fewer sacred ministers.  This is now most bishops who aren’t the ordinary of the place celebrate Pontifical Mass.

There is also a slimmed-down variation of the more solemn Mass at the faldstool, a Pontifical Low Mass, which might be celebrated, with less solemnity, by a bishop who is conferring minor orders or ordaining. In this case he would use the miter and crozier and so forth.

Finally, there is “Low Mass” of a bishop, which is slimmed down even more, though it retains some of the ceremonies of vesting before the altar, etc.  That isn’t really called a “Pontifical Mass” because the bishop isn’t vested in all his “pontificals”.

For the Novus Ordo… who knows?  Most of these distinctions and most of the pontificalia are gone.  The terminology of High Mass and Low Mass are gone for priests as well as for pontiffs.  “Pontifical Mass”, in the sense of the Novus Ordo Mass celebrated by a bishop, is barely more than that which a priest does.  I don’t believe the term “Pontifical Mass” made it into the Novus Ordo as a technical term.  I hope someone will chime in if I am wrong. According to the Ceremoniale Episcoporum there are still a few things done differently for a bishop’s Mass.  Bishops have to have servers around to take from them and give to them their hat and stick, for example.  They bless in a different way.  They kiss the book of the Gospel after someone else reads it.  But beyond that, there isn’t much that they do that is different.  It is all rather dumbed-down and listless.

In any event, it is possible to celebrate the Novus Ordo with elements of the older, traditional form preserved.  You can make the Novus Ordo look and sound like the Roman Rite in its traditional form.  In a way it is easier to do so when a bishop is celebrating, because the Roman Rite’s standard is when a pontiff is pontificating.  We are inclined to “beef up” those Masses and our inclination is dead on right.

To track back to something I wrote above, the Solemn, Pontifical Mass of a Bishop at the throne in his own diocese is the true standard for the Roman Rite.  It is also, pace liberals, the standard for the Novus Ordo!

This is why Summorum Pontificum was so important, such a great gift to the whole Church.

We need wide-spread and frequent celebrations of the traditional form of the Roman Rite BY BISHOPS.

Otherwise…

[wp_youtube]nZ5it20gKqw[/wp_youtube]

And now, by way of contrast, from the famous Pontifical TLM at the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception, in 2010.

[wp_youtube]VaydRX5y0vk[/wp_youtube]

UPDATE:

A reader (Polish?) sent this:

JMJ!

Rev.,

Missa pontificalis non existit in novum et reformandum Caeremoniale Episcoporum.

Habemus tantum “Missam stationalem Episcopi dioecesani”, cf. CE [1984-2008], pars II (De Missa], caput I (De Missa stationali Episcopi dioecesani):

“119. Praecipua manifestatio Ecclesiae localis habetur quando
Episcopus, ut sacerdos magnus sui gregis, Eucharistiam celebrat
praesertim in ecclesia cathedrali, a suo presbyterio et ministris
circumdatus, cum plenaria et actuosa participatione totius plebis sanctae Dei.

Quae Missa, stationalis nuncupata, et unitatem Ecclesiae localis et diversitatem ministeriorum circa Episcopum sacramque Eucharistiam manifestat” (p. 41).

Respectu CE 1600-1752 habemus, exempli gratia:

Liber II, caput 11: “De Missa pontificali pro Defunctis, per Episcopum celebranda, et de sermone, et absolutione post Missam”.

Oremus ad invicem!

In Christo Rege
et in Maria semper Virgine

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,
26 Comments

Fr Z’s Kitchen: Friday Lunch

Grilled cheese sandwich by grilled cheese sandwich.

20130816-113442.jpg

Cheddar on rye, tomato basil soup.

Behold the New Evangelization… that and the TLM everywhere.

UPDATE:

More Romano

20130816-124921.jpg

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Fr. Z's Kitchen, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , ,
13 Comments