Was there a good point you heard in the sermon for your Sunday Mass of precept?
Let us know what it was.
Was there a good point you heard in the sermon for your Sunday Mass of precept?
Let us know what it was.

Fr. Z's Pyx
From a reader…
I work at a religious supply store and yesterday a local religious sister came in and asked to be shown our selection of pyxes. I led her to the cabinet where they are kept and indicated that some of them are lined with plastic and therefore not actually appropriate for transportation of the Sacred Species. She responded that the metal pyxes are too expensive and expressed a desire to see if the pyxes fit the hosts her parish uses. [You can sense that disaster is about to strike… right?] She then removed a pyx from her pocket, and began placing hosts into one of the plastic-lined pyxes. I asked her if these were consecrated, she replied that they were. I knelt. I was confused, had no idea what to do. The first thing I said was that I didn’t think I could sell the pyx anymore since it had touched the Blessed Sacrament. [Good thinking. You’re mind is on the right track.] However, she said that she would have to just take it then. I went to the counter and waited for her to check out while she proceeded to have a leisurely conversation with a priest who was also in the store at the time. When she finished I sold her the pyx and a few other items with as little speech as possible in deference to the Holy Presence.
My question to you, Father, is what should I do now? Should this irreverence be reported to her pastor or the bishop?
Just when you think you’ve heard everything.
Definitely, the pastor and/or the bishop should be contacted.
This would not quite rise to the level of a violation of the Blessed Sacrament spoken of in can. 1367, but is absolutely inappropriate to do, especially for someone (a religious sister, no less) with any sort of official position within the Church.
There are going to be unavoidable occasions when someone carrying the Blessed Sacrament has to stop for some business other than taking the Eucharist directly to the communicant. Stopping because of an accident is about all that comes to mind. But “testing out” new pyxes?!? Chatting with another customers, priest or not?!?
If one is concerned about the size of a pyx, unconsecrated hosts work just as well, BETTER as a matter of fact, because with them you are not committing the sin of sacrilege and scandalizing people!
And DO IT ON YOUR OWN TIME!
Grrrrrrrrrrr.
I contacted a couple of trusted people about this to get their reactions… to double-check myself….
A priest wrote:
I would counsel the clerk to speak with the pastor of the parish to register his dismay. He should be ready to be told “Thanks” or “What’s your problem?” This highlights the absolute horror that the use of extraordinary ministers of Holy Communion has brought upon the Church. The Holy Eucharist is treated as a commodity by ill-trained and ignorant people. This innovation has been found wanting, and needs to be abolished.
This reveals a serious deficit in training of many extraordinary ministers. And even if it is an isolated case, repetita iuvant. Repeated things help. The more something is important, the more something should should be stressed. The more sacred (or dangerous) the action, the greater the need for training. Handling that which is sacred is dangerous, tremendum.
From BBC:
Priests and nun kidnapped in Cameroon
Two Italian priests and a Canadian nun have been kidnapped by unidentified gunmen in Cameroon, Italy’s foreign ministry and media reports say. [Lemme guess… could they be…. Mormon missionaries? Quakers?]
Gunmen ransacked the building in the north-west of the country before taking the hostages, Italy’s Ansa agency said.
The area is close to a stronghold of militant Nigerian group Boko Haram.
The attack comes three months after a French priest was released after being kidnapped by Boko Haram in the same region and held in Nigeria.
The latest attack took place in the district of Maroua in the early hours of Saturday morning.
The gunmen were reported to have arrived by car before entering the building where the priests and the nun were staying at around 02:00 local time (01:00 GMT).
The two priests were from the Vicenza region of Italy, the Italian foreign ministry reported.
It says it has set up a crisis unit to work for their release.
One of the priests had been in Cameroon for more than six years, while the other had arrived about a year ago, Italian media reported.
Last year, seven members of a French family called Moulin-Fournier – four of them children – were abducted by Boko Haram in northern Cameroon and held hostage for two months.
From ANSA: Non si esclude che i sequestratori siano terroristi islamici di Boko Haram, attivi nel nord della Nigeria, che hanno sconfinato in Camerun.
I’m guessing either Islamic terrorists or … well… maybe they refused to criticize Mozilla Firefox fast enough? Either way, I guessing terrorists.
Sts. Nunilo and Alodia pray for us.
From this Sunday, traditionally called 1st Sunday of the Passion, it is customary to veil images in churches.
What is going on where you are?
This is a fine old tradition. It has to do with deprivation of the senses and the liturgical dying of the Church in preparation for the Lord’s tomb and resurrection.
We are our rites.
QUAERITUR:
Father, I receive communion on the tongue while kneeling. Recently, a priest has begun to make an issue that while I am already in the position for communion with my mouth open and tongue out, he demands a verbal “amen.” He made a scene first when my son, 10, and then I, both went for communion. Is it a mortal sin not to say “amen”?
First, if the priest “made a scene”, he should not have “made a scene”. On the other hand, I am wondering if he did “make a scene”. This has the feeling of exaggeration brought on by frustration, embarrassment, conflict, take your pick.
That said, in the Extraordinary Form the priest says , “Corpus Domini nostri Jesu Christi custodiat animam tuam in vitam aeternam. Amen.” The priest says “Amen”, not the communicant.
However, in the Ordinary Form of the the Roman Rite, the form of distribution of Communion is spoken by the minister says “Corpus Christi… The Body of Christ” and the communicant responds “Amen.”
The communicant responds, “Amen.”
Is it a mortal sin not to say “Amen”? Depending on the reason why you don’t (such as defiance), it could be.
So, if you are going to kneel and receive on the tongue, in the Ordinary Form, do your part and say, “Amen.”
It isn’t difficult and it is the right thing to do.
From a priest…
QUAERITUR:
I am a new priest. My pastor tells me that after the Good Friday
liturgy, he buries any leftover consecrated hosts, so that the
tabernacle is “fresh” for the “new beginning” of Easter. Is this a
legitimate practice? It seems suspicious.
This seems not just wrong, but very wrong, sacrilegiously wrong.
I consulted trusted canonists.
Were I in your position, I would contact your local bishop and ask him humbly if this practice constitutes a violation of:
Can. 1367 One who throws away the consecrated species or, for a sacrilegious purpose, takes them away or keeps them, incurs a latae sententiae excommunication reserved to the Apostolic See; a cleric, moreover, may be punished with some other penalty, not excluding dismissal from the clerical state.
Of course for any penalty to be incurred, the person committing the delict has to know that it is seriously wrong and then will to do it anyway.
The combox is closed. I will accept email from clerics on this matter.
Someone sent me this video and I just had to post it.
It must be an amazing moment for parents when babies say first clear words. I got a little shiver watching this, and thinking about how our minds work, reflections as they are of God. Our Lord, the Eternal Word, born into this world a speechless child had to learn His baby words.
In any event, apart from all the machinations within the Church and the conflicts and struggles and disappointments, this might provide a bright moment in the day. Mom’s reactions are as fun as the baby’s.
Do you know what your first words were?
This is from LifeSite
Illinois bishop upholds priest’s decision to deny Communion to pro-abort Sen. Dick Durbin
SPRINGFIELD, IL, April 3, 2014 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Bishop Thomas J. Paprocki of Springfield, Illinois, known for his outspoken defense of the right to life and the natural family, has signaled his support for denying Communion to Catholic politicians who publicly endorse activities gravely contrary to the moral law.
The bishop wrote recently to a pro-life activist to affirm that he is upholding a diocesan priest’s decision to deny Communion to U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin, D-IL, who has a 100% rating from NARAL Pro-Choice America and Planned Parenthood.
Paprocki’s e-mail was reported Thursday by Catholic commentator Matt Abbott.
“Senator Durbin was informed several years ago by his pastor at Blessed Sacrament Parish here in Springfield that he was not permitted to receive Holy Communion per canon 915 of the Code of Canon Law,” Paprocki wrote. “My predecessor upheld that decision and it remains in effect. It is my understanding that the senator is complying with that decision here in the Diocese of Springfield in Illinois.”
Canon 915 states that those who are “obstinately persevering in manifest grave sin are not to be admitted to Holy Communion.”
In placing the onus on ministers of Holy Communion, canon 915 is distinct from canon 916, which places the onus on the communicant to not approach for Communion if they are “conscious of grave sin.”
Canon 915 has been at the center of the dispute in recent years over how Church leaders should deal with the plethora of Catholic politicians who vote for pro-abortion and pro-homosexual legislation.
[…]
Read the rest there.
Bp. Paprocki is going to catch hell for this. The Fishwrap types are going to go entirely bananas.
Stop and say a prayer for him as the wolves begin to howl.
UPDATE 4 April:
Distinguished canonist Ed Peters comments on his blog In The Light Of the Law:
Today, normal is newsworthy. Really.
If we didn’t live in such morally chaotic, socially unravelling, ecclesially antinomian times, none of this would have been news.
As things are, though, many Catholic politicians do not know (or care) that advocacy of abortion is mortally sinful (CCC 2271-2273), let alone that persons in mortal sin should not approach for holy Communion (Canon 916). Many priests do not know (or wish to recall) that holy Communion is to be withheld from persons who obstinately persevere in manifestly and gravely sinful actions (Canon 915). And many bishops do not know (or want to accept) that they are bound to enforce ecclesiastical discipline in all respects, including the protection of the sacraments (Canon 392)—the most august of which is the Eucharist (Canon 897)—and are to protect the rights of their priests and see to it that they fulfill their duties (Canon 384).
Against this backdrop of confusion regarding so many basic aspects of moral order and Church law, no wonder that Bp. Paprocki’s reaffirmation of support for a pastor’s decision to withhold holy Communion from a notorious pro-abortion Catholic politician makes news.
Today, normal is newsworthy. Really.
QUAERITUR:
Would it be conceivable for one or more transitional deacons to request that their ordination to the priesthood be conferred with the Sacrament of Holy Orders according to the Extraordinary Form of the Roman Rite? Perhaps by allowing them to travel to an FSSP seminary or other community that regularly ordains priests using the 1962 books?
Yeeeeesssss… it is conceivable. I can conceive that such a thing could happen. I can in my wildest imagination conceive that a bishop might say “yes” to such a request.
As it stands, according to the prescriptions of Summorum Pontificum, bishops are not allowed to ordain in the Extraordinary Form of the Roman Rite unless for members of those institutes that have exclusive use of the older, traditional forms.
I am pretty sure that a diocesan bishop could, on his own, send his men to the FSSP for ordination. He could write the dimissorial letters and send them off. Of course the FSSP might not want to get involved in that. I suspect that Rome would tuck the fact away and have questions about it down the line. The next time the the bishop was in Rome for his ad limina visit, I’d bet it would come up. The FSSP superiors would also have to answer some questions. But… hey… it’s possible.
A bishop would have to request permission from the Pontifical Commission “Ecclesia Dei” to ordain with the old Roman Pontifical. I suspect that questions would immediately be fired back at him requesting clarifications and so forth.
There is an old principle that I learned from my old mentor and boss Card. Mayer: you can always ask, but then you have to be content with the answer.
Look. I was ordained a deacon by Card. Mayer, entirely in Latin, in a Roman basilica, with the Gregorian chant schola I directed singing the music, using spectacular precious vestments. I was ordained a priest by soon-to-be St. John Paul II, entirely in Latin, in St. Peter’s Basilica, jammed with people. Both times, Novus Ordo, of course. Would I have liked to have been ordained with the old books? Sure! That would have been great! Coolest. Rite. Ehvur! I would not, however, be any more a priest thereby. The priestly difference between a guy like me and an FSSP priest is precisely zero. I can also say the same about a buddy of mine who was ordained deacon by Bp. Gumbleton and priest by Archbp. Jadot!
That said, were I a transitional deacon I would be verrrrrrry hesitant to make such a request, unless I knew the bishop really well, and he knew me really well and we both were on the same page. Seriously. He doesn’t have to ordain me at all. Right?
There is also another principle, it is risky to ask a question unless you know what the answer is going to be in advance.