Your EASTER Sunday Sermon Notes

I am sure that ALL of you heard Mass for Easter.

Was there a good point or two in the sermon you heard?

(Don’t you dare try to contribute bad points.  Really.)

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
33 Comments

Waaaaay beyond “Just Too Cool”

I have been a fan of Archbp. Carlson of St. Louis ever since he did something for me in St. Paul and Minneapolis that I will never forget. Here’s another great reason…

That said… some boys who are ill want to be like a sports hero or like Batman. This kid…

From St Louis Review:

Make-A-Wish requests often involve meeting athletes, attending sporting events or traveling to amusement parks or beaches.

When it came time for 11-year-old Brett Haubrich of south St. Louis County to make his wish, he not only listed none of those things but had no request at all.

“He didn’t want anything,” explained his mother, Eileen. “They had to keep asking him, ‘What would you like to do? Do you want to meet anybody? What do you want to be when you grow up?'”

The answer to the last question became part of his wish — what Make-A-Wish calls “wish enhancement” to complement the main wish. The sixth-grader at St. Mark School wants to be a priest, a doctor or an engineer, in that order.

Priest was No. 1

“I said, ‘I really want to be a priest,‘” he said. [God bless this boy.  I hope his wish will resound through the internet and take root in the hearts of young men who are sound and strong!  It is precisely in this sort of ground that vocations spring and we believe in intermediary causes.]

So, on Holy Thursday, at the invitation of Archbishop Robert J. Carlson, Brett took his place beside the altar at Cathedral Basilica of St. Louis as “Priest For a Day.”

Brett served not one but two Masses — the Chrism Mass and the Evening Mass of the Lord’s Supper — and held the book for Archbishop Carlson for prayers after the homilies. He also joined Archbishop Carlson for two meals; a luncheon with archdiocesan priests and deacons after the Chrism Mass and a dinner with seminarians at the archbishop’s residence before the evening Mass. [What a great thing to read.]

Best of all, he wore a collar provided by a seminarian from Kenrick-Glennon and at the evening Mass was with 11 seminarians having their feet washed by Archbishop Carlson. His parents also had a role in the evening Mass, bringing up the gifts of bread and wine.

As for his favorite part of the entire day, Brett was unequivocal in his answer.

“The whole thing,” he said as he waited for his dad, Conrad, near the Cathedral Basilica sanctuary with his mom and older sister Olivia after the Chrism Mass. “It was really neat for them to let me do this stuff.”

And cool, too — a term he used often in describing the day.

“Just a really cool experience,” he said.

His actual wish is cool, too.

“Eating mangoes on a beach,” his mother said.

That trip will come later. His “priest-for-a-day” request for the interim didn’t surprise his family.  [Here’s the deal.  His “actual” wish seems in some ways less real than the “real” wish.  Sacramental reality is not less real than what we experience with our senses.  Mangos on a beach?  Wonderful.  But being close to the altar like that … priceless.]

“For years, he has loved the Mass and been religious,” said Eileen Haubrich, a graduate of Notre Dame High School. “He has such a good heart. He’s a very caring boy.”

The second of Eileen and Conrad’s four children and oldest of two sons, Brett has served at his school church and at his parish, St. Martin of Tours, which is visible from the back door of his house only a short walk away.

He digs the smell of incense burning in the thurible at Mass, enjoys confession and likes “communion, and the songs, too.”

Communion — the Eucharist, the living presence of Jesus Christ — stands out.

“I like receiving the Body and the Blood,” he said, simply

Brett and his family told several priests about his plan, and they offered several options – like shadowing one, spending the night at a rectory with his dad or serving a Saturday morning Mass at the New Cathedral.

The latter request was made of Father Nick Smith, the Master of Ceremonies at the Cathedral Basilica. His initial response was “no way,” followed quickly by “we can do way better than that.”

Sure enough, they did.

“I said, ‘Why don’t we have him come down for Holy Thursday? He can serve the Chrism Mass — it’s a Mass for priests — and that night mass is always about the Eucharist,'” Father Smith said, repeating the two main aspects of the Masses that fit Brett. “Priests and Eucharist.”

Archbishop Carlson also played a big role. He actually was with Father Smith in the Cathedral sacristy getting ready for his Lenten reflection during Father Smith’s initial phone call about Brett.

“It just so happened he was standing right next to me,” said Father Smith, describing Archbishop Carlson as “very excited. He was throwing out ideas right and left, ‘Let’s do this, let’s do that.'” [Yep.  That’s Archbp. C.]

Archbishop Carlson came up with ideas of the seminarians dinner and of the foot washing.

“He said, ‘Put him in there; we’ll wash his foot,'” Father Smith said, with a laugh. “Before you knew it, it turned into a whole day.”

Father Smith prepared an itinerary for Brett’s day and delivered it in person along with a letter signed by Archbishop Carlson asking for Brett’s help at the Masses.

“I handed it to him, and when he got to the first line, ‘I’m making you a priest for a day,’ his eyes got as big as half-dollars,” Father Smith said.

The letter surprised Brett, who admitted to being a little nervous heading into Holy Thursday.

But the events went off like clockwork. Wearing the collar, Brett processed down the center aisle at the New Cathedral with priests, deacons and seminarians at the Chrism Mass — at which Archbishop Carlson blessed the oils to be used throughout the archdiocese for sacraments for the next year — and took his spot near the altar.

He performed flawlessly.

“He did pretty well,” Archbishop Carlson said.

Kudos.

Posted in Fr. Z KUDOS, Just Too Cool, Priests and Priesthood | Tagged , ,
35 Comments

Wherein Fr. Z sends his readers to Crux… yes… you read that right.

My friend the nearly ubiquitous John L. Allen, Jr, formerly of the Fishwrap and now with the Boston Globe, at the site of his new project Crux has a fun column.

I don’t get to say “fun” about Crux very often, which increases the fun.  HERE

He writes, inter alia, about baseball.   He cites the undersigned, which increased the fun.

I am not going to tell you what he wrote.

But it’s fun.

(Hint: It involves a Pope, some Latin, tobacco and – another fun topic – excommunication!)

And pray for John.  He’s a Yankees fan… which no one deserves.

 

 

Posted in CRUX WATCH, Lighter fare | Tagged
19 Comments

Happy Easter!

I am receiving lots of notes in email wishing me Happy Easter.  Thank you!

I have also had a few through snail mail.   Yesterday one came that made me jealous of the sender’s penmanship. It was one of my desires to improve my deteriorating penmanship.

Happy Easter!

The included handmade card had the text of the Victimae paschali laudes.

Happy Easter!

A nice gesture from someone who clearly loves this beautiful feast!

Posted in Just Too Cool |
8 Comments

URGENT PRAYER REQUEST

Please, in your goodness, say a prayer for a priest who is under some stress.  He has a tough meeting coming up.

Posted in Mail from priests, PRAYER REQUEST, Priests and Priesthood, Urgent Prayer Requests |
20 Comments

INTERNET PRAYER: ILOCO

A long time ago, I wrote a prayer for people to use before they got online and used the internet. Originally composed in Latin, it has been translated into many languages (sometimes more than once).

My page with all the translations I have received is HERE.

You can always find it by going to the list of Pages at the bottom of this blog.

I often forget to pray before using the internet. I sometimes fail in charity when using it. This tool of social communication and research and entertainment has amazing upsides, but it also has spiritually deadly perils. We all should be very careful in how we use it – and through it – use each other, “use” in the finer sense of “treat” each other.

It has been a while since I have received a new language version, so I am pretty chuffed today.

I welcome new language versions, especially when they have received some kind of local official approval.

Here is the newest version in ….

Iloco / Ilocano, the 3rd most spoken language in The Philippines

Mannakabalin amin ken agnanayon a Dios, a namarsua kadakam a kaarngi ti imahenmo ken nangibaon kadakam a sapulenmi amin ti kinaimbag, kinapudno ken kinapintas, nangnangruna ti nailangitan a persona ti Kakaisuna a Naitao nga Anakmo, ti Apomi a Hesukristo, yetnagmo, dawatenmi Kenka, babaen ti panangibabaet ni San Isidro, Obispo ken Doktor, a bayat ti panagdaliasatmi iti las-ud ti internet, ta maiturongmi dagiti ima ken matami kadagiti bambanag a makaay-ayo Kenka ken makatunosanmi babaen iti ayat ken anos amin a parsua a masabatmi. Babaen ken Kristo nga Apomi. Amen.

Alas, the person did not send the title or an audio recording.

Posted in Just Too Cool, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , ,
6 Comments

34K black churches (NBCI) cut ties with, denounce Presbyterian ‘c’hurch USA over same-sex “marriage”

Fr. Z kudos to the 34K.

From Lifesite with my emphases and comments:

34,000 black churches cut ties with the Presbyterian Church USA after it backed same-sex ‘marriage’

April 2, 2015 (LifeSiteNews.com) – The National Black Church Initiative (NBCI) – a coalition of 34,000 black churches from 15 denominations representing almost 16 million black Americans – has cut all ties with the Presbyterian Church USA (PCUSA) [PC- USA… ironic] after the denomination voted to embrace same-sex “marriage.”

The PCUSA voted last June to jettison the traditional definition of marriage as a sacred union between one man and one woman. Instead, its Book of Order now defines marriage as a union “between two people,” with no mention of biological sex. At the same time, the PCUSA voted to allow its pastors to officiate at homosexual “weddings” in states where they have been made legal.

These controversial decisions came just three years after a 2011 vote allowing homosexuals who are openly sexually active to be ordained as PCUSA pastors.  [What a sham.]

The marriage votes were apparently the last straw for the NBCI, which released a prophetic statement, condemning the PCUSA and calling the denomination’s redefinition of marriage a “universal sin” that placed the church’s teachings well outside Christ’s message.

“NBCI and its membership base are simply standing on the Word of God within the mind of Christ,” said Rev. Anthony Evans, the president of NBCI. “We urge our brothers and sisters of the PCUSA to repent and be restored to fellowship.”

“PCUSA’s manipulation represents a universal sin against the entire church and its members,” Evans added. “With this action, PCUSA can no longer base its teachings on 2,000 years of Christian scripture and tradition, and call itself a Christian entity in the body of Christ. It has forsaken its right by this single wrong act.” [I like this language!]

“Apostle Paul warns us about this when he declared in Galatians 1:8 that there are those who will preach another Gospel,” Evans continued.

“No church has the right to change the Word of God,” [Which is why I hope all these zealous people will soon become the Catholics they were intended to be!] Evans said. “By voting to redefine marriage PCUSA automatically forfeits Christ’s saving grace.”

“There is always redemption in the body of Christ through confession of faith and adhering to Holy Scripture,” he added. [And, I hope one day, formal membership in the Body of Christ, the Church that Christ founded.]

Still, Evans called on faithful Christians to show the PCUSA tough love by refusing to associate with the denomination until it changes its ways.

“In this case, PCUSA deliberately voted to change the Word of God and the interpretation of holy marriage between one man and one woman,” Evans said. “This is why we must break fellowship with them and urge the entire Christendom to do so as well.” [Well done!  Someone should send that letter to every member of the Synod on the Family coming up in October…. “holy marriage between one man and one woman”.  That’s it.]

Posted in One Man & One Woman | Tagged , , , ,
19 Comments

ASK FATHER: Dressing up for confession

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

A blessed Holy Week to you! I just had a question about proper attire for confession. We hear a lot about attire for Mass, rightly so, but I’m wondering if we should dress up for other sacraments, like confession? I understand that a lot of times people are in a rush when going to confession and may be coming from work, school, etc. Do you think it is wrong to wear jeans or casual clothing?

Is it wrong to go to confession in your … dungarees?  No.

Is it right to dress better to go to confession?  Yes.

If we were about to be baptized, confirmed, given 1st Communion, married, ordained, … let’s leave aside anointed … you would dress in a fitting way.

Sacraments are great mysteries.  They are encounters with Mystery itself.

What a great mystery it is that when we confess our sins and receive Christ’s absolution from the alter Christus our sins are taken away, washed clean in the Blood of the Lamb.

GO TO CONFESSION!

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, GO TO CONFESSION, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , , , ,
11 Comments

ASK FATHER: More than one Paschal Candle at a Vigil for parish cluster

paschal_candle_01From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

I am a parish priest in a cluster of three parishes. We are celebrating the Easter Vigil at the largest church. The smaller two churches (full parishes in their own rite)will have Mass on Easter Sunday. Do you know of any rite or accommodation for blessing the paschal candles and/or baptismal font and/or Easter Holy water at the smaller two parishes?

Whew.  Tough one.

I am sure this problem came up in the days when a priest might have more than one parish as a benefice, but in those days, too, there were a lot more priests.  I suppose they just did without or they set up another candle that had been blessed.

I don’t remember reading any official directive about what to do in this case, although it must be happening a lot these days, given the way parishes are being collapsed.  Hopefully, someone with experience can chime in with something official (if it exists).

That said, the rites foresee one candle.  I can’t see a way to prepare and bless multiple candles in the Easter Vigil.  That just doesn’t seem right.  The singularity of that candle at that moment shouldn’t be blurred.

However, I think it was – in the day – possible to have more than more candle in a church for Masses celebrated at side altars.  In that case the candles would have had to have been prepared separately, but not during the Easter Vigil itself, when only one candle would be prepared and blessed.

Ideal?  No, but clustering parishes isn’t ideal.  Not having enough priests isn’t ideal.

I would prepare three candles, but only bless one at the Vigil.  The other two I would simply set up for Easter in the other places.  So, that’s how I would handle it, salvo meliore iudicio. 

For the Easter Water, I would bless a LOT of it and take some to the other parishes.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , ,
4 Comments

The Death of the Lord and the hour of the slaying of the lambs

Important reminder at the very end!

One line of argument that has arisen around the date of the Lord’s Death on the Cross, which seems to have been on the Friday of Preparation before the Sabbath of Passover in AD 33, is that the Lord was being crucified at the same time that the lambs were being slain in the Temple.  That would make sense, since He is the true Paschal Lamb who brings to fulfillment all the types and foreshadowing of the mysterious things to come.

However, there are problems with that line of though, since it makes the timing of the Last Supper, the Lord’s Passion, and his Death difficult to reconcile with the Passover practices, when the lambs – a lot of lambs – were to be slain.  The lambs had to be slain before the Hallel Psalms had been sung through. HERE  If this were the case, then, in the silence of the ancient world, it might have been possible for the Lord and those on Golgotha to hear the singing of the priests and and screaming of the dying lambs.

But there are some timing problems.

Here is one proposal which I picked up via True Anglican and Evidence Unseen.  How do we reconcile the calculation of time in the different accounts, Synoptic v John?  This clever and, because it saves the coincidence of the slaughtering of the lambs with the Crucifixion, I like it best!

Of course the thorny question of the year this all happened comes in.  If you use different Jewish to civil calendar calculators and day of the week calculators you get varying results. Still,  let’s have a look:

OPTION #4: There were two calendars for the Pharisees and the Sadducees.

We hold to this final view. It states that the Jews celebrated the Passover on two consecutive days. Hoehner writes, “The Pharisees celebrated the Passover immediately (Nisan 13/14) while the Sadducees waited until the usual time (i.e., Nisan 14/15).” Jesus celebrated the Passover on Thursday night according to the Pharisaic calendar, which is in line with the Synoptics. But John was going off of the Sadducean calendar, when he wrote his gospel, because he was focusing on Jesus’ enemies.  [Interesting.]

Since there were so many people to feed, it would be virtually impossible for the priests to sacrifice enough lambs in a 24 hour period. Josephus estimates that about a quarter million lambs were slaughtered during the Passover. Modern historians believe that Josephus was clearly exaggerating these numbers. It would be difficult for an army with guns and grenades to kill that many sheep, let alone a group of priests! However, modern historians estimate that anywhere from 150,000 to 500,000 people were in Jerusalem during Passover. This would be a massive amount of people to feed with the sacrificed sheep.

By spreading this out over two days, this would help the priests perform the sacrifices. Thus Hoehner explains, “There arose the custom where the Galileans slew their lambs on Nisan 13, and the Feast of Unleavened Bread lasted eight days whereas the Judeans celebrated on Nisan 14.” Hoehner also argues that the Galileans/Pharisees could have used a different way of reckoning the day from the Judeans/Sadducees. He writes, “It is thought that the Galileans used a different method of reckoning the Passover than the Judeans. The Galileans and Pharisees used the sunrise-to-sunrise reckoning whereas the Judeans and Sadducees used the sunset-to-sunset reckoning.” We can express these two groups succinctly:

The Galilean Jews reckoned the day from sunrise-to-sunrise: This made the Last Supper a Passover meal. They had the Paschal lamb slaughtered in the afternoon on Thursday, [?] Nisan 14. Carson writes, “The slaughter normally took place between 3.00 p.m. and 5.00 p.m. on 14 Nisan, falling on a Thursday in the year in question; Passover itself began about 6.00 p.m. on the same Thursday, the beginning of 15 Nisan.” [How does this line up with the astronomy of the other post?]

The Judean Jews reckoned the day from sunset-to-sunset: They would not have considered the Last Supper a Passover meal. They had their Paschal lamb slaughtered on Friday afternoon, Nisan 15. Under this calendar system, Jesus was eating the Passover meal, when his enemies were conspiring to arrest him. In fact, they arrested him the night before.

The corporate sacrifice of a burnt offering for the nation was done at 3 pm on Passover, according to the Judean calendar. This means that when the priest was slaying the Paschal lamb, Jesus was at that very moment yelling “tetelestai” [“It is finished.”] from the Cross! John must have been calling attention to this fact by focusing on the Sadducean calendar.

In any event, regardless of the exact year, or the astronomy of the day, this is something you can be sure about.

Sacramental reality is no less real than what you experience by your senses.

In the sacred liturgical action of the Triduum rites, you are made present to Mystery and Mystery to you.  You experience in a sacramental way the renewed events of the Passion and Death of the Lord.  You are there and they are with you in way that is real, more real than our historical conjuring.

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , ,
6 Comments