Are you a Sponsor for a Confirmand? Will you be one? Food for thought.

12_03_12_confirmationMany of you out there are godparents or sponsors for confirmands (from Latin confirmandus… “someone about to be confirmed”. Some of are are about to take on this responsibility.

Yes, this is a “responsibility”.

Sometimes you may be asked by the less well-informed because you are pals, etc. But this relationship isn’t merely pro-forma. Sure, there are times when baptisms and marriages have been witnessed by the parish caretaker and the priest’s housekeeper because there was no one else around and time was of the essence. That happened. But we are not usually in that situation.

Being a godparent or sponsor means something.

Of course if the parents are indifferent or your own godchild or confirmand blows it off there’s not much you can do but pray from a “distance” and hope, remembering, as Augustine says, where there is charity, there are no distances.

I received a thoughtful email from reader about being a sponsor and about being sponsored.

Food for thought.

“A word from our sponsor…”

So often when we hear that phrase we know it’s going to precede a marketing gimmick or plug for some kind or other organisation behind a particular event or related group. It got me thinking as I prepare myself spiritually and emotionally to “sponsor” a young cousin of mine [a young woman of 18] who will receive the sacrament of confirmation this weekend. Apart from feeling honoured to be asked by her to support her in this momentous soul-changing moment and event in her life, it causes me to pause and reflect on just how much a responsibility it is and will be ….

It also causes me to refresh my own sense of being sponsored by my patron saints, but also and most importantly by the Spirit of God Himself. I know the Spirit inspires me to pray for without Him I cannot pray but I also know I don’t pray directly to Him enough for his sponsorship of me. So as I stand behind my cousin tomorrow with the reassuring hand of an older brother in the faith on her shoulder as she kneels before the Bishop to be “sealed with the gift of the Holy Spirit” – I shall be asking for that same Spirit to teach and guide me in to continued dependence on the Father, so that I too may promote (sponsor) the well being of others in my daily life especially by my words.

Do I hear an “Amen!”?

And, if anyone out there says that you shouldn’t take a “confirmation name”, tell them “Rubbish!”, pick one, and tell the bishop before he confirms you.

Bishop Morlino, the Extraordinary Ordinary, confirming in the traditional Roman Rite.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , , ,
8 Comments

ASK FATHER: The inevitable “Rite of Thanking” at the end of Mass

thankyou_languagesFrom a reader….

QUAERITUR:

I’m curious about your reaction to a part of the Mass I’m calling the “Rite of Thanking”. While it seems that it is especially common with bishops at most liturgies they celebrate, it also happens at times with the pastor. On Holy Thursday, Good Friday and Easter Sunday (I wasn’t at the Easter Vigil), after the post-communion prayer, the bishop celebrating made it a special point to thank the laity who attended (why?), along with concelebrating priests, deacons, seminarians (serving as acolytes), altar servers from the parish, readers and of course, the cantor and choir. At least on Holy Thursday and Good Friday, the bishop did not induce applause which was vigorous on Easter Sunday. [Deo gratias.]

I of course understand why they might be doing this, but wonder about the appropriateness, [decorum!] especially due to the special solemnity of Holy Thursday and Good Friday. In my past liturgical service, where I was a reader, EMHC and member of the choir, this would actually cause me embarrassment since I was not there to receive public thanks from the bishop or priest, but to serve God as humbly and as well as I could in these roles.

I’m tempted to write the bishop in all charity to suggest that he poll some of the people performing these liturgical roles and ask them for their reaction to his thanking them for their service. My guess is that while some appreciate the acknowledgement and might be upset if it wasn’t done, many would have the same reaction I have. Perhaps you could test it in a poll with your readers.

I am reminded of…

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

We, as you, can understand why a bishop or priest would want to express gratitude to all the people who made something big happen.

Should this be liturgical?

I think not.  Especially because these rites of thanking can be both cringe worthy in awkwardness and soul-annihilating in length.

There’s nothing that kills a buzz from a beautiful Mass or other rite than the THUD that comes with these Post-Communion interjections.

I recall one bishop who was such a stickler about this thanking business that, when he was jocularly imitated (oh… yes, seminarians and priests do that), we fictitiously thanked every possible person down to the mothers of the people who folded the napkins, etc.

It can become ridiculous and painful, especially because, once you start, you have to get everyone in. But if you say that you can’t get everyone in, then… why not just stop there?

If the bishops are so grateful, they could occasionally send a note to the people involved. That would make a real impression.

A POLL you say? I’ll take a stab.

And I’ll thank everyone in advance NOT to write, “You left out X!”, or “You should have done Y!” Please. I have enough critics. Instead, just thank me, okay?

Choose your best answer and use the combox (if you are registered) to add your thoughtful 2 cents.

I need two polls to cover this properly.

When the list of "thanks" comes at the end of Mass, when I am involved ...

View Results

When the list of "thanks" comes at the end of Mass, when I am NOT involved ...

View Results

Posted in ¡Hagan lío!, "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Decorum, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, POLLS | Tagged ,
41 Comments

NEW Fr. Z Swag Available: Pope BENEDICT XIV Lambertini (1740-1758)

Benedict_XIV_SHIRT_FRONTThe XIVth Popes are pretty impressive Pontiffs.

We know and love Papa Ganganelli – Clement XIV of Happy Memory – in particular for his suppression of the Jesuits.

But let us also consider the greatness of Papa Lambertini Benedict XIV of especially Happy Memory – for his many gifts as a scholar and jurist, as a humanist and wit.

If Clement XIV is famous for having given the Jesuits their due, Benedict XIV was the Pope to whom canonists and those who work on causes of saints refer to as “The Legislator”.  We are still – with some changes here and there – using his basic process for beatification and canonizations.

Benedict is well-known for many things, but here is something which we will all find delightful: he sternly forbade service of women at the altar for Mass, and he included the notion of “deaconettes”.

In his 1755 document Allatae sunt Benedict, who saw that a terrible practice has slithered in among some Greeks, he in the sternest way forbade “altar girls” and any thought of female deacons.

For this alone, Benedict deserves his very own FR. Z SWAG!

>>HERE<<

Behold…
B14_mug_BackB14_mug_Front

And… wear him with pride!

What’s on the back?  The text of his prohibition is on the back of these shirts (with two exceptions – one economy shirt for men and one for women which don’t have texts, so check carefully):

B14_shirt_Back

B14_shirt_Front

 

What’s on the back?  [NB: Some have sent notes about typos.  There are no typos on the finished shirts… so don’t freak out.]

 

Benedict_XIV_SHIRT_BACK_01_BLACK_letters_CORRECTED_C

Enjoy your mug with some MYSTIC MONK COFFEE or TEA!

Posted in In The Wild, Lighter fare | Tagged , ,
10 Comments

ASK FATHER: Can we go to an SSPX Mass and receive Communion?

first communion card 01From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

We prefer to attend Ascension Day Mass on Ascension Day whenever possible. This year, we have 2 options – drive 2 hours later in the evening with 4 young children), or attend an SSPX chapel about 30 min away.

If we were to attend the SSPX chapel, would it be correct to receive communion?

There are several factors to consider here.

First, it was clearly the will of Sovereign Pontiffs that people should have generous access to Holy Mass also celebrated in what has come to be called the Extraordinary Form, the traditional form of the Roman Rite.  John Paul II, in Ecclesia Dei adflicta, literally commanded by his Apostolic Authority that bishops be generous.  They defied him and people suffered.  Benedict XVI provided with Summorum Pontificum a juridical solution to both that defiance and the fracturing of Catholic identity in the Church that resulted from the precipitous imposition of an artificially created rite on the Church.  Many bishops still defy this legislation.  Francis has been signaling to the world his desire to put people at their ease when frequenting chapels of the SSPX by, in indirect ways, granting faculties to otherwise irregular SSPX priests validly to absolve sins.  More recently he has provided a way to make sure that marriages witnessed by SSPX priests do not lack proper form.

Also, in her desire that people be able to receive the sacraments in a timely manner and without undue burden, the Church allows that people can go even to non-Catholic ministers with valid sacraments when there is a moral or physical difficulty in accessing a regular Catholic priest.  The SSPX is Catholic, not non-Catholic.

The Holy See (Pontifical Commission “Ecclesia Dei“) has said that people fulfill their Sunday and Holy Day obligations by participating at Masses of the SSPX.

The Holy See (PCED) has also stated that, in justice, one can give them donations at collection since they have received services from them.

If there were an opportunity to go to Mass in the Extraordinary Form close to you, I think you should always give it preference.

Catholics are obliged by law to receive Communion once a year.  There is no obligation to receive Communion at every Mass.  We aspire to, of course.

In the past I have not recommended to people that they regularly receive Communion at SSPX Masses. Depending on the priest and the chapel, the tone of the teaching and preaching, one could be in an environment which purposely and openly attempts to undermine unity with the local bishops and with the Pope.  One should avoid such places.

Similarly, we acknowledge, one could argue that a regular parish with horrid abuses and with horrid teaching should be avoided, if possible.

However, my recollection is that the PCED has allowed that people could receive occasionally.

So, weigh together these factors and make your decision.  If, occasionally, you go to an SSPX chapel 30 minutes away rather than a couple hours with several children in tow, I think you are on pretty solid ground.  If, after due consideration, you should receive Communion I don’t think you would automatically err.

The moderation queue is ON, and I will be picky.  I don’t want the same old same old.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, SSPX, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged
11 Comments

UPDATE: A bishop urges priests to encourage reception of Holy Communion on the tongue, kneeling. Wherein Fr. Z rants.

UPDATE 19 April 2017:

The full, transcribed text of Bp. Morlino’s sermon is available HERE

___ Originally Published on: Apr 12, 2017

Last night, Tuesday in Holy Week, His Excellency Most Reverend Robert C. Morlino, the Extraordinary Ordinary, Bishop of Madison, celebrated the Chrism Mass.  The bishop blessed all the special oils used during our sacred rites in the upcoming year.  Customarily, the priests of the diocese who are able attend the Chrism Mass, not only in a sign of unity but also, practically, to receive the oils for their parishes.

My friend Fr. Heilman, who writes at Roman Catholic Man, records that, this year, Bp. Morlino asked the priests of the diocese – beginning in September – to encourage reception of Holy Communion on the tongue, while kneeling.

Thus,…

In his Chrism Mass homily, Bishop Morlino highlighted the fact that the Catholic Church is very good at social issues at every level – Catholic organizations, dioceses, parishes and individuals – but, ours is a crisis of faith, revealed by less than 25% of Catholics attending Mass any longer (less than 5% in many parts of Europe). Where we are failing is in a lack of fervor in our faith, Bishop stated. This is most evident in how we, as priests, are offering the Mass, and how the faithful are praying the Mass.

Bishop Morlino went on to speak about “actuosa participatio” as being more about “actual participation” than “active participation.” [Sound familiar?] Bishop lamented that we seem to feel everyone needs to be busy “doing something” at the Mass, when it is more important that we are deeply contemplating what is being done at the Mass … that God is made Present – Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity. This should stir our soul and fill us with awe and wonder. But, are we too busy to take notice?

Last Fall, as part of [the] Bishop’s overall plan to add sacred beauty and reverence to all Masses in his diocese, Bishop Morlino encouraged all of his priests to strongly consider Cardinal Sarah’s call to offer the Mass ad orientem. Bishop Morlino then announced he would, from now on, be offering all of his Masses ad orientem.

Now, during last evening’s Chrism Mass, Bishop Morlino concluded his homily by appealing to all of his priests in his diocese to strongly encourage their parishioners to begin receiving Communion on the tongue while kneeling, beginning this September.

Praise be Jesus Christ! Now and forever!

THIS is the New Evangelization, my friends.

What Bp. Morlino did brought to my mind the phrase cura animarum, now somewhat outdated, fallen into desuetude.

Cura animarum, “the care of souls”, is the office, or duty, of those to whom, pastoral roles are entrusted, to help the souls in their their care get to heaven.  The cura animarum in mainly connected with the offices of bishop and parish priests, pastors, though there are other roles in which a priest can care for souls.  The cura animarum involves, especially, the exercise of the threefold munera or offices of priest, prophet and king.  The pastor (French curé) tends to his flock and shepherds them towards heaven through catechetical instruction, sermons and other admonitions.  He sanctifies them through administation of the sacraments.  He has to be shrewd and prudent and use many methods and tactics to attain his goal: more souls in heaven, for their good and for God’s glory.  The pastor of souls, with the cura animarum, is responsible before God for the souls in his charge.  He will answer to God for these souls when his time for judgment arrives… and it will arrive.

The priest who senses the weight of the cura animarum, relying on the help of God to make his own hands strong enough for this work – so that ever good work is Christ crowning His own works in us – will come to sense zelus animarum, “zeal for souls”.   You might know the famous first antiphon for Tenebrae of Holy Thursday, Matins, Zelus domus tuae comedit me… Zeal for your house consumes me.  Since the first time I ever sang that antiphon at the first Tenebrae I ever participated in,  that’s been it for me.  Zeal for souls, zeal for God’s “house”, which means souls who are, as Paul describes, the stones that build up the Church, should animate a priest and a bishop.

Priests and bishops are not here to make you feel good about yourselves.  They are given by Christ the High Priest to the Church, to you, to help you get to heaven.  There are zillions of routes by which priests can work for the care of souls.  Sometimes it happens that they must stress material needs… but always with an eye on the true and over riding goal: a soul for heaven.

Earthly life is short.  Eternity is long.

Was it St. John Bosco who said, “Da mihi animas!  Caetera tolle!”?

Fathers, think about souls for heaven, not about being “liked”.  Don’t take the soft and deceptive road which might prompt plaudits and coos in this life.  Be a priest!  Be that immediately, local manifestation of Christus Medicus.   Hard times need hard love.  The doctor doesn’t stop applying the remedy just because the patient screams for him to stop.  “Nice” doesn’t get souls into heaven.  And you will be judged for your care of souls, dear Father… ohhhhh yes.  One day you will be in the presence of the Iustus Iudex, and you will have an explanation.  “These, who were mine, were lost!”

I cannot shake the sense that we are entering into a dark time such as we have never experienced before.  Christians have always, since the Ascension of the Lord, sensed themselves in the “end times”, and I don’t want to diminish that.  However, Our Lord also told us to watch the “signs of the times”.  I’m watching the signs of the time and I don’t like what I see.  I am left discomforted, which I suppose we all ought to be, given that one day we will go before the King of Fearful Majesty to render an account of our works and what we love.

What Bishop Morlino is going is exactly right.  It’s time to start growing more and more into serious, transformative sacred liturgical worship as individuals and as communities in the Church, small and large, families, parishes, dioceses, nations.  We have to sober up and grow up.

Our sacred liturgical worship was, as Benedict XVI so aptly described, fractured in the improper implementation of the reforms mandated by Vatican II.  We didn’t actually get what the Council Fathers mandated.  This rupture has reeked havoc with our Catholic identity.   Vast swathes of the nominally Catholic have little sense of the content of the Catholic faith, by which I mean both the fides quae creditur and the fides qua creditur.   Our liturgical worship has been screwed up for so long that the Lord’s vinyard as been, as Card. Sarah recently described, “devastated”.  Only the blind and obtuse – or those responsible for the devastation – don’t see this.

Years ago I posted my manifesto about the connection of what goes on in the wider world with our liturgical worship.  HERE  and especially HERE  For example,

Do we believe the consecration really does something? Or, do we believe what is said and how, what the gestures are and the attitude in which they made are entirely indifferent? For example, will a choice not to kneel before Christ the King and Judge truly present in each sacred Host, produce a wider effect?

If you throw a stone, even a pebble, into a pool it produces ripples which expand to its edge. The way we celebrate Mass must create spiritual ripples in the Church and the world.

So does our good or bad reception of Holy Communion.

So must violations of rubrics and irreverence.

Mass is not merely a “teaching moment” or a “celebration of unity” or a “tedious obligation”. Our choice of music, architecture, ceremonies and language affect more than one small congregation in one building. We are interconnected in both our common human nature and in baptism. When we sin we hurt the whole Body of Christ the Church.

If that is true for sin, it must also be true for our liturgical choices. They must also have personal and corporate impact. Any Mass can be offered for the intentions of the living or the dead.

Not even death is an obstacle to the efficacy of Holy Mass.

Celebrate Mass well, participate properly – affect the whole world. Celebrate poorly – affect the whole world.

If our liturgical worship as a Church is disordered, then everything else in the Church will be disordered.  The Eucharist is different from the other sacraments in that the Eucharist IS what It symbolizes.  The Eucharist is the great jewel around which the other sacraments glitter in Its glory.  The Eucharist, that is the Sacred Species as well as their celebration which is Holy Mass, is described as the “source and summit” of who we are, what we do.  Everything flows back and forth across our individual and collective lives in the Church, and therefore in the whole world, from and to the Eucharist.   If we don’t get this right, nothing else will be right.  If our worship isn’t properly ordered, then no other effort or initiative we undertake in the Church will bear fruit.

We have to rebuild our Catholic identity soul by soul.  The concrete physical gestures of worship, including getting down on our knees before GOD in the Blessed Sacrament, receiving rather than taking, humbly recognizing the anointed hands of the priest, help us in our spirit.  We are body and soul, both.  We need physical reminders of the invisible realities.

Hence, what Bp. Morlino did is exactly right.  He has provided a personal example.  He has shown leadership.  He has prudently allows a congruent period of time for instruction as well as dialogue with the priests and faithful.  This is great blessing to Holy Church as he fulfills faithfully his heavy mandate.  May his example be taken up by many pastors of souls.

Posted in ¡Hagan lío!, "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Just Too Cool, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, New Evangelization, The future and our choices, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged , , , , , , ,
40 Comments

Fr. Murray hits another triple

Fr Gerald MurrayMy good friend Fr. Gerarld Murray has a sobering, withering, and yet salubrious piece today at The Catholic Thing, called “Cardinal Sarah and the Innovators”.

Fr. Murray cites idiot statements from Thomas Reese, S.J., and provides his responses while citing His Eminence Robert Card. Sarah.

However, Murray, as Card. Sarah, correctly connects the liberal project of the dissolution of the Church’s doctrine with their project of the degradation of the Church’s liturgical worship.

Please go over and read it HERE.

There is a truly funny line, by the way.

But before you go, … take a couple minutes to order up your very own copies of Card. Sarah’s books.

I am ever more convinced that His Eminence is exactly right both in his assessments of the state of the Church and in the cures for our spiritual and ecclesial maladies.

God or Nothing: A Conversation on Faith

US HERE – UK HERE

If you have not read, at least, this one… well… what have you been thinking?

May I suggest that you give Card. Sarah’s books to your priests?

The Power of Silence: Against the Dictatorship of Noise.

US HERE – UK HERE

This is the translation of  Le Force du Silence, hitherto only in French, is as I write available to PRE-ORDER in ENGLISH. It will be released on 15 April (Holy Saturday).  A great Eastertide reading gift to yourselves or friends.

The original French, if you prefer…

US HERE – UK HERE

Posted in ¡Hagan lío!, Liberals, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Mail from priests, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged ,
8 Comments

A spiritual opportunity for Mother’s Day

I bring to the attention of the readership a great spiritual opportunity for mothers.

The Shrine of Our Lady of Guadalupe near LaCrosse (build by Card. Burke) has provided a way to enroll mothers for an intention in Holy Mass on Mothers Day, 14 May 2017.  HERE

I can’t give you the card and envelope, but I can direct you to the site.  Contact information…

>>HERE<<

Posted in Our Solitary Boast, The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged , ,
2 Comments

IN THE WILD! Clement XIV joins the Navy!

My friend Fr. Johnson, USN, sent me a photo of his newly acquired Papa Ganganelli (aka Clement XIV Of Glorious Memory) coffee mug.

Here it is, strategically situated in Father’s stateroom aboard USS KEARSARGE (LHD3).

17_04_18_Clement_mug_01

Fr. Johnson regularly celebrates the TLM while deployed with Marines, in port, or at sea.

Thanks Shipmate!

Everyone: I very much enjoy seeing your In The Wild shots.

Clement_XVI_Mug_01 Clement_XVI_Mug_02

For all the selections click

>>HERE<<

… and you could have your very own Papa Ganganelli mug!

Impress your friends!  Annoy liberals!  Make Jesuits sweat!

BTW…

Did you know that the great impressionist painter Manet painted USS KEARSARGE?

No, not this one…

USS_KEARSARGE

This one… the predecessor from the time of the Civil War.

IMG_4715

During the Civil War, USS Kearsarge sank the Confederate Alabama near the coast of France.  It was widely covered by the French press.  Manet painted the scene twice.  This painting is in the Met in New York.  The other is in Philadelphia. Manet visited the ship at anchor near Boulogne.

If you want to know more about Manet and the Impressionists, I warmly recommend Ross King’s The Judgment of Paris: The Revolutionary Decade That Gave the World Impressionism.

US HERE – UK HERE

Posted in In The Wild, Mail from priests | Tagged , , , , ,
7 Comments

Fr. Z’s Kitchen: Easter Sunday Clerical Supper

I was pleased to have had a guest priest come to town to help with our Sacred Triduum in the Extraordinary Form. His presence allowed us to have a Solemn Triduum. It also allowed me to brush off my cooking utensils.  I hardly do any entertaining these days.

Priests should regularly have Suppers For The Promotion Of Clericalism (SFTPOC), for the building of priestly identity over large pieces of beef and bottles of wine, followed by cigars.

On Easter Sunday (after a nap) I made oven roasted potatoes, asparagus, bone-in rib-eye roast, Bearnaise sauce.

If you want your potatoes to turn out like you find in Rome, give them a good long soak in salt water.  I kept a rosemary plant alive all winter.  Not easy where I live, but life without rosemary is hardly to be imagined.

Behold, the Bearnaise.  I haven’t made it for many moons and it was perfect.

With the pan drippings.

It was spectacular.  Everything was exactly right.

And yet… I have to post this, too.

Last year one of you readers gave me a butter lamb mold.

I tried several times this year to get the butter lamb thing going, but…  I must admit that it has defeated me.

I tried different timings with the freezer.  I tried different butters.  I managed to turn out one that didn’t split in half or break into uneven pieces.  Here is the lone “lamb”, to use the word equivocally.

Alas, it looks a bit like something from Alien… no… better… Bp. Fatty McButterpant’s loathsome, somewhat deformed dog Chester over in the Diocese of Libville.  It once, wisely, bit Fatty’s old classmate, Bp. Antuninu “Dozer” Ruspa of Pie Town.

It’s the ones you hate that live forever.

Anyway, I am sincerely grateful for the gift and for the opportunity to experience greasy, ignominious defeat.  Better luck next year!

Posted in Fr. Z's Kitchen | Tagged , , , , ,
17 Comments

Robert Mickens is exactly wrong about priestly vocations. Here’s why.

spirit_Vatican_IIOne of the worst of the hyper-liberal catholic publications, Commonweal, publishes a regular column by long-time Rome correspondent Robert Mickens.

Many readers here will recall that Mickens loathes Benedict XVI.  He lost his job with The Tablet, the UK’s worst catholic weekly, when in 2014 he posted disgusting comments about Benedict.

This week Mickens addresses the issue of vocations to the priesthood.  He goes after St. John Paul II  and Benedict XVI.  Since it’s the Easter Octave, I won’t trouble you with much of his text.  His bottom line is that 1) narrow, clericalist, backward-looking Popes of the past blocked the work of the Holy Spirit (which Mickens seems to know better than they) Who clearly wanted an end to clerical celibacy and the ordination of women, and 2) the stifling of the “spirit of Vatican II” has caused a huge drop in vocations, which has prompted bishops to reach our for priests from Third World countries to take up the slack and some of those bishops and priests are not in sync with Pope Francis, and 3) there are at long last bright rays of sunshine in the obscurity caused by men, near messianic figures, who coincidentally are associated with the political left and the liberal, progressivist arm of Pope Francis’ pontificate.

Ergo, these bad bad males must be replaced.  His line-up includes (titles removed for the sake of speed): Kasper, Schönborn, Farrell, Tobin, and McElroy.

Along the way, Mickens alternates between the green ink and the purple patch.  You’d think that the Battle of Narnia was about to begin.

Boiled down, Mickens thinks that these bad bad males, these Tridentine, clericalist scaredy-cats have repressed priestly vocations.

Mickens is exactly wrong.

There is no lack of priestly vocations where bishops are capable of projecting solid clerical identity and where they teach perennial Catholic truth in charity and in clarity.

Hows_Liturgy_CandleI come from a parish where in 30 years there were 30 First Masses.  I live in a diocese where in a decade the bishop turned around vocations from 6 to 30.

The proportion of priests to people is more or less constant.  Why?  Lay people get the priests that they produce and that they deserve.   Lower Mass attendance results in falling numbers of priests, not the other way around.

Liberal clerics inevitably fall into the sin of the clericalism which they hurl as tar and feathers at conservative, faithful priests and bishops.  For example, when the former drag lay people up into the sanctuary and let them do something that is really their own role, they clericalize the laity in the most condescending way.  Similarly, libs think that bishops produce vocations like Zeus produced Athena.  In truth, families produce vocations.

In the places (countries, dioceses, parishes, families) where the “spirit of the Council” was pushed à la Mickens, there has been devastation of Catholic identity.

Following Mickens’ logic, the whole Church should look rather like Belgium.

Belgium, which followed the “spirit of the Council” down the storm-drain and out to sea, (the Bishop of Antwerp, Johan Bonny, has called for rituals for “gay” marriage in the Church) now has 5% Mass attendance.   The reforms of the Church that Mickens desires have been so “successful” in Belgium that hardly anyone goes to Mass any more.  Subsequently, there are no vocations to the priesthood, either.

See?  What a success!

Posted in Liberals, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , , ,
18 Comments