In praise of the cassock from an unexpected source

The cassock is the proper garb of the Roman priest.  It is true that conferences to bishops can determine other forms of garb for priests, such as the black suit and Roman or military collar (or in Italy also dark blue and gray), but the cassock remains the proper garb of the priest.

Since the Councils of Baltimore, in the USA, as in England, it was not the custom of Catholic priests to go about the world in the cassock.  They used the cassock at home and while engaged in their ministry, but at other times they were to wear, back in the day, the frock coat and some sort of clerical collar or neckcloth.  So, in the USA priests of a certain age have it pretty much drilled into them that the cassock is not proper “street attire”.

That seems to be changing.  The strictures of the Council of Baltimore don’t seem to apply anymore.  There aren’t a lot of frock coats around nowadays anyway, though I knew a priest who had one…. and wore it.  Younger priests today seem quite willing to use the cassock as street attire.  Times are a changin’

On that note, I read an interesting by our friends at Rorate, which I share with added emphases.

From what used to be, until 1991, the official daily of the Italian Communist Party, L’Unità, founded by Antonio Gramsci in 1924:

The Cassock
The Church has been for quite some time strenuously defending herself from a media-driven movement that has turned on the lights on the phenomenon of the erotic activities and aberrations of the clergy. And it is not only about the horrors of pedophilia, but also red-light feasts, orgies, and clandestine sorties of every kind. Abandoning the cassock and wearing civilian clothes, many priests have gone from the sacred onto the secular in no time. I ask a friend who writes for this paper, Father Filippo Di Giacomo, if it would not be more appropriate, for him and for his jolly colleagues, to renounce walking around in civilian clothes and go back to wearing the long habit of the priest. It would not be embarrassing to wear it, on the contrary, it would be a sign of respect for the Catholic community and would even have the power of eliminating any ambiguity. It is hard to recognize a priest from a fellow in a shirt: we are in the presence of a deception, at least at the semiotic level. My friend Di Giacomo should throw his “lay” habits out of the window and launch an appeal to all priests in the world that it be forbidden to wear anything except for two cassocks: one of wool for winter, and one of cotton for summer. This will certainly not deter the truly possessed from eros, but will keep at bay the profusion of numerous, small daily corruptions. It is said, in general that “l’abito non fa il monaco” [“the habit does not a monk make”], but it is not thus for the Church: the habit must make the monk. Catholicism, as other religions, lives off of symbols, of rites, of chastity, of foundational and unrenounceable values, of faithfulness to doctrine, of rigorous obedience to priestly rules. The cassock, at the simple sight, conveys to us all this: much spirit and little flesh. A priest who replaces his cassock with plains clothes gives up the spirit, as it were.

August 15, 2011 [Vincenzo Cerami]

Perhaps the Council for the New Evangelization could issue a statement about the cassock.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Just Too Cool, Lighter fare, Mail from priests, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices |
37 Comments

The most important thing I will ever write on this blog

This is the most important thing I will ever write on this blog. If I get nothing else through to any reader here, long-time visitor or new, I would want it to be this.

There is no sin that we little mortal humans can commit which is so bad that our infinite and loving God will not forgive us, provided that we are sorry for our sins and ask for God’s forgiveness.

The way that our Savior Himself desired that we confess our sins and receive forgiveness is through the sacrament He instituted while still with us on earth, the sacrament of penance/reconciliation.

When you confess all the mortal sins you are aware of to a priest confessor and he gives you absolution, those sins are gone, removed, taken away. They are no more. They are not just covered over. They are not just ignored. They are no more. The sin may have been horrible, as red as blood and scarlet. You may still have the burden of the memory and other scars from that sin. You may have a lot of penance to do because of that sin. You might need additional help or counseling. But when you receive sacramental absolution, you have been washed clean in the Blood of Christ, who died for your salvation and who forgives you through the person of the priest. When you receive absolution for your good, sincere confession, you have been forgiven. And you can know that you have been forgiven and not just have to guess or wonder or hope.

Everything we have been given by Christ through Holy Church aims at bringing as many people as possible to the happiness of heaven. Nothing else is more important than that goal.

You don’t have to live in the knowledge of your unforgiven sins. You can seek reconciliation. And when you obtain it, you don’t have to doubt it.

Since I posted about the visiting priests in Spain at WYD receiving from the local bishop the faculty to lift excommunications resulting from procuring an abortion I have been getting notes in my email from people who are filled with anxiety, afraid that they are in spiritual danger or that they have not been forgiven their past sin, sometimes many years in the past. A few people are really scared about this.

It is good to be scared about sins. A little fear is healthy and pushes us to get ourselves in order. A lot of fear, too much fear, is unhealthy and can paralyze us rather than motivate us. Sometimes lack of knowledge about something makes us more afraid than we have to be. Knowledge about the Church’s teachings and laws can not only spur us to a little anxious action, but can also put us at our ease, reassure us that we didn’t actually do wrong or incur a censure we were worried about. Knowledge helps.

That said, and that was the really important part for everyone, let’s turn back to that WYD issue about excommunication and abortion.

The 1983 Code of Canon Law for the Latin Church states in can. 1398 that there is a sanction, a penalty, a censure imposed on people who participate in the procuring of an abortion. Censures are intended to help people understand the spiritual danger they are in and seek a remedy, and also in the case of publicly known situations let other people know that there is something gravely wrong with the behavior that incurred the censure.

Excommunication is a censure that means a person cannot receive the sacraments, any sacrament, until there is reconciliation and a lifting of the excommunication by the ecclesiastical authority of the proper level. The person also cannot hold any ecclesial office while under such a censure. Some censures can be absolved by diocesan bishops or their delegates, some are reserved to the Holy See and must be absolved by the Holy Father, the Apostolic Penitentiary, or a confessor to whom the faculty to lift the censure has been given. Once the excommunication is absolved, then the person can also receive absolution for the sin which incurred the excommunication and any other sins besides.

There are those cases when the sin and the censure are not public knowledge (they are “occult” in the sense that they are not widely known and have not been formally declared) when a confessor (and by “confessor” I mean a priest who has faculties to receive sacramental confessions) can absolve a person from a censure for a period of time, while placing that person under the strict obligation to seek reconciliation from the proper authority, such as the local bishop or the Holy See. If the person doesn’t seek reconciliation in the given length of time, 30 days, then he once again falls under the censure. An example of this might be the case of a priest who does something to incur a censure which is not public knowledge or declared. However, he cannot fulfill his duties while the censure is in force.  Furthermore, scandal must be avoided, Masses must be said, confessions heard, people married, buried and baptized, etc. Therefore he can receive absolution from a confessor and fulfill his duties, but under the strict obligation to seek fuller reconciliation from the proper authority, such as the local bishop or the Holy See. In that case, the confessor and penitent priest would have an appointment set up for the near future and the confessor could then seek from the proper authority the faculty to lift the censure the next time the penitent priest returned.  The same could be applied, say to a lay man, say, a seminarian facing ordination.  It may be that many years in the past he did something that incurred a censure that has never been lifted.  He learns about this in canon law class and seeks a confessor who can lift the censure so that when he is validly ordained he would not be actually suspended a divinis from the moment of his ordination.  The ordination would be valid, but illicit because the ordinand was irregular for Holy Orders, but not irregular in a way that made the ordination invalid.  Even if no one else knew about any of this, he would know and that would scorch him from within and taint his priesthood until he was reconciled properly.

To incur an excommunication a person must be 16 years or older, aware of the gravely sinful nature of the action, aware that it incurs the censure, have the use of reason and must be acting with unimpaired free will. If a person is in state of fear or is mentally disturbed, if a person is being coerced, or is otherwise not able to exercise free will, he or she does not incur the censure.

That said, abortion is a crime/sin which incurs automatic excommunication if there are not mitigating factors. It can be hard to determine in some case the level of a person’s participation in the sin of another, but certainly the medical personnel who perform the abortion and those supplying the means and money for it, and who counseled it or provoked it would fall into that category.  If the mother herself knows it is wrong, knows there is a censure and does it anyway from free will, even if she is a little afraid, she incurs the excommunication.  A woman who is terrified, truly fearful, perhaps bullied by an angry husband, parent, boyfriend, does not incur it because her freedom is compromised.

If you are worried about yourself, seek a confessor right away and lay out the whole story, even it is painful or embarrassing.  Priests maintain the secrets of confession. They do not break the Seal of Confession.   What you say there, stays there and will not be revealed to any one on earth unless you permit it.  Even with your permission the priest will be reluctant and probably won’t say anything.  And this is something I have noted even among the most goofy liberal priests: even they protect and maintain the Seal of Confession.

It could be that the priests of a diocese, your diocese, have been granted the faculty to absolve the censure of excommunication incurred by participation in an abortion.  In most places these days that is the case for priests in their own dioceses.  This is why the bishop in Spain where WYD is gave the faculty to absolve the censure of excommunication to all the visiting priests as well as his own priests.  It may be that the priest you talk to will have to seek the faculty or that he will tell you that you must seek the bishop.  But in most cases, a priest in his own diocese will probably be able to absolve the censure.

No matter what he tells you in regard to getting that censure lifted, no matter how hard it might seem or embarrassing at the moment, it will be worth it.

If you are excommunicated you may not receive the sacraments, including the sacrament of penance. You must get that censure lifted.

NEVER NEVER NEVER omit confessing a mortal sin which you do in fact remember and know that you haven’t yet confessed. If you purposely omit confessing a mortal sin, you do not receive valid absolution or the graces of the sacrament. Just DON’T DO THAT. Always confess everything in both kind (what the sin is) and number (how many times).

If you were involved directly and in an active way in the procuring of an abortion, and if you have not confessed that to a priest confessor with the faculty to lift the excommunication or to a bishop, then you have an important task to do, as soon as you can. If you are worried about whether or not you incurred an excommunication or you were properly absolved, seek out a sound, knowledgeable confessor very soon. Don’t delay. Make a place in your oh-so-busy schedule for this soul-saving heart-healing matter.

In most places these days, at least in the USA, priests have been given by their bishops the faculty to lift the excommunication resulting from abortion.

No earthly pursuit is as important as your eternal salvation and your peace of mind.

Email isn’t really a good way to deal with these issues, friends. Most people’s situations are both very personal and also usually involve circumstances that cannot easily be related in writing because of the privacy of others.

You need a conversation with a good, knowledgeable priest confessor who can either put you at your ease or put you back on course.

Again, what follows is the most important thing I could ever write on this blog.

There is no sin we little people can commit that cannot be forgiven provided that we are truly sorry for it and ask God’s forgiveness through His priests and are willing to amend our lives.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, 1983 CIC can. 915, Emanations from Penumbras, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, The future and our choices, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged , , , , , ,
23 Comments

Prayer before connecting to the internet – UPDATE! – New language

A long time ago now, I wrote a prayer for people to use before they got online and used the internet. Originally in Latin, it has been translated into many languages (sometimes more than once).

I often forget to pray before using the internet. I often fail in charity when using it. This tool of social communication and research and entertainment has amazing upsides and spiritually deadly perils. We all should be very careful in how we use it – and through – use each other, “use” in the finer sense of “treat”.

It has been a while since I have received a new language version (I think the last was Hungarian). Today I found a new one in my email box.

SLOVENIAN!

Molitev pred prijavo na internet:
Vsemogočni in večni Bog,
ki nas je ustvaril v tvoje slike
in ukazal, naj nam da iščejo po tem, ko vse, kar je dobro, resnično in lepo, še posebej v božanski osebi Vaš edinorojenega Sina, našega Gospoda Jezusa Kristusa, dodelitvi sredstev, smo Vaši, prosim, da, na priprošnjo sveti Izidor, škof in dokter, v času našega potovanja prek interneta bomo neposredno naše roke in oči, samo tisti, ki je prijeten za tebe
in zdravljenje z ljubeznijo in potrpežljivostjo vse tiste duše, katere smo naleteli.
Po Kristusu, našem Gospodu. Amen.

Posted in Just Too Cool | Tagged ,
4 Comments

QUAERITUR: Are SSPX confirmation valid?

From a reader:

I was confirmed by His Excellency Bishop Tissier de Mallerais. He belongs to the SSPX, and I was reading that my confirmation was valid but illicit. Should I get confirmed again. (If I get a disposition from the bishop of ___) I know this has been done before by many SSPX converts to the ICKSP in my parish.

Confirmation, like baptism, cannot be repeated.  If the SSPX confirmation was valid, and it was, then it cannot be repeated.  If there are cases of doubt, then confirmation would be conferred conditionally.  But I don’t think that is necessary in your case.

SSPX bishops are really bishops.  They validly confirm, even though they have no permission from the Church to do so.  That said, I don’t believe that the SSPX priests could validly confirm, since there is no one with any ecclesial authority who could give them a delegation… unless they got it from the local bishop.  Hard to imagine that.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , ,
32 Comments

Priests/confessors at WYD given authority to lift excommunication for abortion

Via Catholic World News:

Priests hearing confessions at World Youth Day have been given the authority to lift the excommunication of penitents who have been involved in abortions.

Cardinal Antonio Maria Rouco Varela of Madrid granted that authority to all the priests at this week’s WYD events. Ordinarily only a limited number of priests in each diocese have the authority to remove the excommunication that is the automatic penalty for participating in an abortion.

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras, Just Too Cool, SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , ,
52 Comments

Reading certain things in certain places

The great Laudator has a fun entry today about the best places in which to read certain authors.

I resonate mightily with this a amusing post, since I have fond memories of a summer sitting in the sun reading 19th c. English novels for a course for my minor, of going to famous places in Italy and reading Latin texts with Fr. Foster, such as the poem about the Fons Bandusiae at Horace’s villa… with bottles of white wine chilling the very spring, of reading Patrick O’Brian while crewing a boat in the North Atlantic, Edward Rutherford’s London in London, Dante’s Inferno in Monteriggioni and other parts of Tuscany.

One could have a lot of fun with this.

Here’s the Laudator and his guest contributor:

In Part XII of The Anatomy of Bibliomania (1931; rpt. New York: Avenel Books, 1981), Holbrook Jackson asks and answers the question How Bookmen Conquer Time and Place. Topics include Of Reading Places (section II, pp. 236-239) and The Association of Book and Place (section III, pp. 239-241).

D.B.Wyndham Lewis, On Straw and Other Conceits (1927; rpt. Hartford: Edwin Valentine Mitchell; New York, Coward-McCann Incorporated [1929]), pp. 30-32, has some thoughts on this question:

It is evident that to extract the essential soul and flavour of certain books one should endeavour to read them in the exact surroundings in which they were conceived, or in surroundings as nearly similar as may be; for the clear air, the sky, the water are, as it were, mixed with the writer’s mind and woven into the very stuff of his imaginings. But whereas there are plenty of books pointing out What To Read and Why To Read, there is as yet, I think, no guide showing Where To Read. I have therefore drawn up from my own experience, haphazard, a modest and sketchy list which may serve as the foundation for such a Guide, though it clearly touches only the edge of the fringe of a vast and absorbing subject.

SHAKESPEARE. One would naturally read Shakespeare in a Warwickshire meadow in buttercup time; or else in the Fitzalan Chapel at Arundel.

RONSARD. To derive the greatest solace from the poetry of Ronsard one must read him lying on the banks of the Loire, at about sunset of a June evening, upon the grass, with a flask of the wine of Vouvray, or Chinon, or Bourgueil at hand; and with the soft air and the murmur of flowing water there should be mixed the gracious voices of girls.

Some demand, in addition, a lute, and a distant voice singing “Bonjour mon coeur, bonjour ma douce vie,” the words by Ronsard, the music by Orlando de Lassus.This seems (as Samuel Butler said about dumb-bells — see above) academic.

KIPLING (MR.). The works of this famous author are most profitably read in the Crystal Palace on Empire Day, during a massed Brass Band Contest; if that can be arranged.

CONGREVE naturally demands to be read in the Sunken Garden at Hampton Court, on the William-and-Mary side of the palace — not the Cardinal’s.

HERRICK should be read in a Devon lane in the time of violets.

TCHEHOV. To extract the best from this author and his English imitators, their work should be read in a dimly lighted dissecting-room; the corpse rather damp and the surgeon and his assistants rather sick of it, in a moody, gaga sort of way.

RABELAIS must be read among the rich lands of the Chionnais in Touraine, on the edge of a white road with cornfields and vineyards on either side. But let there be a farmyard near, with a ripe and aromatic muck-heap in it, the scent of which must be borne to you on the wind; and let there be also loud bursts of rustic laughter and a bottle of Chinon.

One could swell the list indefinitely, in many cases with two, three, or four alternatives each. There is one English man of letters, for example, who holds stoutly that the only place to read the Bucolics of Vergil is at a café-table opposite the Bourse in Paris, when the money-grubbers are howling their damnedest. My own theory is that the Bucolics are best read in the barber’s parlour at the Cosmopole, with a menial squirting costly unguents on the hair and the Rich all round one being polished and trimmed. Again, most of the modern “analytical” novelists need nothing better than a room filled with stale tobacco-smoke: but what kind of room? And again, there may be a law against reading Mr. M******* M***’s prose in the Elephant House at the Zoo.M.M. is probably John Middleton Murry.

Fun, no?  I am sure you could come up with some of your own, real or imagined.

Your own Kindle, and a thermos of Mystic Monk Coffee or Tea could make this a lot easier, too, though the aesthetic of the book is hardly to be discounted.  And so many good things to read are available for free through the Kindle, classics of poetry and novels.

Posted in Just Too Cool, Lighter fare | Tagged , , ,
33 Comments

RECENT POSTS and thanks to readers!

NOTA BENE: In the near future I may be doing a maintenance update which could interrupt the blog for a short period. I’ll try to let you know ahead of time, but if we don’t pop up right away, don’t worry.

Here are some recent posts, which are scrolling along.

First, remember Waiting for Zagano and also ZAGANO WATCH: UPDATE!

And also these:

I also owe thanks to all of you who have sent things from my wish list and have made donations through the button on the side bar or, lately, the PROTEST FISHWRAP donation button. You have been been very good to me. Thank you. Also, I am deeply grateful for your notes with prayers and good wishes.

Regarding those who have sent things from my wishlist, lately amazon has been remiss in putting packing slips with the names of the givers. I don’t know who you are, but I have not excluded you from my intention when I say Mass for benefactors. This afternoon, Wednesday, I will say Mass for those who have sent things and made donations. It is my honor and duty to do so.

But thanks are due to for the tomatoes and the pasta, for the two volumes of Augustine’s works in translation (De trinitate, and writings against Arians). Again, I don’t know who you are, but I am grateful.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
Comments Off on RECENT POSTS and thanks to readers!

Request to readers: an award, vote for a great charity – TEAM RUBICON

As you know the Catholic New Media Awards for this year have opened voting.  Even though you have to register, I hope you will give WDTPRS your support in these categories:

  • Best Blog by a Cleric
  • Best Blog by a Man
  • Best Produced Podcast

However, there is a secular award going on called the Classy Awards.  WDTPRS is not nominated… but not because we are not classy.

I went there and voted for a charity called TEAM RUBICON, especially because of what they did in Haiti after that devastating earthquake.  TEAM RUBICON – mostly action and very little talk – is found under the “Best Charity” and “Best New Charity” categories.   CLICK HERE.

You do not have to register to vote for TEAM RUBICON in this award.

Look at their bios and their mission statement:

Team Rubicon bridges the critical time gap between large humanitarian disasters and conventional aid response. We provide vanguard medical care by fielding small, self-sustaining, mobile teams of military veterans and medical professionals. To deploy rapidly, we rely heavily on a horizontal command structure, social networking technology, and the employment of local nationals.

Very cool.  Very effective.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Just Too Cool, The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged
1 Comment

QUAERITUR: Can a deaf priest say Mass in the Extraordinary Form?

From a reader:

I recently came across this article about a deaf priest recently ordained for  ___.  I’m curious – could a deaf priest ever say an EF Mass?  It seems to me that the rubrics would either (1) require him to actively speak or (2) even if he could “speak” the Latin through sign language, an EF Mass would require him to both “speak” and use his hands for non-speaking purposes at the same time.  Thanks for your time.

Back in the day, I mean quite a while ago, I suspect that a man who had never had the use of hearing from birth, would probably have been consider not suitable for Holy Orders.  I believe that is relaxed now, but it would bring up some difficulties, concerning receiving sacramental confessions and the like.  But in the modern period, sign language has become more sophisticated and our understanding of ways people genuinely communicate are broader.

That said, I don’t believe that the forms of sacraments can be done in sign language.  I think they must be pronounced aloud, even if very quietly, even if there is some assistance through one of those buzzing gadgets that help people who have lost their voices.

In the case of a man who goes deaf after the use of hearing, who would have also the use of normal speech for the most part, I cannot see why he could not say Mass in the Extraordinary Form.

Think about this.  For how many centuries was the EF the only form of Mass?  During those centuries did any priests lose their hearing?  Did they stop saying Mass?

Come to think of it, the regularity and rhythm of the Extraordinary Form, which is far less verbal and chatty than the Ordinary Form, would be much easier to celebrate without the use of normal hearing.

The priest who is deaf might have a harder time speaking quietly the parts which are so indicated in the rubrics, unless he is disciplined.

If the priest is a little louder during the Canon than he should be, oh well… the world will not come to an end if once in a while people hear the words of consecration in the Extraordinary Form.  Maybe the perfect rhythm of the prayers at the foot of the altar is somewhat offset by the priest’s timing… oh well.. he’ll get up to the altar eventually.

These are the things we can relax about.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged , , ,
23 Comments

ZAGANO WATCH: UPDATE!

I am told that Phyllis Zagano, who works for the National Catholic Reporter, is still calling around in order to make trouble for me and harm my reputation.

I wrote about her here.

You will recall that her personally aimed jihad began after I stood up against her in favor of Bishop Robert Finn of Kansas City-St. Joseph. HERE.

Zagano drew a moral equivalence between Bp. Finn and Dominque Strauss-Khan, Anthony Wiener and Arnold Schwarzenegger.

I called Zagano and her NCR paymasters to task for that, and ever since she has been making phone calls to friends and chanceries in order to harm my reputation.

This is the sort of thing liberals do.  They engage in hateful personal attacks as a technique of bullying and intimidation.

Given that NCR is still seemingly supporting Ms. Zagano in her efforts, I have been counseled to ask anyone whom she has contacted to drop me a note for future reference.

Thanks in advance!

In the meantime, many of the dates in that WDTPRS POLL I posted about the date when Zagano might publish her hit piece about me have come and gone.  Some dates, however, will be perennially valid, such as 16 October 1968, which the Bishop of Kansas City officially condemned the National Catholic Reporter, which has its offices within that diocese.

We still have not figured out a way to create a pool for a date, however.  The prize could be a case of Zagnut candy bars.

If you don’t know Zagnut bars, you are missing out on something tasty, though I don’t recommend them for people with nut allergies.  They don’t have chocolate and are mostly peanut with a little cocoa, covered with coconut.  I guess, they are pretty much nut bars.

By the way, I sent a case of Zagnut bars to the chancery of Bp. Finn’s Diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph in order to sweeten their service to the Lord and the Church in these troubled and bitter times.  I am happy to report that they are enjoying them.

In light of the above, it is appropriate to remind you of my PROTEST against NCFishwrap, especially given the fact that that NCR has a subscription drive going.

You could donate to me and then sign up for a subscription… to The Wanderer.

Posted in Brick by Brick, Lighter fare, Non Nobis and Te Deum, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice, Throwing a Nutty | Tagged , , , , , , ,
36 Comments