IN THE WILD! Clement XIV joins the Navy!

My friend Fr. Johnson, USN, sent me a photo of his newly acquired Papa Ganganelli (aka Clement XIV Of Glorious Memory) coffee mug.

Here it is, strategically situated in Father’s stateroom aboard USS KEARSARGE (LHD3).

17_04_18_Clement_mug_01

Fr. Johnson regularly celebrates the TLM while deployed with Marines, in port, or at sea.

Thanks Shipmate!

Everyone: I very much enjoy seeing your In The Wild shots.

Clement_XVI_Mug_01 Clement_XVI_Mug_02

For all the selections click

>>HERE<<

… and you could have your very own Papa Ganganelli mug!

Impress your friends!  Annoy liberals!  Make Jesuits sweat!

BTW…

Did you know that the great impressionist painter Manet painted USS KEARSARGE?

No, not this one…

USS_KEARSARGE

This one… the predecessor from the time of the Civil War.

IMG_4715

During the Civil War, USS Kearsarge sank the Confederate Alabama near the coast of France.  It was widely covered by the French press.  Manet painted the scene twice.  This painting is in the Met in New York.  The other is in Philadelphia. Manet visited the ship at anchor near Boulogne.

If you want to know more about Manet and the Impressionists, I warmly recommend Ross King’s The Judgment of Paris: The Revolutionary Decade That Gave the World Impressionism.

US HERE – UK HERE

Posted in In The Wild, Mail from priests | Tagged , , , , ,
7 Comments

Fr. Z’s Kitchen: Easter Sunday Clerical Supper

I was pleased to have had a guest priest come to town to help with our Sacred Triduum in the Extraordinary Form. His presence allowed us to have a Solemn Triduum. It also allowed me to brush off my cooking utensils.  I hardly do any entertaining these days.

Priests should regularly have Suppers For The Promotion Of Clericalism (SFTPOC), for the building of priestly identity over large pieces of beef and bottles of wine, followed by cigars.

On Easter Sunday (after a nap) I made oven roasted potatoes, asparagus, bone-in rib-eye roast, Bearnaise sauce.

If you want your potatoes to turn out like you find in Rome, give them a good long soak in salt water.  I kept a rosemary plant alive all winter.  Not easy where I live, but life without rosemary is hardly to be imagined.

Behold, the Bearnaise.  I haven’t made it for many moons and it was perfect.

With the pan drippings.

It was spectacular.  Everything was exactly right.

And yet… I have to post this, too.

Last year one of you readers gave me a butter lamb mold.

I tried several times this year to get the butter lamb thing going, but…  I must admit that it has defeated me.

I tried different timings with the freezer.  I tried different butters.  I managed to turn out one that didn’t split in half or break into uneven pieces.  Here is the lone “lamb”, to use the word equivocally.

Alas, it looks a bit like something from Alien… no… better… Bp. Fatty McButterpant’s loathsome, somewhat deformed dog Chester over in the Diocese of Libville.  It once, wisely, bit Fatty’s old classmate, Bp. Antuninu “Dozer” Ruspa of Pie Town.

It’s the ones you hate that live forever.

Anyway, I am sincerely grateful for the gift and for the opportunity to experience greasy, ignominious defeat.  Better luck next year!

Posted in Fr. Z's Kitchen | Tagged , , , , ,
17 Comments

Robert Mickens is exactly wrong about priestly vocations. Here’s why.

spirit_Vatican_IIOne of the worst of the hyper-liberal catholic publications, Commonweal, publishes a regular column by long-time Rome correspondent Robert Mickens.

Many readers here will recall that Mickens loathes Benedict XVI.  He lost his job with The Tablet, the UK’s worst catholic weekly, when in 2014 he posted disgusting comments about Benedict.

This week Mickens addresses the issue of vocations to the priesthood.  He goes after St. John Paul II  and Benedict XVI.  Since it’s the Easter Octave, I won’t trouble you with much of his text.  His bottom line is that 1) narrow, clericalist, backward-looking Popes of the past blocked the work of the Holy Spirit (which Mickens seems to know better than they) Who clearly wanted an end to clerical celibacy and the ordination of women, and 2) the stifling of the “spirit of Vatican II” has caused a huge drop in vocations, which has prompted bishops to reach our for priests from Third World countries to take up the slack and some of those bishops and priests are not in sync with Pope Francis, and 3) there are at long last bright rays of sunshine in the obscurity caused by men, near messianic figures, who coincidentally are associated with the political left and the liberal, progressivist arm of Pope Francis’ pontificate.

Ergo, these bad bad males must be replaced.  His line-up includes (titles removed for the sake of speed): Kasper, Schönborn, Farrell, Tobin, and McElroy.

Along the way, Mickens alternates between the green ink and the purple patch.  You’d think that the Battle of Narnia was about to begin.

Boiled down, Mickens thinks that these bad bad males, these Tridentine, clericalist scaredy-cats have repressed priestly vocations.

Mickens is exactly wrong.

There is no lack of priestly vocations where bishops are capable of projecting solid clerical identity and where they teach perennial Catholic truth in charity and in clarity.

Hows_Liturgy_CandleI come from a parish where in 30 years there were 30 First Masses.  I live in a diocese where in a decade the bishop turned around vocations from 6 to 30.

The proportion of priests to people is more or less constant.  Why?  Lay people get the priests that they produce and that they deserve.   Lower Mass attendance results in falling numbers of priests, not the other way around.

Liberal clerics inevitably fall into the sin of the clericalism which they hurl as tar and feathers at conservative, faithful priests and bishops.  For example, when the former drag lay people up into the sanctuary and let them do something that is really their own role, they clericalize the laity in the most condescending way.  Similarly, libs think that bishops produce vocations like Zeus produced Athena.  In truth, families produce vocations.

In the places (countries, dioceses, parishes, families) where the “spirit of the Council” was pushed à la Mickens, there has been devastation of Catholic identity.

Following Mickens’ logic, the whole Church should look rather like Belgium.

Belgium, which followed the “spirit of the Council” down the storm-drain and out to sea, (the Bishop of Antwerp, Johan Bonny, has called for rituals for “gay” marriage in the Church) now has 5% Mass attendance.   The reforms of the Church that Mickens desires have been so “successful” in Belgium that hardly anyone goes to Mass any more.  Subsequently, there are no vocations to the priesthood, either.

See?  What a success!

Posted in Liberals, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , , ,
18 Comments

ASK FATHER: Questions about Pope Francis’ Easter Mass in St. Peter’s

I received a couple questions about the Pope’s Mass for Easter.

From a reader (this was NOT in the Ask Father Question Box… I usually ignore questions that don’t come through that link):

Was the Pope’s Easter Mass on EWTN in Latin? Might have been Italian, but I recognized the phrases from the EF.

I didn’t watch it or pay any attention to the coverage.  However, yes, the Pope’s Vigil is generally in Latin.

From a reader:

Watching the Easter Vigil this evening we saw clergy dressed in blue cassocks with red cinctures. We have not seen this color cassock used other than in Marian rites. Do you know what they represented.

As I said, above, I didn’t watch it and I’m not going to, and I’m not sure what “Marian rites” would be, but I’ll bet you that they were not blue, but rather bluish purple cassocks and, with the red fascia, they were seminarians from the Scots College.

The different national colleges (where seminarians live) in Rome have distinctive cassocks.  The Polish wear black with a green sash, Ukrainian blue with yellow, Germans red with black, etc.

It would be great to see all these cassocks return to common use.  Roman streets in the mornings and afternoons would be a lot more colorful!

UPDATE:

I found my old list of college cassocks, somewhat dated now and there are holes.  I’d appreciate corrections.

Collegio Romano Roman Seminary: purple cassock and soprana with pendant strings, no fascia
Pontificio Pio Latino Americano: black cassock, violet fascia, a full cappa or cloak
Collegio Seminario Minore (Vatican): dark purple cassock with crimson trim and buttons, one crimson string decorated with the papal arms, shoes with silver buckles
Capranica College: black cassock, black soprana of shiny cloth, strings, no fascia, shoes with silver buckles
Propaganda Fide: black double breasted cassock, red trim and buttons, scarlet fascia and strings
German/Teutonic College: scarlet cassock, black fascia, scarlet soprana with pendant strings (because of their cassock, Romans nicknamed them “lobsters”)
Greek College: blue cassock, red fascia and pipings, blue soprana with strings or black soprana with wide sleeves when outside
English College: black cassock and soprana, black strings and no fascia
Scots College: purple cassock with crimson facsia, buttons and trim and black soprana with pendant strings
Irish College: black cassock with red piping, no fascia, black soprana and strings
French College: black cassock, no fascia
Lombard College: black cassock, violet fascia, soprana and strings
Seminary of SS. Peter and Paul: black cassock with a black fascia
Belgian College: black cassock with black fascia edged with red
North American College: double-breasted black cassock, blue piping and buttons, crimson fascia, pendant strings
South American College: black cassock with blue edgings, blue fascia, black soprana and strings
Maronite College: black cassock, soprana and strings
Czech/Bohemian College Nepomuceno: black cassock, maroon fascia edged with yellow
Armenian College: black cassock with red trim and out of doors black coat with wide sleeves
College of St Boniface: black cassock with yellow trim, black soprana with black pendant strings lined with red
Polish College: black cassock and soprana with green fascia
Spanish College:  black cassock with blue fascia, round black cape with vertical blue trim
Canadian College: black cassock no fascia
Ruthenian College: blue cassock, soprana with strings, orange fascia
Ukrainian College San Giosafat: blue cassock, yellow fascia
Philippine College: black cassock, blue fascia with red stripes
Brazilian College: black cassock, green fascia edged with yellow
Ethiopian College: black cassock, white fascia, white lining of cape or soprana
Portuguese College: black cassock, red and green fascia
Collegio Leoniano:
Mexican College:
Russian College:
Lithuanian College:
Korean College:

Note – the Soprana was a long sleeveless coat, often with two long strings or streamers hanging from the armholes to signify the state of tuition.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged
14 Comments

ASK FATHER: “Private Mass”… Mass “without people”

From a reader…

I hope your’e doing well and that you’re able to answer my question.
Is a private mass simply any mass not listed in a parish’s bulletin/website?
On one side, I hear/read that a Missa Sin Populo or “private mass” is a mass
with no people in attendance or in the congregation, save an altar server.
Others say that traditionally, the term “private mass” meant any mass not
publicized or announced in a church bulletin/website. I’m part of a lay
faithful group trying to bring the TLM to our diocese and would like to
invite people to go to the priest’s private masses, but I wasn’t sure if
doing so would then change it from a private to a public mass. Please
forgive my use of such clumsy terms; I know that essentially any mass
offered by a priest is public. I hope my point comes across, nonetheless.

GUEST PRIEST RESPONSE

I suppose the writer meant “sine populo” though I could speculate that a Missa Sin Populo would be a Mass for people named Sin, like the late, lamented Filipino Cardinal.

As you say, the terms “private Mass” and “public Mass” are not precise. At every Mass that is offered, the Church is present, and therefore, the Holy Mass is always a public matter. Article 2 of the great motu proprio Summorum Pontificum, notes that a priest may use either Missal (the Extraordinary Form or the Ordinary Form) in offering a Holy Mass “sine populo,” and Article 4 adds that the Christian faithful who freely ask may be admitted to such a Mass. This would make such a celebration, technically speaking, a Mass without people with people. Or a Mass with people without people. Or with people, a Mass without people. You get the point.

When I was in my freewheeling days as a college seminarian, there was a rule in our “Guidelines for Community Living” that stated that “No parties may be held in individual rooms. However, spontaneous gatherings are permitted.” Certain members of the seminary would occasional post notices on the bulletin board to the effect that “A spontaneous gathering will be held in room 210 at 8:00 p.m. this coming Friday.”

We can play with language and find ourselves ending up in some interesting places. It seems to me that the clear intention of the Holy Father with this motu proprio is to make celebrations of the Holy Mass using the 1962 Missal a normal part of the life of the Church. I think it can be a helpful rule of thumb to make the distinction between public Masses being those widely advertised on a parish sign, bulletin, website; and private Masses being those not advertised, even if they are well known.

Otherwise, I suppose one could end up putting something in the bulletin stating, “People are invited to a Mass Without People offered on Tuesday at 7:30 a.m.”

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged ,
5 Comments

URGENT: Benedict XVI’s new text about Sacred Liturgy – The Russian Preface™

For years I have contended that if we do not revitalize our sacred liturgical worship, every initiative we undertake as a Church will wither and face.  Everything we do must start in worship and must be brought back to liturgical worship.  We must reorder our efforts, prioritize if we truly want renewal.

This is one of the reasons that I pound my head on my desk when I read about conferences about “New Evangelization” that lack a strong liturgical component (other than the de rigueur vanilla Novus Ordo Mass with concelebration with some bishop or other for the attendees).

A friend tipped me to something in the Italian daily Corriere della Sera: a newly released text written by Benedict XVI in 2015: a preface for a Russian translation of the volume of his Opera Omnia on liturgy and liturgical theology.

This text – and volume – is being issued for the occasion of his 90th birthday, which coincides with Easter, and which is also Easter this year for the Orthodox (a “sign of the times”?).

Moreover – get this – the Patriarch of Moscow had the volume – on liturgy – from Benedict’s Opera Omnia translated into Russian.

There’s a lot going on there.  Let’s unpack it.

US HERE – UK HERE

Some years ago, a project was undertaken to edit and to publish all Joseph Ratzinger’s works (Opera Omnia) in a series of definitive volumes.  (The projected volumes: HERE)  Then-Bishop, now Card. Müller was editor of the series.   The project has had its ups and downs, at least in the English translation and publication.  Ignatius Press was handling it.

In 2008 Benedict wrote the preface for the first volume of the Opera Omnia that was issued (in fact it’s Vol. XI) which includes his writings about liturgy and liturgical theology.

That was the correct choice: they began with the single issue that connects and roots all other issues even as it also indicates the Church’s direction and goal.  After all, the celebration of the Eucharist and the Eucharist Itself is the “source and summit” of the Church’s life.

It is interesting that the Russian Orthodox got on board with this.  No?

Do you long-time readers recall I what tagged Benedict XVI?

Pope of Christian Unity.

This was an ecumenical signal on the part of the Russians: watching the Catholic Church they, too, are concerned about our worship.  They clearly think that Benedict’s thought is worth promoting.

What does Pope Benedict say in his preface to the Russian edition?

He starts off with the famous phrase from the Rule of Benedict 43: Nihil operi Dei praeponitur… Put nothing before liturgical worship of God.   Literally, this is “let nothing be put before the work of God”, but ‘opera Dei‘ here means ‘liturgy’, which includes Mass and the public recitation of the Office, especially.  Let nothing have precedence over worship even other great earthly matters are pressing.  That was taken literally: when it was time to pray the office, monks were to stop what they were doing and, immediately, go to pray.  They subsequently returned to their tasks and their tasks were consequently themselves transformed by what they did.

Benedict spoke about this very phrase “Nihil operi Dei praeponitur” back in 2013 during his final encounter with priests of the Diocese of Rome, when he made the point that Vatican II also started with liturgy.  He made that very point again in his first preface to the Omnia Opera liturgy volume.  He clarified even then that, although this rock solid, pivotal principle rises from a monastic context, it nevertheless is a necessary guideline for the rest of the Church.  The monastic life provides a guiding force for the life of the active Church.

Back to Benedict and The Russian Preface™.  My translation (with my emphases):

Nihil Operi Dei praeponitur – Let nothing be put before the Work of God. With these words St. Benedict, in his Rule (43.3), established the absolute priority of divine Worship in respect to every other duty of monastic life. This, even though it is in monastic life, was now immediately to be assumed because, for monks, an essential duty was also in agricultural work and in learning [scienza]. In agriculture, just as in craftsmanship, and in the work of formation there could certainly be temporal exigencies that could appear to be more important than liturgy. In the face of this, Benedict, with the priority assigned to liturgy, unequivocally underscored the priority of God Himself in our life: “As soon as the signal for the time of the divine office is heard, let everyone, leaving whatever he hath in his hands, hasten with all speed, yet with gravity” (43:1).

Things of God, and with them the liturgy, do not appear to be at all essential [urgenti] in the consciousness of the men of today. There is an urgency for every possible matter. The issue of God does not ever seem to be pressing.  Now, one could affirm that, in any case, monastic life is something different from the life of the men in the world, and this is unquestionably true.  Nevertheless, the priority of God, which we have forgotten, is important for everyone. If God isn’t important anymore, the criteria for establishing that which is important are shifted. Man, in setting God aside, submits himself to constraints that make him the slave of material forces and that are thus opposed to his dignity.

In the years following the Second Vatican Council, I became aware once again of the priority of God and of the divine liturgy. The misinterpretation of the liturgical reform that was widely diffused in the Catholic Church led to putting in the first place more and more the aspect of instruction and of one’s own activity and creativity. Man’s “doing” almost led to forgetting God’s presence. In this kind of situation, it becomes ever clearer that the Church’s existence lives from the proper celebration of the liturgy and that the church is in danger when the primacy of God no longer appears in the liturgy and, therefore, in life. The most profound cause of the crisis , which has disturbed (sconvolto – “upset, shocked, ‘freaked out'”) the Church, rests in the obscuring of the priority of God in the liturgy.  All of this brought me to dedicate myself more extensively than in the past to the theme of the liturgy because I knew that the true renewal of the liturgy is the fundamental condition for the renewal of the Church. The writings that are collected in the present volume XI of the Opera Omnia were born on the basis of this conviction.  But, in the final analysis, even with all the differences, the essence of the liturgy in the East and in the West is one and the same.  And so I hope that this book can help also the Christians of Russia to grasp in a new and better way the great gift that is given to us in the Sacred Liturgy.

Vatican City
Feast of St. Benedict
11 July 2015

Benedict identifies the problem we face as a Church.  The Church’s identity has been “freaked out”, as it were, by the upheaval caused by the damage done to our sacred liturgical worship.

And now we are in a “situazione … situation”, as he put it, a typically Ratzingerian understatement.  I wonder what German word he chose: Zustand?  Lage?  In any event, his calm words ring with an urgent call to action: “Rome, we have a ‘situation’.”

Didn’t Card. Sarah make this same point recently in his address to the conference in Germany for the 10th anniversary of Benedict’s Summorum Pontificum?   Yes, he did.  He spoke of “devastation”.  The usual libs had a nutty right on schedule.

For years I hammered away at my conviction that Benedict has laid out, especially in Summorum Pontificum and his own ars celebrandi, a kind of “Marshall Plan” for the Church.  You long-time readers here will remember this, but it has been a while since I’ve presented it.

Here it is again:

After World War II many regions of Europe were devastated, especially its large cities and manufacturing.  These USA helped rebuild Europe through the Marshall Plan so as to foster good trading partners and, through prosperity, stand as a bulwark against Communism.

After Vatican II many spheres of the Church were devastated, especially its liturgical and catechetical life. We need a Plan to rebuild our Catholic identity so that we can stand, for ourselves as members of the Church and in the public square for the good of society, as a bulwark – indeed a remedy – against the dictatorship of relativism.

NB: In his brief preface, above, Benedict says that if God is obscured, then our criteria for what is important shifts.  Relativism dominates us.  Where is our most regular and obvious, strengthening and informing meeting and attention with God?  Liturgy.  With out this constant formation and transformation, we have no idea who we are or what is important.

If we don’t know who we are as Catholics, if we don’t know what we believe or pray as Catholics, then the world has no reason to listen to anything we have to say as Catholics.  We will fragment into little self-enclosed groups, islands.  Enervated and drifting, we will be all the more easily driven from the public square by the enemies of objective truth, goodness and beauty.

I have been saying for years that, for any revitalization of our Catholic identity to be successful, we must renew our liturgical worship of God.

We need action in every other sphere as well, but … but… without a renewed sacred liturgical worship, nothing else will stand.  Everything else we do is inexorably tied to our encounter with the transcendent in worship.

Therefore, we must not give preference to any activity in the Church over our sacred liturgical worship.  This is a sine qua non existential priority.

Contrary to the notions of most liberals and progressivists, “the Catholic thing” did not begin in the 1960s.  Hence, I believe that Summorum Pontificum is a key to Benedict’s vision, his “Marshall Plan” as I call it.

His new Russian preface bears out exactly what I have been saying for years and it reaffirms me in my work.

HENCE….

We must work for the prudent and yet energetic application of Summorum Pontificum as far and as widely as possible.

Never be discouraged.

My recommendations follow:

1) Work with sweat and money to make it happen. If you thought you worked hard before?   Been at this a long time?  HAH!  Get to work!  “Oooo! It’s tooo haaard!”  BOO HOO!

2) Get involved with all the works of charity that your parishes or groups sponsor. Make a strong showing. Make your presence known. If Pope Francis wants a Church for the poor, then we respond, “OORAH!!” The “traditionalist” will be second-to-none in getting involved.  “Dear Father… you can count on the ‘Stable TLM Group” to help with the collection of clothing for the poor!  Tell us what you need!”

3) Pray and fast and give alms. Think you have been doing that? HAH!  Think again.  If you love, you can do more.

4) Form up and get organized.  You can do this.  Find like minded people and get that request for the implementation of Summorum Pontificum together, how you will raise the money to help buy the stuff the parish will need and DO IT.  Make a plan. Find people. Execute!

5) Get your ego and your own petty little personal interpretations and preferences of how Father ought to wiggle his pinky at the third word out of the way.  It is team-work time.  If we don’t sacrifice individually, we will stay divided and we won’t achieve our objectives.

6) Fathers… MAN UP.   Get informed.  LEARN YOUR RITE!   Educate.

7) Don’t whine and blame others.

8) When you get what you want… DON’T REST.

As I have previously posted Pope Benedict gave you, boys and girls, a beautiful new bicycle!  He gave you a direction, some encouragement, a snow cone, and a running push.  Now, take off the training wheels and RIDE THE DAMN BIKE!

Posted in Benedict XVI, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Pope of Christian Unity, SESSIUNCULA, The future and our choices, Turn Towards The Lord | Tagged , , , ,
9 Comments

D. Madison – Sacred Triduum PHOTOS

The Tridentine Mass Society of the Diocese of Madison is working for the New Evangelization.    We are dedicated to helping the diocese and parishes in their revitalization of our sacred liturgical worship.

Here are some pics from the parish’s Sacred Triduum celebrated at St. Mary’s in Pine Bluff in the Extraordinary Form.

Holy Thursday

My friend Fr. Charles Johnson, USN did the honors.  We were blessed also to have Fr. Christopher Young form Davenport as Subdeacon.

17_04_13_SMPB_HThurs_01 17_04_13_SMPB_HThurs_02  17_04_13_SMPB_HThurs_07 17_04_13_SMPB_HThurs_08

Good Friday

17_04_14_SMPB_GFriday_01 17_04_14_SMPB_GFriday_02 17_04_14_SMPB_GFriday_03 17_04_14_SMPB_GFriday_05 17_04_14_SMPB_GFriday_06 17_04_14_SMPB_GFriday_07

Vigil of Easter

17_04_15_SMPB_Vigil_01

17_04_15_SMPB_Vigil_02

17_04_15_SMPB_Vigil_03

17_04_15_SMPB_Vigil_03

17_04_15_SMPB_Vigil_04 17_04_15_SMPB_Vigil_05 17_04_15_SMPB_Vigil_06 17_04_15_SMPB_Vigil_07 17_04_15_SMPB_Vigil_08 17_04_15_SMPB_Vigil_09 17_04_15_SMPB_Vigil_10 17_04_15_SMPB_Vigil_11   17_04_15_SMPB_Vigil_14

17_04_15_SMPB_Vigil_21

17_04_15_SMPB_Vigil_16

 

17_04_15_SMPB_Vigil_12

17_04_15_SMPB_Vigil_13

Easter Sunday

17_04_16_SMPB_EasterSunday_01 17_04_16_SMPB_EasterSunday_02

17_04_16_SMPB_EasterSunday_06

17_04_16_SMPB_EasterSunday_05

17_04_16_SMPB_EasterSunday_04   17_04_16_SMPB_EasterSunday_07

Posted in ¡Hagan lío!, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, New Evangelization, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, The future and our choices | Tagged
14 Comments

Your Easter Vigil and Easter Sunday Sermon Notes

Was there a good point made in the sermons you heard for the Vigil of Easter?

Was there a good point made in the sermon you heard for your Easter Sunday Mass of obligation?

Let us know!

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
19 Comments

VIDEO: Her Triumph

The wonderful Benedictine Nuns in Missouri, the Benedictines of Mary, Queen of Apostles sent me a note about a video they have for the centenary of the apparitions of Our Lady of Fatima.

The video features a cut from their disc which you have heard in some of my podcasts.

US HERE – UK HERE

Please visit their site: HERE

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged ,
Comments Off on VIDEO: Her Triumph

Good Friday 3 April AD 33 – Eclipses as Christ died on the Cross

This is definitely worth reposting.

The fellow who made the video about the Star of Bethlehem (a compelling argument, I might add), also did some research about what happened in the heavens on Good Friday.

Let’s break it down.

Passover begins on the 14th day of the Jewish lunar month of Nisan. Moreover, Passover begins at twilight, dividing 14 Nisan and 15 Nissan. The Gospels say the Lord was crucified on Preparation Day, a Friday.  14 Nisan 14 fell on a Friday Preparation Day, twice: 7 April AD 30 and 3 April AD 33.  Daniel in 444 BC prophesied (Daniel 9:21–26) that the Anointed one would be cut off in 476 years after the decree to rebuild Jerusalem: AD 33.

The Bible records that, at the time of the crucifixion and death of the Lord, there were signs, including a “blood moon” or lunar eclipse.

Only one Passover lunar eclipse was visible from Jerusalem while Pilate was in office. It occurred on 3 April 33.

On 3 April the Moon rose already in eclipse.  It rose the color of blood.  That means that the eclipse began before it rose, in the constellation of the Virgin (at the time of Christ’s birth there was a New Moon, in the constellation of the Virgin).

The eclipse started at 3 pm when Christ was breathing His last.

But remember that a lunar eclipse is a syzygy!

If there is an eclipse in one direction there is an eclipse in the other direction too.

If you were standing on the Moon during that syzygy of 3 April 33, you would see a total eclipse of the Sun.

The blotted Sun would be in the heart of the constellation of the Ram (cf. “the Lamb who was slain”).

You can try this out for yourselves.  Go to the online astronomy aid Starry Night.  HERE

Move your location to Jerusalem and then plug in the time of about 7 pm and date 3 April 33 and adjust your view to ESE.  You will see the Moon has just risen and there is a label for your Earth’s shadow.  The Moon had risen at about 6:30 pm in the totality of the eclipse. HERE

15_04_03_eclipse_Crucifixion_01

Click

With the daylight turned off, and the horizon removed, and then looking at an angle down through the Earth below the horizon, at 3 pm, you see the Moon and Earth’s shadow converging in Virgo.

15_04_03_eclipse_Crucifixion_02

Then you can switch to the view from the Moon!

You must adjust your view a little and turn yourself right with a few clicks.  But you will find it.  In the screenshot, below, you can see where Earth and Sun are in Aries. Since the Earth would be larger in the Moon’s sky than in this screenshot, the Sun would be in total eclipse.  Adjust for UTC + 3 hours to the right time in Jerusalem from 1500 to 1800. HERE

15_04_03_eclipse_Crucifixion_03

Click

In read around the question a little more, I find that, using different date calculators, there are some problems of the day of the week.  Also, there are arguments for dating the Crucifixion to 1 April 33.  If that is the case, then the phenomena described above occur on Easter Sunday.  Much hinges on which calendar the Lord and His disciples were using for their own Passover meal, if the last Supper was a Passover meal (Joseph Ratzinger argued that it was a related sacrificial meal but not a seder.)

Definitive?  Not quite.  But it is not to be discounted that God, from all Eternity knowing exactly what would happen, set the heaven’s in motion in so precise a way that its signs would help us to understand the mysteries taking place, which were in other ways foreshadowed.   In the sacraments (a term interchangable with “mystery” in many contexts), visible signs help us to understand that insensible graces and transformations are taking place.  If in the signs of the sacraments, why not too signs in the heavens?

Posted in Classic Posts, Just Too Cool, Linking Back | Tagged ,
12 Comments