“Ad orientem” five years later. A pastor reflects on the effects.

"Ad orientem" five years later. A pastor reflects on the effects.You long time readers might remember that I posted photos of a “table” altar being hauled by some men out of a church and over the the rectory.

That was in 2013.  Five years ago.

That’s when St. Mary’s in Pine Bluff, WI, where Fr. Richard Heilman is pastor, went ad orientem.

Exactly five years later, Fr. Heilman has posted a brief reflection on the impact that this move has had on his parish.  HERE

In 2007…

Then, five years ago, the first Sunday Mass looked like this (before the Communion rail was installed)

 

A communion rail was installed HERE

"Ad orientem" five years later. A pastor reflects on the effects.

And then we put in housling cloths.  HERE

"Ad orientem" five years later. A pastor reflects on the effects.

2015…

A view from last October when The Extraordinary Ordinary pontificated for the 100th anniversary of the last apparition at Fatima.

"Ad orientem" five years later. A pastor reflects on the effects.

Passiontide 2017

"Ad orientem" five years later. A pastor reflects on the effects.

From Easter 2017

"Ad orientem" five years later. A pastor reflects on the effects.

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , ,
13 Comments

ASK FATHER: The “Ultima” chant

ASK FATHER: The "Ultima" chantFrom a reader…

QUAERITUR:

When my father died, about 11 years ago, the priest who offered his funeral Mass ended it by chanting what he called “the Ultima”. The priest who did it is a very good friend of mine, and this is the only instance I’ve ever heard him chant in Latin during a Mass. I had never heard of this chant before my father’s funeral and I haven’t heard it since.

Over the years I would try to research this chant to find information on it but have not had any sucess till recently. I found the words and notation on a website along with a translation that was done in 2006 but I still don’t know much about the chants use or history.

My priest friend has not been helpful. He is usually the type to scoff at all things traditional, which is why I was shocked at his chanting latin at my father’s funeral. Would you be able to shed some light on this for me, please?

Thank you for all your hard work at this blog. You are in my prayers.

The chant in question is called “The Ultima”, from the more complete “Ultima in hora mortis”.

This is something from the Benedictine tradition.  It is a chant, to the Blessed Virgin, invoking her as a good Mother and Queen of Heaven, to help souls to a good death and to take care of them afterward.

You can find it online, for example, HERE.

ASK FATHER: The "Ultima" chant

The American Cassinese Benedictines have a version, which includes three languages.  HERE [UPDATED link: to their new server… help them out and CLICK!]

The text seems to be cobbled up from lines taken from a sequence written by a Cardinal Archbishop of Cologne at the time of Pius IX’s proclamation of the dogma of the Immaculate Conception.  Hence, it is not an ancient text, but it reflects the piety and faith of millennia of Christian experience of Mary and of death.

Usually the first part is sung, and it has been set for four voices, etc.

Ultima in mortis hora
Filium pro nobis ora
Bonam mortem impetra
Virgo, Mater Domina

Literally:

In the last hour/moment of death
pray to Your Son for us
obtain (for us) a good death
O Virgin, Mother Lady.

We should contemplate death often and pray for a good death.

Last night I blessed Epiphany Water, which rite includes the Litany of Saints, during which we pray to be saved from a sudden and unprovided death, that is, death with the the sacraments, the chance to make a good confession.

Baring extraordinary graces, I think people die as they have lived.  Habits get baked into over the years.  We have to develop habits of dying while we are still living, so that when we die, we die as well as possible.  Death is a great mystery, but we can ready ourselves, much as soldiers – and we belong to the Church Militant – ready for the struggle through constant and long drills.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Four Last Things, Our Solitary Boast | Tagged , ,
9 Comments

WDTPRS – Epiphany Collect: Liturgy should be “epiphany”, wherein we encounter transforming mystery.

WDTPRS - Epiphany Collect: Liturgy should be “epiphany”, wherein we encounter transforming mystery.

In the Novus Ordo calendar Epiphany (which is supposed to be 12 days after Christmas – the reason it is called “Twelfth Night”) is sometimes moved to the Sunday.  I suppose that they reasoned that more people would celebrate the important feast that way.

I say that

1) that signals that bishops think that our obligations according to the religion of virtue aren’t that important,

2) the liturgical year isn’t that important, and

3) parishes lose a collection.

In the ancient Western Church and in the East, Epiphany was more important than the relative latecomer Christmas.  Epiphany is from the Greek word for a divine “manifestation” or “revelation”.  There are many “epiphanies” of God in the Scripture.  Think, for example, of the burning bush encountered by Moses.

The Latin Church’s antiphons for Vespers reflect the tradition that Epiphany was thought to be not only the day the Magi came to adore Christ, but also the same day years later when He changed water into wine at Cana, and also when He was baptized by St. John in the Jordan.  In each mysterious event, Jesus was revealed to be more than a mere man: He is man and God.

The Epiphany Collect was in the 1962 Missale Romanum and in ancient sacramentaries.

Deus, qui hodierna die Unigenitum tuum stella duce revelasti, concede propitius, ut qui iam te ex fide cognovimus, usque ad contemplandam speciem tuae celsitudinis perducamur.

Stella duce is an ablative absolute.  The adjective hodiernus means “of this day, today’s”.  In older Latin, celsitudo is “lofty carriage of the body”. In later Latin it is used like the title “Highness”.  In our liturgical context it is a divine attribute, God’s transcendent grandeur, glory.

SUPER LITERAL VERSION:

O God, who on this very day revealed your Only-begotten, a star as the guide, graciously grant, that we, who have already come to know You by faith, may be led all the way unto the beauty of Your glory to be contemplated.

OBSOLETE ICEL (1973):

Father, you revealed your Son to the nations by the guidance of a star. Lead us to your glory in heaven by the light of faith.

NEW CORRECTED ICEL (2011):

O God, who on this day revealed your Only Begotten Son to the nations by the guidance of a star, grant in your mercy, that we, who know you already by faith, may be brought to behold the beauty of your sublime glory.

In Latin prayers species (three syllables) often means “beauty”. It is also a technical, philosophical term about the way the human intellect apprehends things.  Species has to do with the relationship between the thing known and our knowing power.  A species transforms the mind of the one perceiving a thing.  The object we consider acts upon our power of knowing.  Simultaneously, the knowing power acts upon the object known.  Our knowing power’s active and passive aspects meet in the species and the object of our consideration is known directly, without intermediaries.  Easy. Right?

This is what we are praying for, hoping for, living our earthly lives for: to see God face to face, directly and immediately (without intermediaries).

In this life we know God only indirectly, by faith, our reason aided by the authority of revelation and by grace.  This is St. Paul’s “dark glass” (1 Cor 13:12) through which we peer toward Him in longing.

Christ is the visible image of the invisible God.

He is the Father’s Beauty.

He is Truth and Beauty and Glory itself.

St. Hilary of Poitiers (d 367) conceived God’s divine attribute of glory as a transforming power which divinizes us by our contact with it.  After Moses talked with God in the tent of the Ark, he wore a veil over his face, which became too bright to look at.

We pray today, literally, to be brought “all the way to the beauty of glory (species celsitudinis)” of God “which is to be contemplated”.

His beauty will act on us, increase our knowledge of Him and, therefore, our love for Him … for all eternity.   We will be, all the more, the images He intended.

Christ could be understood to be the species celsitudinis of this prayer. Contemplate His truth and beauty.  Christ is the true speaker and spoken truth of every prayer of every Mass.

If eternal Beauty transforms us, “divinizes” us, then beauty in this life changes us too.

Could a fostering of beauty in our churches help us reach people today in a way that arguments or other appeals may not?

Our liturgical worship of the Most High God must lead us to encounter beauty, truth, transcendent mystery.

Holy Mass requires the finest architecture, vestments, music – everything – we can summon from human genius, love and labor.  What we sing and say and do in church, and the church itself, ought to presage the liturgy of heaven, where the Church Triumphant enjoys already the Beatific Vision.  Liturgy should be “epiphany”, wherein we encounter transforming mystery.

Let us celebrate every Mass in such a way that we become shoeless Moses before the burning bush which is never consumed.

Let Mass make us Magi with sight and mind fixed in longing upon the beautiful, true and yet speechless Word, in whom transcendent glory was both hidden and revealed.

As we read today from Leo the Great in the Office of Matins:

Honorétur ítaque a nobis sacratíssimus dies, in quo salútis nostræ Auctor appáruit: et quem Magi infántem veneráti sunt in cunábulis, nos omnipoténtem adorémus in cælis. Ac sicut illi de thesáuris suis mýsticas Dómino múnerum spécies obtulérunt, ita et nos de córdibus nostris, quæ Deo sunt digna, promámus.

Let all observance, then, be paid to this most sacred day, whereon the Author of our salvation was made manifest, and as the wise men fell down and worshipped Him in the manger, so let us fall down and worship Him enthroned Almighty in heaven. As they also opened their treasures and presented unto Him mystic and symbolic gifts, so let us strive to open our hearts to Him, and offer Him from thence some worthy offering.

Posted in Christmas and Epiphany, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Patristiblogging, WDTPRS | Tagged , , , , ,
3 Comments

Fr. Murray on the Buenos Aires Bishops and the Pope’s affirming Letter

Fr. Murray on the Buenos Aires Bishops and the Pope's affirming LetterMy good friend Fr. Gerald Murray has a helpful piece today at The Catholic Thing about the ongoing Amoris laetitia controversy.  He offers some clarity about the interpretation by the bishops of Buenos Aires of the ambiguous content of Chapter 8.  Subsequently Pope Francis wrote them a private letter endorsing their views.  That letter was later published in the Acta Apostolicae Sedis with a note from the Secretary of State that it was part of the Pope’s official teaching.

That, however, doesn’t clear up anything.

Fr. Murray rightly points out that the Buenos Bishops contradict themselves in their document.  The Buenos Bishops also state – and this is now approved by the Pope – that diocesan bishops retain the authority in their own dioceses when it comes to the situation of the divorced and civilly remarried.

Also helpful in Fr. Murray’s piece is his distilling the controversy into simple terms:

Here’s the problem: When a group of bishops teaches that persons in invalid second marriages are free to judge that it is not “feasible” for them to avoid committing acts of adultery, they are telling the faithful that they are not at fault for doing what the Catholic Church teaches to be gravely sinful. “Feasibility” means “the state or degree of being easily or conveniently done,” and even more precisely “capable of being done, accomplished or carried out.” The avoidance of mortal sin does involve difficulty and inconvenience. But the Church does not teach that grown-up people in their right minds are incapable of obeying God’s commandments.

To say to someone that it may be infeasible for him to refrain from acts of adultery is to advise him that, in effect, he is not subject to God’s law in this matter. When pastors tell Catholics living in sin that they are not really guilty of mortal sin as long as they decide that they cannot “feasibly” observe God’s law, the shepherds have seriously failed them.

This unchristian fatalism of denying man’s freedom and ability to avoid committing mortal sin leads to the incredible claim that adultery is not that bad for some people, that they are free to receive both sacramental absolution and Holy Communion without renouncing the intention to commit acts of adultery, and that this reception of the sacraments will “dispose the person to continue maturing and growing with the aid of grace.” This plainly contradicts the Gospel as taught by the Church through the ages.

Do read the whole of Father’s piece over there.

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , ,
6 Comments

ASK FATHER: Are blessings, sacramentals from SSPX priests efficacious?

ASK FATHER: Are blessings, sacramentals from SSPX priests efficacious?From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

Are blessings made by SSPX priests efficacious? Like when they bless sacramentals, water, salt etc, are these really blessed?

Let’s see.

SSPX bishops validly ordain and confirm.

SSPX priests validly confect the Eucharist.

SSPX priests (now) validly absolve sins.

I think that they validly bless sacramentals and that they are efficacious.

In the case of Epiphany Water, the priest should have the faculty from the local bishop. However, that would be for liceity rather than for validity. When it comes to rites like the exorcism of persons, however, if I were an SSPX priest I wouldn’t touch that with a ten foot aspergilum without the explicit faculty of the local bishop.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, SSPX | Tagged ,
Comments Off on ASK FATHER: Are blessings, sacramentals from SSPX priests efficacious?

“The solution is staring the bishops in the face”

The pastor of the parish where I came into the Church was downright disgusted with the Archdiocese’s approach to vocations and the priest shortage crisis that would follow. He used to compare the geniuses of the vocations office et al. to those who during a potato famine sat around talking about how they were going to die from starvation rather than planting other crops and going fishing.

Today I read in the newest number of the Catholic Herald an article about a way to save the Catholic Church in England.

The subtitle:

The solution is staring the bishops in the face

Indeed it is.

The writer presents some cold facts and then gets to it.  Let’s jump in media res with my emphases:

[…]

Without denying that church closures are often inevitable, they are not always the only solution to too many churches. Indeed, several dioceses in north-west England are quietly pioneering another model, of which other “church rich, but priest-and-parishioner poor” bishops might well take heed.

The basic model is simple: lift a surplus-to-requirements church out of the normal parish system and give it to a niche group that can do something distinctive with it. Some of the original parishioners will stay and adjust (and be quite happy to do so); others will go off to provide a welcome boost to the numbers of nearby parishes. By allowing this group to spread its wings, and do something distinctive, it can then attract like-minded people from the surrounding area. Perhaps in any one parish there might be only two, or three, or five people for whom this is “their thing”, but over a wide area – especially in a large town or city – those few soon add up.

After all, most people already drive to church and a significant number of Mass-goers frequent a church that is not, strictly speaking, their own. This happens most obviously in places like London (how many of those attending the Oratory do you suppose actually live within its parochial boundaries?). But it is a perfectly common practice throughout the whole country.

Take my own home town of Preston, in the Diocese of Lancaster. Three grand old churches have recently been given over to the traditionalist Institute for Christ the King (St Walburge’s and English Martyrs) and the Syro-Malabar Church (St Ignatius, or rather the Cathedral of St Alphonsa as it is now). While these three are only a mile apart, there are more than a dozen other Catholic churches within a three-mile radius. So there’s no shortage of options for these churches’ original worshippers, looking for what they’re liturgically used to. I have visited St Walburge’s on a number of occasions, and it is genuinely thriving. In fact, they’re now setting up a school. I’ve also been to the Archdiocese of Liverpool’s own experiment in this area: St Mary’s, Warrington, entrusted to another traditionalist order, the FSSP. It too is doing just champion, as we say in Lancashire.

This basic model is, I’ll wager, worth exploring further, and with other groups. If it can work in Preston with both Extraordinary Form (EF) devotees and Keralan-diaspora Syro-Malabars, with whom else might it work? (As a curious side note, while I’ve seen the idea of EF communities criticised for being cliquey and divisive, I’ve never heard the same allegations against dedicated churches for Eastern Catholic groups.)

[…]

He goes on to talk about the possibility of reviving ethnic, personal parishes as well as the Ordinariate.

It is staring bishops in the face.  I think there are some bishops who would burn the diocese to the ground and sew the land with salt before they would let a parish go entirely Extraordinary Form.

So, let’s start planning how to starve together rather than growing crops and going fishing.

Reason #10 for Summorum Pontificum.

 

Posted in ¡Hagan lío!, "How To..." - Practical Notes, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices | Tagged , ,
8 Comments

UPDATED – Wherein faithful canonist Ed Peters guts papolatrous dilettante Stephen Walford

We’ve seen Stephan Walford before. HERE

He is, in essence, papolatrous.  He’s also pretty nasty, when it comes right down to it.  He blasts away at La Stampa against anyone who dares to have quizzical thoughts about Amoris laetitia.

Canonist Ed Peters looks at Walford’s comments on canon law. It’s kinda gory… and fun. I remember one crisp November day sitting on a bench in Central Park and eating a sandwich from Pastrami Queen while up in a tree a large hawk of some sort ripped the guts out of a squirrel. HERE (for Peters’ article, not the squirrel thing). Nearby a dad told his kids that birds didn’t go to the store for meat in plastic packages. At which point the hawk drew out a nice long bit of intestine, eliciting a vigorous, “EEEEWWWWW!”

But I digress.  Let’s see Ed Peters’ version of hawk and squirrel … with my emphases and comments:

Nooo, Canon 17 does not let us undercut Canon 915 and what it protects

A professional knows the limits of his knowledge. An amateur does not know the limits of his knowledge. A dilettante does not know that there are any limits to his knowledge.

Based on the biographical interview he granted to the Catholic Herald, it seems that Stephen Walford is a professional pianist and an amateur theologian (one’s dearth of formal education in a complex discipline being an obstacle, but not a complete bar, to one’s achieving some knowledge of at least some topics within that discipline), rather as I am a professional canonist and an amateur, I dunno, Latinist or woodwind player. Nothing wrong with being a professional, of course, or an amateur; but dilettantes are something else. If, having watched “Searching for Bobby Fisher” and knowing how the horsey moves, I started opining publicly on the Sicilian [Defense] opening, what would I be? A dilettante. And chess, mind, is a little thing. [There are only 288+ billion possible positions after four moves apiece, btw.]

Now, in regard to canon law, which Walford repeatedly invokes in the course of trashing as “dissenters” anyone who questions the text and certain applications of Amoris laetitia and its progeny, Walford is simply a dilettante unaware that most of his purported explanations of canon law have little or no connection to what the law really means—and sometimes, not even to what it says. And canon law, mind, not to mention the doctrine it works to protect, is a big thing. [Ultimately, law is in the service of the salvation of souls.  A Big Thing™.]

It is difficult to discuss law, of all things, with people who not know what it actually says. For an example of Walford’s misstating what the law (here, Canon 915) says, see his claim that “canon 915 refers to ‘obstinate’ and ‘persevering’ manifest grave sinners.” Of course, John Paul II’s Canon 915—aware that the Church cannot and does not judge souls or determine who is personally culpable for sin or if so by how much—does no such thing. Rather, this papal norm responds to objectively reckoned and publicly observable situations of sin and, in an unbroken line of practice going back to Scripture, directs ministers of holy Communion to withhold that most august Sacrament from persons who, by their public conduct, have placed themselves within the purview of the canon.

Confusing “sinner” and “sin” is, I grant, quite common in this debate and even several ranking prelates seem to think that externally-made assessments of personal culpability (however that oxymoronic task is to be accomplished) are relevant to the operation of Canon 915. But what can I say that has not been said before? Treating “sinner” and “sin” as equivalents is something a professional would avoid, while an amateur, intrigued by the distinction once he saw it, would, hopefully, stop treating the terms as synonyms. [Eeeeewww!]

It is not, however, Walford’s mistaking the plain text of Canon 915 that attracts my attention, but rather his attempt to explain what Canon 17—a norm little noticed in this debate, for good reason—means and allegedly how, by reading Pope Francis’ words in Amoris through in its light, “a path maybe opened to reception of Holy Communion” for divorced-and-remarried Catholics.

As we are talking about canon law, I suggest we start with the canon. The whole canon.

[…]

There’s more gut-ripping available at Ed Peters’ blog In The Light Of The Law.  If you don’t have some squirrel handy, you might make popcorn.

UPDATE:

Meanwhile… watch this tweet exchange, to which I was alerted…

UPDATED - Wherein faithful canonist Ed Peters guts papolatrous dilettante Stephen Walford

Do you see what poor Walford did there?  Poor thing.

Also…. this…

Once again…. his seriously thin skin aside, do you see what Stephen “the poor thing” Walford did there?

 

Posted in ¡Hagan lío!, "How To..." - Practical Notes, Canon Law, The Drill | Tagged , , ,
8 Comments

“The world needs proud warriors, animated by their faith” – OORAH!

There was a meeting in Chicago this week of Catholic young people.  Something called SLS18.

As it happens, the actor Jim Caviezel made a surprise appearance and gave a heck of a short speech about courage.

He talks about “happy talk”.  He tells these young people to be bold, to be warriors.

Rev. Mr. Kandra posted a video some participant shot with a mobile phone of the large screen at the conference.  VIDEO UPDATED (Higher quality)

¡Hagan lío!

Play video

I think the Chicago meeting has something to do with Focus.  It looked pretty good. On Twitter I opined that this might be a real Catholic universe in opposition to the “bearded Spock” parallel universe of the annual Three Days of Darkness in LA.

Posted in ¡Hagan lío!, Fr. Z KUDOS, Just Too Cool, Our Catholic Identity, Si vis pacem para bellum!, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices | Tagged
9 Comments

“To be deep in history is to cease to be Protestant.”

As convert I read with interest the stories of other converts at the Coming Home Network run by Marcus Grodi.  His is, I think, also the best of the shows at EWTN.

Today a story at CHN caught my eye partly because the writer references the great phrase of Bl. John Henry Newman:

“To be deep in history is to cease to be Protestant.”

The post is worth a few minutes of your time.  It is instructive and edifying.  The writer, formerly a Baptist, started looking into early Church writings on baptism and BAMMO.

Also, that great phrase is on some of my swag HERE

Here is a shot of the regular sized coffee mug… I’ll bet you could put your yogurt and granola in it too.

To be deep in history
And the larger one.

 

T

There is also now a MEGA-size.  Very handy.  I use that size all the time now.

Anyway…

“To be deep in history is to cease to be Protestant.”

One of the benefits I derive from sales of these mugs, etc., is that I can use the credit to send mugs to priests and bishops who do great things!

 

Posted in Just Too Cool | Tagged , ,
1 Comment

JUST TOO COOL: TLM missal in Braille

From the Catholic Herald:

Extraordinary Form missal to be produced in Braille for the first time

An Order of Mass for the older Latin form of the liturgy is to be produced in Braille in what is believed to be the first of its kind.

The Latin Mass Society is working to produce the missal with the help of the UK-based Torch Trust, a Christian charity that supports people with sight loss.

Joseph Shaw, LMS chairman, said the idea for the Order of Mass came from supporters. “It is demand-driven,” he said.

He said that LMS was also preparing a large-text “Bishop’s Canon”, which contains the Canon of the Mass and other important texts, for use by priests with poor eyesight.

Braille was invented in the 19th century by the French Catholic musician Louis Braille. He had been a pupil at the world’s first school for the blind, which had been set up decades earlier by Valentin Haüy, another Catholic, in Paris.

A Braille missal already exists for the new English translation of the Mass. The Xavier Society for the Blind, an American organisation, has produced Braille versions of the Catechism and the New American Bible.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
5 Comments