Obama’s surrogate in his attacks on Religious Liberty

This is Kathleen Sebelius, Pres. Obama’s surrogate at HHS, questioned on religious liberty.

FAIL.

I picked this up from Life News:

Sebelius Admits She’s Unaware of Top Religious Liberty Cases
by Jeanne Monahan

This morning in a hearing before the U.S. House of Representatives Education and Workforce Committee, HHS Secretary Sebelius was questioned by Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) on the topic of religious liberty. Specifically, Rep. Gowdy questioned Secretary Sebelius’ statement in her testimony indicating the careful consideration she undertook to “balance” religious liberty protections with preventive services in making the decision about the contraceptive mandate (which includes drugs that can cause abortions).

Rep. Gowdy asked the Secretary about the specifics of her “balance”. In doing so he explained three tests for legal balance, depending on the content and issues being weighed. He explained that because religious liberty is a fundamental right any decision that might violate it would require the strictest scrutiny.

Under oath, the nation’s HHS head stated that in making this decision and taking into consideration religious liberty issues, she relied on the expertise of HHS General Counsel. When questioned further about the counsel she received, the Secretary reported that guidance was provided entirely in discussion, and no legal memo was written on the topic. When asked further about her knowledge of the most significant cases related to religious liberty that have been decided by the Supreme Court, the Secretary responded that she was unaware/unfamiliar with these cases. It is a telling moment.

The full video is a must-see and just over five minutes:

[wp_youtube]NnO7qa7fMRc[/wp_youtube]

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras, Religious Liberty | Tagged , , ,
23 Comments

Now HERE’s a “worship schedule”!

A reader (and monthly donor!) alerted me to this great shot of a “worship schedule” posted on the blog Te igitur.

Now HERE's a "worship schedule"!

Ten Masses on Sundays
Eight Masses on Weekdays
Daily Vespers and Rosary
Daily confessions from 8 am till 8 pm

Not every place can do this, but some can!

Pray for vocations to the priesthood!

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Just Too Cool, Our Catholic Identity, Priests and Priesthood, The future and our choices | Tagged ,
18 Comments

Fishwrap’s good lesson in liberal tactics

Fishwrap's good lesson in liberal tacticsAs you watch the coverage of various dust-ups in the Church watch for a particular tactic used by the liberal left.

A great example comes to us today from the site of the National catholic Fishwrap about dissident priests in Ireland.

Get this:

DUBLIN, IRELAND — Just weeks after a report from a Vatican inquiry into the Irish church lamented what it described as “fairly widespread” dissent from church teaching, it was revealed that the Vatican has “silenced” Redemptorist Fr. Tony Flannery.

The Holy See’s move provoked fury among the members of the 800-strong Association of Catholic Priests, [… THERE’s something to lose sleep about…] which has accused the Vatican of issuing a fatwa against liberal clerics.

[NB] It’s not exactly clear why Flannery, a popular author and retreat director, has come under Vatican suspicion. He has voiced support in the past for opening up debates around the ordination of women, a change to the church’s ban on artificial birth control and an end to mandatory celibacy.

[…]

Gee, I dunno!  Why do you suppose such a wonderful priest would attract the eye of the CDF?

You have seen this same tactic from the supporters of the LCWR.  “We were so surprised! We have no idea why Rome is doing this to us! What could they mean by all this?”

At least now the LCWR isn’t alone in being persecuted.  This Irish Ass. of Catholic Priests is under siege as well.

 

Posted in Biased Media Coverage, Blatteroons, Dogs and Fleas, Magisterium of Nuns, Our Catholic Identity, Priests and Priesthood, The Drill, The future and our choices, Throwing a Nutty | Tagged , , , ,
23 Comments

UPDATE on the tumult in Platteville. Bp. Morlino sends a letter to the community.

UPDATE on the tumult in Platteville. Bp. Morlino sends a letter to the community.A little while I posted an update about a group of liberals in Platteville, WI (D. Madison) who, rebelling against their priests, worked to undermine the finances of the parish and school. The fruit of their labors has now come to light. It is necessary to close the parish school.

This sad situation has something important to say to people in other places where there may be tensions between priests, bishops, laity.

The Diocese of Madison has a posted on their website a letter from His Excellency Most Rev. Robert C. Morlino.  PDF HERE.  You will find a 3 page letter with Bp. Morlino’s explanation of the situation, his decisions, and his pastoral reflection, and then 2 pages of citations from documents of the Church, including Lumen gentium of Vatican II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church, and the Code of Canon Law.

A point that comes through in Bp. Morlino’s letter (we are seeing his response and not the correspondence -and gossip, apparently – that he has received) is that those who are fighting against their priests are making a hell of a tumult.

In Bp. Morlino’s letter there is the suggestion that if the tumult continues there could be “issuance of Canonical warnings“.  He repeats the possibility later in the phrase “… formal warning and action“.

When, in this ever-so-pastoral day and age, you see that sort of language coming from a bishop in a public letter, you know that someone is in spiritual danger.

Aside from that, in this day when both the substitution of feelings for reason and the solipsistic exaltation of poorly understood “rights” cause pastors of souls no small difficulties, Bp. Morlino gets to the nub of a problem:

Excerpt:

Your feelings do matter to me, and I do not take them lightly. However, our end goal should not be simply to restore good feelings. No, there is something greater than good feelings at stake, as good feelings come and go. Much deeper than feelings, what these priests have been sent to offer, is Jesus Christ, He who suffered with and like you, who died for you, and who has been raised to new life, so that you might have lasting joy, lasting hope, and lasting peace – eternal life. The reality of following Jesus is not at every moment full of good feelings; neither Jesus Himself, in His human nature, nor Mary, nor the Apostles were even granted that gift of freedom from painful emotions. By allowing ourselves, with openness, to enter into the mystery of His Church and His Sacraments we find that deep inner joy which passing emotions can’t eradicate.

And then:

There can be no “firing” of priests by the parish community in the Diocese of Madison.  Thus, the priests of the Society of Jesus Christ the Priest will remain in priestly ministry at St. Mary and St. Augustine Parishes in Platteville, and they stand ready to serve you and to seek stability, understanding, and healing. I beg you to seek the same so that the light of Christ might shine. I ask you to forgive, whatever that takes, and to move forward in faith, in hope, and in love.

I cannot (and don’t want to) look into the minds of liberals to figure out what they are really after, but if there is in those minds any shred of Catholic identity left, properly understood, any sense that Christ gave to Holy Church bishops and priests in Holy ORDERS, to order the Church for the sake of the salvation of souls, to sanctify, to teach, and also to govern, I suggest to the folks who have carried on this tumult against authority – regardless of how it was sparked off – to consider the implications of “formal warning and action”.

And you can bet they will read this.

In this day when a theology of the role of laity in Holy Church has been vastly expanded and our practical understanding expanded with it, something pretty dire must be going on when we read about a bishop who sees a possible need for canonical warnings.  That means there is spiritual peril on the horizon.

I pray that the lay people involved will give due consideration to all the elements of the bishop’s letter, which demonstrates a sincere effort to find a way through and beyond the conflict.

“But Father! But Father!” some of you are saying by now, “Why are you, with this big visible blog giving attention to something in a remote corner of the global Church?  Don’t you have bigger fish to fry?”

Yes, and no.

This sad situation in this small town underscores some important problems and we will be seeing a lot more of this in the future.

The decades following Vatican II devastated our Catholic identity.  Leaving aside for now the reasons for this, putting aside blame, we see more and more a sharp and outright rebellion against the Church’s teaching authority in faith and morals and also against her duly appointed, God-anointed pastors.  The poor catechesis and spirit of dissent, fostered for so long, is rumbling to the surface in an exaltation of improperly understood “rights”.  People who have no idea what they are talking about when they speak of their “rights” because they are “baptized” (or whatever – cf. the serpent’s lie to Adam and Eve), are claiming authority to themselves to do, essentially, as they please without reference to their vocations in the Church or the Church’s Magisterium.  There are ecclesiological strains building within many sectors of the Church’s life, like pressures that build on fault lines in the Earth’s crust.

Let’s put this another way and with a less seismological metaphor.

A properly understood and embraced Catholic identity does not mean that no one can say anything to authority.  But it does mean that roles in the Church must be recognized for what they are.  In the ancient Church there could be literal rioting in the streets when bishops and flocks were in conflict.  That’s what comes with the miter and staff.  That’s what comes from belonging to a Church made up of sinners… not made up primarily of sinners, but (in our Church Militant) entirely of sinners. Bishops, priests, religious, laity – every single one a sinner.  But in the end, when there are conflicts, it is the role of bishops to make the decisions.  We might not like the decisions. It may be hard to accept them.  We may think they are impractical, wrong, unjust.  But Catholics accept hard decisions in view of the long term, in view of a larger Church, in view of our vocations in the here and now.  We must learn through pain and tears to see that, yes, even in the hard decisions, God’s will shall come to pass, and that God’s will is always the best thing for us.

The Church has always had its share of cafeterias.  In these cafeterias we will always see ugly food fights.

Frankly, I think ugly food fights must happen from time to time.

But when the food has been thrown, and everyone is a little messy, it is time to clean up.

Let the people who start throwing food (the liberals who attacked the priests) remember that, at the end of the fight, there is less for people to eat. Because of their choice to fight, some are going to go hungry.

Posted in "But Father! But Father!", "How To..." - Practical Notes, Mail from priests, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, Priests and Priesthood, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , , , ,
33 Comments

“To me, the most serious element in all this was the breach of fundamental, liturgical consciousness.”

Please use the sharing buttons!  Thanks!

"To me, the most serious element in all this was the breach of fundamental, liturgical consciousness."In Co-Workers of the Truth: Meditations for Every Day of the Year, from the works Joseph Ratzinger (you know who) for 25 April we read a blurb from his perennially useful Feast of Faith (US link HERE, US Kindle HERE, UK HERE, UK Kindle HERE):

“The Council did not create new articles of faith, nor did it replace existing ones with new ones. Its only concern was to make it possible to hold the same faith under different circumstances, to revitalize it. As for the work that preceded the Council, it seems to have been more intensive in Germany than elsewhere, for Germany was the heartland of the liturgical movement, the primary source in which the documents of the Council had their origin. But many of these documents were issued too abruptly. To many of the faithful, most of them seemed to be a challenge to the creativity of the individual congregation, in which separate groups constructed their own “liturgies” from week to week with a zeal that was as commendable as it was misplaced. To me, the most serious element in all this was the breach of fundamental, liturgical consciousness. The difference between liturgy and festivity, between liturgy and social event, disappeared gradually and imperceptibly, as witness the fact that many priests, imitating the etiquette of polite society, feel that they ought not to receive Holy Communion until the congregation has received; that they should no longer venture to say “I bless you” [German euch: familiar form of plural “you”]—thus dissolving the fundamental liturgical relationship between them and their congregation. In this context belong also the often obnoxious and banal greeting which, it must be admitted, many congregations tolerate with a kind of patient forbearance. In the period before the new missal made its appearance, but after the old one had already been characterized as “old-fashioned”, people forgot that there is a “rite”, that is, a prescribed liturgical form, and that liturgy is genuinely liturgy only if it is not subject to the will of those who celebrate it.”  See: The Feast of Faith, pp. 83–85.

Any effort of renewal of any sphere of our Church and lives must be preceded by and accompanied with a revitalization of our liturgical worship.

"To me, the most serious element in all this was the breach of fundamental, liturgical consciousness."

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , , ,
14 Comments

Ultra-liberal NPR manages decent interviews about the LCWR dust-up. Donna Bethell shines.

Please use the sharing buttons!  Thanks!

I read the transcript (there is also audio available) of an National Public Radio segment on the recent develops between the American Bishops, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, and the Leadership Conference of Women Religious (a subsidiary of the Magisterium on Nuns).

The players are the NPR interviewer, who despite working for this ultra-liberal outlet does a fair job, the nearly-ubiquitous John Allen of the Fishwrap, Donna Bethell, Chairman of the board of directors for Christendom College, Sr. Simone Campbell, executive director of NETWORK (one of the organizations associated with LCWR and under review by the Holy See).

Some great things happen in this interview.

Allen gave a workman-like summary of what is going on, but the really interesting stuff happens in the second part of the segment.

First, Donna Bethell really shines, hitting one after another out of the park.  Don’t miss her demolition of Sr. Campbell’s utilitarian eisegesis of Scripture moment of Our Lord and the Samaritan woman at the well.  Also, when a caller named “Mary” presented her point of view:

CONAN: So you don’t think that your disagreements on doctrine make you any less of a Catholic?

MARY: No, I think I’m a good Catholic. In fact, when I go to confession, I sit there, and I say: You know, I really don’t have a whole lot to say because I think I do a pretty good job. [The confessor heaves a sigh…] Maybe pride is my biggest sin. But no, I think I’m a good Catholic. I think our social doctrine, social justice doctrine is ignored, and we’re focusing on this contraception. [How paradigmatic this is!]

And when I’m out feeding people and helping women with three or four kids, they could probably do without all these kids with no family support. And to be pushing against contraception and pushing against, you know – and I get so – what was your question?

(SOUNDBITE OF LAUGHTER)

MARY: No, I don’t think it makes me worse of a Catholic. I think I’m a good Catholic if I pay attention to the doctrines that are important: Eucharist and social justice. I think our social – and taking care of the poor. That’s – that is what we’re supposed to be doing, and so few do.

CONAN: Mary, thanks very much for the call, appreciate it.

MARY: Thank you.

CONAN: And I wonder, Donna Bethell, that’s somebody who people would – some would uphold as a model, and others would say, well, that’s an a la carte Catholic.

BETHELL: Well, in effect she said she was an a la carte Catholic. She said that she was going to accept the things that were important to her. And I think she sounds like a wonderful lady, a very generous lady, a very warm and caring lady, and that’s just the sort of person that you would like to have as a Catholic.

I think she has not been presented, probably, with the fullness of Catholic doctrine. She probably has not been – had a full explanation to her of why contraception is a problem.

[…]

Anyway, if I ever run into Donna Bethell, I’d be happy to buy her lunch and thank her for her recent media appearances!

Take the time to read the transcript or listen to the audio.  There is a lot going on.  And you who have been reading here for a while will hear all the themes and cliches.

We could even try to create a list of themes to listen or watch for!

So, share your favorite bits here.

And listen for how Sr. Campbell tries (and fails) to back herself and NETWORK away from the Magisterium of Nuns.  Too good.

Posted in Dogs and Fleas, Magisterium of Nuns, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , , , , , ,
26 Comments

Of whales and cannons and movies and burgers and consonants

Of whales and cannons and movies and burgers and consonantsI was flipping around on movie channels while flipping a burger for supper (lots of double consonants) and I caught this:

“He tasks me! He tasks me, and I shall have him! I’ll chase him round the Moons of Nibia, and round the Antares Maelstrom, and round perdition’s flames before I give him up! Prepare to alter course!”

You must know which movie this is!  The quote, however, is obviously an allusion to Moby Dick by Melville.  Ahab, obsessed with revenge against the white whale cries out:

“Aye, aye! It was that accursed white whale that razeed me; made a poor pegging lubber of me for ever and a day!” Then tossing both arms, with measureless imprecations he shouted out: “Aye, aye! and I’ll chase him round Good Hope, and round the Horn, and round the Norway Maelstrom, and round perdition’s flames before I give him up.”

More double consonants!  Too bad the whale’s blubber isn’t referred to there.

Moby Dick is a favorite of reference point for Star Trek movies, I think.  In another one, First Contact, Picard says:

“And he piled upon the whale’s white hump the sum of all the rage and hate felt by his whole race. If his chest had been a cannon, he would have shot his heart upon it.”

Cannon!

In Moby Dick the real quote:

“He piled upon the whale’s white hump the sum of all the general rage and hate felt by his whole race from Adam down; and then, as if his chest had been a mortar, he burst his hot heart’s shell upon it.”

Come to think of it, a character in another vast SiFi series is named from a character in Moby Dick.  So, through I am in the middle of prepping supper, and the burger zizzles and I must away to put creatures in my body (trekkies will get the reference), I thought I would scribble this note. As soon as possible I will butter and grill the bun on the griddle and, all hassles aside, take the opportunity to apply pepper and drizzle mustard.

Burgers are a dish best not served up cold, after all.

I was out of gagh.

[wp_youtube]wRnSnfiUI54[/wp_youtube]

UPDATE:

I had forgotten that the movie ends with a quote not from Melville, but from Dickens.

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged , , , , ,
36 Comments

Pope Benedict’s “pro multis” letter to German-speaking bishops now in English. Wherein an HONORED GUEST ranteth.

Here is a follow up to my post about the Holy Father’s letter of instruction to the German speaking bishops about the translation of “pro multis” in the new liturgical books.

An English translation of the Holy Father’s letter is now to be found on a Dutch blog, In caelo.

I enjoyed a commentary about this Ziegen Rodeo sent me by my friend the Roman Fabricius Magnus. Thus, Fabricius:

Needless to say, still not a sign of this on vatican.va,  not even in German. Argh.

I didn’t fall off the tuna boat yesterday but it still drives me crazy that the Pope has to explain these things that have been said a gazillion times before to bishops who should know better. I know what they think but they are pretending that the discussion just started an hour ago.

My letter would have been much shorter. On a day of exceptionally cheerful mood it could have been:

“Venerable Brothers in the fullness of the Priesthood, greetings and Apostolic Blessing! Because we all strive to be worthy successors of Peter and the Apostles after Pentecost and not of Judas during the days leading up to the Sacrifice of the Calvary, we are obliged under penalty of the eternal fire to serve the Lord in the Church he himself consecrated with his Most Precious Blood, shed for many in atonement for our sins. If you don’t like the new, correct translation of the formula of the consecration, you can always stick with the Latin original and use that for Mass, just as I do most of the time. If you like the old, incorrect and exegetically silly translation so very much, you can always apply for an indult which will be evaluated with the renown celerity of the Roman Curia and submitted to me the day after a sudden drop in temperatures occurs in a place whose existence should be affirmed more often by some of you, if anything as a reminder to self. In the meantime, it’s either Latin or “for many”. By the way, I have never before spent so much time and so many words discussing improvements whose implementation I had ordered a LOOOONG time ago. Venerable Brothers, get busy before I do my routine checks on vacant episcopal sees in North Korea, Iran and other places eager to learn the ways of inculturation and social justice from you. With Easter blessing, I remain in the Lord, Genghis PP I”

Thank God there’s a much much much much holier, wiser and more patient man in charge of this…

That, friends, is what the Romans call “papale papale”!

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, HONORED GUESTS, Lighter fare, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged , ,
16 Comments

RECENT POSTS & THANKS

Thanks to all of you who are using the “social media” buttons at the top of entries.  It really helps when you use them.

RECENT POSTS & THANKS

Also, thanks for the “follows” on Twitter and Facebook.  Is it my imagination or is the Google thing just not catching on very well?

Also, my gratitude for your donations (I pray for benefactors and remember them at Mass) and your use of my links to Amazon and for helping the Carmelites in Wyoming by buying Mystic Monk Coffee!   (Refresh your coffee supply now!)

Here are links to some posts that have been scrolling along.

First, I must highlight this:

Nuns Gone Wild: A Trip Down Memory Lane

Remember: The Holy See and USCCB are aiming their reforms at the leadership of the liberal umbrella group the LCWR (a subsidiary of the Magisterium of Nuns).  The Catholic hierarchy is not attacking nuns or sisters.  Don’t be fooled by twisted news coverage on catholic and secular sites.

Also:

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
Comments Off on RECENT POSTS & THANKS

Mike Malloy (liberal radio talk-show host) calls Pope “Nazi scum” and all Catholics “child-raping sons of bitches”

Here is something I saw on CMR:

Lib Radio Host: “Scum, Nazi Pope.”

Remember when everyone in the media lit their torches and sharpened their pitchforks for Rush Limbaugh for calling a woman who wanted the Catholic Church to pay for her contraception a “slut.”

But last week a liberal radio host in discussing the Hilary Rosen/Ann Romney story, called Catholics “child-raping sons of bitches” and then dropped the “Nazi scum” moniker on Pope Benedict XVI. But oddly,this outburst has hardly caused a ripple among the powers that be.

According to Google News, there has not been one mainstream media story. Not one.

Here’s the transcript from Newsbusters and I warn you, it’s pretty offensive.

MALLOY: And the Catholic League – that piece of human waste Bill Donohue – then twitted or tweeted or tweaked – ‘glad to know Hilary’s fans are in a state of apoplexy – you’d think she was outed by their hysterical reaction. Get over it and grow up! You child-raping sons of bitches in the Catholic Church, I am so sick of all of you – especially your priests and your bishops and your scum, the Nazi Pope, I am so sick of all of you. And this Donohue freak — wow.

Can you honestly imagine saying similar things about any other group of people without becoming the lead story on Anderson Cooper? Jews? Muslims? Gays? Heck, I don’t even think you could say that about oil men and get away with it.But denigrating Catholics with truly offensive language is just completely ignored.

I wonder if President Obama will call Pope Benedict like he did Sandra Fluke. I’m sure Pope Benedict will be waiting by the phone.

I have never heard of Mike Malloy.  His page is HERE.
I think this is a list of the stations which carries his show.  HERE. If you are in the area of one of these stations, you might call the manager and express your opinion about what they are broadcasting.
Posted in The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , ,
47 Comments